不同大豆新品种区域适应性比较试验初报
|
摘要
为了筛选适合湖北省黄冈市种植的大豆[Glycine max (Linn.) Merr]品种,以中豆41为对照,对9个大豆新品种的生育期、形态特征、农艺性状、产量及其构成因素进行了比较。结果表明,濉科23、驻豆20、兴豆5号、苏豆23号为中早熟品种,全生育期在100 d左右,HD21638、HD21144、油春1204、蒙0811、商豆066为中晚熟品种,全生育期在110 d以上,实际栽培中可根据换茬等具体情况进行选种。驻豆20、兴豆5号分别比对照增产19.5%和12.2%,差异达到极显著水平,且完好粒率达到86%以上,可在黄冈地区适当推广种植。
In order to select suitable soybean [Glycine max(Linn.) Merr] varieties for planting in Huanggang city, Hubei province, the Zhongdou 41 was selected as control, and the growing stages, plant type characteristics, agronomic traits, yield and its components of 9 soybean varieties were compared. The results show that Suike 23, Zudou 20, Xingdou No.5, Sudou No.23 are early maturity varieties, growth period was about 100 days; HD21638, HD21144,Youchun 1204, Meng 0811 and Shangdou 066 are late varieties, growth period was above 110 days. So in actual cultivation, seed selection can be carried out according to stubble changing and other specific conditions. The yield of Zudou 20, Xingdou No.5 increased by 19.5%and 12.2% compared with control respectively, reached statistical significant level, and the whole grain rate of these two varieties was above 86%, so they could be popularized in Huanggang trials.
In order to select suitable soybean [Glycine max(Linn.) Merr] varieties for planting in Huanggang city, Hubei province, the Zhongdou 41 was selected as control, and the growing stages, plant type characteristics, agronomic traits, yield and its components of 9 soybean varieties were compared. The results show that Suike 23, Zudou 20, Xingdou No.5, Sudou No.23 are early maturity varieties, growth period was about 100 days; HD21638, HD21144,Youchun 1204, Meng 0811 and Shangdou 066 are late varieties, growth period was above 110 days. So in actual cultivation, seed selection can be carried out according to stubble changing and other specific conditions. The yield of Zudou 20, Xingdou No.5 increased by 19.5%and 12.2% compared with control respectively, reached statistical significant level, and the whole grain rate of these two varieties was above 86%, so they could be popularized in Huanggang trials.
引文
[1]夏友富,田仁礼,朱玉辰.中国大豆产业发展研究[M].北京:中国商业出版社,2003.26.
[2]国家大豆工程技术研究中心,黑龙江省农业科学院.黑龙江省大豆产业化调研报告:续三[J].大豆通报,2004(3):30-33.
[3]孟军,丁琳琳.发展高端大豆产品应对国际大豆危机[J].中国农学通报,2009,25(21):359-362.
[4]芦玉双.黑龙江省大豆产业现状及对策的调研报告[J].大豆通报,2003(1):28-30.
[5]李楠.东北春大豆主要品质性状的改良能力[J].大豆通报,2001(2):12-13.
[6]胡国华,陈庆山,张锡名.黑龙江省大豆品质区划的探讨[J].大豆科学,2006,25(2):118-122.
[7]林长库,姚鑫淼,陈凤山,等.黑龙江省大豆区域试验品种品质现状分析[J].大豆科学,2009,28(6):1031-1032.
[8]包海刚,张如军,南俊明.大豆引种试验初报[J].甘肃农业科技,2009(10):25-27.
[9]辛秀君,于凤瑶,张代军,等.黑龙江省近二十年来育成大豆品种品质性状变化分析[J].大豆科学,2010,29(1):56-60.
[10]贾首锋.大豆新品种引种试验初报[J].农业科技与信息,2011(13):17-19.
[11]徐泽茹,胡铁欢,代雨宾,等.黄淮海夏大豆品种比较研究[J].河北农业科学,2009,13(12):37-39.
[12]王文斌,孙贵荒,刘晓丽.辽宁省大豆新老品种主要农艺性状比较研究[J].辽宁农业科学,2001(1):11-15.
[13]吴存祥,李继存,沙爱华,等.国家大豆品种区域试验对照品种的生育期组归属[J].作物学报,2012,38(11):1977-1987.
[14]康军科,王可珍,景炜明,等.不同大豆品种对光温反应特性的鉴定试验[J].陕西农业科学,2014,60(12):37-38.
[15]徐瑶,张锐,董守坤,等.不同大豆品种鼓粒期茎秆力学特性与抗倒伏性差异研究[J].大豆科学,2017,36(6):905-907.
[2]国家大豆工程技术研究中心,黑龙江省农业科学院.黑龙江省大豆产业化调研报告:续三[J].大豆通报,2004(3):30-33.
[3]孟军,丁琳琳.发展高端大豆产品应对国际大豆危机[J].中国农学通报,2009,25(21):359-362.
[4]芦玉双.黑龙江省大豆产业现状及对策的调研报告[J].大豆通报,2003(1):28-30.
[5]李楠.东北春大豆主要品质性状的改良能力[J].大豆通报,2001(2):12-13.
[6]胡国华,陈庆山,张锡名.黑龙江省大豆品质区划的探讨[J].大豆科学,2006,25(2):118-122.
[7]林长库,姚鑫淼,陈凤山,等.黑龙江省大豆区域试验品种品质现状分析[J].大豆科学,2009,28(6):1031-1032.
[8]包海刚,张如军,南俊明.大豆引种试验初报[J].甘肃农业科技,2009(10):25-27.
[9]辛秀君,于凤瑶,张代军,等.黑龙江省近二十年来育成大豆品种品质性状变化分析[J].大豆科学,2010,29(1):56-60.
[10]贾首锋.大豆新品种引种试验初报[J].农业科技与信息,2011(13):17-19.
[11]徐泽茹,胡铁欢,代雨宾,等.黄淮海夏大豆品种比较研究[J].河北农业科学,2009,13(12):37-39.
[12]王文斌,孙贵荒,刘晓丽.辽宁省大豆新老品种主要农艺性状比较研究[J].辽宁农业科学,2001(1):11-15.
[13]吴存祥,李继存,沙爱华,等.国家大豆品种区域试验对照品种的生育期组归属[J].作物学报,2012,38(11):1977-1987.
[14]康军科,王可珍,景炜明,等.不同大豆品种对光温反应特性的鉴定试验[J].陕西农业科学,2014,60(12):37-38.
[15]徐瑶,张锐,董守坤,等.不同大豆品种鼓粒期茎秆力学特性与抗倒伏性差异研究[J].大豆科学,2017,36(6):905-907.