A validation study of the Iranian version of STarT Back Screening Tool (SBST) in lumbar central canal stenosis patients

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Parisa Azimi (1)
  Sohrab Shahzadi (1)
  Shirzad Azhari (1)
  Ali Montazeri (2)
  
• 刊名：Journal of Orthopaedic Science
• 出版年：2014
• 出版时间：March 2014
• 年：2014
• 卷：19
• 期：2
• 页码：213-217
• 全文大小：277 KB
• 参考文献：1. O’Leary CB, Cahill CR, Robinson AW, Barnes MJ, Hong J. A systematic review: the effects of podiatrical deviations on nonspecific chronic low back pain. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2013;26:117-3.
  2. Gevirtz C. Update on treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Part 1: defining the problem, diagnosis, and appropriate imaging. Topics Pain Management. 2010;25:1-.
  3. Airaksinen O, Brox JI, Cedraschi C, Hildebrandt J, Klaber-Moffett J, Kovacs F, Mannion AF, Reis S, Staal JB, Ursin H, Zanoli G. Chapter 4. European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2006;15(Suppl 2):S192-00. CrossRef
  4. Dunn KM, Lewis M, Mullis R, Hill J, Main CJ, Hay EM. STarT Back––development of a low back pain screening tool. Rheumatology. 2005;44:i85.
  5. Hill JC, Dunn KM, Mullis R, Lewis M, Main CJ, Hay EM. Validation of a new low back pain sub-grouping tool for primary care (The STarT Back Tool). Rheumatology. 2006;45:i119. CrossRef
  6. Hill JC, Dunn KM, Lewis M, Mullis R, Main CJ, Foster NE, Hay EM. A primary care back pain screening tool: identifying patient subgroups for initial treatment. Arthr Care Res. 2008;59:632-1. CrossRef
  7. Gusi N, del Pozo-Cruz B, Olivares PR, Hernández-Mocholi M, Hill JC. The Spanish version of the “STarT Back Screening Tool-(SBST) in different subgroups. Aten Primaria. 2011;43:356-1. CrossRef
  8. Bruyère O, Demoulin M, Brereton C, Humblet F, Flynn D, Hill JC, Maquet D, Beveren JV, Reginster JY, Crielaard JM, Demoulin C. Translation validation of a new back pain screening questionnaire (the STarT Back Screening Tool) in French. Arch Public Heal. 2012;70:12. CrossRef
  9. Mors? L, Albert H, Kent P, Manniche C, Hill J. Translation and discriminative validation of the STarT Back Screening Tool into Danish. Eur Spine J. 2011;20:2166-3. CrossRef
  10. Keele university, STarT Back Screening Tool Website [http://www.keele.ac.uk/sbst/translatedversions/].
  11. Keele university, STarT Back Screening Tool Website [http://www.keele.ac.uk/sbst/researcharticles/].
  12. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25:3186-1. CrossRef
  13. WHO: Process of translation and adaptation of instruments. [http://www.who.int/substance_abuse/research_tools/translation/en/].
  14. Bulliger M, Alonso J, Apolone G. Translating health status questionnaire and evaluating their quality: the IQOLA project approach. J Clin Epidemol. 1998;9:13-3.
  15. Mousavi SJ, Parnianpour M, Mehdian H, Montazeri A, Mobini B. The Oswestry Disability Index, the Roland–Morris Disability questionnaire, and the Quebec back pain disability scale: translation and validation studies of the Iranian versions. Spine. 2006;31:454-. CrossRef
  16. Nunnally JC, Bernstien IH. Psychometric theory. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994.
  17. Kirkwood BR, Sterne JAC. Essential medical statistics. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.; 2004. p. 430-.
  
• 作者单位：Parisa Azimi (1)
  Sohrab Shahzadi (1)
  Shirzad Azhari (1)
  Ali Montazeri (2)
  
  1. Shohada Tajrish Hospital, Functional Neurosurgery Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. Mental Health Research Group, Health Metrics Research Centre, Iranian Institute for Health Sciences Research, ACECR, Tehran, Iran
  
• ISSN：1436-2023

文摘

Background This study aimed to translate and validate the STarT Back Screening Tool (SBST) in Iran. Methods This was a prospective clinical validation study. The translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the original questionnaire was performed, and a total of 269 patients with lumbar central canal stenosis were asked to respond to the questionnaire at their first visits. Patients also were asked to complete the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Reliability was assessed by internal consistency using the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient. Validity was evaluated by performing convergent validity and responsiveness to change. Results Mean patient age was 58.6 [standard deviation (SD)?=?10.9] years; 56.5?% were women. According to patients-imaging, they were diagnosed as grade 1 (n?=?86), grade 2 (n?=?107), and grade 3 (n?=?76). In general, the SBST showed good psychometric properties. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for overall scale (Q1–Q9) and psychosocial subscale (Q5–Q9) was 0.82 and 0.79, respectively. The ODI correlated strongly with overall SBST scores, lending support to its good convergent validity (r?=?0.81; P?<?0.001). Responsiveness to change also indicated desirable results. Conclusion In general, the Iranian version of the SBST performed well, and findings suggest that it is a reliable and valid measure for screening low back pain in patients with lumbar central canal stenosis in primary care settings.