基于Scopus数据库的Altmetrics指标与引文计量对比分析
|
摘要
本文选取ESI图情领域高被引论文作为数据源,通过运用SPSS软件,对比分析Altmetric.com数值、ESI引用量及Scopus数据库提供的Altmetrics指标,以期得到指标之间的相关性和差异性。分析结果表明,Altmetrics和引用量并无显著相关性,各自研究角度也不同,因此,将两者相结合作为学术评价的方法具有合理性。
This paper uses SPSS software to acquire data from the Essential Science Indicators(ESI) of highly cited Library and Information Science(LIS) papers, in order to obtain the correlation and difference between the data collected from the indexes of Altmetric.com, citation from the ESI database, and the Altmetrics index from the Scopus database. The results of the analysis show that there is no significant correlation between Altmetrics and citation for which angles differ.Therefore, it is reasonable to combine Altmetrics and citation as an academic evaluation method.
This paper uses SPSS software to acquire data from the Essential Science Indicators(ESI) of highly cited Library and Information Science(LIS) papers, in order to obtain the correlation and difference between the data collected from the indexes of Altmetric.com, citation from the ESI database, and the Altmetrics index from the Scopus database. The results of the analysis show that there is no significant correlation between Altmetrics and citation for which angles differ.Therefore, it is reasonable to combine Altmetrics and citation as an academic evaluation method.
引文
[1]Ortega J L.Relationship between Altmetric and bibliometric indicators across academic social sites:The case of CSIC’s members[J].Journal of Informetrics,2015,9(1):39-49.
[2]Sotudeh H,Mazarei Z,Mirzabeigi M.CiteULike bookmarks are correlated to citation at journal and author levels in library and information science[J].Scientometrics,2015,105(3):2237-2248.
[3]Costas R,Zahedi Z,Wouters P.The thematic orientation of publications mentioned on social media:Large-scale disciplinary comparison of social media metrics with citations[J].Aslib Journal of Information Management,2015,67(3):260-288.
[4]Hassan S U,Imran M,Gillani U,et al.Measuring social media activity of scientific literature:An exhaustive comparison of scopus and novel Altmetrics big data[J].Scientometrics,2017,113(2):1037-1057.
[5]Shema H,Bar-Ilan J,Thelwall M.Do blog citations correlate with a higher number of future citations?Research blogs as a potential source for alternative metrics[J].Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,2014,65(5):1018-1027.
[6]Costas R,Zahedi Z,Wouters P.Do“altmetrics”correlate with citations?Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective[J].Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,2015,66(10):2003-2019.
[7]Haustein S,Peters I,Sugimoto C R,et al.Tweeting biomedicine:An analysis of tweets and citations in the biomedical literature[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2014,65(4):656-669.
[8]Waltman L,Costas R.F1000 recommendations as a potential new data source for research evaluation:A comparison with citations[J].Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,2014,65(3):433-445.
[9]Mike T,Stefanie H,Vincent L,et al.Do Altmetrics work?Twitter and ten other social web services[J].PLoS ONE,2013,8(5):e64841.
[10]刘晓娟,周建华,尤斌.基于Mendeley与WoS的选择性计量指标与传统科学计量指标相关性研究[J].图书情报工作,2015,59(3):112-118.
[11]由庆斌,汤珊红.不同类型论文层面计量指标间的相关性研究[J].图书情报工作,2014,58(8):79-84.
[12]刘晓娟,宰冰欣.图书情报领域文献的Altmetrics指标分析[J].图书情报工作,2015,59(18):108-116.
[13]由庆斌,韦博,汤珊红.基于补充计量学的论文影响力评价模型构建[J].图书情报工作,2014,58(22):5-11.
[14]刘晓娟,宋婉姿.基于PLOS ALM的Altmetrics指标可用性分析[J].图书情报工作,2016,60(4):93-101.
[15]郝若扬.高Altmetrics指标论文的特征分析及影响力分析[J].图书情报工作,2018,62(8):107-114.
[16]刘艳民.Altmetrics指标与传统文献计量指标相关性研究[J].情报杂志,2017(9):75-81.
[17]王睿,胡文静,郭玮.高Altmetrics指标科技论文学术影响力研究[J].图书情报工作,2014,58(21):92-98.
[18]余厚强.替代计量指标与引文量相关性的大规模跨学科研究--数值类型、指标种类与用户类别的影响[J].情报学报,2017,36(6):74-85.
[19]Trowler P R.Academic tribes and territories[M].McGraw-Hill Education(UK),2001.
[20]Nederhof A J.Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the social sciences and the humanities:A review[J].Scientometrics,2006,66(1):81-100.
[21]邱均平,王曰芬.文献计量内容分析法[M].北京:书目文献出版社,2008.
[22]Holmberg K,Thelwall M.Disciplinary differences in Twitter scholarly communication[J].Scientometrics,2014,101(2):1027-1042.
[23]Hellqvist B.Referencing in the humanities and its implications for citation analysis[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2010,61(2):310-318.
[24]王颖鑫,黄德龙,刘德洪.ESI指标原理及计算[J].图书情报工作,2006,50(9):73-75.
[25]Piwowar H.Introduction altmetrics:what,why and where?[J].Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2013,39(4):8-9.
[2]Sotudeh H,Mazarei Z,Mirzabeigi M.CiteULike bookmarks are correlated to citation at journal and author levels in library and information science[J].Scientometrics,2015,105(3):2237-2248.
[3]Costas R,Zahedi Z,Wouters P.The thematic orientation of publications mentioned on social media:Large-scale disciplinary comparison of social media metrics with citations[J].Aslib Journal of Information Management,2015,67(3):260-288.
[4]Hassan S U,Imran M,Gillani U,et al.Measuring social media activity of scientific literature:An exhaustive comparison of scopus and novel Altmetrics big data[J].Scientometrics,2017,113(2):1037-1057.
[5]Shema H,Bar-Ilan J,Thelwall M.Do blog citations correlate with a higher number of future citations?Research blogs as a potential source for alternative metrics[J].Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,2014,65(5):1018-1027.
[6]Costas R,Zahedi Z,Wouters P.Do“altmetrics”correlate with citations?Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective[J].Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,2015,66(10):2003-2019.
[7]Haustein S,Peters I,Sugimoto C R,et al.Tweeting biomedicine:An analysis of tweets and citations in the biomedical literature[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2014,65(4):656-669.
[8]Waltman L,Costas R.F1000 recommendations as a potential new data source for research evaluation:A comparison with citations[J].Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,2014,65(3):433-445.
[9]Mike T,Stefanie H,Vincent L,et al.Do Altmetrics work?Twitter and ten other social web services[J].PLoS ONE,2013,8(5):e64841.
[10]刘晓娟,周建华,尤斌.基于Mendeley与WoS的选择性计量指标与传统科学计量指标相关性研究[J].图书情报工作,2015,59(3):112-118.
[11]由庆斌,汤珊红.不同类型论文层面计量指标间的相关性研究[J].图书情报工作,2014,58(8):79-84.
[12]刘晓娟,宰冰欣.图书情报领域文献的Altmetrics指标分析[J].图书情报工作,2015,59(18):108-116.
[13]由庆斌,韦博,汤珊红.基于补充计量学的论文影响力评价模型构建[J].图书情报工作,2014,58(22):5-11.
[14]刘晓娟,宋婉姿.基于PLOS ALM的Altmetrics指标可用性分析[J].图书情报工作,2016,60(4):93-101.
[15]郝若扬.高Altmetrics指标论文的特征分析及影响力分析[J].图书情报工作,2018,62(8):107-114.
[16]刘艳民.Altmetrics指标与传统文献计量指标相关性研究[J].情报杂志,2017(9):75-81.
[17]王睿,胡文静,郭玮.高Altmetrics指标科技论文学术影响力研究[J].图书情报工作,2014,58(21):92-98.
[18]余厚强.替代计量指标与引文量相关性的大规模跨学科研究--数值类型、指标种类与用户类别的影响[J].情报学报,2017,36(6):74-85.
[19]Trowler P R.Academic tribes and territories[M].McGraw-Hill Education(UK),2001.
[20]Nederhof A J.Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the social sciences and the humanities:A review[J].Scientometrics,2006,66(1):81-100.
[21]邱均平,王曰芬.文献计量内容分析法[M].北京:书目文献出版社,2008.
[22]Holmberg K,Thelwall M.Disciplinary differences in Twitter scholarly communication[J].Scientometrics,2014,101(2):1027-1042.
[23]Hellqvist B.Referencing in the humanities and its implications for citation analysis[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2010,61(2):310-318.
[24]王颖鑫,黄德龙,刘德洪.ESI指标原理及计算[J].图书情报工作,2006,50(9):73-75.
[25]Piwowar H.Introduction altmetrics:what,why and where?[J].Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2013,39(4):8-9.