Discrimination of marine algal taxonomic groups based on fluorescence excitation emission matrix, parallel factor analysis and CHEMTAX

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Xiaona Chen (1)
  Rongguo Su (1)
  Ying Bai (1)
  Xiaoyong Shi (1)
  Rujun Yang (1)
  
• 关键词：CHEMTAX ; fluorescence excitation ; emission matrices ; in vivo ; fluorescent components ; parallel factor analysis ; phytoplankton
• 刊名：Acta Oceanologica Sinica
• 出版年：2014
• 出版时间：December 2014
• 年：2014
• 卷：33
• 期：12
• 页码：192-205
• 全文大小：945 KB
• 参考文献：1. Andersen C M, Bro R. 2003. Practical aspects of PARAFAC modeling of fluorescence excitation-emission data. J Chemom, 17(4): 200鈥?15 CrossRef
  2. Arrigo K R. 2005. Marine microorganisms and global nutrient cycles. Nature, 437(7057): 349鈥?55 CrossRef
  3. Barber C B, Dobkin D P, Huhdanpaa H. 1996. The Quickhull algorithm for convex hulls. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 22(4): 469鈥?83 CrossRef
  4. Beutler M, Wiltshire K H, Arp M, et al. 2003. A reduced model of the fluorescence from the cyanobacterial photosynthetic apparatus designed for the in situ detection of cyanobacteria. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Bioenergetics, 1604(1): 33鈥?6 CrossRef
  5. Bosco M V, Larrechi M S. 2007. PARAFAC and MCR-ALS applied to the quantitative monitoring of the photodegradation process of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons using three-dimensional excitation emission fluorescent spectra Comparative results with HPLC. Talanta, 71(4): 1703鈥?709 CrossRef
  6. Bro R. 1997. PARAFAC tutorial and applications. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 38(2): 149鈥?71 CrossRef
  7. Bro R. 1999. Exploratory study of sugar production using fluorescence spectroscopy and multi-way analysis. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 46(2): 133鈥?47 CrossRef
  8. Chen J Q, Guo R X. 2012. Access the toxic effect of the antibiotic cefradine and its UV light degradation products on two freshwater algae. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 209鈥?10: 520鈥?23 CrossRef
  9. Drinovec L, Flander-Putrle V, Knez M, et al. 2011. Discrimination of marine algal taxonomic groups using delayed fluorescence spectroscopy. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 73: 42鈥?8 CrossRef
  10. Fellman J B, Miller M P, Cory R M, et al. 2009. Characterizing dissolved organic matter using PARAFAC modeling of fluorescence spectroscopy: A comparison of two models. Environmental Science & Technology, 43(16): 6228鈥?234 CrossRef
  11. Gameiro C, Cartaxana P, Brotas V. 2007. Environmental drivers of phytoplankton distribution and composition in Tagus Estuary, Portugal. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 75(1鈥?): 21鈥?4 CrossRef
  12. Guillard R R L. 1975. Culture of phytoplankton for feeding marine invertebrates. In: Culture of Marine Invertebrate Animals. New York: Springer, 29鈥?0 CrossRef
  13. Harshman R A. 1970. Foundations of the PARAFAC procedure: Models and conditions for an 鈥渆xplanatory鈥?multimodal factor analysis. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics, 16: 1鈥?4
  14. Havskum H, Schl眉ter L, Scharek R, et al. 2004. Routine quantification of phytoplankton groups-microscopy or pigment analyses. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 273: 31鈥?2 CrossRef
  15. Harwati T U, Willke T, Vorlop K D. 2012. Characterization of the lipid accumulation in a tropical freshwater microalgae / Chlorococcum sp. Bioresource Technology, 121: 54鈥?0 CrossRef
  16. Hu Yuxi, Li Xibing. 2012. Bayes discriminant analysis method to identify risky of complicated goaf in mines and its application. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 22(2): 425鈥?31 CrossRef
  17. Jeffrey S W, Hallegraeff G M. 1980. Studies of phytoplankton species and photosynthetic pigments in a warm core eddy of East Australian Current: I. Summer populations. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 3: 285鈥?94 CrossRef
  18. Khullar S, Michael A, Correa N, et al. 2011. Wavelet-based fMRI analysis: 3-D denoising, signal separation, and validation metrics. Neuroimage, 54(4): 2867鈥?884 CrossRef
  19. Latasa M. 2007. Improving estimations of phytoplankton class abundances using CHEMTAX. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 329: 13鈥?1 CrossRef
  20. Lee T, Tsuzuki M, Takeuchi T, et al. 1995. Quantitative determination of cyanobacteria in mixed phytoplankton assemblages by an in vivo fluorimetric method. Analytica Chimica Acta, 302(1): 81鈥?7 CrossRef
  21. Li Yumei, Anderson-Sprecher R. 2006. Facies identification from well logs: A comparison of discriminant analysis and na茂e Bayes classifier. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 53(3鈥?): 149鈥?57 CrossRef
  22. Liu Xianli, Tao Shu, Deng Nansheng. 2005. Synchronous-scan fluorescence spectra of Chlorella vulgaris solution. Chemosphere, 60(11): 1550鈥?554 CrossRef
  23. Mackey M D, Mackey D J, Higgins H W, et al. 1996. CHEMTAX鈥攁 program for estimating class abundances from chemical markers: application to HPLC measurements of phytoplankton. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 144: 265鈥?83 CrossRef
  24. Nie Jinfang, Wu Hailong, Zhang Shurong, et al. 2010. Self-weighted alternating normalized residue fitting algorithm with application to quantitative analysis of excitation-emission matrix fluorescence data. Analytical Methods, 2: 1918鈥?926 CrossRef
  25. Oldham P B, Zillioux E J, Walker I M. 1985. Spectral 鈥渇ingerprinting鈥?of phytoplankton populations by two-dimensional fluorescence and Fourier-transform-based pattern recognition. Journal of Marine Research, 43:893鈥?06 CrossRef
  26. Paerl H W, Huisman J. 2009. Climate change: A catalyst for global expansion of harmful cyanobacterial blooms. Environmental Microbiology Reports, 1(1): 27鈥?7 CrossRef
  27. Rodriguez F, Varela M, Zapata M. 2002. Phytoplankton assemblages in the Gerlache and Bransfield Straits (Antarctic Peninsula) determined by light microscopy and CHEMTAX analysis of HPLC pigment data. Deep-Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 49(4鈥?): 723鈥?47 CrossRef
  28. Ruivo M, Amorim A, Cartaxana P. 2011. Effects of growth phase and irradiance on phytoplankton pigment ratios: implications for chemotaxonomy in coastal waters. Journal of Plankton Research, 33(7): 1012鈥?022 CrossRef
  29. Schl眉ter L, Lauridsen T L, Krogh G, et al. 2006. Identification and quantification of phytoplankton groups in lakes using new pigment ratios-a comparison between pigment analysis by HPLC and microscopy. Freshwater Biology, 51(8): 1474鈥?485 CrossRef
  30. Schl眉ter L, M酶hlenberg F, Havskum H, et al. 2000. The use of phytoplankton pigments for identifying and quantifying phytoplankton groups in coastal areas: testing the influence of light and nutrients on pigment/chlorophyll a ratios. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 192: 49鈥?3 CrossRef
  31. Sheng Guoping, Yu Hanqing. 2006. Characterization of extracellular polymeric substances of aerobic and anaerobic sludge using three-dimensional excitation and emission matrix fluorescence spectroscopy. Water Research, 40(6): 1233鈥?239 CrossRef
  32. Stedmon C A, Bro R. 2008. Characterizing dissolved organic matter fluorescence with parallel factor analysis: a tutorial. Limnology and Oceanography: Methods, 6: 572鈥?79 CrossRef
  33. Stedmon C A, Markager S. 2005. Resolving the variability in dissolved organic matter fluorescence in a temperate estuary and its catchment using PARAFAC analysis. Limnology and Oceanography, 50(2): 686鈥?97 CrossRef
  34. Stedmon C A, Markager S, Bro R. 2003. Tracing dissolved organic matter in aquatic environments using a new approach to fluorescence spectroscopy. Marine Chemistry, 82(3鈥?): 239鈥?54 CrossRef
  35. Wang Zhiwei, Wu Zhichao, Tang Shujuan. 2009. Characterization of dissolved organic matter in a submerged membrane bioreactor by using three-dimensional excitation and emission matrix fluorescence spectroscopy. Water Research, 43(6): 1533鈥?540 CrossRef
  36. Wright S W, Thomas D P, Marchant H J, et al. 1996. Analysis of phytoplankton of the Australian sector of the Southern Ocean: comparisons of microscopy and size frequency data with interpretations of pigment HPLC data using the 鈥楥HEMTAX鈥?matrix factorisation program. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 144: 285鈥?98 CrossRef
  37. Wright S W, van den Enden R L, Pearce I, et al. 2010. Phytoplankton community structure and stocks in the Southern Ocean (30鈥?01E) determined by CHEMTAX analysis of HPLC pigment signatures. Deep-Sea Research Part II, 57: 758鈥?78 CrossRef
  38. Zelen M, Severo N C. 1970. Probability functions. In: Abramowitz M, Stegun I A, eds. Handbook of Mathematical Functions. New York: Dover Publications, 925鈥?95
  39. Zepp R G, Sheldon W M, Moran M A. 2004. Dissolved organic fluorophores in southeastern US coastal waters: correction method for eliminating Rayleigh and Raman scattering peaks in excitationemission matrices. Marine Chemistry, 89(1鈥?): 15鈥?6 CrossRef
  40. Zhang Fang, Su Rongguo, He Jianfeng, et al. 2010. Identifying phytoplankton in seawater based on discrete excitation-emission fluorescence spectra. Journal of Phycology, 46(2): 403鈥?11 CrossRef
  41. Zhang Fang, Su Rongguo, Wang Xiulin, et al. 2009. A fluorometric method for the discrimination of harmful algal bloom species developed by wavelet analysis. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 368(1): 37鈥?3 CrossRef
  
• 作者单位：Xiaona Chen (1)
  Rongguo Su (1)
  Ying Bai (1)
  Xiaoyong Shi (1)
  Rujun Yang (1)
  
  1. College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266100, China
  
• ISSN：1869-1099

文摘

An in vivo three-dimensional fluorescence method for the determination of algae community structure was developed by parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC) and CHEMTAX. The PARAFAC model was applied to fluorescence excitation-emission matrix (EEM) of 60 algae species belonging to five divisions and 11 fluorescent components were identified according to the residual sum of squares and specificity of the composition profiles of fluorescent. By the 11 fluorescent components, the algae species at different growth stages were classified correctly at the division level using Bayesian discriminant analysis (BDA). Then the reference fluorescent component ratio matrix was constructed for CHEMTAX, and the EEM-PARAFAC-CHEMTAX method was developed to differentiate algae taxonomic groups. The correct discrimination ratios (CDRs) when the fluorometric method was used for single-species samples were 100% at the division level, except for Bacillariophyta with a CDR of 95.6%. The CDRs for the mixtures were above 94.0% for the dominant algae species and above 87.0% for the subdominant algae species. However, the CDRs of the subdominant algae species were too low to be unreliable when the relative abundance estimated was less than 15.0%. The fluorometric method was tested using the samples from the Jiaozhou Bay and the mesocosm experiments in the Xiaomai Island Bay in August 2007. The discrimination results of the dominant algae groups agreed with microscopy cell counts, as well as the subdominant algae groups of which the estimated relative abundance was above 15.0%. This technique would be of great aid when low-cost and rapid analysis is needed for samples in a large batch. The fluorometric technique has the ability to correctly identify dominant species with proper abundance both in vivo and in situ.