用户名: 密码: 验证码:
四川龙门山南段青衣江河流阶地形成时代及其构造地貌意义
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Formation age and its tectonic geomorphological significance of Qingyijiang River terraces in the southern of Longmenshan,Sichuan
  • 作者:王继龙 ; 吴中海 ; 张克旗 ; 孙玉军 ; 周游
  • 英文作者:WANG Jilong;WU Zhonghai;ZHANG Keqi;SUN Yujun;ZHOU You;Key Laboratory of Neotectonic Movement and Geohazards, Ministry of Land and Mineral Resources/Institute of Geomechanics, ChineseAcademy of Geological Sciences;School of Earth Science and Resources, China University of Geosciences;
  • 关键词:龙门山 ; 青衣江 ; 光释光测年 ; 河流阶地 ; 芦山地震发震构造
  • 英文关键词:Longmen Mountain;;Qingyijiang River;;optically stimulated luminescence dating;;river terrace;;seismogenic structure of Lushan earthquake
  • 中文刊名:ZQYD
  • 英文刊名:Geological Bulletin of China
  • 机构:国土资源部新构造运动与地质灾害重点实验室/中国地质科学院地质力学研究所;中国地质大学(北京)地球科学与资源学院;
  • 出版日期:2018-06-15
  • 出版单位:地质通报
  • 年:2018
  • 期:v.37;No.277
  • 基金:中国地质调查局项目《南北构造带活动构造体系综合调查与研究》(编号:12120114002101)、《长江经济带活动构造与区域地壳稳定性调查》(编号:DD20160268);; 国家自然科学基金项目《藏北高原近南北向地堑群晚新生代正断层活动的时空特性与规律研究》(批准号:41571013)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:ZQYD201806004
  • 页数:10
  • CN:06
  • ISSN:11-4648/P
  • 分类号:34-43
摘要
地表调查发现,横穿龙门山南段的青衣江具有上游以发育深切峡谷为主,而中下游段阶地发育较完整的特点。采用光释光测年方法对现今青衣江低阶地进行年代学测试分析,获得了低阶地的形成年代,并结合对前人资料的对比和对青衣江河流阶地已有年代学数据的分析,基本确定青衣江中下游地区的T1~T7阶地主要形成于距今7.7~9.0ka,40~50ka,75~85ka,129ka,149ka,270~300ka,740ka。结合地表调查结果进一步推断,现今青衣江主河道在中更新世及之前已经存在。因此,现今的青衣江究竟是因断块整体倾斜式改道还是后期河流袭夺而形成需进一步研究。另外,据青衣江低阶地地貌面的年龄数据估算,龙门山南段青衣江流域不同段落的晚第四纪河流下切速率不同,中更新世以来,芦山至大岗顶段的河流下切速率明显较大,很可能是芦山地震发震构造(盲逆断层)在晚第四纪期间存在持续活动的地貌响应。
        The earth's surface survey found that, across the south part of the Longmen Mountain, Qingyijiang River has incised canyon along the upstream section, and terrace development is more complete along the downstream section. The chronological test of low terrace in Qingyijiang River was carried out by the method of OSL dating, and the formation age of low terrace was obtained. In combination with the systematic arrangement, comparison and analysis of the previous data and an analysis of the existing chronological data of the Qingyijiang River terrace, the authors found that the T1-T7 terrace in the middle and lower reaches of the Qingyi River was mainly formed at about 7.3 ~ 8.0 ka, 40~50 ka, 75~85 ka, 129 ka, 149 ka, 270~300 ka, 740 ka. According to further inference from the results of the surface investigation, it is found that the present Qingyijiang River main channel already existed in the Middle Pleistocene and earlier. Therefore, the formation of the present Qingyijiang River resulted from the broken block tilting diversion or late river capture, which needs further research. In addition, the estimation of the age results of the geomorphic surface of the lower terrace of the Qingyijiang River shows that the crustal uplift rates of the Late Quaternary in different sections of the Qingyijiang Riv-er Valley in the south of Longmen Mountain are different. Since the Middle Pleistocene, the river incision rate of Lushan to Dagangding section has been significantly larger, which can probably be attributed to the geomorphic response of the Lushan seismogenic tectonics in the late Quaternary period.
引文
[1]苏鹏,田勤俭,梁朋,等.基于青衣江变形河流阶地研究龙门山断裂带南段的构造活动性[J].地震地质,2016,38(3):523-545.
    [2]唐熊,陶晓风.雅安地区青衣江流域第四纪阶地特征分析[J].沉积学报,2009,27(1):137-141.
    [3]张世民,丁锐,毛昌伟,等.青藏高原东缘龙门山山系构造隆起的地貌表现[J].第四纪研究,2010,30(4):791-802.
    [4]贾营营,付碧宏,王岩,等.青藏高原东缘龙门山断裂带晚新生代构造地貌生长及水系响应[J].第四纪研究,2010,30(4):825-836.
    [5]Liu S,Zhang S,Ding R,et al.Upper crustal folding of the 2013Lushan earthquake area in southern Longmen Shan,China,insights from Late Quaternary fluvial terraces[J].Tectonophysics,2015,639(3):99-108.
    [6]Jiang D,Zhang S,Li W.Research on the Quaternary fluvial geomorphological surface sequence of the foreland region in southern Longmen Shan,eastern Tibet[J].Geomorphology,2016,269:133-148.
    [7]王继龙,吴中海,孙玉军,等.青衣江河流沉积与阶地特征及其成因演化[J].地质力学学报,2016,22(3):642-658.
    [8]袁俊杰,陶晓风.四川名山—丹棱地区青衣江流域的砾石层特征及水系演化[J].四川地质学报,2008,28(1):6-12.
    [9]王刚,陶晓风,伊海生,等.四川盆地西南缘雅安—名山地区青衣江古河道的变迁及蒙顶山背斜的隆起[J].第四纪研究,2010,30(4):779-790.
    [10]王二七,孟庆任.对龙门山中生代和新生代构造演化的讨论[J].中国科学:地球科学,2008,(10):1221-1233.
    [11]田婷婷,吴中海,张克旗,等.第四纪主要定年方法及其在新构造与活动构造研究中的应用综述[J].地质力学学报,2013,19(3):242-266.
    [12]张克旗,吴中海,吕同艳,等.光释光测年法——综述及进展[J].地质通报,2015,(1):183-203.
    [13]Godfrey Smith D I,Huntley D J,Chen W H.Optical dating studies of quartz and feldspar sediment extracts[J].Quaternary Science Reviews,1988,7(3):373-380.
    [14]Berger G W.Effectiveness of natural zeroing of the thermoluminescence in sediments[J].Journal of Geophysical Research,1990,95(B8):12375-12397.
    [15]周从政.青衣江流域的水资源[J].四川水利,2009,30(1):37-39.
    [16]李勇,周荣军,Densmore A L,等.青藏高原东缘龙门山晚新生代走滑-逆冲作用的地貌标志[J].第四纪研究,2006,26(1):40-51.
    [17]张显林.青衣江中上游流域水文特征[J].四川水力发电,1991,(1):39-42.
    [18]李勇,曾允孚.龙门山逆冲推覆作用的地层标识[J].成都理工大学学报(自科版),1995,(2):1-10.
    [19]Burchfiel B C,Chen L,Liu Y P,et al.Tectonics of the Longmen Shan and Adjacent Regions,Central China[J].International Geology Review,1995,37(8):661-735.
    [20]邓起东,陈社发,赵小麟.龙门山及其邻区的构造和地震活动及动力学[J].地震地质,1994,16(4):389-403.
    [21]李智武,刘树根,陈洪德,等.龙门山冲断带分段-分带性构造格局及其差异变形特征[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2008,35(4):440-454.
    [22]李勇,周荣军,赵国华,等.龙门山前缘的芦山地震与逆冲-滑脱褶皱作用[J].成都理工大学学报(自科版),2013,40(4):353-363.
    [23]马晓雪,吴中海,李家存,等.龙门山构造带南段向西南延伸的遥感影像证据及地震地质意义[J].地质力学学报,2016,(3):548-567.
    [24]刘韶,张世民,丁锐,等.青衣江中游晚第四纪河流阶地构造变形特征与芦山地震成因分析[J].地壳构造与地壳应力文集,2014:35-49.
    [25]梁明剑,郭红梅,李大虎,等.2013年四川芦山7.0级地震发震构造机理及青衣江上游流域地貌的响应[J].地学前缘,2013,20(6):21-28.
    [26]Godard V,LavéJ,Carcaillet J,et al.Spatial distribution of denudation in Eastern Tibet and regressive erosion of plateau margins[J].Tectonophysics,2010,491(1):253-274.
    [27]崔志强,刘登忠,孟庆敏.川西凹陷地区更新统砾石层沉积成因探讨[J].中国地质,2009,36(5):1065-1078.
    [28]王旭龙,卢演俦,李晓妮.细颗粒石英光释光测年:简单多片再生法[J].地震地质,2005,27(4):615-623.
    [29]Wang X,Lu Y,Zhao H.On the performances of the single-aliquot regenerative-dose(SAR)protocol for Chinese loess:fine quartz and polymineralgrains[J].Radiation Measurements,2006,41(1):1-8.
    [30]Durcan J A,King G E,Duller G A T.DRAC:Dose Rate and Age Calculator for trapped charge dating[J].Quaternary Geochronology,2015,28:54-61.
    [31]姜大伟.龙门山南段及其前陆区晚第四纪构造变形的河流地貌研究[D].中国地震局地质研究所博士学位论文.2017.
    [32]徐锡伟,闻学泽,韩竹军,等.四川芦山7.0级强震:一次典型的盲逆断层型地震[J].科学通报,2013,58(20):1887-1893.
    (1)成都地质学院.1∶5万区域地质调查队1989—1991年实测天全幅地质图.1989-1991.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700