中晚唐屈原接受研究
|
摘要
经历了开元盛世的唐王朝在安史之乱后步入了中晚唐的新阶段里,藩镇与中央对立,政治上经历了永贞革新和甘露之变,给广大文人的心灵带来了极大冲击。政治上的无情打击与贬谪,使广大文人自觉地与屈原的精神世界产生深深的共鸣。本文以中晚唐诗文为研究对象,辅以其间发生的重要的政治事件,力图从屈原"人格接受""美政接受""文辞接受"三个方面论述中晚唐文人对屈原的接受情况,挖掘失意士人群体的多种心态,从而使中晚唐文人的精神面貌更加立体饱满。
after embracing Kaiyuan Flourishing Age and surviving AN Lu-shan Rebellion, the country entered the Middle and Late Tang Dynasty. At these regressing stages, the military governors stood against the central power; and Yongzhen Reformation and Ganlu Event shook the country politically; all of these had a great impact on the minds of scholars. Discouraged and relegated relentlessly in political life, the scholars consciously and strongly resonated with the spiritual world of QU Yuan.This essay studies on the poems in the Middle and Late Tang Dynasty and analyzed the important political events back then.It endeavors to discuss the acceptance of QU Yuan in the Middle and Late Tang Dynasty from "personality acceptance", "ideal politics acceptance" and "diction acceptance" of QU Yuan. Moreover, this essay probes into the multiple mental states of the frustrated scholars, and thus expounding the mental attitudes of scholars in the Middle and Late Tang Dynasty.
after embracing Kaiyuan Flourishing Age and surviving AN Lu-shan Rebellion, the country entered the Middle and Late Tang Dynasty. At these regressing stages, the military governors stood against the central power; and Yongzhen Reformation and Ganlu Event shook the country politically; all of these had a great impact on the minds of scholars. Discouraged and relegated relentlessly in political life, the scholars consciously and strongly resonated with the spiritual world of QU Yuan.This essay studies on the poems in the Middle and Late Tang Dynasty and analyzed the important political events back then.It endeavors to discuss the acceptance of QU Yuan in the Middle and Late Tang Dynasty from "personality acceptance", "ideal politics acceptance" and "diction acceptance" of QU Yuan. Moreover, this essay probes into the multiple mental states of the frustrated scholars, and thus expounding the mental attitudes of scholars in the Middle and Late Tang Dynasty.
引文
(1)(5)[后晋]刘昫等撰,《旧唐书》,中华书局1975年版,分别引自第268页,第4344页。
(2)吕思勉,《隋唐五代史》,北京理工大学出版社2016年版,第253-254页。
(3)池万兴、刘怀荣,《梦逝难寻唐代文人心态史》,河北教育出版社2001年版,第163页。
(4)(6)(7)(8)(9)(11)(12)(13)(14)(16)(22)(23)(24)[清]彭定求等编,《全唐诗》,中华书局1960年版,分别引自第4679页,第4927页,,第6527页,第3379页,第3376页,第4673页,第8044页,第7720页,第7371-7372页,第5979页,第8342页,第6065页,第4889页,第6128页,第4427页
(10)[唐]王建撰、尹占华校注,《王建诗集校注》,巴蜀书社2006年版,第14-15页。
(15)(18)(19)(20)(21)(25)(26)(28)(29)[清]董浩等编,《全唐文》,中华书局1983年版,分别引自第7677页,第3198页,第4193页,第5816页,第6411页,第7133页,第5613页,第7807页,第8372页。
(17)[宋]司马光编著、[元]胡三省音注,《资治通鉴》,中华书局1956年6月版,第7875-7876页。
(27)郭维孙、许结,《中国辞赋发展史》,江苏教育出版社1996年版,第349页。
(2)吕思勉,《隋唐五代史》,北京理工大学出版社2016年版,第253-254页。
(3)池万兴、刘怀荣,《梦逝难寻唐代文人心态史》,河北教育出版社2001年版,第163页。
(4)(6)(7)(8)(9)(11)(12)(13)(14)(16)(22)(23)(24)[清]彭定求等编,《全唐诗》,中华书局1960年版,分别引自第4679页,第4927页,,第6527页,第3379页,第3376页,第4673页,第8044页,第7720页,第7371-7372页,第5979页,第8342页,第6065页,第4889页,第6128页,第4427页
(10)[唐]王建撰、尹占华校注,《王建诗集校注》,巴蜀书社2006年版,第14-15页。
(15)(18)(19)(20)(21)(25)(26)(28)(29)[清]董浩等编,《全唐文》,中华书局1983年版,分别引自第7677页,第3198页,第4193页,第5816页,第6411页,第7133页,第5613页,第7807页,第8372页。
(17)[宋]司马光编著、[元]胡三省音注,《资治通鉴》,中华书局1956年6月版,第7875-7876页。
(27)郭维孙、许结,《中国辞赋发展史》,江苏教育出版社1996年版,第349页。