基于ESI数据库6所中医药学术机构科研现状分析
|
摘要
目的了解进入基本科学指标数据库(ESI)全球前1%的中医药学术机构科研情况,对近10年科研发展的变化趋势进行比较,为中医药研究提供参考。方法检索ESI数据库,对进入ESI全球前1%的中医药学术机构的科研产出、被引次数、高被引论文、入榜学科等指标进行分析,通过Excel2016对数据进行处理。结果 6所中医药学术机构总被引次数排名前三的为南京中医药大学(以下简称"南中医")、上海中医药大学(以下简称"上中医")和中国中医科学院;高被引论文中,南中医以23篇排名首位,其余机构均在10篇左右;论文数量南中医、上中医和北京中医药大学(以下简称"北中医")分别以3 914、3 621、3 147篇排名前三;本次研究检索到北中医和南中医各有热点论文1篇,其他机构尚未有热点论文入榜;6所中医药学术机构进入ESI全球前1%的学科有临床医学、药理学与毒理学,其中临床医学为南中医、上中医和中医科学院位于前三,药理学与毒理学上中医排名首位,南中医和中医科学院位于其后;根据短期数据对比(2018年5月10日与2017年9月14日对比),6所中医药学术机构全球排名呈稳步上升趋势。结论中医药学术机构应提升研究质量,长期监测学科变化趋势与水平,建设发展一流学科,促进中医药科学研究发展。
Objective To understand the research status of the top 1% TCM academic institutes in the world based on ESI database; To compare the trends of scientific research development in the past decade; To provide references for TCM research. Methods ESI database was used to analyze the top 1% TCM academic institutes in the world from the aspects of the number of papers, cited frequencies, high cited papers, disciplines and other aspects. Excel 2016 was used to conduct data processing. Results The top three of cited frequencies in the six TCM academic institutes were Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Shanghai University of Chinese Medicine and China Academy of Chinese Medical Science. Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine had 23 high cited papers which was the first, and other academic institutes had about 10 papers. The numbers of papers of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Shanghai University of Chinese Medicine and Beijing University of Chinese Medicine were 3 914, 3 621, and 3 147, ranking the top three. Only Beijing University of Chinese Medicine and Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine had one hot paper. Clinical medicine, pharmacology and toxicology of the six TCM academic institutes got into the top 1% of ESI database, among which Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Shanghai University of Chinese Medicine and China Academy of Chinese Medical Science were the top three for clinical medicine. In pharmacology and toxicology, the first was Shanghai University of Chinese Medicine, and Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine and China Academy of Chinese Medical Science were the second and third. The global ranking of the six TCM institutes was steadily rising based on short-term data(14 th September 2017 and 10 th May 2018). Conclusion Improving the quality of research, monitoring the trends and levels of disciplines, and constructing and developing first-rate disciplines can promote the development of scientific research on TCM.
Objective To understand the research status of the top 1% TCM academic institutes in the world based on ESI database; To compare the trends of scientific research development in the past decade; To provide references for TCM research. Methods ESI database was used to analyze the top 1% TCM academic institutes in the world from the aspects of the number of papers, cited frequencies, high cited papers, disciplines and other aspects. Excel 2016 was used to conduct data processing. Results The top three of cited frequencies in the six TCM academic institutes were Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Shanghai University of Chinese Medicine and China Academy of Chinese Medical Science. Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine had 23 high cited papers which was the first, and other academic institutes had about 10 papers. The numbers of papers of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Shanghai University of Chinese Medicine and Beijing University of Chinese Medicine were 3 914, 3 621, and 3 147, ranking the top three. Only Beijing University of Chinese Medicine and Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine had one hot paper. Clinical medicine, pharmacology and toxicology of the six TCM academic institutes got into the top 1% of ESI database, among which Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Shanghai University of Chinese Medicine and China Academy of Chinese Medical Science were the top three for clinical medicine. In pharmacology and toxicology, the first was Shanghai University of Chinese Medicine, and Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine and China Academy of Chinese Medical Science were the second and third. The global ranking of the six TCM institutes was steadily rising based on short-term data(14 th September 2017 and 10 th May 2018). Conclusion Improving the quality of research, monitoring the trends and levels of disciplines, and constructing and developing first-rate disciplines can promote the development of scientific research on TCM.
引文
[1]科睿唯安.InCites数据库常用指标手册[EB/OL].[2018-06-20].https://clarivate.com.cn/media/download.InCitesIndex.qrc.pdf.
[2]张诗博.2004-2008年国内图书馆学研究高被引论文的统计与分析[J].情报科学,2011,29(3):387-390.
[3]黄晓斌,张欢庆.我国情报学高被引论文分析[J].情报科学,2018,36(1):54-60.
[4]邱均平,孙凯.基于ESI数据库的中国高校科研竞争力的计量分析[J].图书情报工作,2007,51(5):45-48.
[5]景晶.地区差异视角下的我国高校学科发展现状分析--基于ESI数据库[J].现代情报,2017,37(11):93-97.
[6]GAO W,WANG Y Q,WANG W F,et al.The first multiplication atom-bond connectivity index of molecular structures in drugs[J].Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal,2017,25(4):548-555.
[7]BRUIX J,QIN S K,MERLE P,et al.Regorafenib for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who progressed on sorafenib treatment(RESORCE):a randomised,double-blind,placebocontrolled,phase 3 trial[J].The Lancet,2017,389(10064):56-66.
[8]贺艳慧,黄玲玲,蒋茵婕.基于InCites和ESI的我国16所中医药高校科研产出统计与分析[J].中国中医药图书情报杂志,2018,42(2):9-15.
[9]何俗非,王硕,刘二伟.基于ESI数据库的中医药院校高水平论文分析[J].中华医学图书情报杂志,2017,26(4):51-55,67.
[2]张诗博.2004-2008年国内图书馆学研究高被引论文的统计与分析[J].情报科学,2011,29(3):387-390.
[3]黄晓斌,张欢庆.我国情报学高被引论文分析[J].情报科学,2018,36(1):54-60.
[4]邱均平,孙凯.基于ESI数据库的中国高校科研竞争力的计量分析[J].图书情报工作,2007,51(5):45-48.
[5]景晶.地区差异视角下的我国高校学科发展现状分析--基于ESI数据库[J].现代情报,2017,37(11):93-97.
[6]GAO W,WANG Y Q,WANG W F,et al.The first multiplication atom-bond connectivity index of molecular structures in drugs[J].Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal,2017,25(4):548-555.
[7]BRUIX J,QIN S K,MERLE P,et al.Regorafenib for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who progressed on sorafenib treatment(RESORCE):a randomised,double-blind,placebocontrolled,phase 3 trial[J].The Lancet,2017,389(10064):56-66.
[8]贺艳慧,黄玲玲,蒋茵婕.基于InCites和ESI的我国16所中医药高校科研产出统计与分析[J].中国中医药图书情报杂志,2018,42(2):9-15.
[9]何俗非,王硕,刘二伟.基于ESI数据库的中医药院校高水平论文分析[J].中华医学图书情报杂志,2017,26(4):51-55,67.