一种考虑专家因素的飞机驾驶舱人机界面评估方法
详细信息 查看官网全文
- 英文论文题名：Method for Multi-Attribute Decision Making with Consideration of Expert Factor
- 论文作者：李战武 ; 赵晓哲 ; 周德云 ; 常一哲 ; 安超 ; 肖中晖 ; 杨海燕
- 英文论文作者：Li Zhanwu ; Zhao Xiaozhe ; Zhou Deyun ; Chang Yizhe ; An Chao ; Xiao Zhonghui ; Yang Haiyan ; College of Electronic Communication ; Northwestern Polytechnical University ; Dalian Naval Academy ; Aeronautics and Astronautics Engineering College ; Air Force Engineering University ; ATC navigation College ; Air Force Engineering University
- 年：2016
- 作者机构：西北工业大学电子信息学院;海军大连舰艇学院;空军工程大学航空航天工程学院;空军工程大学空管领航学院;
- 论文关键词：人机界面 ; 直觉三角模糊集 ; 多目标决策 ; 专家因素
- 英文论文关键词：human-machine interface ; intuitionistic triangular fuzzy set ; multi-attribute decision making ; expert factor
- 会议召开时间：2016-10-31
- 会议录名称：探索 创新 交流（第7集）——第七届中国航空学会青年科技论坛文集（上册）
- 英文会议录名称：Discovery,Innovation and Communication——Proceedings of 7th CSAA Science and Technology Youth Forum
- 语种：中文
- 分类号：V223.1
- 学会代码：ZGHU
- 会议名称：探索 创新 交流（第7集）——第七届中国航空学会青年科技论坛
- 会议地点：中国广东中山
- 主办单位：中国航空学会
- 学会名称：中国航空学会
- 页数：8
- 文件大小：502k
- 原文格式：O
- 会议级别：全国
摘要
针对在飞机驾驶舱人机界面评估中专家对评估方案存在主客观偏好及对评估领域认知不同的问题,提出一种以直觉三角模糊集为基础,考虑专家主客观偏好及综合重要程度的评估方法。首先建立了飞机驾驶舱人机界面的评估体系;之后在考虑专家主客观偏好的基础上,确定出主客观值偏差最小时的指标权重并计算得到专家意见在专家群体中的重要程度;之后对专家的评估意见进行精确化并得到其精确值,从而进一步确定出最优方案;最后进行了仿真验证,结果表明了所提方法的可行性与有效性。
To tackle the problem of decision maker's subjective/objective preference and difference in cognition during the evaluation of fighter cockpit human-machine interface,a method is proposed on the basis of intuitionistic triangular fuzzy set,in which decision-maker's preference and its comprehensive importance measurement of experts is considered.At first,evaluation architecture of fighter cockpit human-machine interface was established.Secondly,after taking account of decision maker's subjective/objective preference,the attribute weight with minimum deviation between subjective and objective preference was obtained.Then importance measurement on decision among the ones inside of the group and the precise value of the decision was calculated,from which the optimal alternative was determined.Finally,an simulation example showed the feasibility and effectiveness of the method presented in the paper.
To tackle the problem of decision maker's subjective/objective preference and difference in cognition during the evaluation of fighter cockpit human-machine interface,a method is proposed on the basis of intuitionistic triangular fuzzy set,in which decision-maker's preference and its comprehensive importance measurement of experts is considered.At first,evaluation architecture of fighter cockpit human-machine interface was established.Secondly,after taking account of decision maker's subjective/objective preference,the attribute weight with minimum deviation between subjective and objective preference was obtained.Then importance measurement on decision among the ones inside of the group and the precise value of the decision was calculated,from which the optimal alternative was determined.Finally,an simulation example showed the feasibility and effectiveness of the method presented in the paper.
引文
[1]Daisuke K,Makoto T.Human-Machine System Simulation for Supporting the Design and Evaluation of Reliable Aircraft Cockpit Interface.Busan:SICE-ICASE,2006.International Joint Conference.2006:55-60.
[2]Senol M B,Dagdeviren M.Evaluation of Cockpit Design by Using Quantitative and Qualitative Tools.Hong Kong:Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management,2009.IEEM 2009:847-851.
[3]Wang Lijing,Xiang Wei.The Virtual Evaluation of the Ergomics Layoutin Aircraft Cockpit.Wenzhou:ComputerAided Industrial Design&Conceptual Design,2009.CAID&CD 2009.IEEE 10th International Conference,2009:1438-1442.
[4]Stanton N.Human Factors in Consumer Products.Taylor&Francis.Inc,1997.
[5]Min Tian,Yuanyuan He,Sifeng Liu.Extension of TOPSIS for Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Decision Making Problem Based on Experimental Analysis[J].Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics,2010,21(3),416-422.
[6]Yao Shengbao,Yue Chaoyuan.Approach to Stochastic MultiAttribute Decision Problems Using Rough Sets Theory[J].Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics,2006,17(1):103-108.
[7]Bo Feng,Fujun Lai.Multi-Attribute Group Decision Making with Aspirations;A Case Study[J].Omega,2014,44:136-147.
[8]Xin Zhang,Fang Jin.Peide Liu.A Grey Relational Projection Method for Multi-attribute Decision Making Based on Intuitionistic Trapezoidal Fuzzy Number[J].Applied Mathematical Modelling,2013,37:3467-3477.
[9]Zhou Hong'an,Liu Sanyang,Fang Xiangrong.Method for Uncertain Multi-Attribute Decision-Making with Preference Information in the Form of Interval Numbers Complementary Judgement Matrix[J].Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics,2007,18(2):265-269.
[10]Wang Zhengxin,Dang Yaoguo,Wei Jing,Yang Hu.Study on the Extending Multi-Attribute Decision Model of Grey Target[J].Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics,2009,20(5):985-991.
[11]Rao Congjun,Zhao Yong.Multi-Attribute Decision Making Model Based on Optimal Membership and Relative Entropy[J].Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics,2009,20(3):537-542.
[12]Wenkun Zhou,Wenchun Jiang.Two-Phase TOPSIS of Uncertain Multi-Attribute Group Decision-Making[J].Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics,2010,21(3):423-430.
[13]Maghsoud Amiri,Farhaneh Golozari.Application of Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Decision Making in Determining the Critical Path by Using Time,Cost,Risk,and Quality Criteria[J],2011,54(1-4):393-401.
[14]Shan YU,Zeshui XU.Aggregation and Decision Making Using Intuitionistic Multiplicative Triangular Fuzzy Information[J].Journal of Systems Sciences and Systems Engineering,2014,23(1):20-38.
[15]刘秀梅,赵克勤,王传斌.基于联系数的三角模糊数多目标决策新模型[J].系统工程与电子技术,2009,31(10):2399-2403.
[16]李鹏,刘思峰,朱建军.基于前景理论的随机直觉模糊决策方法[J].控制与决策,2012,27(11):1601-1606.
[17]龚艳冰.方案偏好已知的三角模糊数型多指标决策方法[J].控制与决策,2012,27(2):281-285.
[18]刘培德,张新.直觉不确定语言集成算子及在群决策中的应用[J].系统工程理论与实践,2012,32(12):2704-2711.
[19]胡丽芳,关欣,邓勇,等.一种三角模糊数型多目标决策方法[J].控制与决策,2011,26(12):1877-1885.
[20]张健,张德智,吴玉斌,等.论评价目标值的可公度性处理[J].兵工学报,2004,25(6):746-751.
[21]Ye J.Improved Method of Multicriteria Fuzzy Decisionmaking Based on Vague Sets[J].Computer Aided Design,2007,39(2):164-169.
[2]Senol M B,Dagdeviren M.Evaluation of Cockpit Design by Using Quantitative and Qualitative Tools.Hong Kong:Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management,2009.IEEM 2009:847-851.
[3]Wang Lijing,Xiang Wei.The Virtual Evaluation of the Ergomics Layoutin Aircraft Cockpit.Wenzhou:ComputerAided Industrial Design&Conceptual Design,2009.CAID&CD 2009.IEEE 10th International Conference,2009:1438-1442.
[4]Stanton N.Human Factors in Consumer Products.Taylor&Francis.Inc,1997.
[5]Min Tian,Yuanyuan He,Sifeng Liu.Extension of TOPSIS for Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Decision Making Problem Based on Experimental Analysis[J].Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics,2010,21(3),416-422.
[6]Yao Shengbao,Yue Chaoyuan.Approach to Stochastic MultiAttribute Decision Problems Using Rough Sets Theory[J].Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics,2006,17(1):103-108.
[7]Bo Feng,Fujun Lai.Multi-Attribute Group Decision Making with Aspirations;A Case Study[J].Omega,2014,44:136-147.
[8]Xin Zhang,Fang Jin.Peide Liu.A Grey Relational Projection Method for Multi-attribute Decision Making Based on Intuitionistic Trapezoidal Fuzzy Number[J].Applied Mathematical Modelling,2013,37:3467-3477.
[9]Zhou Hong'an,Liu Sanyang,Fang Xiangrong.Method for Uncertain Multi-Attribute Decision-Making with Preference Information in the Form of Interval Numbers Complementary Judgement Matrix[J].Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics,2007,18(2):265-269.
[10]Wang Zhengxin,Dang Yaoguo,Wei Jing,Yang Hu.Study on the Extending Multi-Attribute Decision Model of Grey Target[J].Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics,2009,20(5):985-991.
[11]Rao Congjun,Zhao Yong.Multi-Attribute Decision Making Model Based on Optimal Membership and Relative Entropy[J].Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics,2009,20(3):537-542.
[12]Wenkun Zhou,Wenchun Jiang.Two-Phase TOPSIS of Uncertain Multi-Attribute Group Decision-Making[J].Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics,2010,21(3):423-430.
[13]Maghsoud Amiri,Farhaneh Golozari.Application of Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Decision Making in Determining the Critical Path by Using Time,Cost,Risk,and Quality Criteria[J],2011,54(1-4):393-401.
[14]Shan YU,Zeshui XU.Aggregation and Decision Making Using Intuitionistic Multiplicative Triangular Fuzzy Information[J].Journal of Systems Sciences and Systems Engineering,2014,23(1):20-38.
[15]刘秀梅,赵克勤,王传斌.基于联系数的三角模糊数多目标决策新模型[J].系统工程与电子技术,2009,31(10):2399-2403.
[16]李鹏,刘思峰,朱建军.基于前景理论的随机直觉模糊决策方法[J].控制与决策,2012,27(11):1601-1606.
[17]龚艳冰.方案偏好已知的三角模糊数型多指标决策方法[J].控制与决策,2012,27(2):281-285.
[18]刘培德,张新.直觉不确定语言集成算子及在群决策中的应用[J].系统工程理论与实践,2012,32(12):2704-2711.
[19]胡丽芳,关欣,邓勇,等.一种三角模糊数型多目标决策方法[J].控制与决策,2011,26(12):1877-1885.
[20]张健,张德智,吴玉斌,等.论评价目标值的可公度性处理[J].兵工学报,2004,25(6):746-751.
[21]Ye J.Improved Method of Multicriteria Fuzzy Decisionmaking Based on Vague Sets[J].Computer Aided Design,2007,39(2):164-169.