用户名: 密码: 验证码:
Skewness of cloud droplet spectrum and an improved estimation for its relative dispersion
详细信息    查看全文
  • 作者:Yu Liu ; Chunsong Lu ; Weiliang Li
  • 刊名:Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics
  • 出版年:2017
  • 出版时间:February 2017
  • 年:2017
  • 卷:129
  • 期:1
  • 页码:47-56
  • 全文大小:730KB
  • 刊物类别:Earth and Environmental Science
  • 刊物主题:Atmospheric Sciences; Meteorology; Math. Appl. in Environmental Science; Terrestrial Pollution; Waste Water Technology / Water Pollution Control / Water Management / Aquatic Pollution;
  • 出版者:Springer Vienna
  • ISSN:1436-5065
  • 卷排序:129
文摘
The relative dispersion of the cloud droplet spectrum is a very important parameter in describing and modeling cloud microphysical processes. Based on the definition of skewness as well as theoretical and data analyses, a linear fitting relationship (α = 2.91ε−0.59) between skewness (α) and relative dispersion (ε) is established and a new method is developed to estimate the relative dispersion of the cloud droplet spectrum. The new method does not depend on any assumption of a particular distribution for the cloud droplet spectrum and has broader applicability than the previous methods. Comparisons of the three methods for the relative dispersion with the observed data supported the following conclusions. (1) The skewness of the cloud droplet spectrum is asymmetrically distributed. An assumption of zero skewness in quantifying the relative dispersion inevitably results in relatively large deviations from the observations. Errors of the estimated relative dispersion due to the omission of the skewness term are not solely related to the skewness, but rather to the product of the skewness and relative dispersion. (2) The use of the assumption that the cloud droplet spectrum takes a gamma distribution is similar to the assumption that the skewness is twice the relative dispersion. This leads to a better accuracy in estimating the relative dispersion than that with zero skewness assumption. (3) Comparisons with observations show that the new method is more accurate than the one under gamma distribution assumption and is the best among all the three methods. (4) It is believed that finding a better correlation between the skewness and the relative dispersion would further reduce the deviations for the estimated relative dispersion.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700