基于AHP模型的运城盐湖湿地及周边景观综合评价
|
摘要
为了提高城市湿地公园的景观建设,以运城市盐湖湿地及周边环境为研究对象,选取4个景观单元8块样地,运用层次分析法(AHP)通过4个准则层10个指标层进行综合评价。结果表明:准则层中,植物景观的权重值最大;指标层中,植物层次丰富度总权重值最大。4个景观单元质量等级评价排序中,望湖园和盐湖碧桂园景观质量等级均为Ⅱ级,盐湖公园为Ⅳ级,盐湖死海为Ⅴ级。4个景观单元的景观质量等级整体偏低、景观发展建设不平衡、景观的管护力度不够。根据评价结果,建议在盐湖湿地的景观建设中统筹规划、协调发展,将其纳入运城市城市总体规划;构建乔、灌、草立体复层混合结构的植物群落景观;加强管护力度,保持景观品质。
In order to improve the landscape construction of urban wetland park, taking Yuncheng salt lake wetland and its surrounding environment as the research object, 8 pieces of sample plots of 4 landscape units were selected, and the analytic hierarchy process(AHP) was applied to conduct a comprehensive evaluation through 4 criterion layers and 10 index layers. The results showed that, in criterion layer, the weight value of plant landscape was the largest; in index layer, the total weight value of plant richness was the largest. In the ranking of four landscape units, the landscape quality grades of Wanghu Garden and Biguiyuan Garden in Salt Lake were all of Grade II, Salt Lake Park was of Grade IV and Dead Sea of Salt Lake was of Grade V. The overall landscape quality grade of the four landscape units was low, the development and construction of the landscape was unbalanced, and the management and protection of the landscape was insufficient. According to the evaluation results, it was suggested that the overall planning and coordinated development of the landscape construction of Salt Lake wetland should be incorporated into the overall planning of Yuncheng City; the plant community landscape with tree, shrub and grass three-dimensional composite structure should be constructed; and the management and protection should be strengthened to maintain the landscape quality.
In order to improve the landscape construction of urban wetland park, taking Yuncheng salt lake wetland and its surrounding environment as the research object, 8 pieces of sample plots of 4 landscape units were selected, and the analytic hierarchy process(AHP) was applied to conduct a comprehensive evaluation through 4 criterion layers and 10 index layers. The results showed that, in criterion layer, the weight value of plant landscape was the largest; in index layer, the total weight value of plant richness was the largest. In the ranking of four landscape units, the landscape quality grades of Wanghu Garden and Biguiyuan Garden in Salt Lake were all of Grade II, Salt Lake Park was of Grade IV and Dead Sea of Salt Lake was of Grade V. The overall landscape quality grade of the four landscape units was low, the development and construction of the landscape was unbalanced, and the management and protection of the landscape was insufficient. According to the evaluation results, it was suggested that the overall planning and coordinated development of the landscape construction of Salt Lake wetland should be incorporated into the overall planning of Yuncheng City; the plant community landscape with tree, shrub and grass three-dimensional composite structure should be constructed; and the management and protection should be strengthened to maintain the landscape quality.
引文
[1]阮文龙.可持续发展的城市湿地公园设计研究———以胡志明市THUTHIEM新区湿地公园设计为例[D].南京:东南大学,2014.
[2]王晶.城市湿地公园与水景观设计研究[D].天津:天津大学,2010.
[3]安静,刘念念,杨荣和,等.花溪国家城市湿地公园夏季植物景观美感评价[J].生态经济,2014,30(10):194-199.
[4]苏佩萍,弓弼,吉鑫淼.三门峡天鹅湖城市湿地公园植物景观质量评价[J].西北林学院学报,2015,30(2):262-267.
[5]林葳,喻来,陈舒静,等.基于SBE法的成都市人工湿地公园植物景观评价[J].四川大学学报:自然科学版,2015,52(3):697-702.
[6]许丽,欧静,陈荣建,等.基于SBE法的阿哈湖国家湿地公园植物景观评价[J].山地农业生物学报,2017,36(3):15-22,48.
[7]巫柳兰.桂林会仙湿地公园景观健康综合评价[J].湖南农业科学,2015(2):79-81.
[8]左乐,路毅.西安灞桥生态湿地公园滨水景观评价研究[J].山西建筑,2012,38(27):218-220.
[9]刘艺平,仝向,赵亚楠,等.周口淮阳龙湖湿地滨水景观分析与评价[J].上海交通大学学报:农业科学版,2017,35(1):9-14.
[10]作者不详.山西运城盐湖大地的调色盘[J].中国产经,2017(5):82.
[11]尉淑珍,张玲.基于AHP法的工业废弃地综合治理生态景观评价——以运城盐湖工业废弃地治理工程为例[J].中国园艺文摘,2017,33(5):111-113.
[12]张何信,许晶,韦建杏,等.基于层次分析法的猴面包树观赏性状综合评价[J].热带农业科学,2018,38(6):79-84.
[13]曾明亮.福州市综合公园景观评价研究[D].福州:福建农林大学,2014.
[14]关庆伍.长春市公园绿地的植物景观评价[D].哈尔滨:东北林业大学,2006.
[2]王晶.城市湿地公园与水景观设计研究[D].天津:天津大学,2010.
[3]安静,刘念念,杨荣和,等.花溪国家城市湿地公园夏季植物景观美感评价[J].生态经济,2014,30(10):194-199.
[4]苏佩萍,弓弼,吉鑫淼.三门峡天鹅湖城市湿地公园植物景观质量评价[J].西北林学院学报,2015,30(2):262-267.
[5]林葳,喻来,陈舒静,等.基于SBE法的成都市人工湿地公园植物景观评价[J].四川大学学报:自然科学版,2015,52(3):697-702.
[6]许丽,欧静,陈荣建,等.基于SBE法的阿哈湖国家湿地公园植物景观评价[J].山地农业生物学报,2017,36(3):15-22,48.
[7]巫柳兰.桂林会仙湿地公园景观健康综合评价[J].湖南农业科学,2015(2):79-81.
[8]左乐,路毅.西安灞桥生态湿地公园滨水景观评价研究[J].山西建筑,2012,38(27):218-220.
[9]刘艺平,仝向,赵亚楠,等.周口淮阳龙湖湿地滨水景观分析与评价[J].上海交通大学学报:农业科学版,2017,35(1):9-14.
[10]作者不详.山西运城盐湖大地的调色盘[J].中国产经,2017(5):82.
[11]尉淑珍,张玲.基于AHP法的工业废弃地综合治理生态景观评价——以运城盐湖工业废弃地治理工程为例[J].中国园艺文摘,2017,33(5):111-113.
[12]张何信,许晶,韦建杏,等.基于层次分析法的猴面包树观赏性状综合评价[J].热带农业科学,2018,38(6):79-84.
[13]曾明亮.福州市综合公园景观评价研究[D].福州:福建农林大学,2014.
[14]关庆伍.长春市公园绿地的植物景观评价[D].哈尔滨:东北林业大学,2006.