Prohibition, Regulation or Free Market: A Mapping of Colombian People’s Perspectives Regarding National Drug Policies
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Wilson López López ; Claudia Pineda Marín ; Paul C. Sorum…
- 关键词：Drug policy ; Public perception ; Colombia
- 刊名：Social Indicators Research
- 出版年：2016
- 出版时间：March 2016
- 年：2016
- 卷：126
- 期：2
- 页码：689-710
- 全文大小：730 KB
- 参考文献：Agrawal, S., Everett, W. W., & Sharma, S. (2010). Medical students’ views of substance abuse treatment, policy and training. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 17, 587–602.
Anderson, N. H. (2008). Unified social cognition. New York: Psychology Press.
BBC News. (2004). Uribe defends security policies. Retrieved September 12th at http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4021213.stm
Blendon, R. J., & Young, J. T. (1998). The public and the war in illicit drugs. Journal of American Medical Association, 279, 827–832.CrossRef
Boyum, D. (2001). Prohibition and legalization: Beyond the false dichotomy. Social Research, 68, 865–868.
Bretteville-Jensen, A. L. (2006). To legalize or not to legalize? Economic approaches to the decriminalization of drugs. Substance Use and Misuse, 41, 555–565.CrossRef
Bushnell, D., & Hudson, R. A. (2010). Social strata division. In R. A. Hudson (Ed.), Colombia: A country study (pp. 101–103). Washington: Library of Congress.
Camacho, A., Gaviria, A., & Rodríguez, C. (2011). El consumo de droga en Colombia. In A. En Gaviria & D. Mejía (Eds.), Políticas antidroga en Colombia: Éxitos, fracasos y extravíos (pp. 15–40). Bogotá: Universidad de los Andes. [Drug consumption in Colombia].
Camus, J., Muñoz Sastre, M. T., Sorum, P. C., & Mullet, E. (2014). French people’s positions regarding national policies about illicit drugs: A preliminary study. Social Indicators Research, 118, 1191–1204.
Costes, J. M., Le Nézet, O., Spilka, S., & Lafitteau, C. (2010). Dix ans d’évolution des perceptions et des opinons de Français sur les drogues (1999–2008). Tendances, 71, 1–6. [French people’s perceptions and opinions regarding drugs: Ten years of evolution].
Courtwright, D. T. (1982). Dark paradise: Opiate addiction in America before 1940. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
DANE: Departamiento Administrativo Nacional de Colombia. (2014). Demografía y población [Demography and population]. Retrieved on December 4th from http://www.dane.gov.co/index.php/estadisticas-por-tema/demografia-y-poblacion
DRCNet. (2001). Colombian legalization movement. Retrieved on September 12th, 2014 from http://www.november.org/razorwire/rzold/26/page9.html
Elejalde, B. R. (1975). Marijuana and genetic studies in Colombia. In V. Rubin (Ed.), Cannabis and culture (pp. 327–344). The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton.
Friedman, M. (1991). Interview on the drug of war. Retrieved on February 6th, 2014 from http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/Misc/friedm1.htm
Gamelin, A., Muñoz Sastre, M. T., Sorum, P. C., & Mullet, E. (2006). Eliciting utilities using functional methodology: People’s disutilities for the adverse outcomes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Quality of Life Research, 15, 429–439.CrossRef
Gaviria, A., & Mejía, D. (2011). Políticas antidroga en Colombia: Éxitos, fracasos y extravíos. Bogotá: Universidad de los Andes. [Antidrug Policy in Colombia: Successes, failures and drifts].
Goode, E. (1998). Strange bedfellows: Ideology, politics, and drug legalization. Society, 35, 18–27.CrossRef
Heimann, M., Mullet, E., & Bonnefon, J. F. (2014, in press). People’s views about the acceptability of remuneration policies and executive bonuses. Journal of Business Ethics.
Hoffmann, N. G., Chang, A. J., & Lewis, D. C. (2000). Medical student attitudes toward drug addiction policy. Journal of Addictive Diseases, 19, 1–12.CrossRef
Hofmans, J., & Mullet, E. (2013). Towards unveiling individual differences in different stages of information processing: A clustering-based approach. Quality & Quantity, 47, 555–564.CrossRef
Hopwood, M., Brener, L., Frankland, A., & Treloar, C. (2010). Assessing community support for harm reduction services: Comparing two measures. Drug and Alcohol Review, 29, 385–391.CrossRef
Human Rights Watch. (2011). World Report 2011: Colombia. Retrieved on September 18th, 2014 from http://www.hrw.org/en/world-report-2011/world-report-2011-colombia
Jelsma, M. (2011). The development of international drug control: Lessons learned and strategic challenges for the future. Working paper prepared for the first meeting of the Global Commission on Drug policy.
Jelsma, M., Blickman, T., & Metaal, P. (2013). Uruguay’s pioneering cannabis regulation marks the tipping point in the failed war on drugs. Retrieved February 19th, 2014 from http://www.druglawreform.info/en/newsroom/press-releases/item/5178-uruguays-pioneering-cannabis-regulation-marks-the-tipping-point-in-the-failed-war-on-drugs
Jenner, M. S. (2011). International drug trafficking: A global problem with a domestic solution. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 18, 901–927.CrossRef
Lambert, E. G., Ventura, L. A., Baker, D. N., & Jenkins, M. (2006). Drug views: Does race matter? Journal of Ethnicity and Criminal Justice, 4, 93–111.CrossRef
López-López, W., Pineda Marín, C., Murcia León, M. C., Perilla Garzón, D. C., & Mullet, E. (2012). Forgiving the perpetrators of violence: Colombian people’s positions. Social Indicators Research, 114, 287–301.CrossRef
Millhorn, M., Monaghan, M., Montero, D., Reyes, M., Roman, T., Tollasken, R., & Walls, R. (2009). North Americans’ attitudes toward illegal drugs. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 19, 125–141.CrossRef
Nadelmann, E. (2006). La reducción de los daños de la prohibición de las drogas en las Américas. In En Camacho, A (Eds.), Narcotráfico: Europa, Estados Unidos, América Latina. Bogotá: Uniandes-Ceso. [Reducing prohibition’s side effects in America].
Neto, F., Pinto, C., & Mullet, E. (2013). The acceptability of military humanitarian interventions. International Perspectives in Psychology, 2, 73–84.
Olivari, C., Munoz Sastre, M. T., Guedj, M., Sorum, P. C., & Mullet, E. (2011). Breaking patient confidentiality: Comparing Chilean and French viewpoints regarding the conditions of its acceptability. Universitas Psychologica: Pan American Journal of Psychology, 10, 13–26.
Patiño, V. M. (1969). Plantas cultivadas y animales domésticos en América Equinoccial. Tomo IV: Plantas introducidas. Cali, Colombia: Imprenta Departamental. [Cultivated plants and domestic animals in Latin America. Volume 4: Introduced plants]
Pérez Gómez, A. (2013). Colombia: Fuera del ojo del huracán, pero todavía cerca. Adicciones, 25, 106–108. [Colombia: out of the eye of the hurricane, but still close].
Plowman, T. (1979). Botanical perspectives in coca. Journal of Psychedelic Drugs, 11, 103–117.CrossRef
Thoumi, F. E. (2002). Illegal drugs in Colombia: From illegal economic boom to social crisis. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 582, 102–116.CrossRef
Timberlake, J. M., Lock, E. D., & Rasinski, K. A. (2003). How should we wage the war on drugs? Determinants of public preferences for drug control alternatives. The Policy Studies Journal, 31, 71–88.CrossRef
Timberlake, J. M., Rasinski, K. A., & Lock, E. D. (2001). Effects of conservative sociopolitical attitudes on public support for drug rehabilitation spending. Social Science Quarterly, 82, 184–196.CrossRef
Treloar, C., & Fraser, S. (2007). Public opinion on needle and syringe programmes: Avoiding assumptions for policy and practice. Drug and Alcohol Review, 26, 355–361.CrossRef
Trevino, R. A., & Richard, A. J. (2002). Attitudes towards drug legalization among drug users. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 28, 91–108.CrossRef
Uchtehagen, A. (2009). Heroin-assisted treatment in Switzerland: A case study in policy change. Addiction, 105, 29–37.CrossRef
United Kingdom Drug Policy Commission. (2012). Final report of the UK Drug Policy Commission. Retrieved on February 6th, 2014 from http://www.ukdpc.org.uk
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2009). World drug report 2009. Retrieved February 6th, 2014 from http://www.unodc.org/documents/wdr/WDR_2009/WDR2009_eng_web.pdf
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2013). World drug report 2013. Retrieved February 6th, 2014 from http://www.unodc.org/unodc/secured/wdr/wdr2013/World_Drug_Report_2013.pdf
Van Laar, M., Cruts, G., van Gageldonk, A., van Ooyen-Houben, M., Croes, E., Meijer, R., & Ketelaars, T. (2007). Report to the EMCDDA by the Reitox national focal point: The Netherlands. Retrieved February 6th, 2014 from http://www.trimbos.nl/webwinkel/productoverzicht-webwinkel/feiten—cijfers—beleid/af/~/media/files/gratis%20downloads/af0817%20the%20netherlands%20drug%20situation%202007%20compleet.ashx
Werb, D., Rowell, G., Guyatt, G., Kerr, T., Montaner, J., & Wood, E. (2010). Effect of drug law enforcement on drug-related violence: Evidence from a scientific review. Vancouver: International Centre for Science in Drug Policy. Retrieved on February 6th, 2014 from http://www.icsdp.org
Wood, E. (2010). Evidence-based policy for illicit drugs: An ethical obligation for those working in the field of drug addiction. British Medical Journal, 341, 107–108.
Zorro, C. (2011). Políticas de desarrollo alternativo en Colombia (1982–2009). In A. Gaviria & D. Mejía (Eds.), Políticas antidroga en Colombia: Éxitos, fracasos y extravíos (pp. 91–120). Bogotá: Universidad de los Andes. [Alternative development policies in Colombia]. - 作者单位：Wilson López López (1)
Claudia Pineda Marín (2)
Paul C. Sorum (3)
Etienne Mullet (4)
1. Pontificia Javeriana University, Bogotá, Colombia
2. Santo Tomas University, Bogotá, Colombia
3. Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, USA
4. Institute of Advanced Studies (EPHE), Quefes 17bis, 31830, Plaisance, France - 刊物类别：Humanities, Social Sciences and Law
- 刊物主题：Social Sciences
Sociology
Quality of Life Research
Microeconomics
Public Health
Human Geography - 出版者：Springer Netherlands
- ISSN：1573-0921
文摘
Colombian laypersons’ perspectives regarding actual and potential drug policies were examined. Adults (N = 395) aged 18–68 and living in Bogota were presented with 24 vignettes that were composed according to two within-subject orthogonal factor designs: (a) Demand for drugs in the country × Current government policy regarding soft and hard drugs (from “laissez faire” policy for all drugs to complete prohibition of all drugs) and (b) Information campaigns regarding the dangerousness of drugs × Current policy. Participants rated the level of acceptability of each policy. Seven different perspectives were identified that can be grouped into five broad views. The first one (50 % of participants) was called “radical constructionists” because participants considered that all policies were unacceptable. The second one (19 %) was called “cultural conservatives” because only one drug policy was considered fully acceptable: complete prohibition (although half of the members of this group were willing to allow soft drugs to be sold freely). The third one (14 %) was called “progressive prohibitionists” because the preferred policies in this group were either complete prohibition or complete regulation by the government. The fourth one (8 %) was called “free trade libertarians” because the dominant opinion was that the drug market should be free. The last one (5 %) was called “progressive advocates of legalization” because the preferred policy in this group was complete regulation of all substances. In most cases, the presence of information campaigns was highly valued. Methodological implications and implications for decision-makers are discussed. Keywords Drug policy Public perception Colombia