Validating abbreviated measures of effort-reward imbalance at work in European cohort studies: the IPD-Work consortium
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Johannes Siegrist (1)
Nico Dragano (1)
Solja T. Nyberg (2)
Thorsten Lunau (1)
Lars Alfredsson (3)
Raimund Erbel (6)
G?ran Fahlén (7)
Marcel Goldberg (4) (5)
Karl-Heinz J?ckel (9)
Anders Knutsson (8)
Constanze Leineweber (10)
Linda L. Magnusson Hanson (10)
Maria Nordin (11)
Reiner Rugulies (12) (13) (14)
Jürgen Schupp (15)
Archana Singh-Manoux (16) (5)
T?res Theorell (10)
Gert G. Wagner (15) (17)
Hugo Westerlund (10)
Marie Zins (4) (5)
Katriina Heikkil? (2)
Eleonor I. Fransson (10) (18) (3)
Mika Kivim?ki (16) (2) - 关键词：Effort ; reward imbalance ; Work stress ; IPD ; Work ; Abbreviated measures ; European cohort studies
- 刊名：International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health
- 出版年：2014
- 出版时间：April 2014
- 年：2014
- 卷：87
- 期：3
- 页码：249-256
- 全文大小：215 KB
- 参考文献：1. Belkic KL, Landsbergis PA, Schnall PL, Baker D (2004) Is job strain a major source of cardiovascular disease risk? Scand J Work Environ Health 30:85-28 CrossRef
2. Blekesaune M, Solem PE (2005) Working conditions and early retirement: a prospective study of retirement behavior. Res Aging 27:3-0 CrossRef
3. Cartwright S, Cooper CL (eds) (2009) The Oxford handbook of organizational well-being. Oxford University Press, Oxford
4. Dragano N (2007) Arbeit, stress und krankheitsbedingte Frührenten: Zusammenh?nge aus theoretischer und empirischer Sicht. [Work, stress and health-related early retirement: theoretical and empirical analyses] VS Verlag
5. Elovainio M, Kivim?ki M, Vahtera J (2002) Organizational justice: evidence of a new psychosocial predictor of health. Am J Public Health 92:105-08 CrossRef
6. Fahlen G, Peter R, Knutsson A (2004) The Effort-Reward Imbalance model of psychosocial stress at the workplace—a comparison of ERI exposure assessment using two estimation methods. Work Stress 18:81-8 CrossRef
7. Fransson EI, Nyberg ST, Heikkila K, Alfredsson L, De Bacquer D, Batty GD et al (2012) Comparison of alternative versions of the job demand-control scales in 17 European cohort studies: the IPD-Work consortium. BMC Public Health 12:62 CrossRef
8. Greenberg J (2010) Organizational injustice as an occupational health risk. Acad Manag Ann 4:205-43 CrossRef
9. Head J, Kivim?ki M, Siegrist J, Ferrie JE, Vahtera J, Shipley MJ, Marmot MG (2007) Effort-reward imbalance and relational injustice at work predict sickness absence: the Whitehall II study. J Psychosom Res 63:433-40 CrossRef
10. Karasek R, Theorell T (1990) Healthy work. Stress, productivity, and the reconstruction of working life. Basic Books, New York
11. Kuper H, Singh-Manoux A, Siegrist J, Marmot M (2002) When reciprocity fails: effort-reward imbalance in relation to coronary heart disease and health functioning within the Whitehall II study. Occup Environ Med 59:777-84 CrossRef
12. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159-74 CrossRef
13. Leineweber C, Wege N, Westerlund H, Theorell T, Wahrendorf M, Siegrist J (2010) How valid is a short measure of effort-reward imbalance at work? A replication study from Sweden. Occup Environ Med 67:526-31 CrossRef
14. Li J, Loerbroks A, Jarczok MN, Sch?llgen I, Bosch JA, Mauss D et al (2012) Psychometric properties and differential explanation of a short measure of effort-reward imbalance at work: A study of industrial workers in Germany. Am J Industrial Med. doi:10.1002/ajim.22018
15. Li J, Loerbroks A, Shang L, Wege N, Wahrendorf M, Siegrist J (2012b) Validation of a short measure of effort-reward imbalance in the workplace: evidence from China. J Occup Health. doi:10.1539/joh.12-0106-BR
16. Magnavita N, Garbarino S, Siegrist J (2012) The use of parsimonious questionnaires in occupational health surveillance: psychometric properties of the short Italian version of the effort/reward imbalance questionnaire. ScientificWorldJournal. doi:10.1100/2012/372852
17. Nieuwenhuijsen K, Bruinvels D, Frings-Dresen M (2010) Psychosocial work environment and stress-related disorders, a systematic review. Occup Med 60:277-86 CrossRef
18. Nyberg ST, Heikkil? K, Fransson EI, Alfredsson L, de Bacquer D, Bjorner JB et al (2012) Job strain in relation to body mass index: pooled analysis of 160.000 adults from 13 cohort studies. J Intern Med 272:65-3 CrossRef
19. Salavecz G, Chandola T, Pikhart H, Dragano N, Siegrist J, Jockel KH et al (2010) Work stress and health in Western European and post-communist countries: an East-West comparison study. J Epidemiol Community Health 64:57-2 CrossRef
20. Schnall PL, Dobson M, Rosskam E (2009) Unhealthy work: causes, consequences, cures. Baywood Pub. Co., Amityville
21. Siegrist J (1996) Adverse health effects of high effort/low reward conditions. J Occup Health Psychol 1:27-1 CrossRef
22. Siegrist J, Starke D, Chandola T, Godin I, Marmot M, Niedhammer I, Peter R (2004) The measurement of effort-reward imbalance at work: European comparisons. Soc Sci Med 58:1483-499 CrossRef
23. Siegrist J, Wege N, Pühlhofer F, Wahrendorf M (2009) A short generic measure of work stress in the era of globalization: effort-reward imbalance. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 82:1005-013 CrossRef
24. Stansfeld S, Candy B (2006) Psychosocial work environment and mental health—a meta-analytic review. Scand J Work Environ Health 32:443-62 CrossRef
25. Steptoe A, Kivim?ki M (2012) Stress and cardiovascular disease. Nat Rev Cardiol. doi:10.1038/ncardio.2012.45
26. Tsutsumi A, Kawakami N (2004) A review of empirical studies on the model of effort-reward imbalance at work: reducing occupational stress by implementing a new theory. Soc Sci Med 59:2335-359 CrossRef
27. Tsutsumi A, Iwata N, Watanabe N, de Jonge J, Pikhart H, Fernández-López JA, Xu L, Peter R, Knutsson A, Niedhammer I, Kawakami N, Siegrist J (2009) Application of item response theory to achieve cross-cultural comparability of occupational stress measurement. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 18:58-7 CrossRef - 作者单位：Johannes Siegrist (1)
Nico Dragano (1)
Solja T. Nyberg (2)
Thorsten Lunau (1)
Lars Alfredsson (3)
Raimund Erbel (6)
G?ran Fahlén (7)
Marcel Goldberg (4) (5)
Karl-Heinz J?ckel (9)
Anders Knutsson (8)
Constanze Leineweber (10)
Linda L. Magnusson Hanson (10)
Maria Nordin (11)
Reiner Rugulies (12) (13) (14)
Jürgen Schupp (15)
Archana Singh-Manoux (16) (5)
T?res Theorell (10)
Gert G. Wagner (15) (17)
Hugo Westerlund (10)
Marie Zins (4) (5)
Katriina Heikkil? (2)
Eleonor I. Fransson (10) (18) (3)
Mika Kivim?ki (16) (2)
1. Department of Medical Sociology, Medical Faculty, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
2. Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland
3. Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
6. Department of Cardiology, West-German Heart Center Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
7. The National Agency for Special Needs Education and Schools, H?rn?sand, Sweden
4. Versailles-Saint Quentin University, Versailles, France
5. Inserm U1018, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Villejuif, France
9. Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry, and Epidemiology, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
8. Department of Health Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Sundsvall, Sweden
10. Stress Research Institute, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
11. Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Ume? University, Ume?, Sweden
12. National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark
13. Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
14. Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
15. German Institute for Economic Research, Berlin, Germany
16. Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK
17. Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany
18. School of Health Sciences, J?nk?ping University, J?nk?ping, Sweden - ISSN：1432-1246
文摘
Background Effort-reward imbalance (ERI) is an established conceptualisation of work stress. Although a validated effort-reward questionnaire is available for public use, many epidemiological studies adopt shortened scales and proxy measures. To examine the agreement between different abbreviated measures and the original instrument, we compared different versions of the effort-reward scales available in 15 European cohort studies participating in the IPD-Work (Individual-participant-data meta-analysis in working populations) consortium. Methods Five of the 15 studies provide information on the original (‘complete- scales measuring ‘effort-and ‘reward- whereas the 10 remaining studies used ‘partial-scales. To compare different versions of the ERI scales, we analyse individual-level data from 31,790 participants from the five studies with complete scales. Results Pearson’s correlation between partial and complete scales was very high in case of ‘effort-(where 2 out of 3 items were used) and very high or high in case of ‘reward- if at least 4 items (out of 7) were included. Reward scales composed of 3 items revealed good to satisfactory agreement, and in one case, a reward scale consisting of 2 items only demonstrated a modest, but still acceptable degree of agreement. Sensitivity and specificity of a composite measure, the ratio of effort and reward, comparing partial versus complete scales ranged between 59-3 and 85-9?%, respectively. Complete and partial scales were strongly associated with poor self-rated health. Conclusion Our results support the notion that short proxy measures or partial versions of the original scales can be used to assess effort-reward imbalance.