论我国法官职业伦理之德性建构
|
摘要
"徒法不足以自行"。防治司法腐败,保障司法公正,法官具有关键性作用。法官职业伦理则对塑造法官职业信仰,约束法官职业行为,培养法官职业美德,都是不可或缺的。在当前社会背景下,司法改革正如火如荼进行。在司法技术层面和制度层面,改革取得了很大的进步和发展,改变了原有落后的局面。但在司法改革的软件方面,也即法官的伦理道德方面却捉襟见肘,改革迟缓,效果不佳,以至于影响了法官在人们中的信誉和司法的公信力。法官在道德伦理上的发展水平直接影响着司法改革的水准,甚至是关系到司法改革的成败。所以,在当下,法官职业伦理的发展与完善,法官职业伦理之德性发展与建构,具有重要的理论和现实意义。
"Law does not work itself". Judges play a key role in preventing and curbing judicial corruption and guaranteeing judicial justice. Judges' professional ethics is indispensable for standardizing their professional behavior,shaping their professional beliefs and cultivating their professional virtues. Currently,the judicial reform is in full swing. On the technical and institutional level,the reform has made great progress and has changed the original backward situation. In the software aspect,however,that is,the ethics and morality of judges,the reform is so slow and ineffective that it has affected the credibility of judges and judiciary. Judges' moral and ethical development level has a direct impact on the quality and even on the success or failure of the judicial reform. Therefore,at present,the development and perfection of judges' professional ethics,and the virtue development and construction in judges' professional ethics,have important theoretical and practical significance.
"Law does not work itself". Judges play a key role in preventing and curbing judicial corruption and guaranteeing judicial justice. Judges' professional ethics is indispensable for standardizing their professional behavior,shaping their professional beliefs and cultivating their professional virtues. Currently,the judicial reform is in full swing. On the technical and institutional level,the reform has made great progress and has changed the original backward situation. In the software aspect,however,that is,the ethics and morality of judges,the reform is so slow and ineffective that it has affected the credibility of judges and judiciary. Judges' moral and ethical development level has a direct impact on the quality and even on the success or failure of the judicial reform. Therefore,at present,the development and perfection of judges' professional ethics,and the virtue development and construction in judges' professional ethics,have important theoretical and practical significance.
引文
[1]樊浩.中国伦理道德报告[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2012:7.
[2]亚里士多德.尼各马可伦理学[M].邓安庆,译.北京:商务印书馆,2011:36.
[3]宋希仁.西方伦理思想史[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2010:4.
[4]李建华.官员的道德[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2012:24.
[5]王汎森.执拗的低音:一些历史思考方式的反思[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2104:139.
[6]齐格蒙特·鲍曼.共同体[M].欧阳景根,译.南京:江苏人民出版社,2007:3.
[7]约翰·罗尔斯.正义论[M].何怀宏,何包钢,廖申白,译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1988:56.
[8]卡内冈.法官、立法者与法学教授[M].薛张敏敏,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2006:139.
[9]徐贲.人以什么理由来记忆[M].北京:中央编译出版社,2016:3.
[10]休谟.道德原则研究[M].曾晓平,译.北京:商务印书馆,2001:156.
[11]威尔金.法律职业精神[M].王俊峰,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2016:57.
[12]王利明.司法改革研究[M].北京:法律出版社,2001:584.
[13]斯密什.政治哲学[M].贺晴川,译.北京:后浪出版公司,2015:55.
[14]康德.道德形而上学基础[M].孙少伟,鹿林,译.北京:九州出版社,2007:10.
[15]邓正来,郝雨凡.转型中国的社会正义问题[M].桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2013:87.
[16]邹川宁.司法理念是具体的[M].北京:人民法院出版社,2012:11.
[17]波斯纳.法官如何思考[M].苏力,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2009:59.
[2]亚里士多德.尼各马可伦理学[M].邓安庆,译.北京:商务印书馆,2011:36.
[3]宋希仁.西方伦理思想史[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2010:4.
[4]李建华.官员的道德[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2012:24.
[5]王汎森.执拗的低音:一些历史思考方式的反思[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2104:139.
[6]齐格蒙特·鲍曼.共同体[M].欧阳景根,译.南京:江苏人民出版社,2007:3.
[7]约翰·罗尔斯.正义论[M].何怀宏,何包钢,廖申白,译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1988:56.
[8]卡内冈.法官、立法者与法学教授[M].薛张敏敏,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2006:139.
[9]徐贲.人以什么理由来记忆[M].北京:中央编译出版社,2016:3.
[10]休谟.道德原则研究[M].曾晓平,译.北京:商务印书馆,2001:156.
[11]威尔金.法律职业精神[M].王俊峰,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2016:57.
[12]王利明.司法改革研究[M].北京:法律出版社,2001:584.
[13]斯密什.政治哲学[M].贺晴川,译.北京:后浪出版公司,2015:55.
[14]康德.道德形而上学基础[M].孙少伟,鹿林,译.北京:九州出版社,2007:10.
[15]邓正来,郝雨凡.转型中国的社会正义问题[M].桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2013:87.
[16]邹川宁.司法理念是具体的[M].北京:人民法院出版社,2012:11.
[17]波斯纳.法官如何思考[M].苏力,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2009:59.