Changes of the setae on the mouthparts of the red king crab Paralithodes camtschaticus (Tilesius, 1815) (Decapoda: Lithodidae) during ontogeny

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：R. R. Borisov
• 关键词：red king crab ; Paralithodes camtschaticus ; setae ; morphology ; ontogeny
• 刊名：Russian Journal of Marine Biology
• 出版年：2016
• 出版时间：January 2016
• 年：2016
• 卷：42
• 期：1
• 页码：51-57
• 全文大小：1,674 KB
• 参考文献：1. Kamchatskii krab v Barentsevom more (Red King Crab in the Barents Sea), 2nd Ed., Murmansk: Polyarn. Nauchno-Issled. Inst. Morsk. Rybn. Khoz. Okeanogr., 2003.
  2.Levin, V.S., Kamchatskii krab Paralithodes camtschaticus. Biologiya, promysel, vosproizvodstvo (Red King Crab Paralithodes camtschaticus. Biology, Harvesting, Reproduction), St. Petersburg Izhitsa, 2001.
  3.Epelbaum, A.B., Aphagia in glaucothoe of the red king crab Paralithodes camtschaticus (Tilesius, 1815), in Mater. VI Vseross. konf. promysl. bespozvon., Kaliningrad, 2003, Tezisy dokladov (Proc. VI All-Russ. Conf. on Commercial Invertebrates, Kaliningrad, 2003, Abstracts of Papers), Moscow: Vseross. NauchnoIssled. Inst. Rybn. Khoz. Okeanogr., 2003, pp. 67–69.
  4.Abrunhosa, F.A. and Kittaka, J., Functional morphology of mouthparts and foregut of the last zoea, glaucothoe and first juvenile of the king crabs Paralithodes camtschaticus, P. brevipes and P. platypus, Fish. Sci., 1997, vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 923–930.
  5.Batang, Z.B. and Suzuki, H., Gill structure and gillcleaning mechanisms of the redclaw crayfish Cherax quadricarinatus (Decapoda, Astacidea, Parastacidae), J. Crustacean Biol., 2000, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 699–714.CrossRef
  6.Drach, P. and Jacques, F., Système sétifère des Crustacés Décapodes: principles d’une classification générale, C. R. Seances Acad. Sci., 1977, vol. 284, pp. 1995–1998.
  7.Epelbaum, A.B. and Borisov, R.R., Feeding behavior and functional morphology of the feeding appendages of red king crab Paralithodes camtschaticus larvae, Mar. Biol. Res., 2006, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 77–88.CrossRef
  8.Factor, J.R., Morphology of the mouthparts of larval lobsters, Homarus americanus (Decapoda: Nephrophidae), with special emphasis on their setae, Biol. Bull. (Woods Hole, MA, U. S.), 1978, vol. 154, pp. 383–408.CrossRef PubMed
  9.Farmer, A.S., The functional morphology of the mouthparts and pereiopods of Nephrops norvegicus (L.) (Decapoda: Nephropide), J. Nat. Hist., 1974, vol. 8, pp. 121–142.CrossRef
  10.Garm, A., Revising the definition of the crustacean seta and setal classification systems based on examinations of the mouthpart setae of seven species of decapods, J. Linn. Soc. Lond., Zool., 2004, vol. 142, pp. 233–252.CrossRef
  11.Garm, A., Derby, C.D., and Høeg, J.T., Mechanosensory neurons with bendand osmo-sensitivity in mouthpart setae from the spiny lobster Panulirus argus, Biol. Bull. (Woods Hole, MA, U. S.), 2004, vol. 207, pp. 195–208.CrossRef PubMed
  12.Garm, A. and Watling, L., The crustacean integument: setae, setules and other ornamentation, in Functional Morphology and Diversity, Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2013, pp. 167–198.CrossRef
  13.Holmquist, J.G., The functional morphology of gnathopods: importance in grooming, and variation with regard to habitat, in talitroidean amphipods, J. Crustacean Biol., 1982, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 159–179.CrossRef
  14.Jacques, F., The setal system of crustaceans: types of setae, groupings, and functional morphology, in Crustacean Issues, vol. 6: Functional Morphology of Feeding and Grooming in Crustacea, Rotterdam: Balkema, 1989, pp. 1–13.
  15.Loya-Javellana, G.N., Fielder, D.R., and Thorne, M.J., Ontogeny of foregut in the tropical freshwater crayfish, Cherax quadricarinatus von Martens, 1868 (Parastacidae: Decapoda), Invertebrate Reprod. Dev., 1994, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 49–58.CrossRef
  16.Pohle, G. and Telford, M., Morphology and classification of decapod crustacean larval setae: a scanning electron microscope study of Dissodactylus crinitichelis Moreira, 1901 (Brachyura: Pinnotheridae), Bull. Mar. Sci., 1981, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 736–752.
  17.Thomas, W.J., The setae of Austropotamobius pallipes (Crustacea: Astacidae), J. Zool., 1970, vol. 160, pp. 91–142.CrossRef
  18.Vieira, R.R.R., Rieger, P.J., Cichowski, V., and Pinheiro, M.A.A., Juvenile development of Dilocarcinus pagei Stimpson, 1861 (Brachyura, Trichodactylidae) reared in the laboratory, with emphasis on setae morphology, Crustaceana, 2013, vol. 86, nos. 13–14, pp. 1644–1663.CrossRef
  19.Woods, C.M.C., Morphology of the mouthparts and associated setae of Notomithraxursus (Brachyura: Majidae), N. Z. Nat. Sci., 1994, vol. 21, pp. 17–25.
  20.Wortham, J.L., van Maurik, L.N., and Price, W.W., Setal morphology of the grooming appendages of Macrobrachium rosenbergii (Crustacea: Decapoda: Caridea: Palaemonidae) and review of decapod setal classification, J. Morphol., 2014, vol. 275, pp. 634–649.CrossRef PubMed
  
• 作者单位：R. R. Borisov (1)
  
  1. Russian Scientific Research Institute of Fisheries and Oceanography, ul. Verkhnyaya Krasnosel’skaya 17, Moscow, 107140, Russia
  
• 刊物主题：Freshwater & Marine Ecology;
• 出版者：Springer US
• ISSN：1608-3377

文摘

Setae on the mouthparts of juvenile and adult red king crabs, Paralithodes camtschaticus (Tilesius, 1815), were studied. A total of seven types of setae have been differentiated; their distribution over the mouthparts was determined. It was established that setules and denticles on the surface of setae show a tendency to shorten and/or disappear as the body grows; the length of the setae decreases relative to the size of the individual; the number of setae of most types increases considerably, forming dense groups of setae. These changes are apparently related to the fact that the effectiveness of the functions that are performed by solitary setae decreases with the growth in the size of an individual; these functions are subsequently assumed by groups of setae.