Lack of Accessible Data on Prosthetic Heart Valves

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Michelle Frank ; Giulia Ganzoni…
• 关键词：Prosthetic heart valves ; Annuloplasty rings ; Patient prosthesis mismatch ; Valve repair ; Valve replacement ; Valve app ; valveguide.ch
• 刊名：The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging (formerly Cardiac Imaging)
• 出版年：2016
• 出版时间：March 2016
• 年：2016
• 卷：32
• 期：3
• 页码：439-447
• 全文大小：786 KB
• 参考文献：1.Vahanian A, Alfieri O, Andreotti F et al (2012) Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012). Eur Heart J 33:2451–2496CrossRef PubMed
  2.Zoghbi WA, Chambers JB, Dumesnil JG et al (2009) Recommendations for evaluation of prosthetic valves with echocardiography and doppler ultrasound: a report From the American Society of Echocardiography’s Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Task Force on Prosthetic Valves, developed in conjunction with the American College of Cardiology Cardiovascular Imaging Committee, Cardiac Imaging Committee of the American Heart Association, the European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, the Japanese Society of Echocardiography and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography, endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation, American Heart Association, European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, the Japanese Society of Echocardiography, and Canadian Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 22:975–1014 quiz 1082-1014 CrossRef PubMed
  3.Rosenhek R, Binder T, Maurer G et al (2003) Normal values for Doppler echocardiographic assessment of heart valve prostheses. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 16:1116–1127CrossRef PubMed
  4.Blauwet LA, Danielson GK, Burkhart HM et al (2010) Comprehensive echocardiographic assessment of the hemodynamic parameters of 285 tricuspid valve bioprostheses early after implantation. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 23:1045–1059, 1059 e1041–1042
  5.Daneshvar SA, Rahimtoola SH (2012) Valve prosthesis–patient mismatch (VP–PM): a long-term perspective. J Am Coll Cardiol 60:1123–1135CrossRef PubMed
  6.House CM, Nelson WB, Kroshus TJ et al (2012) Manufacturer-provided effective orifice area index charts and the prevention of prosthesis-patient mismatch. J Heart Valve Dis 21:107–111PubMed
  7.Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG (2012) Valve prosthesis-patient mismatch, 1978 to 2011: from original concept to compelling evidence. J Am Coll Cardiol 60:1136–1139CrossRef PubMed
  8.Daneshvar SA, Rahimtoola SH (2012) Predicting the occurrence of valve prosthesis–patient mismatch: the need for more data. J Heart Valve Dis 21:106PubMed
  9.Kirzner CF, Vinals B, Moya J et al (1997) Hemodynamic performance evaluation of small aortic ATS Medical valves by Doppler echocardiography. J Heart Valve Dis 6:661–665PubMed
  10.Lesbre JP, Chassat C, Lesperance J et al (1986) Evaluation of new pericardial bioprostheses by pulsed and continuous Doppler ultrasound. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss 79:1439–1448PubMed
  11.McDonald ML, Daly RC, Schaff HV et al (1997) Hemodynamic performance of small aortic valve bioprostheses: Is there a difference? Ann Thorac Surg 63:362–366CrossRef PubMed
  12.Baumgartner H, Hung J, Bermejo J et al (2009) Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice. Eur J Echocardiogr 10:1–25CrossRef PubMed
  13.Head SJ, Mokhles MM, Osnabrugge RL et al (2012) The impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term survival after aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 34 observational studies comprising 27 186 patients with 133 141 patient-years. Eur Heart J 33:1518–1529CrossRef PubMed
  14.Jeong DS, Chang HW, Kim KH et al (2013) Impact of patient–prosthesis mismatch in the aortic position: twenty-year experience with Korean patients. J Heart Valve Dis 22:56–63PubMed
  15.Tully PJ, Aty W, Rice GD et al (2013) Aortic valve prosthesis–patient mismatch and long-term outcomes: 19-year single-center experience. Ann Thorac Surg 96:844–850CrossRef PubMed
  16.Stahli BE, Maier W, Corti R et al (2013) Aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: mechanisms and implications. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 3:15–22PubMedCentral PubMed
  17.Werner N, Sinning JM (2014) Aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Circ J 78:811–818CrossRef PubMed
  18.Descoutures F, Himbert D, Maisano F et al (2013) Transcatheter valve-in-ring implantation after failure of surgical mitral repair. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 44:e8–e15CrossRef PubMed
  19.Toggweiler S, Wood DA, Rodes-Cabau J et al (2012) Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation for failed balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valves. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 5:571–577CrossRef PubMed
  20.Zamorano JL, Badano LP, Bruce C et al (2011) EAE/ASE recommendations for the use of echocardiography in new transcatheter interventions for valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J 32:2189–2214CrossRef PubMed
  21.Dvir D, Webb J, Brecker S et al (2012) Transcatheter aortic valve replacement for degenerative bioprosthetic surgical valves: results from the global valve-in-valve registry. Circulation 126:2335–2344CrossRef PubMed
  22.Milburn K, Bapat V, Thomas M (2014) Valve-in-valve implantations: is this the new standard for degenerated bioprostheses? Review of the literature. Clin Res Cardiol 103:417–429CrossRef PubMed
  
• 作者单位：Michelle Frank (1)
  Giulia Ganzoni (1)
  Christoph Starck (2) (4)
  Jürg Grünenfelder (2) (3)
  Roberto Corti (1) (3)
  Christiane Gruner (1)
  David Hürlimann (1) (3)
  Felix C. Tanner (1)
  Rolf Jenni (1)
  Matthias Greutmann (1)
  Patric Biaggi (1) (3)
  
  1. University Heart Center, Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
  2. University Heart Center, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
  4. Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, German Heart Center Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
  3. Heart Clinic Zurich, Witellikerstrasse 40, 8032, Zurich, Switzerland
  
• 刊物类别：Medicine
• 刊物主题：Medicine & Public Health
  Cardiology
  
• 出版者：Springer Netherlands
• ISSN：1573-0743

文摘

Incomplete information on characteristics of prosthetic heart valves (PHV) may lead to inappropriate choices for PHV implantation (patient-prosthesis-mismatch) or erroneous interpretation of PHV function after implantation. No single and easy accessible source provides all relevant information on PHV. The aim of this study was to provide a comprehensive overview of available data for the majority of PHVs and annuloplasty rings. Information was collected by reviewing articles published on www.​pubmed.​org up to December 2014 and by written contact to all PHV manufacturers. Four areas of interest were defined: (1) PHV image, (2) in vivo transvalvular gradients, (3) effective orifice area (EOA) calculators and (4) PHV dimensions. Available information was classified as complete (all categories), partial (two or three categories) or minimal (one category). 108 PHV (including homografts) and 34 annuloplasty rings systems were identified. The information on PHV was complete, partial or minimal in 19.5, 61.0 and 19.5 % of PHV, respectively. In 91.6 % a picture of the valve could be obtained, whereas normative data for transvalvular gradients and EOA calculators were available in 63.0 and 25.0 % of all PHV, respectively. The available data was summarized on a new open access webpage (www.​valveguide.​ch). There is a lack of accessible data on PHV dimensions, normal transvalvular gradients and effective orifice area calculators, although such information is of crucial importance for proper PHV assessment. Keywords Prosthetic heart valves Annuloplasty rings Patient prosthesis mismatch Valve repair Valve replacement Valve app valveguide.ch