用户名: 密码: 验证码:
中红外光谱对甲醇汽油甲醇含量检测研究
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Methanol Content Determination in Methanol Gasoline with Mid Infrared Spectroscopy Analysis
  • 作者:刘燕 ; 胡军 ; 唐天义 ; 张宇 ; 欧阳玉平 ; 欧阳爱国
  • 英文作者:LIU Yan-de;HU Jun;TANG Tian-yi;ZHANG Yu;OUYANG Yu-ping;OUYANG Ai-guo;School of Mechatronics Engineering,East China Jiaotong University;
  • 关键词:中外光谱 ; 甲醇汽油 ; 无信息变量消除 ; 偏最小二乘支持向量机
  • 英文关键词:Mid-infrared spectroscopy;;Ethanol gasoline;;UVE;;LS-SVM
  • 中文刊名:GUAN
  • 英文刊名:Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis
  • 机构:华东交通大学机电与车辆工程学院;
  • 出版日期:2019-02-15
  • 出版单位:光谱学与光谱分析
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.39
  • 基金:国家“十二五”(863)计划项目(SS2012AA101306);; 江西省优势科技创新团队建设计划项目(20153BCB24002);; 南方山地果园智能化管理技术与装备协同创新中心项目(赣教高字[2014]60号);; 江西省研究生创新资金项目(YC2016-S253)资助
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:GUAN201902024
  • 页数:6
  • CN:02
  • ISSN:11-2200/O4
  • 分类号:133-138
摘要
甲醇汽油是一种清洁能源,甲醇汽油中甲醇的含量决定了汽油的性能。通过中红外光谱对甲醇汽油中甲醇含量进行定量检测和分析。首先,对采集的甲醇汽油原始中红外光谱进行平滑处理(smoothing)、多元散射校正(MSC)、基线校正(baseline)、归一化(normalization)等预处理,再建立PLS模型,对比选择最佳预处理方法,结果表明:在多元散射校正(MSC)处理后建立的PLS模型效果最好,模型的预测集相关系数r为0.918,预测均方根误差RMSEP为2.107。为进一步简化模型,提高预测精度,采用无信息变量消除(uninformative variable elimination,UVE)方法对波长进行筛选,将UVE波段筛选之后的作为模型的输入变量,采用偏最小二乘法(partial least squares,PLS)、主成分回归(principal components regression,PCR)和最小二乘支持向量机(least square support vector machine,LSSVM)三种方法分别建立甲醇汽油中甲醇含量的定量预测模型,并比较不同模型的预测效果和结果。结果表明,使用无信息变量消除可以较好提高数据的运算速度,其中,UVE-PLS模型建模效果最好,r和RMSEP分别为0.923和2.075。该实验表明中红外光谱检测甲醇汽油中甲醇含量是可行的并可以得到较好的效果;UVE是一种对甲醇汽油的中红外光谱非常有效的波段筛选方法,该模型的建立对石油化工领域具有较为重要的意义。
        Methanol gasoline is a new type of environmentally friendly diesel fuel,and the performance and quality of methanolgasoline are based on the diesel methanol content.In this work,mid-infrared spectroscopy was successfully used to evaluate the methanol contents in methanol-gasoline samples with the aid of chemometric approaches.First,the mid-infrared spectral data obtained were pre-processed by smoothing standard normal,multiple scatter correction(MSC),baseline correction and normalization,and the partial least-square(PLS)quantitative calibration models were established,and the best pre-processed method was found.It was found that the PLS model pre-processed by MSC was much better than others,and the rand RMSEP evaluated were 0.918 and 2.107,respectively.In order to simplify the model and improve the prediction accuracy,uninformative variable elimination(UVE)was used to select the optimal wavelengths,and the experimental results showed that the prediction ability was greatly improved.Different quantitative calibration models by UVE selected wavelength,such as partial least-square(PLS),principal component regression(PCR)and least square-support vector machine(LS-SVM)for measuring methanol content were established and their prediction results were compared.It was found that the UVE-PLS model was much better than others,and the rand RMSEP evaluated were 0.923 and 2.075.It suggested that infrared spectroscopy in the detection of methanol content in the methanol gasoline is feasible and can bring good prediction results.UVE is an effective method for methanol gasoline in the infrared spectrum of band selection method,which is significant for the development of oil chemical industry.
引文
[1] LI Yan-ru(李雁如).Shanxi Chemical Industry(山西化工),2014,4:38.
    [2] JIN Pan-pan,ZHANG Teng,WANG Min,et al(金盼盼,张腾,王珉,等).Energy and Energy Conservation(能源与节能),2012,5:3.
    [3] OUYANG Ai-guo,LIU Jun,WANG Ya-ping(欧阳爱国,刘军,王亚平).Laser&Infrared(激光与红外),2012,8:901.
    [4] YAO Jie,DAI Lian-kui,LIN Yi-ling(姚捷,戴连奎,林艺玲).Chinese Journal of Light Scaltering(光散射学报),2013,1:59.
    [5] LI Yan-ru,SUN Rui-qing,WANG Yong-miao(李雁如,孙瑞卿,王永苗).Modern Chemical Industry(现代化工),2013,2:113.
    [6] DING Hong-yuan,HUANG Rong-hua,WANG Zhao-wen,et al(丁红元,黄荣华,王兆文,等).Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology·Natural Science Edition(华中科技大学学报·自然科学版),2012,6:113.
    [7] JIN Pan-pan,ZHANG Teng,YANG Xiao-ping,et al(金盼盼,张腾,杨晓平,等).Auto Sci-Tech(汽车科技),2012,5:66.
    [8] LIU Yan-de,WU Ming-ming,SUN Xu-dong,et al(刘燕德,吴明明,孙旭东,等).Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(农业工程学报),2016,6:289.
    [9] ZU Qin,ZHANG Shui-fa,CAO Yang,et al(祖琴,张水发,曹阳,等).Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析),2015,35(2):479.
    [10] HAN Zhong-zhi,WAN Jian-hua,LIU Kang-wei(韩仲志,万剑华,刘康炜).Chinese Journal of Analysis Laboratory(分析试验室),2015,11:1268.
    [11] OUYANG Ai-guo,TANG Tian-yi,LIU Yan-de,et al(欧阳爱国,唐天义,刘燕德,等).Chinese Journal of Luminescence(发光学报),2016,10:1253.
    [12] ZHANG Rui-hua(张瑞华).Journal of Science and Technology Information(科技信息),2014,(15):298.
    [13] MAO Jia-wei,ZOU Yong,ZENG Ling-xi,et al(毛佳伟,邹勇,曾令羲,等).Shandong Chemical Industry(山东化工),2015,(3):85.
    [14] OUYANG Ai-guo,LIU Jun(欧阳爱国,刘军).Journal of Southwest China Normal University·Natural Science Edition(西南师范大学学报·自然科学版),2012,9:98.
    [15] YAO Jie,DAI Lian-kui,LIN Yi-ling(姚捷,戴连奎,林艺玲).Chinese Journal of Light Scattering(光散射学报),2013,1:59.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700