用户名: 密码: 验证码:
卫生资源合理配置研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
基于世界卫生组织等的研究与各国实践经验,对公共卫生的投入是改善人群健康性价比高、物有所值的领域。本论文选取公共卫生领域的资源配置作为研究对象,采用优先级配置(priority setting)为研究视角,除了其本身是国际卫生资源配置的研究趋势,也是基于卫生资源作为稀缺资源这一普世前提所引发的中国思考。借助卫生资源的优先级配置改善中国卫生资源配置公平性,需要遵循适切的优先标准和公平程序,提高政府资源治理能力。
     本研究首先在对比评析国外政府应对稀缺资源供需矛盾的施政措施的基础上,检视优先抉择这一不可避免的问题。同时在学术领域,多元哲学流派对合理配置、公平分配乃至优先配置问题都有其思辨,而这些哲学思想如何影响优先分配抉择又与一国的社会背景密切相关。对我国来说,确立围绕以公平为目标的卫生资源优先级配置,并非狭隘地排斥效率等其他配置元素,而是以动态而辩证的观念看待效率与公平的平衡促进关系。
     其次,探讨卫生资源优先级配置程序公平的实现问题,采用国内外对比研究和案例分析的方法,运用合理问责框架(A4R)、公众参与研究(PAR)对资源配置的两种程序进行评价,建议加强卫生决策过程的透明公开,实现各利益方的参与赋权,提高政府决策能力并落实政治承诺。
     再次,分析卫生资源优先级配置的实质公平实现问题,主要采用政策分析和案例分析方法。一是将善治作为治理的理想状态,分析我国卫生资源配置的历史变迁摸清治理的实然状态,并借助多元治理手段提出改善建议;二是以老年人群、贫困人群等重点优先人群为例,提出对应的治理措施;三是制定我国卫生资源优先标准和项目。通过pubmed、CNKI等数据库以及国外相关机构网站,评估国外优先级配置的价值观念、伦理原则和优先标准,为我国相关优先分配抉择提供对比参考。
     最后是实证研究。一是采用公平性基准方法(BF)对全国卫生资源数据展开分析,研究结果说明,卫生资源配置政策应继续围绕减少城乡二元化,缩小地域差距而展开,并特别加强对西部地区的扶持。二是开展重庆市卫生局行政人员的优先级配置态度调查,设计Likert态度量表获取量化数据。调查摸清了重庆市级卫生行政机关人员偏好,即最愿意优先资源投入的第一方阵以及最重要的优先决策标准,调查对象的态度基本能保障卫生资源优先级配置的顺利实施。
     本研究基本理清我国卫生资源优先级配置的优先项目和优先决策标准,首次将合理问责框架、公平基准等分析方法运用于中国情境并提出相应政策建议;初步探明卫生资源优先级配置的省级卫生厅行政人员认知态度,将为我国开展卫生资源优先级配置提供理论和实证参考依据。
The evidences from researches conducted by WHO, demonstrate that investment inpublic health is cost-effective and efficient for improving population health. However,limited health resource and unlimited demands obsessed health policy making andmanagement of China all the time. Currently, priority setting is a well acknowledgedmeasure for health resource allocation around the world, which provides a perspective toconsider the universal premise of scarce health resource in China. Thus, this study focuseson the allocation of health resource by setting priority for health investment, is an attemptto advance the fairness of Chinese health resource allocation through the way of bettergovernance, explicit priority criteria and more procedural fairness.
     To attain the aim of this study, this study first reviews the measures for dissolving thedilemma of supply and demand on health resource employed by foreign countries. Thefindings show that priority setting is an effective strategy that commonly used, although thestrategy is specific for the context of each country. Moreover, those strategies areinfluenced by the diverse philosophical theories, which provide a source of reference onrational allocation, equitable distribution and allocation priority. Based on the researchfindings, this study believe the fairness should be the basic principle of the priority settingin China. Such belief provides a dynamic and dialectical view on the balance and promotionof efficiency and fairness, rather than excluding other allocation factors, such as efficiency.
     Next, this study explores the procedural fairness on health resources priority setting byusing comparative cases study. Accountability for Reasonableness (A4R) and ParticipatoryAction Research (PAR) are used to evaluate the resource allocation procedure. The resultsillustrate the following measures should be carried out in order to perform the proceduralfairness: to set up a transparent and open health decision-making process; to empowerrelative stakeholders; to advance government decision-making capability; and to meet the political commitment of government.
     Then, this study discusses how to implement the priority setting on the health resourceallocation for carrying out fairness in three steps. Firstly, this study finds that the idealmodel of governance is stewardship by analyzing relative policy and cases. To attain thisideal state, promoting recommendations should comprehensively understand the historicalchange of health resource allocation governance and adopt diverse governance means.Secondly, relative measures emphasized on the elderly, the poor and other priority groupsare put forward. Thirdly, this study summarizes performance criteria such as values, ethicalprinciples etc. on setting priority of health resource allocation by reviewing relativeliterature from Pubmed and CNKI, to put forward china’s own prioritize criteria andpriority area.
     Finally, this study conducted two empirical studies in order to implement the prioritysetting of health resource allocation. One study analyses the relative data of health resourceof the whole country by using the Benchmark of Fairness (BF). The results demonstrate thatthe allocation policy on health resource should emphasize on: to fill the gap between urbanand rural areas; to shorten regional disparities; to strengthen the support for Western regionof China. The second study carries out a survey on the administrators’ attitudes towardpriority setting in Chongqing Municipal Health Bureau used three Likert scales. The resultsshow the preference of Chongqing Municipal Health Administrative agencies, their willingto prioritize the health resource and the foremost priority decision criteria. It finds that theytend to support the implementation of setting priority on the health resource allocation.
引文
1.王延中.中国卫生改革与发展实证研究[M].中国劳动社会保障出版社,2008.348-368.
    2.傅晓,欧阳华生.我国省际间医疗卫生资源配置公平性分析[J].卫生经济研究,2008,(11):18-21
    3.李岳峰,吴明,对我国卫生资源配置的再认识[J].生产力研究,2009,(10):7-9.
    4.石光.中国卫生资源配置的制度经济学研究[M].北京:中国社会出版社.2007.
    5.杜仕林.医疗资源配置法律制度研究:以健康公平为中心[M].北京:光明日报出版社.2010.1-10.
    6.王前强,倪建.区域卫生规划政策低效及其治理[J].中国卫生经济,2010,(5):52-54.
    7.段丁强.医疗保健领域公平价值理念的选择与实现[J].卫生经济研究,2009,(11):21-23.
    8.王健,孟庆跃.确定卫生研究优先领域的分析方法进展[J].中国卫生经济,2003,22(7):37-38.
    9.曹河圻.如何确定医学研究的优先资助领域--来自世界卫生组织的经验[J].解放军医院管理杂志,2003,10(5):498-499.
    10.高春辉,胡善联.国际组织卫生研究重点设置方法概述[J].中华医学科研管理杂志,2004,17(2):81-84.
    11. Daniels, N. Just Health: Meeting Health Needs Fairly[M]. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.2008.125-176.
    12.李迎生,张瑞凯,乜琪.公益·公平·多元·整合:“新医改”的社会政策内涵[J].江海学刊,2009,(5):108-115.
    13. James Wilson.Towards a Normative Framework for Public Health Ethics andPolicy[J].Public Health Ethics,2009,2(2):184-194.
    14. Norman Daniels, Bruce P. Kennedy, IchiroKawachi.Why Justice Is Good for OurHealth: The Social Determinants of Health Inequalities[J].Daedalus,1999,128(4):215-251.
    15. S Edgar W. Rationing health care in New Zealand—how the public has a say. In:Coulter A, Ham C, editors. The global challenge of healthcare rationing [M].Philadelphia: Open University Press;2000.175-191.
    16.潘明星,韩丽华.政府经济学(第二版)[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2008.
    17.(德)彼得欧伯恩德,托马斯埃克,于尔根策尔特,等.卫生经济学与卫生政策[M].山西经济出版社.2007.49-51.
    18. Jenny Stewart. Models of priority-setting for public sector research[J]. Rese-arch Policy,1995,24:115-126.
    19. Mossialos, Elias and Le Grand, Julian,(eds.) Health care and cost containment in theEuropean Union[M]. Ashgate, Aldershot, UK.1999.78-99.
    20.李红文.公共健康与公共政策:建构一种规范性分析框架[J].哲学动态,2011,(4):72-77.
    21.法社会学导论(第四版)[德国]托马斯·莱塞尔,高旭军译[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2007.188-194
    22.何伦,施卫星.临床生命伦理学导论:生命的困惑[M].南京:东南大学出版社,2005.191-202.
    23. Daniels N. Justice, health, and healthcare [J]. The American Journal of Bioethics,2001,1(2):2-16.
    24.(美)雷蒙德·埃居,约翰·兰德尔·格罗夫斯.应向华译.卫生保健伦理学[M].北京大学出版社.2005.161-163.
    25.庇古.福利经济学[M].北京:商务印书馆,2006.11-30.
    26.刘钧.西方福利经济学发展浅探[J].中央财经大学学报,2001,(3):6-11.
    27. Weinstein M, Manning W. Theoretical issues in cost-effectiveness analysis [J]. Journalof Health Economics,1997,(16):121-128.
    28.任正安,峗怡.从“道”、“德”到“生”、“命”——基于中西文化视野下的认知差异比较[J].道德与文明,2010,(4):74-77.
    29.俞可平.当代西方社群主义及其公益政治学评析[J].中国社会科学,1998,(3):68-72.
    30.韦森.个人主义与社群主义——东西方社会制序历史演进路径差异的文化原因[J].复旦学报(社会科学版),2003,(3):1-8.
    31.[美]维克托.R.福克斯,罗汉(译)谁将生存?——健康、经济学和社会选择[M].上海人民出版社,2000.181.
    32. Daniels, N. Justice, Health&Healthcare[J].American Journal of Bioethics.2001,1(2):2-16.
    33. Baum, N. Gollust, S. Goold, S. and Jacobson, P. Ethical Issues in Public HealthPractice in Michigan[J].American Journal of Public Health.2009,99(2):369-374.
    34. Gostin, L. and Powers, M. What Does Social Justice Require for the Public's Health?[J].Health Affairs.2006,25(4):1053-1060.
    35.刘继同.卫生资源的四次分配机制与分配性公平卫生改革模式的战略思考[J].中国卫生经济,2006,25(2):22.
    36. Cook, R. J. Exploring fairness in health care reform[J]. Journal for Juridical Science,2004,29(3):1–27.
    37. Braveman P,Gruski S.Defining equity in health[J].J Epidemiol CommunityHealth,2003,57(4):254-258..
    38. Chris James,Guy Carrin,William Savedoff,et al. Clarifying Efficiency-Equity TradeoffsThrough Explicit Criteria, With a Focus on Developing Countries[J]. Health CareAnalysis,2005,13(1):33-34.
    39. Norman Daniels, Donald W. Light,Ronald L. Caplan. Benchmarks of Fairness forHealth Care Reform [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press,1996.33-38.
    40. Leonie Segal,Ying Chen. priority setting for health: a critique of alternative models[R].Report to the Population Health Division Department of Health and Aged Care,2001.
    41. Per-Erik Liss.The Significant of the Goal of Health Care for the setting of Priorities[J].Health Care Analysis,2003,11(2):161-169.
    42. Peter C Smith. Health care reforms in Europe and their implications for Japan[J].TheJapanese Journal of Social Security policy,2004,3(2):80-91.
    43.(美)阿瑟·奥肯,王奔洲(译).平等与效率:重大抉择[M].华夏出版社,2010.96.
    44.刘承礼.近三十年来西方文献关于公平与效率研究的基本观点述要[M].政治经济学评论,中国人民大学出版社,2008,(1):101.
    45.李杰.公平与效率:三十年不同学科研究述评[J].社会科学研究,2008,(6):68-69.
    46.王虎峰.论争中的中国医改问题、观点和趋势[J].中共中央党校,2008,12(3):85-87
    47. Maria Goddard,Katharina Hauck,Peter C Smith. Priority setting in health a politicaleconomy perspective[J].Health Economics,Policy and Law,2006,(1):79-90
    48. Maluka S, amuzora P K, Sebasti n M, et al. Decentralized health care priority-setting inTanzania: Evaluating against the accountability for reasonableness framework[J].Social Science&Medicine,2010,71(4):751-759.
    49. Gibson J, Mitton C, Martin D, Ethics and economics: does program budgeting andmarginal analysis contribute to fair priority setting?[J].Journal of Health ServicesResearch&Policy,2006,(11):32-37
    50. Kenny N, Giacomini M. Wanted: A New Ethics Field for Health Policy Analysis[J].Health Care Analysis,2005,13(4):257.
    51.(美)富兰德,等著,于保荣等译.卫生经济学(第五版)[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社.2010.508-513
    52. Hasman A, Holm S. Accountability for reasonableness: opening the black box ofprocess[J].Health Care Anal.2005,13(4):261-73.
    53. Norman D,Sabin J E.Accountability for reasonableness:an update[J].BMJ,2008,337:a1850.
    54. Norman D. Accountability for reasonableness: Establishing a fair process for prioritysetting is easier than agreeing on principles[J].BMJ,2000,321:1300-1301.
    55. Gibson J L, Martin D K and Singer P A. Priority setting for new technologies inmedicine: A transdisciplinary study[J].BMC Health Services Research,2002,2(1):14.
    56. Martin D, Abelson J, Singer P.Participation in health care priority-setting through theeyes of the participants[J]. Journal of Health Services Research&Policy,2002,7(4):222–229.
    57. Gibson J L, Martin D K, Singer P A. Priority setting in hospitals: fairness,inclusiveness, and the problem of institutional power differences[J].Soc Sci Med,2005,61(11):2355-2362.
    58. Simon Mshana, Haji Shemilu, Benedict Ndawi,et al. What do District Health Plannersin Tanzania think about improving priority setting using 'Accountability forReasonableness'?[J].BMC Health Services Research,2007,7:180.
    59. Kapiriri L,Norheim O F,Martin D K. Fairness and accountability for reasonableness.Do the views of priority setting decision makers differ across health systems and levelsof decision making?[J]. Social Science&Medicine2009,68(4)766-773.
    60. Byskov J, Bloch P, Blystad A,ect Accountable priority setting for trust in healthsystems-the need for research into a new approach for strengthening sustainable healthaction in developing countries[J]Health Research Policy and Systems,2009,(10):23-23.
    61. Kapiriri L, Norheim OF, Martin DK. Priority setting at the micro-, meso-andmacro-levels in Canada, Norway and Uganda[J].Health Policy,2007,82(10):78-94.
    62.赵德余.政策制定中的价值冲突:来自中国医疗卫生改革的经验[J].管理世界,2008(10):41-52.
    63.长策智库(CRCCP).行政管控vs购买服务——地方医改方案综合评述[R].2010.
    64.尹希果,朱猛新.医改方案的制度预期:一个制度变迁理论框架的分析[J].福建论坛·人文社会科学版,2009,(1):158-161.
    65. Norman Daniels, Donald W. Light,Ronald L. Caplan.Benchmarks ofFairness for HealthCare Reform [M]. Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress,1996.
    66.杜英歌,娄成武.协商民主对公民参与的多维审视与局限[J].南京社会科学,2011,(1):83.
    67.朱德米.回顾公民参与[J].同济大学学报(社会科学),2009,20(6):90-96.
    68. Bruni RA, Laupacis A, Martin DK. Public engagement in setting priorities in healthcare[J].CMAJ,2008,179(1):15.
    69. Martin D, Abelson J, Singer PA. Participation in health care priority-setting through theeyes of the participants[J]. J Health Serv Res Policy,2002,(4):222.
    70. Doxman A, Lewin S, Lavis JN, et al. Support tools for evidence-informed healthpolicymaking:Engaging the public in evidence-informed policy making [J].HealthResearch policy and System,2009,(7)(suppl1):15
    71. Friedman A. Beyond accountability for reasonableness[J].Bioethics,2008,22(2):101-112.
    72. Burgess M. What difference does public consultation make in ethics?[M]. Vancouver:W. Maurice Centre for Applied Ethics, University of British Columbia;2003:25.
    73. Baum F,MacDougall C,Smith D. Participatory action research[J].Journal ofEpidemiology&Community Health,2006,60(10):854-857.
    74. Khanlou N, Peter E. Participatory action research considerations for ethicalreview[J].Social Science&Medicine,2005,60:2333–2334
    75. Peacock S,Mitton C,Batee A,et al.Overcoming barriers to priority setting usinginterdisciplinary methods[J].Health Policy,2009(92):128-129.
    76. Dixon J, Welch HG. Priority setting: lessons from Oregon[J].Lancet1991(337):891-894.
    77. Lenaghan J. Involving the public in rationing decisions. The experience of citizensjuries[J].Health Policy,1999(49):45-61.
    78. Edgar W. Rationing health care in New Zealand—how the public has a say. In:Coulter A, Ham C, editors. The global challenge of healthcare rationing[M].Philadelphia: Open University Press,2000.175-91.
    79. Kelson M. The NICE Patient Involvement Unit[J].Evidence-Based Healthcare PublicHealth2005,(9):304-7
    80. Swedish Parliamentary Priorities Commission. Priorities in health care[R].Stockholm:Ministry of Health and Social Affairs.1995.
    81. Shani S, Siebzehner MI, Luxenburg O, et al. Setting priorities for the adoption of healthtechnologies on a national level-the Israeli experience[J].Health Policy2000(54):169-85.
    82. Tim Tenbensel.Interpreting public input into priority-setting: the role of mediatinginstitutions[J].Health Policy,2002,62:173–194.
    83.约翰·克莱顿·托马斯著,孙柏瑛等译,公共决策中的公民参与[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2010.1.
    84. Mitton C, Patten S, Waldner H,et al. Priority setting in health authorities: a novelapproach to a historical activity[J].Social Science&Medicine,2003,57(9):1653–1663.
    85.白钢,史卫民.中国公共政策分析(2007年卷)[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社.2007.
    86.(日)俞炳匡,赵银华译.医疗改革的经济学[M].北京:中信出版社,2008.271.
    87.布赖恩·琼斯著,刘新胜,张国庆,李丹阳译,再思民主政治中的决策制定:注意力、选择和公共政策[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2010.16.
    88. Sibbald, S. L., Singer, P. A., Upshur, R.,&Martin, D. K. Priority setting: whatconsti-tutes success? A conceptual framework for successful priority setting[J]. BMCHealth Service Research,2009,9:43.
    89. WC Hsiao. What is a health system? Why should we care Harvard School of PublicHealth[R].working paper,2003.
    90. WHO.全球视角下中国医药卫生体制改革监测与评价综合框架[R].2009
    91.王虎峰.全球视野下的医改周期与规律[EB/OL].健康报,2012-10-18
    92.[英]罗伯特·罗茨:新的治理[A],俞可平主编:治理与善治[C].社会科学文献出版社,2000.87-96.
    93.杰索普.治理的兴起机器失败的风险:以经济发展为例的论述[J].国际社会科学(中文版),1999,2.
    94.俞可平.治理和善治:一种新的政治分析框架[J].南京社会科学.2001,(9):40-44.
    95.俞可平.善治与幸福[J].马克思主义与现实,2011(2):1-3.
    96.何哲.“善治”概念的核心要素分析—一种经济方法的比较观点,理论与改革,2011,(5):20-23.
    97.俞可平.全球治理引论.马克思主义与现实,2002,(1):20-32.
    98. Murray, C., Frenk. J. A Framework for Assessing the Performance of Health Systems.Bulletin of the World Health Organization.2000,78(6):717-731.
    99. Travis P, Egger D, Davies P,et al. Towards better stewardship: concepts and criticalissues[R].World Health Organization: Geneva.2002.
    100. Laura Reichenbach. The Politics of Priority Setting for Reproductive Health: Breastand Cervical Cancer in Ghana[J].Reproductive Health Matters,2002,10(20):47–58
    101. Katharina Hauck, Peter C. Smith,Maria Goddard. The Economics of Priority Settingfor Health Care: A Literature Review[R] HNP discussion paper,2003.
    102. Menon D,Stafinski T,Martin D.Priority-setting for healthcare: who,how,and is itfair?[J].Health Policy,2007,84(2-3):220-233.
    103. Gibson J L,Martin D K,Singer PA. Priority setting in hospitals: fairness,inclusiveness,and the problem of institutional power difference.Soc Sci Med[J].2005,61(11):2355-2362.
    104. Kapiriri L,Matin D. A stragety to improve priority setting in developing countries[J].health care anal,2007,15:159-167
    105. Murray, C. J. L.,&Lopez, A. D.(Eds.). The global burden of disease[M]. Cambridge:Harvard University Press.1996.
    106. Kapiriri, L.,&Bondy, S. J. Health practitioners’ and health planners’ informationneeds and seeking behavior for decision making in Uganda[J].International Journal ofMedical Informatics,2006,75(10-11):714-721.
    107. Mooney G, Wiseman V. Burden of disease and priority setting[J]. Health Economics,2000,9(5),369-372.
    108. Klein, R.Dimensions of rationing: Who should do what?[J]. British Medical Journal,1993:307,309-311.
    109. Berry, S. R., Hubay, S., Soibelman, H., et al. The effect of priority setting decisionsfor new cancer drugs on medical oncologists’ practice in Ontario: a qualitative study[J].BMC Health Service Research,2007,7:193.
    110. Englehardt H T. The foundations of Bioethics (Second edition ed.)[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press.1996
    111. R.Sennett, The Craftsman [M].London: Allen Lane,2008,50.
    112.刘继同.卫生改革“困境成因”的系统结构分析与宏观战略思考[J].中国卫生经济,2005,(11):19-21.
    113.白鸽,李丹,孙梅.医改何去何——政策研究者郝模教授纵论医改访谈录[J].中国卫生资源,2009,12(5):201-206.
    114.戚畅.体制转型中的我国医疗保险制度[J].中国卫生经济,2006,25(1):45.
    115.耿瑛,裴丽昆,David Legge.增加政府投入提高医药卫生服务的公平性和可及性[J].中国卫生经济,2009,28(3):12.
    116.中国社会科学院财经战略研究院.中国公共财政建设报告[R].2012
    117.杨彦.神木医改半年百姓实惠多少?人民日报[EB/OL].2009-11-2(12).
    118.王海荣,林枫,周绿林.透过神木“免费医疗”看当前县域医改方略[J].中国卫生经济,2009,(10):11.
    119.石东风,于连芳.地方卫生立法中存在问题刍议[J].中国卫生法制,2007,(5):13-14.
    120.姚建红:澳大利亚的医疗保险制度[J].中国卫生经济,2006,25(6):49-50.
    121.蔡江南.美英两国医改新进展及对中国医改的启示[J].中国卫生政策研究,2011,4(3):51-56.
    122.李玲.美国医改对我国医改的启示[J].中国卫生政策研究,2010,(5):5-6.
    123.罗元文,王慧.日本医疗保险制度经验对中国的启示[J].日本研究,2009,(4):43-44.
    124.顾昕.泰国的医疗救助制度及其对我国的启示[J].中国行政管理,2006,(7):73-75.
    125.费里西亚玛丽亚纳乌勒,埃克多尔阿雷奥拉奥尔内拉斯,奥斯卡门德斯-卡尔尼阿多,等.墨西哥的全民医疗保险改革[J].经济社会体制比较,2009,(4):61-68.
    126.丁学良.国际视野下的中国医改[J].财经文摘,2009,(6):2.
    127. Green S A.Is Managed Care Ethical?[J].General Hospital Psychiatry.1999,21:258.
    128.周成武,严素勤.我国医疗体制改革导入公私合作伙伴关系的初步探讨[J].中国卫生经济,2007,26(6):26.
    129.中国科学院人口健康领域战略研究组:中国至2050年人口健康科技发展路线图[M].北京:科学出版社,2009.25.
    130.莫龙.1980-2050年中国人口老龄化与经济发展协调性定量研究[J].人口研究,2009,(3):10-19.
    131.张昌彩.人口老龄化:影响、特点与对策[J].开放导报,2008,(3):28-32.
    132.刘喜珍.老龄伦理研究[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2009.61.
    133.卫龙宝,储雪玲,王恒彦.我国城乡老年人口生活质量比较研究[J].浙江大学学报:人文社科版,2008,(6):65-74.
    134.段春波,于普林.WHO/中国老年社区卫生服务研讨会纪要[J].中华老年医学杂志,2003,22(12):765.
    135.卢春玲.美国老年保健计划与改革[J].美国研究,2003,(1):91.
    136.刘晓红.奥巴马政府卫生改革分析[J].中国卫生政策研究2009,2(12):45.
    137.伍小兰.中国农村老年人口照料现状分析[J].人口学刊,2009,(6):35.
    138.许岩丽,刘志军.澳大利亚老年保健服务现况分析及其对我国的启示[J].医学与哲学(人文社会医学版),2008,29(8):68.
    139.石光,李明柱.澳大利亚卫生保健制度[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2004:24.
    140.斯坦因·U·拉尔森任,晓等译.社会科学理论与方法[M].上海人民出版社.2002
    141.胡苏云.中国农村人口医疗保障:穷人医疗干预视角的分析[J].中国人口科学,2006,(3):30-37.
    142.威廉·科克汉姆.医学社会学[M].华夏出版社.2000.
    143. F.A.Rozovsky.Consent to Treatment:A Practiical Guide[M].1984.90-95.
    144. Igor Rudan, Kit Yee Chan, Jian SF Zhang,et al. Causes of deaths in children youngerthan5years in China. Lancet,2008,375(9720):1083–1089.
    145. Feng XL,GuoSF,Hipgrave D,et al. China’s facility-based birth strategy and neonatalmortality:a population-based epidemiological study[J].Lancet,2011.378(9801):1493–
    1500.
    146.(美)德兰诺夫,李国芳译.你的生命价值多少[M].中国人民大学出版社,2004.138-156.
    147. Ter Meulen RH.Limiting solidarity in the Netherlands: a two-tier[J]. The journal ofmedicine and philosophy,1995,20(6):607-616.
    148. Calltorp, J.Priority Setting in Health Policy in Sweden and a Comparison withNorway[J]. Health Policy,1999,50:1-22.
    149. Swedish Parliamentary Priorities Commission. Priorities in Health Care.[R]Stockholm:Ministry of Health and Social Affairs,1995.
    150. Resolving Health Care′s Difficult Choices:Survey of Priority Setting in Sweden and anAnalysis of Principles and Guidelines on Priorities in Health Care[R].National Centrefor Priority Setting in Health Care.2007
    151. National Advisory Committee on Core Health and Disability Support Services. CoreServices for1993-94[R].First Report to the Minister of Health. Wellington: NationalAdvisory Committee on Core Health and Disability Support Services,1992.
    152. Norheim, O. Limiting Access to Health Care: A Contractualist Approach to FairRationing[M].Oslo: Oslo University Press.2003.58-79.
    153. Mitton C, Patten S, Waldner H,et al. Priority setting in health authorities: a novelapproach to a historical activity[J].Soc Sci Med.2003,57(9):1653-1663.
    154. Martin, D.,&Singer, P. Canada. In C. Ham&G. Robert (Eds.), Reasonable rationing:International experience of priority setting in health care Maidenhead[M].England:Open University Press.2003.42-63.
    155. Chris Ham, priority setting in health care: learning from international experience[J].health policy,1997,42:49-66
    156. Nuala Kenny,Christine Joffres.An Ethical Analysis of International HealthPriority-Setting[J].Health Care Anal,2008,16:145–160.
    157.刘继同.个人疾病痛苦与公共政策议题:重塑公共卫生政策角色[J].卫生经济研究,2005,(10):5-7.
    158. Scott, P. Assessing Determinants of Bureaucratic Discretion: An Experiment inStreet-Level Decision Making[J]. Journal of Public Administration Research andTheory,1997:35-57.
    159. Baum N, Gollust S, Goold S, et al. Ethical Issues in Public Health Practice inMichigan[J]. American Journal of Public Health,2009,99(2):369-374.
    160. A.D. Asante, A.B. Zwi.Factors influencing resource allocation decisions and equity inthe health system of Ghana[J].Public Health,2009,123:371–377.
    161. Leys, W. Ethics and Administrative Discretion[A]. in Worthley, J. ed. The Ethics ofthe Ordinary in Health Care[M].Chicago: Health Administration Press1997.83-101.
    162. Sowa J,Selden S. Administrative Discretion and Active Representation: An Expansionof the Theory of Representative Bureaucracy[J].Public Administration Review,2003,63(6):700-710.
    163. Kelly M. Theories of Justice and Street-Level Discretion[J].Journal of PublicAdministration Research and Theory,1994,4(2):119-140.
    164.(美)DeanT.Jamison.全球卫生优先事项,张炜译[M].中国财政经济出版社,2006.172-186.
    165. Norman Daniels, Donald W. Light, and Ronald L. Caplan, Benchmarks of Fairness forHealth Care Reform[M]. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc.,1996
    166. Daniels N, Bryant J, Castano RA, et al Benchmarks of fairness for health care reform:a policy tool for developing countries[J]. Bulletin of the World Health Organization.,2000,78(6):740-50.
    167. NormanDaniels.Toward Ethical Review of Health System Transformations [J].American Journal of Public Health,2006,96(3):449.
    168. Norman Daniels,Walter Flores,Supasit Pannarunothai,et al. An evidence-basedapproach to benchmarking the fairness of health-sector reform in developingcountries[J].Bulletin of the World Health Organization,2005,83(7):534-539.
    169.和经纬.全国性医疗卫生政策评估的方法论策略——墨西哥全民医保政策评估的经验[J].公共管理评论.2009,(1):168-177.
    170. Daniels N, Flores W.An Evidence-Based Approach to Benchmarking Fairness inHealth Sector Reform in Latin America[R].2004.
    171.肖龙华,雷海潮.中国省级卫生总费用快速推算方法与应用研究[J].中国卫生经济,2012,31(5):14-17
    172.徐秋云.我国卫生资源配置区域差异的主成分分析[J].管理观察,2008,(14):26.
    173.李岳峰,吴明.对我国卫生资源配置的再认识[J].生产力研究,2009,(10):7-9
    174.黄文佳.泰尔指数分析我国卫生资源地区分布公平性[J].商场现代化,2010,(19):164-165.
    175.张敏,陈锐,李宁秀.引入剥夺指数促进我国公共卫生财政资源配置的公平性[J].中国卫生经济,2010,(11):19-21.
    176.乐虹,唐圣春,陈迎春.东中西部地区农村卫生发展比较(二)——卫生服务利用与提供状况的比较[J].中国卫生经济,2006,(3):40-42
    177. Xu K, Evans D, Carrin G, et al. Protecting households from catastrophic healthspending[J].Health Affair,2007,26:972-83.
    178. Yuanli Liu, Keqin Rao, Jing Wu,et al. China’s health system performance[J].Lancet2008,372(9653):1914-1923.
    179. Anand, S, et al. China’s human resources for health: quantity, quality, and distribution[J].The Lancet,2008,372(9653):1774-1781.
    180. Hu S, Tang S, Liu Y,et al. Reforming how health care is paid for in China: challengesand opportunities[J]. Lancet,2008,372(9653):1846-1853.
    181. Hana Brixi,Yan Mu,Beatrice Targa,et al.Equity and Public Governance in HealthSystem Reform: Challenges and Opportunities for China[R]. The World Bank,2011.
    182. Hanson. Expanding access to priority health interventions: a framework forunderstanding the constraints to scaling-up[J].Journal of International Develop-ment,2003,15:1-14.
    183. Guo,Y,KenjiShibuya,GangCheng,etal.Tracking China’s health reform [J].Lancet.2010,375(9720):1056-1058.
    184. Brixi, H. China: Urban Services and Governance[R]. Policy Research Working Paper(No.5030). World Bank,2009.
    185. O'Donnell, O., E. van Doorslaer, R. P. Rannan-Eliya, et al, The incidence of publicspending on healthcare: Comparative evidence from Asia.[J].World Bank EconomicReview,2007,21(1):93-123.
    186. Yip W, Hsiao WC. Non-evidence-based policy: how effective is China’s newcooperative medical scheme in reducing medical impoverishment?[J].Social Science&Medicine,2009,68(2):201–209.
    187. Yuanli Liu, Keqin Rao, Jing Wu,et al. China’s health system performance[J].Lancet2008,372(9653):1914-1923.
    188.陈春辉,李顺平.我国中央财政卫生转移支付方式探讨[J].中国卫生经济,2010,(1):5-7.
    189. Shengelia B, Murray CJL, Adams OB. Beyond access and utilization: defining andmeasuring health system coverage[A]. In: Murray CJL, Evans DB eds. Health systemsperformance assessment: debates, methods and empiricism[C]. Geneva: World HealthOrganization,2003:221-34.
    190.(美)普雷克尔,兰登布伦纳,郑联盛,王小芽译.明智的支出——为穷人购买医疗卫生服务[M].中国财政经济出版社,2006.295-296.
    191.龚向光.疾病预防控制资源配置研究[J].中国卫生经济,2005,(8):12-15.
    192. Nancy M. Baum.Resource allocation in public health practice[D].PHD dissertation inThe University of Michigan,2010.6-8
    193. Fischer, C. Resource Allocation in the Public Sector: Values, Priorities and Markets inthe Management of Public Services[M].New York: Routledge.1998.26-30.
    194. Mays, G. Organization of the Public Health Delivery System[A]. In Novick, L.,Morrow, C. and Mays, G.(eds.) Public Health Administration. Principles forPopulation-Based Management(2ned)[M].Sudbury: Jones and Bartlett.2008
    195. Mays, G. and Smith, S. Geographic Variation in Public Health Spending: Correlatesand Consequences[J]. Health Services Research.2009,44(5):1794-1817.
    196. Nancy M. Baum.Resource allocation in public health practice: a national survey oflocal public health officials[J]. J Public Health Manag Pract,2011,17(3):265-274.
    197.托马斯·戴伊.理解公共政策(第12版)[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2006.55-89.
    198.刘庆元,刘宝宏.战略管理:分析、制定与实施[M].大连:东北财经大学出版社,2001.46-78.
    199. Pallant, J. SPSS survival manual.3rd ed[M]. Berkshire: Open University Press.2007.98.
    1. Martin D, Singer P. A strategy to improve priority setting in health care institutions[J].Health Care Analysis,2003,11:59-68.
    2. Spicker P.What is a priority?[J]. Journal of Health Services Research&Policy,2009,14(2):112-116.
    3. Leeds, Grenville and Lanark District Health Unit. Program Review Guidelines:Description of an Evidence-Based Planning and Prioritization Process[R]. Leeds andGrenville,2009:4.
    4. Ham C. Priority setting in health care: learning from international experience[J]. HealthPolicy,1997,42(1):49-66
    5. Lindsay M Sabik,Reidar K Lie. Priority setting in health care: Lessons from theexperiences of eight countries[J]. International Journal for Equity in Health.2008;7:4.
    6. Gonzalez-Pier E,Gutierrez-Delgado C,Stevens,G,et al Priority setting for healthinterventions in Mexico's System of Social Protection in Health[J]. The Lancet,2006:9547
    7. Rob Carter,Theo Vos,Marj Moodie.Priority setting in health: origins, description andapplication of the Australian Assessing Cost-Effective ness initiative[J].Expert Reviewof Pharmacoeconomics&Outcomes Research,2008,8(6):593-617.
    8. Per Carlsson. Priority setting in health care: Swedish efforts and experiences[J].Scand JPublic Health,2010,38:561-564.
    9. Cleary S,Mooney G,McIntyre D.Equity and efficiency in HIV-treatment in South Africa:the contribution of mathematical programming to priority setting.Health economics[J].2010,19(10):1166-80
    10. Baeroe K.Priority setting in health care: on the relation between reasonable choices onthe micro-level and the macro-level[J].Theoretical medicine and bioethics,2008,29(2):87-102.
    11. Baltussen R, Niessen L. Priority setting of health interventions: the need for multi-criteriadecision analysis[J].Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation,2006,4(8):14.
    12. Peacock S, Mitton C, Bate A,et al. Overcoming barriers to priority setting usinginterdisciplinary methods[J].Health Policy,2009,9(2-3)2:124-132.
    13. Chris James, Guy Carrin,William Savedoff,et al. Clarifying Efficiency-EquityTradeoffs Through Explicit Criteria, With a Focus on Developing Countries[J]. HealthCare Analysis,2005,13(1):33-34.
    14. Kapiriri L,Norheim OF,Martin DK.Priority setting at the micro-,meso-andmacro-levels in Canada,Norway and Uganda[J].Health Policy,2007,82(10):78-94.
    15. Daniels N,Sabin J E. Setting limits fairly: Can we learn to share medical resources?[M].Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.2002:25-46.
    16. Bryant, J. H. Health Priority Dilemmas in developing countries In A. Coulter&C. Ham(Eds.) The Global Challenge of Health Care Rationing[M]. Buckingham: OpenUniversity Press.2000.63-74
    17. Baltussen R. Priority setting of public spending in developing countries: Do not try to doeverything for everybody[J].Health Policy,2006,76(2-3):149–156.
    18. Kapiriri L, Martin D K. A strategy to improve priority setting in developing countries[J].Health Care Anal,2007,15(3):159-167.
    19. Byskov J, Bloch P, Blystad A,et al. Accountable priority setting for trust in healthsystems-the need for research into a new approach for strengthening sustainable healthaction in developing countries[J]. Health Research Policy and Systems,2009,7(10):23.
    20. Smith N,Mitton C,eacock S,et al. Identifying research priorities for health care prioritysetting: a collaborative effort between managers and researchers[J].BMC Health ServicesResearch,2009,9(1):165.
    21. R Baltussen, S Youngkong, F Paolucci, L Niessen. Multi-criteria decision analysis toprioritize health interventions: Capitalizing on first experiences[J].Health Policy,2010,96(3):262-264.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700