超声BI-RADS评分系统联合超声造影用于乳腺肿块良恶性鉴别的诊断价值

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：The Diagnostic Value of Ultrasonographic Bi-rads Scoring System and Contrast Imaging in the Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Breast Masses 作者：董彦 ; 董凤林 ; 刘哲婴 英文作者：Dong Yan;Dong Fenglin;Liu Zheying;Department of Ultrasound,the First Hospital Affiliated to Suzhou University; 关键词：BI-RADS评分 ; 超声造影 ; 乳腺肿块 英文关键词：BI-RADS score;;Contrast-enhanced ultrasound;;Breast mass 中文刊名：ZGCY 英文刊名：Chinese Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine 机构：苏州大学附属第一医院超声科; 出版日期：2019-04-16 出版单位：中国超声医学杂志 年：2019 期：v.35;No.342 语种：中文; 页：ZGCY201904010 页数：4 CN：04 ISSN：11-2110/R 分类号：31-34

摘要

目的分析超声影像学报告及数据系统(BI-RADS)评分系统联合超声造影用于乳腺肿块良恶性鉴别的诊断价值。方法选取60例乳腺肿块患者,对其中的60个肿块均实施常规超声检查,根据BI-RADS评分系统对其实施分级诊断,并展开超声造影检查,比较BI-RADS评分、超声造影单独应用及联合应用时的诊断结果。结果 60个肿块经病理检查,诊断为恶性28个,良性32个。BI-RADS评分单独应用时的敏感度、特异度、准确度为67.86%、75.00%、71.67%,超声造影单独应用时的敏感度、特异度、准确度为71.43%、71.88%、71.67%,BI-RADS评分联合超声造影诊断的敏感度、特异度、准确度为92.86%、93.75%、93.33%。经比较,BI-RADS评分联合超声造影诊断的敏感度、特异度、准确度明显高于两种方法单用时的对应结果 (P<0.05)。结论 BI-RADS评分联合超声造影用于乳腺肿块良恶性鉴别的诊断结果准确度高,可为治疗方案制定、预后评估提供重要参考信息。
        Objective To analyze the diagnostic value of ultrasound imaging report and data system(BI-RADS)scoring system in differentiating benign and malignant breast masses.Methods 60 cases of breast masses were examined by conventional ultrasound.The patients were classified and diagnosed according to BI-RADS scoring system.Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography was carried out to compare the BI-RADS scores.The diagnostic results of angiography alone and in combination.Results After pathological examination,28 of the 60 masses were malignant and 32 were benign.The sensitivity,specificity and accuracy of bi-rads score when applied alone were 67.86%,75.00% and 71.67%;the sensitivity,specificity and accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound score when applied alone were71.43%,71.88% and 71.67%;and the sensitivity,specificity and accuracy of bi-rads score combined with contrastenhanced ultrasound diagnosis were 92.86%,93.75% and 93.33%.After comparison,the sensitivity,specificity and accuracy of bi-rads score combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasound diagnosis were significantly higher than the corresponding results when the two methods were used alone(P<0.05).Conclusions Bi-rads score combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography is highly accurate in the diagnosis of benign and malignant breast masses,which can provide important reference information for the formulation of treatment plans and prognosis evaluation.

引文

[1]詹嘉,刘迎春,陈悦,等.声触诊组织成像和定量技术鉴别诊断乳腺肿块良恶性的初步探讨[J].中国临床医学影像杂志,2017,28(6):405-407.
    [2]刘军,司芩,钱晓莉,等.乳腺良恶性肿块的超声造影与弹性成像对比分析[J].临床肿瘤学杂志,2016,21(3):262-266.
    [3]叶华容,曾婧,叶方立.声影像特征鉴别乳腺肿块良恶性的判别分析[J].中国卫生统计,2014,31(1):13-15.
    [4]崔凤荣,芦桂林,吴芳.常规超声及声脉冲辐射力弹性成像鉴别诊断乳腺肿块良恶性的价值[J].临床超声医学杂志,2016,18(9):621-623.
    [5]王慧,江华,周晓蓉,等.超声弹性成像应变率比值法对乳腺肿块良恶性鉴别诊断价值[J].医学影像学杂志,2017,27(2):266-269.
    [6]范向阳,李紫瑶,申凯凯,等.剪切波弹性成像联合超微血管显像在乳腺肿块良恶性鉴别诊断中的应用[J].中华超声影像学杂志,2016,25(9):795-799.
    [7]于蕾,李建国,杨力.超声弹性成像比值法与面积比法在鉴别乳腺良恶性肿块中的应用价值[J].中国全科医学,2014,17(24):2904-2906.
    [8]吴猛,周如海.超声BI-RADS分级标准指导判断乳腺肿块良恶性的价值[J].中国临床医学影像杂志,2014,25(6):390-392.