基于边界固定效应法研究学区房溢价——以广州市为例
|
摘要
我国义务教育阶段,采取"就近入学"制度,导致基础教育资源质量成为影响其周边住宅价格高低的重要因素之一。为探究广州市中心城区学区房溢价,采用边界固定效应法,将毗邻的省重点学区房与非省重点学区房的配对,在特征价格模型基础上,建立差分方程,精确度量优质基础教育资源对房地产的"资本化"溢出效应。结论得出,省级重点小学所属范围内学区房高出非省级重点学区房8.3%的溢价,"省重点小学—普通小学"配对小区对整个省重点学区房溢价贡献较大。
At the stage of compulsory education in China,the system of "admission to the nearest school" has been adopted,which has led to the quality of basic education resources becoming one of the important factors affecting the price of residential houses around it. In order to explore the housing premium of the downtown area of Guangzhou,the boundary fixed effect method is used to match the adjacent provincial key school districts with the non-provincial key school districts. Based on the characteristic price model,a difference equation is established to accurately measure the "capitalization" spillover effect from qualified basic education resources. The conclusion is that the school districts within the scope of the provincial key primary schools have a premium of 8.3% of the non-provincial key school districts,and the "provincial key primary school-general primary school" matching community contributes a lot to the premium of the province's key school districts.
At the stage of compulsory education in China,the system of "admission to the nearest school" has been adopted,which has led to the quality of basic education resources becoming one of the important factors affecting the price of residential houses around it. In order to explore the housing premium of the downtown area of Guangzhou,the boundary fixed effect method is used to match the adjacent provincial key school districts with the non-provincial key school districts. Based on the characteristic price model,a difference equation is established to accurately measure the "capitalization" spillover effect from qualified basic education resources. The conclusion is that the school districts within the scope of the provincial key primary schools have a premium of 8.3% of the non-provincial key school districts,and the "provincial key primary school-general primary school" matching community contributes a lot to the premium of the province's key school districts.
引文
[1] Oates.W.E.The Effects of Property Taxesand Local Public Spending on Property Values:An Empirical Study of Tax Capitalization and the Tiebout Hypothesis[J].Journal of Political Economy,1969,77(6):957-971.
[2] Rosen H.S,Fullerton D.J.A not on local tax Rosen H.S,FullertonD.J.A not on local tax rates,public benefit levels and property values[J].Journal of Political Economy,1977(2):433-440.
[3] Hayes K J,Taylor L L.Neighborhood school characte-ristics:what’s signals quality to homebuyers?[J]Econ-omic Review-Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas,1996:2-9.
[4] Davidoff I,Leigh A.How Much do Public Schools Really Cost? Estimating the Relationship between House Prices and School Quality[J].Economic Record,2008,84(265):193-206.
[5] Bogart W T,Cromwell B A.How much more is a good school district worth?[J].National Tax Journal,1997:215-232.
[6] Black S.E.Do Better schools Matter? Parental Valuation of Elementary Education[J].The Quatterly journal of Economics,1999,114(2):577-599.
[7]黄滨如.教育配套对周边住宅价格的影响——基于人大附小学区划片对周边住宅价格的影响的调查[C].学术要论,2010.
[8]毛丰付,罗刚飞,潘家顺.优质教育资源对杭州学区房价格影响研究[J].城市与环境研究,2014(2):53-64.
[9]孙斌艺.住宅市场的微观结构:关于教育因素对上海住宅价格影响的计量经济分析[J].财贸经济,2008(9):114-118.
[10]石忆邵,王伊婷.上海市学区房价格的影响机制[J].中国土地科学,2014(12):47-55.
[11]周京奎,吴晓燕.公共投资对房地产市场的价格溢出效应研究—基于中国30省市数据的检验[J].世界经济文汇,2009(1):15-32.
[12]冯皓,陆铭.通过买房而择校:教育影响房价的经验证据与政策含义[J].世界经济,2010(12):89-104.
[13]胡婉旸,郑思齐,王锐.学区房的溢价究竟有多大:利用“租买不同权”和配对回归的实证估计[J].经济学:季刊,2014(3).
[14]哈巍,吴红斌,余韧哲.学区房溢价新探——基于北京市城六区重复截面数据的实证分析[J].教育与经济,2015(5):3-10.
[15]洪世键,周玉.基于特征价格法的学区房价格外溢出效应探讨—以厦门岛为例[J].建筑经济,2016(2):65-69.
[16]张骥.学区房溢价的再估计:以北京市为例[J].经济问题探索2017(8):57-63.
[2] Rosen H.S,Fullerton D.J.A not on local tax Rosen H.S,FullertonD.J.A not on local tax rates,public benefit levels and property values[J].Journal of Political Economy,1977(2):433-440.
[3] Hayes K J,Taylor L L.Neighborhood school characte-ristics:what’s signals quality to homebuyers?[J]Econ-omic Review-Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas,1996:2-9.
[4] Davidoff I,Leigh A.How Much do Public Schools Really Cost? Estimating the Relationship between House Prices and School Quality[J].Economic Record,2008,84(265):193-206.
[5] Bogart W T,Cromwell B A.How much more is a good school district worth?[J].National Tax Journal,1997:215-232.
[6] Black S.E.Do Better schools Matter? Parental Valuation of Elementary Education[J].The Quatterly journal of Economics,1999,114(2):577-599.
[7]黄滨如.教育配套对周边住宅价格的影响——基于人大附小学区划片对周边住宅价格的影响的调查[C].学术要论,2010.
[8]毛丰付,罗刚飞,潘家顺.优质教育资源对杭州学区房价格影响研究[J].城市与环境研究,2014(2):53-64.
[9]孙斌艺.住宅市场的微观结构:关于教育因素对上海住宅价格影响的计量经济分析[J].财贸经济,2008(9):114-118.
[10]石忆邵,王伊婷.上海市学区房价格的影响机制[J].中国土地科学,2014(12):47-55.
[11]周京奎,吴晓燕.公共投资对房地产市场的价格溢出效应研究—基于中国30省市数据的检验[J].世界经济文汇,2009(1):15-32.
[12]冯皓,陆铭.通过买房而择校:教育影响房价的经验证据与政策含义[J].世界经济,2010(12):89-104.
[13]胡婉旸,郑思齐,王锐.学区房的溢价究竟有多大:利用“租买不同权”和配对回归的实证估计[J].经济学:季刊,2014(3).
[14]哈巍,吴红斌,余韧哲.学区房溢价新探——基于北京市城六区重复截面数据的实证分析[J].教育与经济,2015(5):3-10.
[15]洪世键,周玉.基于特征价格法的学区房价格外溢出效应探讨—以厦门岛为例[J].建筑经济,2016(2):65-69.
[16]张骥.学区房溢价的再估计:以北京市为例[J].经济问题探索2017(8):57-63.