创新城区不动产空间结构特征及优化路径
|
摘要
作为当前城市建设中一种新型的经济空间载体,创新城区需要特定的地方特征来培养、吸引和留住人才与资本等创新要素,以适应持续经济活动的需求。研究从创新城区的不动产空间结构视角切入,对不动产空间结构中要素的"集聚"特征、物理关系的"临近"特征及逻辑关系的"网络"特征进行了归纳,指明创新城区发展一般遵循形成发育的阶段性规律、空间晶体结构组合规律和可持续发展的梯度爬升规律,创新城区的不动产空间结构可以从环境、要素、关系三个维度进行优化。研究表明,强化不动产的具体特征、发展规律和规划愿景,会加快创新要素的沟通和互动,不动产空间结构的优化能疾速提高区域对于人才、技术、资本等创新要素的整合能力,构建良性创新生态系统、合理规划不动产的物理布局,强化不动产间的网络关系是不动产空间结构优化的有效路径。
As a new type of economic space carrier in current urban construction, innovative urban areas need specific local characteristics to cultivate, attract and retain talents, capital and other innovative elements, so as to adapt to the demand of sustained economic activities. From the angle of real estate spatial structure in innovative urban areas, the research has concluded the 'concentration' characteristic among the real estate space structure elements, the 'adjacency' feature in physical relationship and the 'network' feature in the logical relationship, and pointed out three laws followed by the development of innovative urban areas: the periodic law of formation, the combination rule of space crystal texture and the rule of gradient climb of sustainable development, so that the real estate space structure in innovative urban areas can be optimized from three dimensions such as environment, factors and relationships. Study has showed that strengthening the specific characteristics of real estate, law of development and planning vision, can accelerate the communication and interaction of innovation elements; optimization of the real estate space structure can rapidly improve the area for the integration of innovative elements such as talent, technology, capital ability. Therefore, to build a benign innovation ecosystem, plan a reasonable real estate physical layout and strengthen the network relationship between real estate are effective paths to optimize the real estate space structure.
As a new type of economic space carrier in current urban construction, innovative urban areas need specific local characteristics to cultivate, attract and retain talents, capital and other innovative elements, so as to adapt to the demand of sustained economic activities. From the angle of real estate spatial structure in innovative urban areas, the research has concluded the 'concentration' characteristic among the real estate space structure elements, the 'adjacency' feature in physical relationship and the 'network' feature in the logical relationship, and pointed out three laws followed by the development of innovative urban areas: the periodic law of formation, the combination rule of space crystal texture and the rule of gradient climb of sustainable development, so that the real estate space structure in innovative urban areas can be optimized from three dimensions such as environment, factors and relationships. Study has showed that strengthening the specific characteristics of real estate, law of development and planning vision, can accelerate the communication and interaction of innovation elements; optimization of the real estate space structure can rapidly improve the area for the integration of innovative elements such as talent, technology, capital ability. Therefore, to build a benign innovation ecosystem, plan a reasonable real estate physical layout and strengthen the network relationship between real estate are effective paths to optimize the real estate space structure.
引文
[1]Petra Wagner,Doris Wilhelme.An Integrated Transformative Process Model for Social Innovation in Cities[J].Procedia Engineering,2017(198):935-947.
[2]李健.创新驱动城市更新改造:巴塞罗那普布诺的经验与启示[J].城市发展研究,2016(8):45-51.
[3]The Rise of Innovation Districts:A New Geography of Innovation in America[R].Brookings Institution,2014.
[4]Thomas Hutton.The New Economy of the Inner City[J].Cities,2004,21(2):89-108.
[5]George Bugliarello.Urban Knowledge Parks Knowledge Cities and Urban Sustainability[J].International Journal Technology Management,2004,28(3):388-394.
[6]Michael Jaroff,Dennis Frenchman,Francisco a Rojas.New Century City Developments Creating Extraordinary Value[M].Cambridge:Massachusetts Institute of Technology,2009:92-96.
[7]Niusha Esmaeil poorarabi,et al.Evaluating place quality in innovation districts:A Delphic hierarchy process approach[J].Research article.Land Use Policy,2018(76):471-486.
[8]Richard Florida.Startup City:The Urban Shift in Venture Capital and High Technology[M].Toronto:Martin Prosperity Institute,2014:127-132.
[9]李健.创新驱动空间重塑:创新城区的组织联系,运行规律与功能体系[J].南京社会科学,2016(7):76-82.
[10]Niusha Esmaeilpoorarabi,et,al.Evaluating place quality in innovation districts:A Delphic hierarchy process approach[J].Land Use Policy,2018,76(7):471-486.
[11]Niusha Esmaeilpoorarabi,et,al.Does place quality matter for innovation districts?Determining the essential place characteristics from Brisbane’s knowledge precincts[J].Land Use Policy,2018(79):734-747.
[12]程小燕,张所地.城市创新性特质对房价分化影响的实证研究[J].数量统计与管理,2018(9):105-114.
[13]DUAN Dezhong,DU Debin,LIU Chengliang,Seamus GRIMES.Spatio-temporal evolution of urban innovation structure based on zip code geodatabase:An empirical study from Shanghai and Beijing[J].Journal of Geographical Sciences,2016,26(12):1707-1724.
[14]Christian Binz,Bernhard Truffer.Global Innovation Systems-A conceptual framework forinnovation dynamics in transnational contexts[J].Research Policy,2017,46(9):1284-1298.
[15]Bob Walrave,Madis Talmar,Ksenia S Podoynitsyna,A Georges L Romme,Geert PJ Verbong.A multi-level perspective on innovation ecosystems for path-breaking innovation[J].Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2017,28(4):103-113.
[16]Mandrita Banerjee,Junghee Lee,Kim-Kwang Raymond Choo.A blockchain future to Internet of Things security:A position paper[J].Digital Communications and Networks,2018,4(3):149-160.
[17]Duncan R.Shaw,Tim Allen.Studying innovation ecosystems using ecology theory[J].Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2018,136:88-102.
[18]郑德高,袁海琴.校区、园区、社区:三区融合的城市创新空间研究[J].国际城市规划,2017(4):67-75.
[19]Jan Kratzer,Dirk Meissner,Vitaly Roud.Open innovation and company culture:Internal openness makes the difference[J].Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2017,119(6):128-138.
[20]Peter Hall.Cities in Civilization:Culture,Innovation,and Urban Order[M].London:Phoenix Giant,1999:84-86.
[21]苗东升.系统科学论[J].系统辩证学学报,1998(4):7-10+15.
[2]李健.创新驱动城市更新改造:巴塞罗那普布诺的经验与启示[J].城市发展研究,2016(8):45-51.
[3]The Rise of Innovation Districts:A New Geography of Innovation in America[R].Brookings Institution,2014.
[4]Thomas Hutton.The New Economy of the Inner City[J].Cities,2004,21(2):89-108.
[5]George Bugliarello.Urban Knowledge Parks Knowledge Cities and Urban Sustainability[J].International Journal Technology Management,2004,28(3):388-394.
[6]Michael Jaroff,Dennis Frenchman,Francisco a Rojas.New Century City Developments Creating Extraordinary Value[M].Cambridge:Massachusetts Institute of Technology,2009:92-96.
[7]Niusha Esmaeil poorarabi,et al.Evaluating place quality in innovation districts:A Delphic hierarchy process approach[J].Research article.Land Use Policy,2018(76):471-486.
[8]Richard Florida.Startup City:The Urban Shift in Venture Capital and High Technology[M].Toronto:Martin Prosperity Institute,2014:127-132.
[9]李健.创新驱动空间重塑:创新城区的组织联系,运行规律与功能体系[J].南京社会科学,2016(7):76-82.
[10]Niusha Esmaeilpoorarabi,et,al.Evaluating place quality in innovation districts:A Delphic hierarchy process approach[J].Land Use Policy,2018,76(7):471-486.
[11]Niusha Esmaeilpoorarabi,et,al.Does place quality matter for innovation districts?Determining the essential place characteristics from Brisbane’s knowledge precincts[J].Land Use Policy,2018(79):734-747.
[12]程小燕,张所地.城市创新性特质对房价分化影响的实证研究[J].数量统计与管理,2018(9):105-114.
[13]DUAN Dezhong,DU Debin,LIU Chengliang,Seamus GRIMES.Spatio-temporal evolution of urban innovation structure based on zip code geodatabase:An empirical study from Shanghai and Beijing[J].Journal of Geographical Sciences,2016,26(12):1707-1724.
[14]Christian Binz,Bernhard Truffer.Global Innovation Systems-A conceptual framework forinnovation dynamics in transnational contexts[J].Research Policy,2017,46(9):1284-1298.
[15]Bob Walrave,Madis Talmar,Ksenia S Podoynitsyna,A Georges L Romme,Geert PJ Verbong.A multi-level perspective on innovation ecosystems for path-breaking innovation[J].Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2017,28(4):103-113.
[16]Mandrita Banerjee,Junghee Lee,Kim-Kwang Raymond Choo.A blockchain future to Internet of Things security:A position paper[J].Digital Communications and Networks,2018,4(3):149-160.
[17]Duncan R.Shaw,Tim Allen.Studying innovation ecosystems using ecology theory[J].Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2018,136:88-102.
[18]郑德高,袁海琴.校区、园区、社区:三区融合的城市创新空间研究[J].国际城市规划,2017(4):67-75.
[19]Jan Kratzer,Dirk Meissner,Vitaly Roud.Open innovation and company culture:Internal openness makes the difference[J].Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2017,119(6):128-138.
[20]Peter Hall.Cities in Civilization:Culture,Innovation,and Urban Order[M].London:Phoenix Giant,1999:84-86.
[21]苗东升.系统科学论[J].系统辩证学学报,1998(4):7-10+15.