用户名: 密码: 验证码:
三峡库区和贵州石漠化地区生态治理模式及经济敏感性分析
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
本论文通过总结整理西部山地具有典型性和代表性的三峡库区和贵州石漠化地区实践中创造的生态治理模式,参考国内外理论研究,并选取试验地区进行规划设计、组织实施、跟踪调查等实例验证方法,旨在补充国内西部山地生态治理模式,构建西部山地生态治理的模式系列;通过选取典型生态治理模式实践应用后社会经济指标的收集处理和计算,探索生态治理模式的社会经济评价方法,特别是研究分析生态治理模式对劳动力价格因素的敏感度,旨在补充国内对生态治理模式基于社会经济评价中对劳动力价格变化因素尚未引起重视并深入研究应用的空白,为动态选择生态治理模式提供新的思路、依据和标准;提出西部开发生态治理的政策措施建议,旨在推动西部山地生态治理模式的科学选择和应用,探索生态治理模式区域转移条件,推进我国西部山地生态治理技术进步。得出主要结论如下:
     (1)通过对三峡库区的一般调查研究和系统调查研究,提出了基于自然条件的三峡库区生态模式三级分类系统:模式序列、模式类型和具体模式。生态林业(防护林)技术模式体系细分4个序列11种类型,农林复合经营技术模式序列分5种类型。
     (2)通过对贵州石漠化地区的实地调研和资料总结,提出了石漠化地区生态技术模式系列,该模式系列包括林业治理技术模式、农林复合技术模式、生态农业技术模式类型以及岩溶地区生态旅游技术模式及具体模式。
     (3)通过三峡库区秭归县和贵州省关岭县为案例分析,综合小流域治理和综合石漠化治理是一个综合的生态修复工程,采用综合的生态技术措施,产生了比较好的生念以及社会经济效果。
     (4)在当前劳动力价格下,黔西县和关岭县采用的生态治理模式内部收益率都高于设定的基准贴现率(10%),但收益率随生态治理模式不同而不同,户用生态模式投资收益率显著高于林业生态治理模式。劳动力价格变动势必带来生产结构的变化,在生态治理结构下表现为劳动力投入量少替代劳动投入量多的治理模式。在当前劳动力价格下,林下种草生态治理模式要高于其他几种林业治理模式,坡改梯、针阔混交林、封山育林经济效益差不多,而当劳动力价格大于每工同63元以后,封山育林的经济适应性比较强,政策应偏向于封山育林生态治理模式:劳动力价格大于32元/工日时,农户生态治理模式内部收益率比较为:经济林>农林复合>观光果园,农户为了得到更多的经济利益,应更偏好于经济林;沼气池经济效益好,承担风险小,在有条件的地方可以进一步推广。
     (5)本研究的政策启示有:1)重视各地生态治理技术模式的整理,而形成多样化的模式序列,以丰富生态治理模式的多样化、序列化,是适应山区复杂的自然经济和社会条件和不断增加的农户异质性;2)由于不同的生态治理模式其投入不一样,中央政府的生态治理投资项目往往采取生态治理模式的标准化、模式化,这样就迫使地方政府和农民选择单一化;3)重视生态治理模式社会经济适应性的问题,不同的模式其社会经济条件的适应性是不同的;4)国家和地方生态治理工程项目必须正视劳动工资不断上涨的趋势,生态治理政策必须具备农民视角;5)考虑生态治理模式从东向西的转移。
This dissertation aims to document existing ecological rehabilitation models, reconstruct a mapping of model series through analyzing ecological rehabilitation models and second hand research materials and with on-site investigation including rehabilitation designing, implementation and monitoring, evaluation in mountainous region of Western China. Through empirical cases studies on typical ecological rehabilitation models and social economic evaluation based on developing a social and economic indicators for evaluation, social and economic evaluation model has been explored for ecological rehabilitation, in particular, sensitivity of labor price to ecological rehabilitation models and associated techniques, which has not yet been considered by the prior researchers and provide a new angle, new perspective and criterion to optimize the ecological rehabilitation models in dynamic approaches. The dissertation comes up with policies for ecological rehabilitation models and associated technologies, which could direct scientific choices and application on enhancing ecological rehabilitation models in mountainous region of Western China, explored the conditions of regional transferring, and to promote technical progress of ecological rehabilitation in the mountainous region of Western China. The major conclusions are as followings:
     1. Through general investigation and in-depth investigation at the Three Gorges Reservoir Regions, a 3 -level model category has been put forward for ecological rehabilitation models and associated techniques, which are model series, model type and model. Ecological forestry model series can be grouped into 11 model types.
     2. Through field investigation at Karsts and documentation analysis, at the karsts area of Guizhou province, the models series includes ecological rehabilitation models types with forestry, agroforestry types, eco-farming type, and eco-tourism types. The detailed models in each type has been documented too.
     3. Through cases studies at Zigui county of the Three Gorges Reservior Regions and Karst Region of Guizhou Province, integrated watershed management and integrated Karst area management are of a successful, integrated ecological engeering. The integrated ecological models and associated technologies have been adopted, and good ecological and economic return can be achieved.
     4. Assuming at the present labor price, the internal economic return of ecological rehabilitation models adopted at Xianxi County and Guanlin County is higher that that set banking return 10%. However, internal economic return varies among different models. And In general, the economical return of household based models is higher that of area based model, in particular plantation models. As regards the current labor costs, the best pattern is forest combined with grass, the second pattern is to terrace the slope land, the third is coniferous forest combined with broad-leaved forest pattern, and finally is the forest conservation pattern. When labor costs exceeds 63 yuan, the economic benefit of the forest conservation models are better than others. When the price set at 32 yuan/day, internal economic return ranks from higher to lower are: Cash crops models; agroforestry, orchards for tour. Thus, in order to having high cash return, the householders would prefer cash crops models. Biogas models have high economic return too and with low risks in terms of labor price fluctuation, which would extend to large scale.
     5. Policy recommendation from this research are: 1) strengthening the documentation of ecological rehabilitation models at different regions, forming great diversity of ecological rehabilitation models, then to adopt great complex of natural, economic and social condition, and diversifying householders condition; 2) due to different level of input required to different models, thus, simplification and standardization of models upon the request of ecological rehabilitation project proposed by central government, would limit the choice of households and local government; 3) paying great attention on adaptation of ecological rehabilitation model to social and economic conditions; 4) the ecological rehabilitation projects approved by central government and local government should meet the challenges of rising of labor cost in the future, policy to ecological rehabilitation should adopt farmers' perspective; 5) pay attention to transfer the models and associated technology from east part of China to west part of China.
引文
1.曹利军.可持续发展评价与方法.北京:科学出版社,1999
    2.长江流域上游水土保持委员会.长江水利委员会水土保持局.长江上游水土保持重点防治工程科学研究论文集.北京:中国水利水电出版社,1997
    3.长江流域水土保持技术手册编辑委员会.长江流域水土保持技术手册.北京:中国水利水电出版社,1999
    4.长江水利委员会.三峡工程生态环境影响研究.武汉:湖北科学出版社,1997
    5.陈士军,周昱,谢振华.赣州市“猪—沼—果”生态农业标准化建设探讨.农业环境与发展,2002(04):8-9
    6.陈伟烈,张喜群,梁松筠.三峡库区的植物与复合农业生态系统.北京:科学出版社,1994
    7.樊巍,张劲松等.苹果—平菇复合系统生态经济效应研究.林业科学,2002,38(5):152-155
    8.冯明汉.长江流域水土保持规划.万里长江(水土保持专集).1993(3)
    9.高春雨,毕于运等.“五配套”生态家园模式经济效益评价—以陕两省洛川县“果-畜-沼-窖-草”模式为例.中国生态农业学报,2008,16(5):1287-1292
    10.高椿翔,高杰等.林粮间作生态效果分析.防护林科技,2000,44(3):97-98
    11.高甲荣,齐实.生态环境建设规划.北京:中国林业出版社,2006
    12.顾连宏、赖世登、廖俊国等,1992,林粮间作系统空间结构的优化设计与分析方法:熊文愈、姜志林、黄宝龙等主编,中国农林复合经营,江苏科学技术出版社,南京。
    13.关君蔚,张洪江.山区建设和可持续发展,《海峡两岸山地灾害与环境研究》第一卷,崔鹏主编,四川科学技术出版社,1998
    14.关君蔚.长江洪水的启示.中国林业出版社,1999
    15.郭方.长江流域环境问题与持续发展.重庆环境科学,1996,18(4):1-4
    16.郭永明,唐时嘉.四川省土地石化问题初探.贵州科学,1992,10(3):49-53.
    17.国家林业局.全国林业生态建设与治理模式.北京:中国林业出版社,2003
    18.国家林业局科学技术司.长江上游黄河上游经济林栽培技术.北京:中国农业出版社,2000
    19.何群,1991,农桐间作优化模式的经济学分析,泡桐与农用林业,1:20-32。
    20.黄闰泉.三峡库区农林复合系统结构优化研究[D].北京林业大学图书馆,2002
    21.蒋建平、武禄光、刘廷志等,1992,农桐间作系统综合效益分析及多目标模式优化:熊文愈、姜志林、黄宝龙等主编,中国农林复合经营,江苏科学技术出版社,南京。
    22.蒋昭侠.三峡区域资源开发及产业发展初探.地域研究与开发.1998,17(4):49-52
    23.赖亚兰.重庆三峡库区生态脆弱带农业可持续发展研究.生态经济,2000(1):21-23
    24.李文华,赖世登.中国农林复合经营.北京:科学出版社,1994
    25.李秀彬,彭业轩等.等高活篱笆技术提高坡地持续生产力探讨—以三峡库区为例.地理研究,1998,17(3):309-315
    26.李秀彬,施迅等.高活篱笆试验研究的若干问题.地理研究,1996,15(1):66-72
    27.梁万选等,1987,农桐间作效益的研究,泡桐与农用林业,(2):1-11。
    28.刘江等.全国生态环境建设规划.北京:中华工商联合出版社,1999
    29.刘宏伟,马延华.三峡库区开发性移民途径的探讨—以开县为例.西南师范大学学报,1998, 23(1):97-103
    30.刘金龙,肖斌.民权县农区林业综合效益评价.林业科学研究,1999,12(2):165-171
    31.刘克辉.立体农业工程技术.郑州:河南科学技术出版社,2000
    32.刘书楷.长江流域农业生态经济区划的初步探讨.中国农村经济,1988,(3):40-43
    33.刘晓鹰,1991,杉木、柳杉与黄连间作的初步研究,生态学杂志,10(4):30-34。
    34.娄安如.生物多样性与我国的农林业的复合经营.生态农业研究,1994,2(4):14-17.8
    35.卢琦,慈龙骏.农林复合经营研究的回顾与展望.世界林业研究,1996,9(2):39-49
    36.卢良恕.加大治山、治水和林业建设力度,力促山区综合开发再上新台阶.北京:中国林业出版社,1999
    37.卢琦、赵体顺、师永全等(著),1999,农用林业系统仿真的理论与方法,中国环境科学出版社,北京。
    38.卢耀如.长江全流域国土地质生态环境有待进行综合治理.北京:中国林业出版社.,1999
    39.吕耀.农业生态系统中氮素造成的非点源污染.农业环境保护,1998,17(1):35-39
    40.吕俊强,钟章成.重庆三峡库区农林复合经营可持续发展研究.重庆环境科学,20(6):1-4
    41.骆永菊.三峡腹地贫困山区经济支撑框架构建及产业发展路径选择.农村经济,2004(4):31-33
    42.马世骏,王如松.社会—经济—自然复合生态系统.生态学报,1984,4(1):1-9
    43.孟平,樊巍.农林复合系统水热资源利用率的研究.林业科学研究,1999,12(3):256-261
    44.孟平,宋兆民等.农林复合系统光能利用率的研究.林业科学,1997,33(Sp):14-19
    45.钱发文,刘金龙,江红星等.社区参与湿地管理.北京:中国科学出版社,2008.
    46.钦佩,安树青,颜京松.生态工程学.南京:南京大学出版社,1998
    47.申元村,冷疏影等.坡地农林复合系统的结构类型与效益分析—以三峡库区坡地农业为例.地理研究,1995,14(3):43-50
    48.申元村.三峡库区植物篱坡地农业技术水土保持效益研究.土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报,1998,4(2):61-66
    49.申元村.资源工程体系建设探讨—以三峡库区坡地资源开发保护体系建设为例.长江流域资源与环境,1998,7(2):97-100
    50.苏维词.贵州石漠化山地的“石漠化”及防治对策.长江流域资源与环境,1995,4(2):177-182.
    51.苏维词.贵州岩溶山区石漠化及生态经济治理模式.中国岩溶,2004,21(1):19-25.
    52.苏维词.中国西南岩溶山区石漠化治理的症结、模式及对策.水土保持学报,2002,16(5):24-29.
    53.陶战.生态经济区概论.生态农业研究,1996,4(2):11-13
    54.屠玉麟.贵州土地石漠化现状及原因分析[A].见:李箐主编.石灰岩地区开发治理[C].贵阳:贵州人民出版社,1996:67.
    55.王辉,崔光教.“桑+蚕+菜+沼”生态农业模式与经济效益.林业实用技术,2006(3):10-11
    56.王超俊.建立长江法规体系,保护长江水资源.重庆环境保护,1987,9(2):13-16
    57.王黎明,杨燕风,关庆锋.三峡库区退耕坡地环境移民压力研究.地理学报,2001,56(6)
    58.王礼先,张洪江.中国森林与生态环境.北京:中国林业出版社,1999
    59.王礼先,解明曙.山地防护林水土保持水文生态效益及其信息系统.北京:中国林业出版社, 1998
    60.王礼先.长江上游水土保持及环境保护..北京:中国林业出版社,1995
    61.王礼先.加强西部地区生态环境建设.中国水土保持.2000(5):7-9
    62.王瑞江,姚长宏等.贵州六盘水石漠化特点、成因及防治.中国岩溶,2001,20(3):211.
    63.王顺克.三峡库区山地高效生态农业复合产业群的研究.西南农业大学学报,2001,23(2):189-192
    64.王顺克.三峡库区生态经济复合产业带的构建研究.长江流域资源与环境,2001,10(3):205-210
    65.王允喜.花岗岩风化层地区梯田的布设与施工.中国水土保持,1991,(7):23-28
    66.王忠林.渭北旱塬混农林体系小气候环境与光合生产研究.西北林学院学报,1998,13(1):10-15
    67.温铁军.“三农问题”世纪反思,粮食问题研究,2001(02):16
    68.吴刚,冯宗炜.黄淮海平原豫北地区农林业系统的能量研究.应用生态学报,1994,5(4):355-359
    69.席桂萍.豫东黄河故道的农林复合生态模式经济效益分析.河南林业科技,2008,28(02):23-25
    70.向成华.川中浅丘农区坡地林农复合系统的综合评价.自然资源学报,1996,11(2):142-149
    71.向成华.川中浅丘农区坡地林农复合系统能量流的研究.农村生态环境,1996,12(1):11-15
    72.向万胜,梁称福,李卫红.三峡库区花岗岩坡耕地不同种植方式下水土流失定位研究.应用生态学报,2001,12(1):47-50
    73.向万胜,梁称福,肖润林.三峡库区坡耕地利用与水土保持种植制.长江流域资源与环境,1998,7(3):255-259
    74.向仲怀等.三峡库区生态环境建设与农业可持续发展战略研究.北京:中国林业出版社,2000
    75.肖文发等.长江三峡库区陆生动植物生态.北京:中国林业出版社,2000
    76.谢京湘,于汝元,胡涌.农林复合生态系统研究概述.北京林业大学学报,1988,10(1):104-108
    77.徐创军,杨立中等.紫色土坡地不同种植模式生态经济效益综合评价.中国生态农业学报.2008,16(01):196-199
    78.许厚泽.长江三峡工程对生态与环境的影响及对策研究.北京:科学出版社,1988
    79.薛家翠,曾祥福等.三峡库区长江防护林模式的研究.水土保持研究,2006,13(6):37-40
    80.杨爱民.三峡库区森林小流域可持续经营管理生态技术体系研究[D].北京林业大学图书馆,2001
    81.杨达源,任梨秀.长江三峡地区资源的分层结构特征.长江流域资源与环境,1996,5(4):304-309
    82.杨大三等.鄂西三峡库区防护林研究.武汉:湖北科学出版社,1996
    83.杨林章,李运东等.三峡库区复合农业生态系统及其建设途径.长江流域资源与环境,1999,8(2):205-209
    84.杨启修.三峡工程对库区植被资源的影响与对策[M].北京:科学出版社,1987
    85.杨艳生,史德明.长江三峡区土壤侵蚀研究.南京:东南大学出版社,1994
    86.杨玉坡等.长江上游防护林研究[M].北京:科学出版社,1993
    87.银春台.中国长江中上游防护林体系.成都:四川科学技术出版社,1990
    88.余刚鹏.湖北省农业生态经济分区初探.华中师范大学学报(自然科学版),1997,3l(1):107-112
    89.余剑如.长江上游地面侵蚀与河流泥沙问题的探讨.人民长江,1987:21-29
    90.袁泳,陈永芳.三峡工程对农业生态环境的影响与对策.农业环境保护,1999,18(3):141-143
    91.云正明,刘金铜.生态工程学.北京:气象出版社,1998
    92.张德邻.实行可持续发展战略,为把我市建设成为山青水秀的生态经济区而奋斗.重庆环境科学,1997,19(1):1-4
    93.张洪江,高中琪等.三峡库区多功能防护林体系构成与布局的思考.长江流域资源与环境,2000,9(4):479-486
    94.张洪江,解明曙等.长江三峡库区多功能防护林建设途径探讨.北京林业大学学报,1998,20(6):47-53
    95.张洪江,王礼先.中国农业水危机对策.北京:中国农业科技出版社,1998
    96.张劲松,孟平等.“京九”铁路大兴段绿化模式动力效应的研究.林业科学研究,2002,15(3):317-322
    97.张劲松,孟平等.太行山低山丘陵区苹果生姜间作系统综合效应研究.林业科学,2001,37(2):74-78.
    98.张攀俊,张智奎.三峡工程(库区)环境管理浅析.重庆环境科学,1997,19(1):35-38
    99.张壬武,卢兵友,孙振军.农业生态工程技术.郑州:河南科学技术出版社,2000
    100.张淑焕.中国农业生态经济与可持续发展.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2000
    101.郑吕隆.三峡库区生态林工程建设的初探.重庆环境科学,1999,21(1):6-7
    102.钟章成,邱永树.重庆三峡库区主要生态环境问题与对策.重庆环境科学,1999,21(1):1-2
    103.周万明,王力.重庆贫困山区种植业用地结构调整的模式与方法.西南师范大学学报,1998,23(2):244-251
    104.周再知,郑海水,杨曾奖.橡胶-砂仁复合系统生物产量、营养元素空间格局的研究.生态学报,1997,17(3):225-233
    105.朱首军,丁艳芳.渭北旱塬农林复合生态系统土壤水扩散率研究.水土保持通报,1999,19(3)
    106.竺肇华,1991,农桐间作综合效能及其合理模式的研究总报告,泡桐与农用林业,1:1-19。
    107.BooltinkHWG,HatanoR,et.al..Measurement and simulation of bypass flow in a structured clay soil:A physical morphological approach.Journal of Hydrology,1993,148:149-168
    108.Cameira,M.R.L.Ahuja,et.al..Evaluating field measured soil hydrautic properties in water transport simulations using the RZWQM.Journal of Hydrology,2000:78-90
    109.Chen.C,Thomas.D.Met.al..Two-domaine stimation of hydraulic in macropore soils.Soil Sci Soc AmJ,1993,(57):680-686
    110.Chen.C,Wagenet.R.J.Simulation of water and chemicals in macropore soils,l.representation of the equivalent macropore influence and its effect on soil-water flow.JHydrol,1992a,130:105-126
    111.Dabney S M,Meyer L D,et al.Depositionalpatterns of sediment trapped by grass hedges. Transaction of the ASAE,1995,38(6):1719-1729
    112.Daly,H.E.& J.B.Cobb.For the common Good:Redirecting the Economy toward the Community,the Environment and a Sustainable Future.Boston:Beacon Press,1989
    113.Gerke.H.H,van Genuchten.M.T.A dual-porosity rnodel for simulating the preferential movement of water and solutes in structured porous media.Water Resoures Research,1993a,19(2):305-319
    114.Hayes J C,Bafield B J,BarnhiselR I.Performance of grass filters under laboratory and field conditions.Transaction of the ASAE,1984,27(5):1321-1331
    115.Hill.D.Environmental soil physics.Academic press,1998:188-190
    116.Hu,C.Integrated management of home-garden.In:Compound Agriculture in China.WendingHuang.Science and Technology Press,Najing,1993.
    117.IUCN,UNEP,WWF.World Conservation Strategy:Living Resource Conservation for Sustainable Development.
    118.J kanmegne etc,Screening of 18 agroforestry species for high acid and aluminum toxic soils of the hurnid tropics,Agroforestry systems,2000:49
    119.J.E.Gilley,D.B.Simons.Interrill soil erosion-part Ⅰ Development of model equations.Transaction of the ASAE,1985,28(1):147-159
    120.J.Lehmann etc,Decomposition and nutrient release from leaves,twig and roots of three alley-cropped tree legurnes in central Togo.Agroforestry systems,1995,29:21-36
    121.J.Savat.Resistance to flow in rough supercritical sheet flow.Earth Surface Processes and Landforms,1980,5(2):103-122
    122.J.A Okogun etc,Nitrogen contribution of five leguminous trees and sgrubs to alley cropped maize in Ibadan,Nigeria.Agroforestry systems,2000:50
    123.J.Gregory,Approaches to rnodeling the uptake of water and nutrients in agroforestry systems,Agroforestry systems,1996:51-65
    124.Jarvis.N.J,Bergstrom.L.,PEDik.Modelling water and solute transport in macroporous soils,,chloride break through under non-steady flow.JSoilSci,1991b,42:71-81
    125.Karvonen,T.Koivusalo H.,Jauhiainen,et.al..Ahydrological model forpredicting runoff fome different land use.Journal of Hydrology,1999:253-265
    126.Kitahara Hikaru.The study history between pipe flow and rnacropores.Japan.hydraulic science,1996,227:81-114
    127.L.G.Govers.Selectivity and transport capacity of thin flows in elation to rill.CATENA,1985,12(1):35-49
    128.Landon,M.,Delin,K.G.N.,Komor,S.C.Regan,C.P.Comparison of the stable-isotopic composition of soil water collected from suction lysimeters,wick samplers,and cores in a sandy unsaturated zone.Journal of Hydrology,1999:45-54
    129.Larsson,M.H.Jarvis,N.J.Evaluation of a dual-porosity model to predict field-scale solute transport in a rnacroporous soil,Journal of Hydrology,1999:153-171
    130.Lukey,B.T.Sheffield,J.Bbathurst,et.al..Test of the SHETRAN technology for rnodelling the impact of reforestation on badlands runoff and sediment yield at Draix,France.Journal of Hydrology,2000:44-62
    131.Lundgren B O..Introduction.Agroforestry Systems,1982,1:3-61
    132.M.P.Mosley.Experiment study of rill erosion.Transaction of the ASAE,1974,17(5):909-913
    133.Montas.H.J,Eigel.J.D,Engel.B.A,et.al..Deterministic modeling of solute transportion soils with preferential flow pathways.American Society of Agricultureal Engineers,1997,40(5):1245-1256
    134.Novak,S.M.Portal,J.M.Schiavon,M.Effects of soil type upon metolachior losses in subsurface drainage.Chemosphere,2001:235-244
    135.Odum H.T,Enviroment,Power and Society[M].New York:Willy,1971
    136.Radulovich R.,Solorzano E.,Sollins P.,Soil macropore size distribution from water breakthrough curves.Soil Sci.Soc.Amer.J.53,1989:556-559
    137.Rob F.A.Handriks,Klaas Oostindie,Pim Hamminga,Simulation of bromide tracer and nitrogen transport in a cracked slay soil with the FLOCR/ANIMO model combination,Journal of Hydrology,1999:94-115
    138.Rutenbeek,H.J.Indicators of Ecologically Sustainable Development:Towards New Fundamentals.Ottawa:Canadian Environmental Advisory Council,1991
    139.S.S.Jain and P.Singh,Economical analysis of industrial agroforestry:Poplar in Utter Pradesh.Agroforestry systems,2000:49
    140.Schellinger G R,Clausen J C.Vegetative filter treament of dairy barnyard runoff in cold regions.J.Environ.Qual.,1992,21(1):40-45
    141.Steenhuis.T.S,Boll.J,Shalit.G,et.al..Simple equations for predicting preferential flow solute concentration.J Environ Qual,1994,23:1058-1064
    142.Sten Bergstrom,Phil Graham L.,On the scale problem in hydrological modeling.Journal of Hydrology,1999:253-265
    143.Van H.den Bosch,Ritsema,C.J.Boesten,J.T.I.Dekker,L.W.Hamminga,W.Simulation of water flow and bromide transport in a water repellent sandy soil using a one-dimensional convection-dispersion model.Journal of Hydrology,1999:172-187
    144.Wendroth,O.Pohl,Koszinski,W.S.Rogasik,H.Ritsema,C.J.Nielsen,D.
    145.World commission on Environment and Development(WCED).Our Common Future.Oxford:Oxford University Press,1987
    146.Zhang Anming,Xu Maoqi.The sustainable development of the mountainous region in Chongqing Three Gorges Reservoir region.Journal of Southwest China Normal University(Natural Science),1997,22(5):581-58

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700