Low latency IP mobility management: protocol and analysis

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Min Liu (1)
  Xiaobing Guo (1) (2) (4)
  Anfu Zhou (1)
  Shengling Wang (1)
  Zhongcheng Li (1)
  Eryk Dutkiewicz (3)
  
• 刊名：EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking
• 出版年：2011
• 出版时间：December 2011
• 年：2011
• 卷：2011
• 期：1
• 全文大小：652KB
• 参考文献：1. Makaya C, Pierre S: An analytical framework for performance evaluation of IPv6-based mobility management protocols. / IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun 2008,7(3):972鈥?83. CrossRef
  2. Zahran AH, Liang B, Saleh A: Signal threshold adaptation for vertical handoff in heterogeneous wireless networks. / Mobile Netw. Appl 2006, 11:625鈥?40. CrossRef
  3. Fogelstroem E, Jonsson A, Perkins C: Mobile IPv4 regional registration. / Internet Engineering Task Force, RFC 4857 2007.
  4. Valko A: Cellular IP: a new approach to internet host mobility. / ACM SIGMOBILE Computer Comm. Rev 1999,29(1):50鈥?5. CrossRef
  5. Misra A, Das S, Dutta A, McAuley A, Das S: IDMP-based fast handoffs and paging in IP-based 4G mobile networks. / IEEE Commun. Mag 2002,40(3):138鈥?45. CrossRef
  6. Ramjee R, Varadhan K, Salgarelli L, Thuel SR, Wand SY, La-Porta T: HAWAII: a domain-based approach for supporting mobility in wide-area wireless networks. / IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw 2002,10(3):396鈥?10. CrossRef
  7. Xie J, Akyildiz IF: A distributed dynamic regional location management scheme for mobile IP. / Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM 2002 2002, 1069鈥?078.
  8. Ma WC, Fang YG: Dynamic hierarchical mobility management strategy for mobile IP networks. / IEEE J. Selected Areas Commun 2004,22(4):664鈥?76. CrossRef
  9. Perkins CE, Johnson DB: Route optimization in mobile IP. Internet Draft (Work in Progress), Internet Engineering Task Force, draft-ietf-mobileipoptim-11.txt, Sept. 2001.
  10. Johnson D, Perkins C, Arkko J: Mobility support in IPv6. / Internet Engineering Task Force, RFC 3775 2004.
  11. Perkins C: IP mobility support for IPv4. / Internet Engineering Task Force, RFC 3220 2002.
  12. Soliman H, Castelluccia C, ElMalki K, Bellier L: Hierarchical mobile IPv6 (HMIPv6) mobility management. / Internet Engineering Task Force, RFC 5380 2008.
  13. Weniger K: MIPv6 correspondent node-targeted location privacy and optimized routing. Internet Draft (Work in Progress), Internet Engineering Task Force, draft-weniger-mobopts-mip6-cnlocpriv-03. 2008.
  14. Akyildiz IF, Xie J, Mohanty S: A survey on mobility management in next generation all-IP based wireless systems. / IEEE Wireless Commun 2004,11(4):16鈥?8. CrossRef
  15. Kara N: Mobility management approaches for mobile IP networks:performance comparison and use recommendations. / IEEE Trans Mobile Comput 2009,8(10):1312鈥?325. CrossRef
  16. Cao J, Zhang L, Chan H, Das SK: Design and performance evaluation of an improved mobile IP protocol. / Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM 2004 2004, 319鈥?29.
  17. Koodli R: Mobile IPv6 fast handovers. Internet Engineering Task Force, RFC 5268, June 2008.
  18. Lee YJ, Akyildiz IF: A new scheme for reducing link and signaling costs in mobile IP. / IEEE Trans Comput 2003,52(6):706鈥?11. CrossRef
  19. Zheng R, Ge Y, Hou JC, Thuel SR: A case for mobility support with temporary home agents. / ACM SIGMOBILE Mob Comput Commun Rev 2002,6(1):32鈥?6. CrossRef
  20. Mao Y, Knutsson B, Lu HH, Smith JM: DHARMA: distributed home agent for robust mobile access. / Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM 2005 2005, 1196鈥?206.
  21. P'erez-Costa X, Torrent-Moreno M, Hartenstein H: A performance comparison of mobile IPv6, hierarchical mobile IPv6, fast handovers for mobile IPv6 and their combination. / ACM SIGMOBILE Mob Comput Commun Rev 2003,7(4):5鈥?9. CrossRef
  22. Gwon Y, Kempf J, Yegin A: Scalability and robustness analysis of mobile IPv6, fast mobile IPv6, hierarchical mobile IPv6, and hybrid IPv6 mobility protocols using a large-scale simulation. / Proceedings of IEEE ICC 2004 2004, 7:4087鈥?091.
  23. P'erez-Costa X, Schmitz R, Hartenstein H, Leibsch M: A MIPv6, FMIPv6 and HMIPv6 handover latency study: analytical approach. / IST Mobile Wireless Commun Summit 2002, 100鈥?05.
  24. Castelluccia C: HMIPv6: a hierarchical mobile IPv6 proposal. ACM SIGMOBILE Mob. / Comput Commun Rev 2000,4(1):48鈥?9. CrossRef
  25. Pack S, Choi Y: Performance analysis of fast handover in mobile IPv6 networks. / IFIP Pers Wireless Commun LNCS 2003, 2775:679鈥?91. CrossRef
  26. Pack S, Choi Y: A study on performance of hierarchical mobile IPv6 in IP-based cellular networks. / IEICE Trans Commun 2004,E87-B(3):462鈥?69.
  27. Jung HY, Kim EA, Yi JW, Lee HH: A scheme for supporting fast handover in hierarchical mobile IPv6 networks. / ETRI J 2005,27(6):798鈥?01. CrossRef
  28. Giaretta G, Kempf J, Devarapalli V: Mobile IPv6 bootstrapping in split scenario. / Internet Engineering Task Force, RFC 5026 2007.
  29. MobiWan: NS-2 extensions to study mobility in Wide-Area IPv6 Networks [http://www.inrialpes.fr/planete/mobiwan/]
  30. The Network Simulator - ns-2 [http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/]
  
• 作者单位：Min Liu (1)
  Xiaobing Guo (1) (2) (4)
  Anfu Zhou (1)
  Shengling Wang (1)
  Zhongcheng Li (1)
  Eryk Dutkiewicz (3)
  
  1. Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, People鈥檚 Republic of China
  2. Collaborative Computing Lab, Lenovo Corporate Research & Development, Beijing, 100085, People鈥檚 Republic of China
  4. Graduate University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, People鈥檚 Republic of China
  3. Department of Electronic Engineering, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia
  
• ISSN：1687-1499

文摘

Mobile IP is one of the dominating protocols that enable a mobile node to remain reachable while moving around in the Internet. However, it suffers from long handoff latency and route inefficiency. In this article, we present a novel distributed mobility management architecture, ADA (Asymmetric Double-Agents), which introduces double mobility agents to serve one end-to-end communication. One mobility agent is located close to the MN and the other close to the CN. ADA can achieve both low handoff latency and low transmission latency, which is crucial for improvement of user perceived QoS. It also provides an easy-to-use mechanism for MNs to manage and control each traffic session with a different policy and provide specific QoS support. We apply ADA to MIPv6 communications and present a detailed protocol design. Subsequently, we propose an analytical framework for systematic and thorough performance evaluation of mobile IP-based mobility management protocols. Equipped with this model, we analyze the handoff latency, single interaction delay and total time cost under the bidirectional tunneling mode and the route optimization mode for MIPv6, HMIPv6, CNLP, and ADA. Through both quantitative analysis and NS2-based simulations, we show that ADA significantly outperforms the existing mobility management protocols.