用户名: 密码: 验证码:
美国高等教育问责制研究
详细信息    查看官网全文
摘要
美国高等教育问责制在过去四十余年的探索进程中积累着丰富的经验。本文主要从美国高等教育问责制的发展历程探讨问责制对高校发展的影响,并分析了美国高等教育问责制的发展趋势以及对中国高等教育问责制发展的借鉴意义。
引文
[1]UNESCO.Higher Education in the Twenty-First Century:Vision and Action[EB/OL].http://www.unesco.org/education/educprog/wche/declaration_eng.htm,1998-10-09
    [2]IHEP.Postsec Data[EB/OL].http://www.ihep.org/postsecdata/data-at-work,2016-11-01
    [3]Martin Trow.Trust,Markets,and Accountability in Higher Education:a Comparative Perspective[J].Higher Education Policy,1996(9):309-324.
    [4]Rick Kroc&Gary Hanson.Enrollment Management[A].William E.Knight ed.The Primer for Institutional Research[C].Tallahassee:The Association for Institutional Research,2003:79-102.
    [5]Kenneth P.Mortimer.Accountability in Higher Education[M].Washington,DC:American Association for Higher Education,1972:2-7.
    [6]National Commission on Excellence in Education.A Nation at Risk:The Imperative for Educational Reform[R].Washington,DC:U.S.Department of Education,1983.
    [7]Florida State Department of Education.College-Level Academic Skills Test:Sample Test Items for Skills Effective 10/92[R].Tallahassee:Florida State Department of Education,1992.
    [8]The Student-Right-To-Know And Campus Security Act of 1990(Title II of Public Law 101-542)[Z],signed into law on November 8,1990 amended section 485 of the Higher Education Act of 1992.
    [9]Kevin Carey.The Myth of Higher Education Accountability[J].The Magazine of Higher Learning.2007(10):24-29.
    [10]Higher Education Opportunity Act(110th Congress Public Law 315)[Z],the amendment of the Higher Education Act of 1965.
    [11]柳亮.大学信任与高等教育问责[J].教育发展研究,2010,(1):19-22.
    [12]王淑娟.对美国教育语境中问责涵义的考察[J].比较教育研究,2007,(2):54-59.
    [13]周湘林.中国高校问责制60年:新制度主义视角的透视[J].现代大学教育,2010,(1):27-36.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700