Negotiating Mine Fields: Public Policy,Protest and the Proposed Penokee Mine

详细信息   

• 作者：Turville-Heitz ; Margaret E. Meg
• 学历：Doctor
• 年：2015
• 关键词：Social sciences ; Communication and the arts ; Civil t
• 导师：Loew,Patricia A.
• 毕业院校：The University of Wisconsin
• Department：Mass Communications - AG
• 专业：Cultural anthropology;Public policy;Mass communications
• ISBN：9781321724165
• CBH：3701611
• Country：USA
• 语种：English
• FileSize：4374879
• Pages：369

文摘

Civil discourse is considered critical to democratic governance. Public perceptions of what that discourse entails -- including a demand for a seat at the table -- and the reality of what political elites and governments want from the public in the development and practice of public policy -- the registering of an opinion--often conflict. Research suggests the conflict over unpopular government policy and the sense of disempowerment and disillusion in the public process often lead to apathy and a decline in public participation. Yet,in spite of a lack of sympathetic or even fair mainstream discourse,in other cases the public engages in sustained letter-writing and lobbying efforts,direct action and civil disobedience,leading to successful social movements. Using archival and historical review,content analysis of traditional and social media,interviews,and participant observation,this qualitative research explored the communications arena surrounding the attempts to site three different controversial mines in Wisconsin over the last 40 years to understand what moves people from apathy to protest and from protest to social movement. Complicating this issue in Wisconsin are treaty rights held by the Lake Superior Chippewa (Ojibwe) to hunt,fish and gather on public lands and waterways in the northern third of the state. With increasing global population,resource conflicts become more prevalent as extraction projects encroach on environmentally and culturally sensitive areas,leading to sustained conflicts and litigation. This research finds that historical precedent,past natural resource conflicts,and strong place-based identity prime communications about these conflicts and help structure a cultural sense of the worthiness of a struggle,but it is framing that shapes the perceptions of a civil taking via procedural,structural and environmental injustices that drives opposition to the streets. Predictive features include the perception of a powerful agent knowingly and even intentionally causing a perceived harm to citizens who have played by the rules. There must be concrete,broadly understood examples of perceived breaches of the social contract that erode trust in the agent,especially when that agent is representative government. The agent must be a clear perpetrator of the injustice,acting with perceived impunity,with identifiable victims with whom the public can empathize. Most critically,the victims must be deemed "worthy" of the moral outrage of those seeing the injustice,by following all the rules and having built up a history of struggle in the equivalent of the David vs. Goliath battle;and there must be a sense of efficacy based on a clear moral high ground to set the stage for hot button injustice frames.