Efficacy of Radiation Safety Glasses in Interventional Radiology
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Bart D. van Rooijen ; Michiel W. de Haan…
- 关键词：Radiation protection ; Cataract ; Eye lens dose ; Glasses
- 刊名：CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
- 出版年：2014
- 出版时间：October 2014
- 年：2014
- 卷：37
- 期：5
- 页码：1149-1155
- 全文大小：570 KB
- 参考文献：1. Vano E, Gonzalez L, Guibelalde E, Fernandez JM, Ten JI (1998) Radiation exposure to medical staff in interventional and cardiac radiology. Br J Radiol 71(849):954-60 CrossRef
2. Koukorava C, Carinou E, Simantirakis G, Vrachliotis TG, Archontakis E, Tierris C et al (2011) Doses to operators during interventional radiology procedures: focus on eye lens and extremity dosimetry. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 144(1-):482-86 CrossRef
3. Stewart FA, Akleyev AV, Hauer-Jensen M, Hendry JH, Kleiman NJ, Macvittie TJ et al (2012) ICRP publication 118: ICRP statement on tissue reactions and early and late effects of radiation in normal tissues and organs—threshold doses for tissue reactions in a radiation protection context. Ann ICRP 41(1-):1-22 CrossRef
4. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP 37(2-4):1-332
5. Nakashima E, Neriishi K, Minamoto A (2006) A reanalysis of atomic-bomb cataract data, 2000-2002: a threshold analysis. Health Phys 90(2):154-60 CrossRef
6. Neriishi K, Nakashima E, Minamoto A, Fujiwara S, Akahoshi M, Mishima HK et al (2007) Postoperative cataract cases among atomic bomb survivors: radiation dose response and threshold. Radiat Res 168(4):404-08 CrossRef
7. Vano E, Kleiman NJ, Duran A, Rehani MM, Echeverri D, Cabrera M (2010) Radiation cataract risk in interventional cardiology personnel. Radiat Res 174(4):490-95 CrossRef
8. Chodick G, Bekiroglu N, Hauptmann M, Alexander BH, Freedman DM, Doody MM et al (2008) Risk of cataract after exposure to low doses of ionizing radiation: a 20-year prospective cohort study among US radiologic technologists. Am J Epidemiol 168(6):620-31 CrossRef
9. Ciraj-Bjelac O, Rehani MM, Sim KH, Liew HB, Vano E, Kleiman NJ (2010) Risk for radiation-induced cataract for staff in interventional cardiology: is there reason for concern? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 76(6):826-34 CrossRef
10. Rehani MM, Vano E, Ciraj-Bjelac O, Kleiman NJ (2011) Radiation and cataract. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 147(1-):300-04 CrossRef
11. Ainsbury EA, Bouffler SD, Dorr W, Graw J, Muirhead CR, Edwards AA et al (2009) Radiation cataractogenesis: a review of recent studies. Radiat Res 172(1):1- CrossRef
12. Kleiman NJ (2012) Radiation cataract. Ann ICRP 41(3-):80-7 CrossRef
13. Worgul BV, Kundiyev YI, Sergiyenko NM, Chumak VV, Vitte PM, Medvedovsky C et al (2007) Cataracts among Chernobyl clean-up workers: implications regarding permissible eye exposures. Radiat Res 167(2):233-43 CrossRef
14. Vano E, Gonzalez L, Fernandez JM, Haskal ZJ (2008) Eye lens exposure to radiation in interventional suites: caution is warranted. Radiology 248(3):945-53 CrossRef
15. Moore WE, Ferguson G, Rohrmann C (1980) Physical factors determining the utility of radiation safety glasses. Med Phys 7(1):8-2 CrossRef
16. Sherman M, Maity A, Wang SJ (2011) Inferences for the ratio: Fieller’s interval, log ratio, and large sample based confidence intervals. Asta Adv Stat Anal 95(3):313-23 CrossRef
17. Galster M, Guhl C, Uder M, Adamus R (2013) Exposition of the operator’s eye lens and efficacy of radiation shielding in fluoroscopically guided interventions. Rofo 185(5):474-81 CrossRef
18. Geber T, Gunnarsson M, Mattsson S (2011) Eye lens dosimetry for interventional procedures—relation between the absorbed dose to the lens and dose at measurement positions. Radiat Meas 46:1248-251 CrossRef
19. Challa K, Warren SG, Danak S, Bates MC (2009) Redundant protective barriers: minimizing operator occupational risk. J Interv Cardiol 22(3):299-07 CrossRef
20. Maeder M, Brunner-La Rocca HP, Wolber T, Ammann P, Roelli H, Rohner F et al (2006) Impact of a lead glass screen on scatter radiation to eyes and hands in interventional cardiologists. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 67(1):18-3 CrossRef
21. Kuon E, Schmitt M, Dahm JB (2002) Significant reduction of radiation exposure to operator and staff during cardiac interventions by analysis of radiation leakage and improved lead shielding. Am J Cardiol 89(1):44-9 CrossRef
22. Germano JJ, Day G, Gregorious D, Natarajan V, Cohen T (2005) A novel radiation protection drape reduces radiation exposure during fluoroscopy-guided electrophysiology procedures. J Invasive Cardiol 17(9):469-72
23. Sawdy JM, Gocha MD, Olshove V, Chisolm JL, Hill SL, Phillips A et al (2009) Radiation protection during hybrid procedures: innovation creates new challenges. J Invasive Cardiol 21(9):437-40 - 作者单位：Bart D. van Rooijen (1)
Michiel W. de Haan (1)
Marco Das (1)
Carsten W. K. P. Arnoldussen (1)
R. de Graaf (1)
Wim H. van Zwam (1)
Walter H. Backes (1)
Cécile R. L. P. N. Jeukens (1)
1. Department of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands - ISSN：1432-086X
文摘
Purpose This study was designed to evaluate the reduction of the eye lens dose when wearing protective eyewear in interventional radiology and to identify conditions that optimize the efficacy of radiation safety glasses. Methods The dose reduction provided by different models of radiation safety glasses was measured on an anthropomorphic phantom head. The influence of the orientation of the phantom head on the dose reduction was studied in detail. The dose reduction in interventional radiological practice was assessed by dose measurements on radiologists wearing either leaded or no glasses or using a ceiling suspended screen. Results The different models of radiation safety glasses provided a dose reduction in the range of a factor of 7.9-0.0 for frontal exposure of the phantom. The dose reduction was strongly reduced when the head is turned to the side relative to the irradiated volume. The eye closest to the tube was better protected due to side shielding and eyewear curvature. In clinical practice, the mean dose reduction was a factor of 2.1. Using a ceiling suspended lead glass shield resulted in a mean dose reduction of a factor of 5.7. Conclusions The efficacy of radiation protection glasses depends on the orientation of the operator’s head relative to the irradiated volume. Glasses can offer good protection to the eye under clinically relevant conditions. However, the performance in clinical practice in our study was lower than expected. This is likely related to nonoptimized room geometry and training of the staff as well as measurement methodology.