安德森“类型学”唯物史观思想研究
|
摘要
本文以马克思主义哲学的基本理论为基础,从总体上把握安德森对唯物史观的本质理解,认为安德森在解读马克思主义哲学的过程中,形成了一种“类型学”的唯物史观思想,因此,本文的宗旨即在于揭示其思想内核和基本特征。本文主要是基于国内外学者对安德森思想的研究,通过对其代表性著作和文章的详细考察和解读,以及尽可能客观的分析和评价,形成了一个初步的探索性文本,意在理清安德森“类型学”唯物史观的学术脉络和历史渊源,把握其思想横向与纵向的内在关联,揭示其深层的本体论基质和方法论意蕴,挖掘其背后的认识论基础和价值论诉求。在这一“类型学”的唯物史观思想中,历史唯物主义构成了其核心的理论框架和话语体系,“类型学”构成了其基本的方法论原则。在这一理论体系和方法论原则的结合下,安德森集中对社会形态、社会主体、社会权力以及资本主义和社会主义等问题做了深入分析和研究。
遵循这一思路,本文共分为七章：
第一章为导言,首先通过对安德森学术著作和学术成就的梳理,阐明研究安德森思想的重要性和必要性；其次是通过对安德森思想的国内外研究现状的综述,指出其中所存在的问题和不足；再者是对安德森思想的核心理念给出轮廓性的勾勒；最后是对本论文的研究意义予以简要说明。
第二章主要是系统梳理安德森“类型学”唯物史观的三大思想来源,即经典马克思主义、英国的马克思主义和欧洲大陆的马克思主义。对于经典马克思主义,安德森走向了对晚期马克思思想的科学保卫和辩护,尤其采用了马克思在《政治经济学批判》和《资本论》中得出的一套系统的历史唯物主义的基本理论和范畴,如生产力与生产关系、经济基础与上层建筑、生产方式与社会形态等思想,并应用于对历史、现实和未来的研究中。对于英国的马克思主义,安德森在与以汤普森为首的历史学派就有关英国历史、社会、文化和政治等层面的争论中,得出了对英国马克思主义和社会主义文化的一种否定诊断和结论,从而为英国引入欧洲大陆理性主义的马克思主义奠定了坚实的理论基础。对于欧洲大陆的马克思主义,安德森认为“西方马克思主义”偏离了经典马克思主义的政治经济学传统而走向了哲学、美学、文化等上层建筑领域,同时具有一种理论与实践内在分离的典型特征。最为重要的是,安德森在对阿尔都塞的极端结构主义思想的批判基础上,形成了一种温和的结构主义的马克思主义思想。所有这些都构成了安德森“类型学”唯物史观的理论源泉,经典马克思主义成了其思想的理论基石,英国的马克思主义为其提供了经验主义和历史主义的思想基质,欧洲大陆的马克思主义为其提供了理性主义和科学主义的本质要素。
第三章主要是阐述安德森的历史哲学思想。历史研究是安德森“类型学”唯物史观的逻辑前提和基础,他遵循着经典历史唯物主义的理性主义和科学主义的研究路径和方法,对社会存在、社会发展和社会变迁进行了重点研究和论述。首先,通过对生产方式和社会形态之间关系的理论论证,说明社会形态在时间和空间中的集约性；其次,通过对奴隶主义生产方式与封建主义生产方式之间的对比,以及对封建主义总危机的考察和封建主义生产方式的重新界定,说明社会存在的结构性和整体性。再者,通过对“封建主义类型学”和“绝对主义类型学”的细致考察,说明社会变迁的断裂性和社会形态的多样性。最后,通过对资本主义的起源及欧洲封建主义与日本封建主义之间的对比,说明每个社会发展自身的系谱性和根源性。
第四章主要是阐释安德森的阶级主体理论。尽管阶级范畴和理论受到了诸多非马克思主义者甚至是马克思主义者的质疑和责难,但它在安德森的“类型学”唯物史观中却占据着核心位置。首先,在对阶级的界定中,安德森明确反对汤普森对于历史代理人的唯意志主义的界定,认为历史代理人的能动作用只有在严格的历史决定论的前提下才能成立,由此形成了有关阶级的结构性定义。其次,在对工人阶级的主观意识和文化的考察和分析中,安德森认为英国工人阶级享有一种典型的劳工主义的意识形态而缺乏一种革命的马克思主义思想和文化,得出了英国工人阶级无法自我解放的结论,并在此基础上提出了一种替代主义的策略,认为英国工人阶级需要自由独立的知识分子帮助他们形成一种革命意识和行为。
第五章主要是论述安德森的阶级权力思想。无论是历史学的研究,还是社会学的研究中,政治都是安德森整个学术著作和学术研究的一个核心焦点,而权力问题则是其重中之重。首先,安德森在《当代危机的起源》一文中提出了一种基于唯物史观核心概念和理论的“具体的类型学”的阐释模式,并在这一模式下分析了英国独特的“三角地形学”的权力结构模式。其次,安德森在《安东尼奥·葛兰西的自相矛盾》一文中通过对葛兰西“领导权”概念和理论的剖析,指出了葛兰西有关西欧资产阶级权力结构的说明中存在的三大矛盾和问题,同时提出了他自己对西欧资产阶级权力结构本质的说明和对东西欧权力结构模式的思考框架。
第六章主要是探讨安德森的革命社会主义的策略思想。在安德森看来,无论是苏俄的马克思主义,还是西方马克思主义,他们都普遍缺乏一种实现社会主义的切实可行的具体策略。一方面,安德森在对列宁主义和社会民主主义两种策略模式分析的基础上,认为前者是一种真正的适应,后者是一种错误的适应,从而接受了列宁的经典工程,认为向社会主义的转变必须推翻资本主义的国家机器。另一方面,安德森在对葛兰西“阵地战”策略的批评基础之上,为西方无产阶级提出了“阵地战”与“运动战”相结合的革命策略。但鉴于这一革命策略的不可行,安德森在1980年认为这一革命的社会主义理想应加入一种道德现实主义的乌托邦,同时在2000年从革命主义转向了现实主义。与此同时,在对资本主义的历史分期和新自由主义的祛魅中,安德森设想了一种资本主义全面变革之后的社会主义理想国,一种真正自由、民主和平等的社会主义社会。
第七章主要对安德森“类型学”唯物史观思想进行一个总体的评析。从本体论来看,与英国新马克思主义者威廉斯的部分改造和汤普森的完全摒弃不同,安德森始终把唯物史观当作一种有关历史的理论话语体系,在对它的坚决保卫和辩护中回到了经典马克思主义的解释路径,坚持了对历史的唯物主义解释原则和历史决定论的思想。从方法论来看,安德森采用了一种多元的方法论,经验的、理性的、历史的、结构的、总体的和比较的,并在这些方法的杂糅和交汇中形成了一种独特的“类型学”唯物史观的思维范式。其中,历史和社会构成了“类型学”唯物史观的两个根本维度,从而形成了一种总体的历史社会理论。从认识论来看,社会主义构成了安德森“类型学”唯物史观的理论诉求和价值旨归。他怀有一种国际主义的社会主义思想,与汤普森等人的民族主义的社会主义不同,前者的理论基础在于其科学主义和理性主义的马克思主义,后者的理论基础在于其人本主义和道德主义的马克思主义。从实践论来看,安德森始终坚守着革命社会主义的理想,期待着马克思主义理论和工人阶级运动的结合。在对第一代新左派的道德政治实践的拒绝中,安德森走向了科学的政治实践。但在这一科学的政治实践中,繁荣的革命理论与无为的革命实践之间形成了鲜明对照。
This paper is going to get through the thought core and essentional features of Anderson's historical materialism of "typology". The whole study is based on the basic theory of Marxist philosophy, made an overall grasp of Anderson's essencial understanding of historical materialism. I found that Anderson formed his historical materialism of "typology" in the process of reading Marxist philosophy thought. My desertation wants to clarify the academic context and historical sources of Anderson's historical materialism of "typology", get through its intrisic connection horizonly and vertically, reveal its ontological nature and methodological meaning, dig out its epistemological foundation and value pursuit; all my study was on the basis of studies which held by foreign and domestic scholars, I analyzed the classical books and articles which wrote by Anderson objectively. From his historical materilism of "typology", we can say that the historical materialism is a core theory system and the typology is a kind of methodology which appeared in Anderson's studies, which focused on the social formation, the social subject, the social power, the capitalism and socialist and so on.
The paper is divided into seven chapters.
The first chapter is an introduction. In this part, I explained the importance and necessity of Anderson's thought through his academic works and achievements firstly. Secondly, I gave an outline of the foreign and domestic studies and pointed out the problems and defects. Thirdly, I gave the reason of the core ideal of Anderson's thought. Forthly, I explained the significance of study briefly.
In the second chapter, I combed the three sources of Anderson's thought systemly, which are the classical Marxism, the empericist Marxism in Britiain and the rationalist Marxism in European Continent. About the classical Marxism thought, Anderson defended the late-Marx's thought scientifically. Especially, Anderson accepts productivity and production relations, base and superstructure, mode of production and social formation which Marx proposed in Critique of Political Economy and Capital, and applies them in the study of history, reality and future. In the debate with the new English Marxism, especially with the Historical School represented by E. P. Thompson, on the Britain history, society, culture and politics, Anderson denied the English existence of Marxist and socialist culture, while dug the theretical and cultural resources of European Marxism. But toward European Marxism, Anderson argued that they deviated from the political economy of the classical Marxism to the cultural field of philosophy and aesthetics and had the typical separation of theory and practice. Most importantly, Anderson formed a mild structuralist Marxism based on the criticism of Althusser's extreme structuralism. All of these constituted the theoretical sources of Anderson's historical materialism of "typology", the theretical corestone provided by the classical Marxism, the substancial element of expericism and historicism provided by the English Marxism and the essencial element of rationalism and scientism provided by the Marxism in European Continent.
In the third chapter, I studied Anderson's historical philosophy thought thoroughly. The historical study is the logical premise and foundation of Anderson's historical materialism of "typology", his historical study guided by the research approaches and methods of classical historical materialism, which focus on social existences, developments and changes. Firstly, Anderson explained the temporal and spacial intensivity of social formation by the theoretical arguments between the mode of production and the social formation. Secondly, Anderson formulated the unity of society, which carried by the comparsion between the slavary and feudalist mode of production, the investigation of the general crisis of feudalism and the redefination of the feudalist mode of production. And then, Anderson explained the difference and diversity of social changes in different European regions and countries, which went through the investigation of the feudalist and absolutist typology. At last, Anderson illustrated the genealogy and inherency of social development based on the study of the origins of capitalism and the contrast between the European and Japanese feudalism.
The fourth chapter is to elucidate the theory of class subject. Although class category and class theory questioned and blamed by a lot of non-Marxists, sometimes came from Marxists, they occupied a central position of Anderson's historical materialism of "typology". At first, Anderson rejected the definition of the historical agency through the individual or class will by Thompson, he considered that the positive role of historical agency must be understood under the premise of strict historical determinism, and then he formed the structural definition of class. Second, in the analysis of the subjective conciousness and culture of the working-class, Anderson argued English working-class has a typical ideology of Labourism and lacks the revolutionary Marxist thought, and then, he gave us one conclusion that the English working-class couldn't liberate themselves. Based on the conclusion, Anderson put forward a kind of an alternative strategy, which is working-class need the intellectuals to help them shaping a truly revolutionary ideology and action.
The fifth chapter is to disscuss Anderson's class power. Politics is the most important part both in Anderson's history study and society study; and the question of power is priority among priorities in his politics. In Origins of the Present Crisis, Anderson put forward the explanation mode of a specific typology based on the historical materialism; according to the explanation mode, he analyzed the unique "triangle topography" mode in Britain power-structure. Meanwhile, Anderson elaborated Gramsci's theory of hegomony in The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci and pointed out that there are three contradictions in Gramsci's theory about the power-structure in Western Europe. At last, Anderson advanced the essence of the bourgeois power-structure in Western European, and then dis-closed his understanding about the different power-structures in the Eastern Europe and Western Europe.
The sixth chapter is to explore Anderson's revolutionary socialist strategy. In his opinion, the Russian Marxism and the Western Marxism lack the feasible strategies of socialist realization. By discussing Leninist and social democracy strategies which were suitable for the Eastern and Western Europe respectively, he argued that the former was a utter application and the latter was a wrong application and accepted the classical project of Lennin, that is towards socialism must overthrow the capitalist state machine. On the other hand, he criticized Gramsci's "position warfare" strategy and proposed a revolutionary strategy of combining the "position warfare" and the "movement warfare". Because of the unfeasible revolutionary strategy, Anderson believed that the revolutionary socialist thought should join a utopia of moral realism in1980, then get to the realism from revolutionalism in2000. At the same time, in analysis of the historical period of capitalism and in the disenchantment of the new liberalism, Anderson imaged a socialist utopia after a comprehensive change, which had a genuine freedom, democracy and equality.
The seventh chapter is conclusion. It is to give commentaries on Anderson's historical materialism of "typology" in four aspects. Ontologically, which is different from the partial transformation of Williams and the complete abandon of Thompson, Anderson always took historical materialism as a discourse system of historical theory, and in the resolute defence of historical materialism, returned to the interpretation path of classical Marxism and stick to the interpretation principle of historical materialism and the historical determinism. Methodologically, Anderson adopted a pluralistic methodology, such as experience, ration, history, structure, and comparison, and in the combination and intersection of these methods, formed a unique thinking pattern of the historical materialism of "typology". We have to say, history and society constituted two fundamental dimensions of his historical materialism of "typology", thus forming a general historical social theory. Epistemologically, socialism constituted the theoretical pursuit and value orientation of Anderson's historical materialism of "typology". He had an international socialism different from Thompson's nationalist socialism. The theoretical basis of the former is the scientific and rational Marxism, while the theoretical basis of the latter is the humane and moral Marxism. Practically, Anderson always insists on the revolutionary socialism ideal, expects the combination of the Marxist theory and the working class movement. Refusing the moral political practice of the first generation new left, Anderson had headed to scientific political practice. But in the practice, the prosperous revolutionary theory and the inactive revolutionary practice were in stark contrast.
遵循这一思路,本文共分为七章：
第一章为导言,首先通过对安德森学术著作和学术成就的梳理,阐明研究安德森思想的重要性和必要性；其次是通过对安德森思想的国内外研究现状的综述,指出其中所存在的问题和不足；再者是对安德森思想的核心理念给出轮廓性的勾勒；最后是对本论文的研究意义予以简要说明。
第二章主要是系统梳理安德森“类型学”唯物史观的三大思想来源,即经典马克思主义、英国的马克思主义和欧洲大陆的马克思主义。对于经典马克思主义,安德森走向了对晚期马克思思想的科学保卫和辩护,尤其采用了马克思在《政治经济学批判》和《资本论》中得出的一套系统的历史唯物主义的基本理论和范畴,如生产力与生产关系、经济基础与上层建筑、生产方式与社会形态等思想,并应用于对历史、现实和未来的研究中。对于英国的马克思主义,安德森在与以汤普森为首的历史学派就有关英国历史、社会、文化和政治等层面的争论中,得出了对英国马克思主义和社会主义文化的一种否定诊断和结论,从而为英国引入欧洲大陆理性主义的马克思主义奠定了坚实的理论基础。对于欧洲大陆的马克思主义,安德森认为“西方马克思主义”偏离了经典马克思主义的政治经济学传统而走向了哲学、美学、文化等上层建筑领域,同时具有一种理论与实践内在分离的典型特征。最为重要的是,安德森在对阿尔都塞的极端结构主义思想的批判基础上,形成了一种温和的结构主义的马克思主义思想。所有这些都构成了安德森“类型学”唯物史观的理论源泉,经典马克思主义成了其思想的理论基石,英国的马克思主义为其提供了经验主义和历史主义的思想基质,欧洲大陆的马克思主义为其提供了理性主义和科学主义的本质要素。
第三章主要是阐述安德森的历史哲学思想。历史研究是安德森“类型学”唯物史观的逻辑前提和基础,他遵循着经典历史唯物主义的理性主义和科学主义的研究路径和方法,对社会存在、社会发展和社会变迁进行了重点研究和论述。首先,通过对生产方式和社会形态之间关系的理论论证,说明社会形态在时间和空间中的集约性；其次,通过对奴隶主义生产方式与封建主义生产方式之间的对比,以及对封建主义总危机的考察和封建主义生产方式的重新界定,说明社会存在的结构性和整体性。再者,通过对“封建主义类型学”和“绝对主义类型学”的细致考察,说明社会变迁的断裂性和社会形态的多样性。最后,通过对资本主义的起源及欧洲封建主义与日本封建主义之间的对比,说明每个社会发展自身的系谱性和根源性。
第四章主要是阐释安德森的阶级主体理论。尽管阶级范畴和理论受到了诸多非马克思主义者甚至是马克思主义者的质疑和责难,但它在安德森的“类型学”唯物史观中却占据着核心位置。首先,在对阶级的界定中,安德森明确反对汤普森对于历史代理人的唯意志主义的界定,认为历史代理人的能动作用只有在严格的历史决定论的前提下才能成立,由此形成了有关阶级的结构性定义。其次,在对工人阶级的主观意识和文化的考察和分析中,安德森认为英国工人阶级享有一种典型的劳工主义的意识形态而缺乏一种革命的马克思主义思想和文化,得出了英国工人阶级无法自我解放的结论,并在此基础上提出了一种替代主义的策略,认为英国工人阶级需要自由独立的知识分子帮助他们形成一种革命意识和行为。
第五章主要是论述安德森的阶级权力思想。无论是历史学的研究,还是社会学的研究中,政治都是安德森整个学术著作和学术研究的一个核心焦点,而权力问题则是其重中之重。首先,安德森在《当代危机的起源》一文中提出了一种基于唯物史观核心概念和理论的“具体的类型学”的阐释模式,并在这一模式下分析了英国独特的“三角地形学”的权力结构模式。其次,安德森在《安东尼奥·葛兰西的自相矛盾》一文中通过对葛兰西“领导权”概念和理论的剖析,指出了葛兰西有关西欧资产阶级权力结构的说明中存在的三大矛盾和问题,同时提出了他自己对西欧资产阶级权力结构本质的说明和对东西欧权力结构模式的思考框架。
第六章主要是探讨安德森的革命社会主义的策略思想。在安德森看来,无论是苏俄的马克思主义,还是西方马克思主义,他们都普遍缺乏一种实现社会主义的切实可行的具体策略。一方面,安德森在对列宁主义和社会民主主义两种策略模式分析的基础上,认为前者是一种真正的适应,后者是一种错误的适应,从而接受了列宁的经典工程,认为向社会主义的转变必须推翻资本主义的国家机器。另一方面,安德森在对葛兰西“阵地战”策略的批评基础之上,为西方无产阶级提出了“阵地战”与“运动战”相结合的革命策略。但鉴于这一革命策略的不可行,安德森在1980年认为这一革命的社会主义理想应加入一种道德现实主义的乌托邦,同时在2000年从革命主义转向了现实主义。与此同时,在对资本主义的历史分期和新自由主义的祛魅中,安德森设想了一种资本主义全面变革之后的社会主义理想国,一种真正自由、民主和平等的社会主义社会。
第七章主要对安德森“类型学”唯物史观思想进行一个总体的评析。从本体论来看,与英国新马克思主义者威廉斯的部分改造和汤普森的完全摒弃不同,安德森始终把唯物史观当作一种有关历史的理论话语体系,在对它的坚决保卫和辩护中回到了经典马克思主义的解释路径,坚持了对历史的唯物主义解释原则和历史决定论的思想。从方法论来看,安德森采用了一种多元的方法论,经验的、理性的、历史的、结构的、总体的和比较的,并在这些方法的杂糅和交汇中形成了一种独特的“类型学”唯物史观的思维范式。其中,历史和社会构成了“类型学”唯物史观的两个根本维度,从而形成了一种总体的历史社会理论。从认识论来看,社会主义构成了安德森“类型学”唯物史观的理论诉求和价值旨归。他怀有一种国际主义的社会主义思想,与汤普森等人的民族主义的社会主义不同,前者的理论基础在于其科学主义和理性主义的马克思主义,后者的理论基础在于其人本主义和道德主义的马克思主义。从实践论来看,安德森始终坚守着革命社会主义的理想,期待着马克思主义理论和工人阶级运动的结合。在对第一代新左派的道德政治实践的拒绝中,安德森走向了科学的政治实践。但在这一科学的政治实践中,繁荣的革命理论与无为的革命实践之间形成了鲜明对照。
This paper is going to get through the thought core and essentional features of Anderson's historical materialism of "typology". The whole study is based on the basic theory of Marxist philosophy, made an overall grasp of Anderson's essencial understanding of historical materialism. I found that Anderson formed his historical materialism of "typology" in the process of reading Marxist philosophy thought. My desertation wants to clarify the academic context and historical sources of Anderson's historical materialism of "typology", get through its intrisic connection horizonly and vertically, reveal its ontological nature and methodological meaning, dig out its epistemological foundation and value pursuit; all my study was on the basis of studies which held by foreign and domestic scholars, I analyzed the classical books and articles which wrote by Anderson objectively. From his historical materilism of "typology", we can say that the historical materialism is a core theory system and the typology is a kind of methodology which appeared in Anderson's studies, which focused on the social formation, the social subject, the social power, the capitalism and socialist and so on.
The paper is divided into seven chapters.
The first chapter is an introduction. In this part, I explained the importance and necessity of Anderson's thought through his academic works and achievements firstly. Secondly, I gave an outline of the foreign and domestic studies and pointed out the problems and defects. Thirdly, I gave the reason of the core ideal of Anderson's thought. Forthly, I explained the significance of study briefly.
In the second chapter, I combed the three sources of Anderson's thought systemly, which are the classical Marxism, the empericist Marxism in Britiain and the rationalist Marxism in European Continent. About the classical Marxism thought, Anderson defended the late-Marx's thought scientifically. Especially, Anderson accepts productivity and production relations, base and superstructure, mode of production and social formation which Marx proposed in Critique of Political Economy and Capital, and applies them in the study of history, reality and future. In the debate with the new English Marxism, especially with the Historical School represented by E. P. Thompson, on the Britain history, society, culture and politics, Anderson denied the English existence of Marxist and socialist culture, while dug the theretical and cultural resources of European Marxism. But toward European Marxism, Anderson argued that they deviated from the political economy of the classical Marxism to the cultural field of philosophy and aesthetics and had the typical separation of theory and practice. Most importantly, Anderson formed a mild structuralist Marxism based on the criticism of Althusser's extreme structuralism. All of these constituted the theoretical sources of Anderson's historical materialism of "typology", the theretical corestone provided by the classical Marxism, the substancial element of expericism and historicism provided by the English Marxism and the essencial element of rationalism and scientism provided by the Marxism in European Continent.
In the third chapter, I studied Anderson's historical philosophy thought thoroughly. The historical study is the logical premise and foundation of Anderson's historical materialism of "typology", his historical study guided by the research approaches and methods of classical historical materialism, which focus on social existences, developments and changes. Firstly, Anderson explained the temporal and spacial intensivity of social formation by the theoretical arguments between the mode of production and the social formation. Secondly, Anderson formulated the unity of society, which carried by the comparsion between the slavary and feudalist mode of production, the investigation of the general crisis of feudalism and the redefination of the feudalist mode of production. And then, Anderson explained the difference and diversity of social changes in different European regions and countries, which went through the investigation of the feudalist and absolutist typology. At last, Anderson illustrated the genealogy and inherency of social development based on the study of the origins of capitalism and the contrast between the European and Japanese feudalism.
The fourth chapter is to elucidate the theory of class subject. Although class category and class theory questioned and blamed by a lot of non-Marxists, sometimes came from Marxists, they occupied a central position of Anderson's historical materialism of "typology". At first, Anderson rejected the definition of the historical agency through the individual or class will by Thompson, he considered that the positive role of historical agency must be understood under the premise of strict historical determinism, and then he formed the structural definition of class. Second, in the analysis of the subjective conciousness and culture of the working-class, Anderson argued English working-class has a typical ideology of Labourism and lacks the revolutionary Marxist thought, and then, he gave us one conclusion that the English working-class couldn't liberate themselves. Based on the conclusion, Anderson put forward a kind of an alternative strategy, which is working-class need the intellectuals to help them shaping a truly revolutionary ideology and action.
The fifth chapter is to disscuss Anderson's class power. Politics is the most important part both in Anderson's history study and society study; and the question of power is priority among priorities in his politics. In Origins of the Present Crisis, Anderson put forward the explanation mode of a specific typology based on the historical materialism; according to the explanation mode, he analyzed the unique "triangle topography" mode in Britain power-structure. Meanwhile, Anderson elaborated Gramsci's theory of hegomony in The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci and pointed out that there are three contradictions in Gramsci's theory about the power-structure in Western Europe. At last, Anderson advanced the essence of the bourgeois power-structure in Western European, and then dis-closed his understanding about the different power-structures in the Eastern Europe and Western Europe.
The sixth chapter is to explore Anderson's revolutionary socialist strategy. In his opinion, the Russian Marxism and the Western Marxism lack the feasible strategies of socialist realization. By discussing Leninist and social democracy strategies which were suitable for the Eastern and Western Europe respectively, he argued that the former was a utter application and the latter was a wrong application and accepted the classical project of Lennin, that is towards socialism must overthrow the capitalist state machine. On the other hand, he criticized Gramsci's "position warfare" strategy and proposed a revolutionary strategy of combining the "position warfare" and the "movement warfare". Because of the unfeasible revolutionary strategy, Anderson believed that the revolutionary socialist thought should join a utopia of moral realism in1980, then get to the realism from revolutionalism in2000. At the same time, in analysis of the historical period of capitalism and in the disenchantment of the new liberalism, Anderson imaged a socialist utopia after a comprehensive change, which had a genuine freedom, democracy and equality.
The seventh chapter is conclusion. It is to give commentaries on Anderson's historical materialism of "typology" in four aspects. Ontologically, which is different from the partial transformation of Williams and the complete abandon of Thompson, Anderson always took historical materialism as a discourse system of historical theory, and in the resolute defence of historical materialism, returned to the interpretation path of classical Marxism and stick to the interpretation principle of historical materialism and the historical determinism. Methodologically, Anderson adopted a pluralistic methodology, such as experience, ration, history, structure, and comparison, and in the combination and intersection of these methods, formed a unique thinking pattern of the historical materialism of "typology". We have to say, history and society constituted two fundamental dimensions of his historical materialism of "typology", thus forming a general historical social theory. Epistemologically, socialism constituted the theoretical pursuit and value orientation of Anderson's historical materialism of "typology". He had an international socialism different from Thompson's nationalist socialism. The theoretical basis of the former is the scientific and rational Marxism, while the theoretical basis of the latter is the humane and moral Marxism. Practically, Anderson always insists on the revolutionary socialism ideal, expects the combination of the Marxist theory and the working class movement. Refusing the moral political practice of the first generation new left, Anderson had headed to scientific political practice. But in the practice, the prosperous revolutionary theory and the inactive revolutionary practice were in stark contrast.
引文
① Gregory Elliott. The Merciless Laboratory of History. Minneapolis London, University of Minnesota Press, xi.
① 参见玛丽·福布鲁克和西达·斯考切波.命定的路径：佩里·安德森的历史社会学.载西达·斯考切波.历史社会学的视野与方法.上海,上海人民出版社,2007,177-178.
① Paul Blackledge. Perry Anderson, Marxism and the New Left. London, The Merlin Press Ltd.,2004, x.
② Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London and New York, Verso,1980,207.
① Paul Blackledge. Perry Anderson, Marxism and the New Left. London, The Merlin Press Ltd.,2004, xi.
① Perry Anderson.Portugul and the End of Ultra-Colonialism Ⅲ.New Left Review,1962,17,113.
① 马克思恩格斯全集第3卷.北京，人民出版社,1960,43.
② 普列汉诺夫哲学著作选集第2卷.北京,三联书店,1961,510.
① 马克思恩格斯全集第31卷,北京,人民出版社,1998,413.
① Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,1980,62.
② Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,1980,63.
③ Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,1980,81.
① Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,1980,66.
② Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,1980,64.
③ 佩里·安德森.西方马克思主义探讨.高铦等译,北京,人民出版社,1981,136.
④ 马克思恩格斯全集第2卷.北京,人民出版社,1995,118.
① 马克思恩格斯选集第1卷.北京,人民出版社,1995,66.
② 马克思恩格斯选集第4卷.北京.人民出版社,1995,126-127.
③ 马克思恩格斯选集第1卷.北京,人民出版社,1995,13.
④ See Antony Easthope.British Post-structuralism since 1968.London and New York,Routledge,1988,1.
① Perrv Anderson. Arguments Within Enelish Marxism. London. Verso.1980.9-11.
③ 佩里·安德森.西方马克思主义探讨.高铦等译,北京,人民出版社,1981,138.
② Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,1980,9-12.
① 佩里·安德森.当代西方马克思主义.余文烈译,北京,东方出版社,1989,28.
② 佩里·安德森.西方马克思主义探讨.高铦等译,人民出版社,1981,139.
③ 佩里·安德森.当代西方马克思主义.余文烈译,北京,东方出版社,1989,121.
① Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,1980,84.
② 佩里·安德森.西方马克思主义探讨.高铦等译,北京,人民出版社,1981,133.
① Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,1980,149.
② Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,1980,149.
① Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,1980,207.
② Perry Anderson. Origins of the Present Crisis. New Left Review,1964,23,38-39.
① Perry Anderson.Origins of the Present Crisis.New Left Review,1964,23,28.
① Perry Anderson. Origins of the Present Crisis. New Left Review,1964,23,37.
② Perry Anderson. Origins of the Present Crisis. New Left Review,1964,23,39.
① E. P. Thompson. The Pecularity of the English, in The Poverty of Theory & Other Essays. New York and London, Monthly Review Press,290.
② Perry Anderson. Origins of the Present Crisis. New Left Review,1964,23,28.
③ Edward Thompson. The Peculiarities of the English. The Poverty of the Theory and Other Essays, London, Merlin Press,1978,358.
④ 李瑞艳.基于民族性的社会主义诉求——安德森从英国民族性特征对发达国家走向社会主义的哲学思考.当代国外马克思主义评论,2012,10,252.
① Edward Thompson. The Peculiarities of the English. The Poverty of the Theory and Other Essays, London, Merlin Press,1978,247.
② Edward Thompson. The Peculiarities of the English. The Poverty of the Theory and Other Essays, London, Merlin Press,1978,257.
③ Edward Thompson. The Peculiarities of the English. The Poverty of the Theory and Other Essays, London, Merlin Press,1978,267.
④ Edward Thompson. The Peculiarities of the English. The Poverty of the Theory and Other Essays, London, Merlin Press,1978,286.
① Perry Anderson. Origins of the Present Crisis. New Left Review,1964,23,30.
② Perry Anderson. Socialism and Pseudo-Empiricism.New Left Review,1966,35,24.
③ Perry Anderson. Component of the National Culture. New Left Review,1968,50,57.
① Perry Anderson. Component of the National Culture. New Left Review,1968,50,13.
① Perry Anderson. Component of the National Culture. New Left Review,1968,50,18.
② Perry Anderson. Component of the National Culture. New Left Review,1968,50,56.
③ Perry Anderson. Component of the National Culture. New Left Review,1968,50,18-19.
④ Antony Easthope. British Post-structuralism since 1968. London and New York, Routledge,1988,11.
① Perry Anderson.A Culture in Contraflow-Ⅰ. New Left Review,1990,180,52.
① Perry Anderson. Socialism and Pseudo-Empiricism.New Left Review,1966,35,31.
① Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,1980,149.
② Perry Anderson. Renewals. New Left Review,2000,1,8.
③ 佩里·安德森.西方马克思主义探讨.高铦等译,北京,人民出版社,1981,36.
① 佩里·安德森.西方马克思主义探讨.高铦等译,北京,人民出版社,1981,71.
② 参见陈学明.“西方马克思主义”命题词典.北京,东方出版社,2004,299.
① 佩里·安德森.西方马克思主义探讨.高铦等译,北京,人民出版社,1981,118.
② 佩里·安德森.当代西方马克思主义.高铦等译,北京,人民出版社,1981,30.
③ Lin Chun. The British New Left. Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press,1993,110.
④ 佩里·安德森.西方马克思主义探讨.高铦等译,北京,人民出版社,1981,89.
① 丹尼斯·德沃金.文化马克思主义在战后英国.李丹凤译,北京,人民出版社,2008,189-190.
① Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,1980,65.
② 阿尔都塞.保卫马克思.顾良译,北京,商务印书馆,2006,103.
② Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,1980,67.68.
① Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,1980,67.68.79.
② 阿尔都塞.保卫马克思.顾良译,北京,商务印书馆,2006,197-198.
① Perry Anderson.Arguments Within English Marxism.London,Verso,1980,55-56.
②佩里·安德森.当代西方马克思主义.余文烈译,东方出版社,1989，39.
① Louis Althusser. Reading Capital. trans. by Ben Brewster, London, New Left Books,1970,39.
② Louis Althusser. Lenin and Philosophy and other Essays. New York and London, Monthly Review Press,1971,180.
③ 佩里·安德森.西方马克思主义探讨.高铦等译,人民出版社,1981,68.
④ 佩里·安德森.当代西方马克思主义.余文烈译,东方出版社,1989,74.
① Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,1980,58.
② Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,1980,84.
③ 马尔库塞.单向度的人.刘继译,上海,上海译文出版社,2006,中译者序言.
① Perry Anderson. Components of the National Culture. New Left Review,1968,50,57.
② Paul Blackledge. Perry Anderson, Marxism and the New Left. London, The Merlin Press Ltd.,2004,61.
③ Paul Blackledge. Perry Anderson, Marxism and the New Left. London, The Merlin Press Ltd.,2004,68.
④ 佩里·安德森.西方马克思主义探讨.高铦等译,北京,人民出版社,1981,121.
⑤ 参见徐崇温主编.西方马克思主义理论研究.海南,海南出版社,2000,30.
① 佩里·安德森.当代西方马克思主义.余文烈译,北京,东方出版社,1989,116.
② 佩里·安德森.当代西方马克思主义.余文烈译,北京,东方出版社,1989,148.
③ 佩里·安德森.西方马克思主义探讨.高铦等译,北京,人民出版社,1981,122.
① 佩里·安德森.西方马克思主义探讨.高铦等译,北京,人民出版社,1981,122-123.
① 佩里·安德森.西方马克思主义探讨.高铦等译,北京,人民出版社,1981,136.
② 马克思恩格斯全集第2卷.1957,118-119.
③ 乔瑞金、李瑞艳.试论安德森的“类型学”唯物史观思想及其意义.哲学研究,2011,7.31.
① Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,1980,64.
② 佩里·安德森.绝对主义国家的系谱.刘北成、龚晓庄译,上海,上海人民出版社,2001,452.
③ Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,1980,66
① 马克思恩格斯全集第30卷,北京,人民出版社,1995,48.
② 阿尔都塞、巴里巴尔.读《资本论》.李其庆、冯文光译,北京,中央编译出版社,2008,87.
① Perry Anderson.Arguments within English Marxism.London,Verso,1980,73-76.
① 佩里·安德森.从古代到封建主义的过渡.郭方、刘健译,上海,上海人民出版社,2001,194-195.
① 马克思恩格斯选集第2卷,北京,人民出版社,1995,32-33.
② 佩里·安德森.从古代到封建主义的过渡.郭方、刘健译,上海,上海人民出版社,2001,216.
① Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,1980,81.
② Lin Chun. The British New Left. Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press,1993,129.
③ 佩里·安德森.绝对主义国家的系谱.刘北成、龚晓庄译,上海,上海人民出版社,2001,431.
① 佩里·安德森.绝对主义国家的系谱.刘北成、龚晓庄译,上海,上海人民出版社,2001,438.
② 佩里·安德森.绝对主义国家的系谱.刘北成、龚晓庄译,上海,上海人民出版社,2001,438.
③ 佩里·安德森.绝对主义国家的系谱.刘北成、龚晓庄译,上海,上海人民出版社,2001,432.
④ 佩里·安德森.绝对主义国家的系谱.刘北成、龚晓庄译,上海,上海人民出版社,2001,433-434.
① 佩里·安德森.绝对主义国家的系谱.刘北成、龚晓庄译,上海，上海人民出版社.2001.26.
② 佩里·安德森.绝对主义国家的系谱.刘北成、龚晓庄译,上海,上海人民出版社,2001,17.
① 乔瑞金、李瑞艳.试论安德森的“类型学”唯物史观思想及其意义.哲学研究,2011,7.33.
② 马克思恩格斯全集第31卷,北京,人民出版社,1998,413.
③ 佩里·安德森.绝对主义国家的系谱.刘北成、龚晓庄译,上海,上海人民出版社,2001,449.
④ 佩里·安德森.从古代到封建主义的过渡.郭方、刘健译,上海,上海人民出版社,2001,130.
① 佩里·安德森.从古代到封建主义的过渡.郭方、刘健译,上海,上海人民出版社,2001,159-160.
① 佩里·安德森.从古代到封建主义的过渡.郭方、刘健译,上海,上海人民出版社,2001,161-162.
① 佩里·安德森.绝对主义国家的系谱.刘北成、龚晓庄译,上海,上海人民出版社,2001,前言4.
② 佩里·安德森.绝对主义国家的系谱.刘北成、龚晓庄译,上海,上海人民出版社,2001,6.
③ Paul Blackledge. Perry Anderson, Marxism and the New Left. London, The Merlin Press Ltd.,2004.74.
④ Betty Behrens. Review:[untitled]. The Historical Journal,1976,1,249.
① 佩里·安德森.绝对主义国家的系谱.刘北成、龚晓庄译,上海,上海人民出版社,2001,203.
② 佩里·安德森.绝对主义国家的系谱.刘北成、龚晓庄译,上海,上海人民出版社,2001,213.
③ 佩里·安德森.绝对主义国家的系谱.刘北成、龚晓庄译,上海,上海人民出版社,2001,210.
④ 佩里·安德森.绝对主义国家的系谱.刘北成、龚晓庄译,上海,上海人民出版社,2001,13.
⑤ 佩里·安德森.绝对主义国家的系谱.刘北成、龚晓庄译,上海,上海人民出版社,2001,460.
① 乔瑞金、李瑞艳.试论安德森的“类型学”唯物史观思想及其意义.哲学研究,2011,7.35.
② 佩里·安德森.绝对主义国家的系谱.刘北成、龚晓庄译,上海,上海人民出版社,2001,450.
① 佩里·安德森.绝对主义国家的系谱.刘北成、龚晓庄译,上海,上海人民出版社,2001,455.
② 佩里·安德森.绝对主义国家的系谱.刘北成、龚晓庄译,上海,上海人民出版社,2001,451.
① 马克思恩格斯全集第19卷,北京,人民出版社,1963,129.130.430.
① 佩里·安德森.绝对主义国家的系谱.刘北成、龚晓庄译,上海,上海人民出版社,2001,前言5-6.
② 佩里·安德森.迈克尔·曼的权力社会学.载佩里·安德森.交锋地带.北京,中国社会科学竖版社,2008：101.
③ 佩里·安德森.绝对主义国家的系谱.刘北成、龚晓庄译,上海,上海人民出版社,2001,前言3.
④ 玛丽·福布鲁克,西达·斯考切波.命定的路径：佩里·安德森的历史社会学.载[美]西达·斯考切波编.历史社会学的视野与方法.上海,上海人民出版社,2007,186.
① 佩坐·安德森.绝对主义狗屁家的系谱.刘北成、龚晓庄译,上海,上海人民出版社,2001,567.
② 见玛丽·福布鲁克和西达·斯考切波.命定的路径：佩里·安德森的历史社会学.载西达·斯考切波.历史社会学的视野与方法.上海,上海人民出版社,2007,212.
① 郑陆霖.试析安德森《绝对国家之系谱》的历史方法.2006,32.
② 见玛丽·福布鲁克和西达·斯考切波.命定的路径：佩里·安德森的历史社会学.载西达·斯考切波.历史社会学的视野与方法.上海,上海人民出版社,2007,204.
③ 见玛丽·福布鲁克和西达·斯考切波.命定的路径：佩里·安德森的历史社会学.载西达·斯考切波.历史社会学的视野与方法.上海,上海人民出版社,2007,205.
④ E. P. Thompson. The Poverty of the Theory and Other Essays. London, Merlin and New York, Monthly Review Press,1978.37.
① 彼得·伯克.历史学与社会理论.姚朋等译, 上海,上海人民出版社,2010,2.
② R. Porter &C. R. Whittaker. Review:States and Estates", Social History,1976,3,376.
③ Martin Jay. Review:[untitled]. Theory and Society,1977,2,267
① Paul Blackledge. Perry Anderson, Marxism and the New Left. London, The Merlin Press Ltd.,2004,168.
① Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,1980,17.
② E. P. Thompson. The Poverty of the Theory and Other Essays. London, Merlin and New York, Monthly Review Press,1978,280.280.244
③ Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,1980,50.
④ 马克思恩格斯全集第37卷,北京,人民出版社,1971,461-462.
① Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,1980,19.
② Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,1980,19-20.
① E.P汤普森.英国工人阶级的形成.钱乘旦等译,南京,译林出版社,2001,前言1.213.
② Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,1980,33-34.
③ Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,1980,35.36.37.
① E. P. Thompson. The Making of the English Class. London,Victor Gollancz,1963,9.
② E. P. Thompson. The Poverty of the Theory and Other Essays. London, Merlin and New York, Monthly Review Press,1978,298-299.
① E. P. Thompson. The Making of the English Class. London, Victor Gollancz,1963,915.
② Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,1980,46.
③ Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,1980,44-45.
① See Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,1980,40.
② E. P. Thompson. Eighteenth-century English Society:Class Struggle Without Class? Social History,1978,2,150.
① E. P. Thompson. The Poverty of the Theory and Other Essays. London, Merlin and New York, Monthly Review Press,1978,357.
② E.P汤普森.民俗学、人类学与社会史.载蔡少卿.再现过去：社会史的理论视野.204。
③ E.P汤普森.英国工人阶级的形成.钱乘旦等译,南京,译林出版社,2001,211.
① 戴维·麦克莱伦.马克思思想导论.郑一明、陈喜贵译,北京,中国人民大学出版社,2008,191.
① Perry Anderson. Origins of the Present Crisis. New Left Review,1964,23,39.
② Perrv Anderson. Components of the National Culture. New Left Review,1968,50,15.
③ Perry Anderson, Origins of the Present Crisis. New Left Review,1964,23,41.
④ Perry Anderson, Origins of the Present Crisis. New Left Review,1964,23,30.
① Perry Anderson. Origins of the Present Crisis. New Left Review,1964,23,44.
② Perry Anderson. Origins of the Present Crisis. New Left Review,1964,23,43.
③ Perry Anderson. Origins of the Present Crisis. New Left Review,1964,23,44.
① Tom Nairn. The English Working Class. New Left Review,1964,24,52.57.
② 李瑞艳.基于民族性的社会主义诉求——安德森从英国民族性特征对发达国家走向社会主义的哲学思考.当代国外马克思主义评论,2012,10,256-257.
③ Perry Anderson. Socialism and Pseudo-Empiricism. New Left Review,1966,35,26.
④ Perry Anderson. Components of the National Culture. New Left Review,1968,50,11.
⑤ Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,148-149.
① Paul Blackledge. Perry Anderson, Marxism and the New Left. London, The Merlin Press Ltd.,2004,40.
② E.P汤普森.英国工人阶级的形成.钱乘旦等译,译林出版社,2001,862.
③ E. P. Thompson. The Pecularity of the English. in The Poverty of Theory & Other Essays, New York and London, Monthly Review Press,286.
④ E. P. Thompson. The Pecularity of the English. in The Poverty of Theory & Other Essays, New York and London, Monthly Review Press,284.
① 卢卡奇.历史与阶级意识.杜章智等译,商务印书馆,2009,131-132.
② Edward Thompson. The Peculiarities of the English. The Socialist Register,1965,346.
① Perry Anderson. Socialism and Pseudo-Empiricism.New Left Review,1966,35,27.
② E. P. Thompson. Eighteenth-century English Society:Class Struggle Without Class? Social History,1978,2,164.
① Perry Anderson. A Culture in Contraflow-Ⅰ. New Left Review,1990,180,41.
② Lin Chun. The British New Left. Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press,1993,90.
① Perry Anderson.A Culture in Contraflow-Ⅰ.New Left Review,1990,180,58.
② Lin Chun.The British New Left.Edinburgh,Edinburgh University Press,1993,112.
③ Lin Chun.The British New Left.Edinburgh,Edinburgh University Press,1993,113.
① Paul Blackledge. Perry Anderson, Marxism and the New Left. London, The Merlin Press Ltd.,2004.12.
② Paul Blackledge. Perry Anderson, Marxism and the New Left. London, The Merlin Press Ltd.,2004.13.
① Paul Blackledge. Perry Anderson, Marxism and the New Left. London, The Merlin Press Ltd.,2004,103.
② 马克思恩格斯全集第28卷,北京,人民出版社,1973,509.
③ 马克思恩格斯令集第4卷,北京,人民出版社,1958,465.
④ Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,1980,55.
⑤ 马克思恩格斯全集第22卷,北京,人民出版社,1963,346.
⑥ 列宁选集第4卷,北京,人民出版社,1995,11.
① 乔瑞金等.英国的新马克思主义.北京,人民出版社,2012,70-71.
② 列宁选集第1卷,北京,人民出版社,1995,363.
① 列宁选集第1卷,北京,人民出版社,1995,326.
② 葛兰西文选(1916-1935)北京,人民出版社,1992,83.
① Laymond Williams. Notes on Marxisn in Britain since 1945. New Left Review,1976,100,87.
① Laymond Williams. Notes on Marxisn in Britain since 1945. New Left Review,1976,.100,87.
② Perry Anderson. Components of the National Culture. New Left Review,1968,50,9.
① 佩里·安德森.西方马克思主义探讨.高铦等译,北京,人民出版社,1981,131.
① Perry Anderson. Origins of the Present Crisis. New Left Review,1964,23,47.
② Perry Anderson. Origins of the Present Crisis. New Left Review,1964,23,49.
③ Perry Anderson. The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci. New Left Review,1976,100,28.
① Perrv Anderson.Origins of the Present Crisis. New Left Review,1964,23,44. London, Monthly Review Press,1978,284.
② E. P. Thompson. The Pecularity of the English, in The Poverty of Theory & Other Essays, New York and
③ 李瑞艳.基于民族性的社会主义诉求——安德森从英国民族性特征对发达国家走向社会主义的哲学思考.当代国外马克思主义评论,2012,10,255.
① Perry Anderson. The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci. New Left Review,1976,100,5.
② 列宁选集第1卷.北京,人民出版社,1995,558.
③ Perry Anderson. The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci. New Left Review,1976,100,17.17.
① 安东尼奥·葛兰西.狱中札记.葆煦译,北京,人民出版社,1993,41.
② Perry Anderson. The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci. New Left Review,1976.100,18.
③ Perry Anderson. The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci. New Left Review,1976,100,17.
① Antonio Gramsci.Selection from political Writings(1921-1926),Lawrence and Wishart,1978,443.
③ Perry Anderson.The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci.New Left Review,1976,100,21-22.
② Perry Anderson.The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci.New Left Review,1976,100,21. ④ Perry Anderson.The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci.New Left Review,1976,100,10.
① Perry Anderson.The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci.New Left Review,1976,100,28.
① Perry Anderson. The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci. New Left Review,1976,100,32-34.
③ Perry Anderson. The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci. New Left Review,1976,100,33-34.
④ Perry Anderson. The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci. New Left Review,1976,100,32.
① 这里做了一些改动,把阿尔都塞有关“强制性的国家机器”与“意识形态的国家机器”改为“强制性的机器”和“意识形态的机器”,因为阿尔都塞的这一表述就把市民社会并入国家中而丧失了市民社会的自主性,因此把“国家”这一限定去掉之后,这一表述更加符合葛兰西的原意。
① Perry Anderson. The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci. New Left Review,1976,100,42.
② Perry Anderson. Problems of Socialist Strategy. Towards Socialism, with Robin Blackburn (eds.), London, Collins,1966,230.
③ Perry Anderson. The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci. New Left Review,1976,100,25-26.
① 参见《思想的谱系：西方思潮左与右》一书,安德森在《设计共识：约翰·罗尔斯》、《规范事实：尤尔根·哈贝马斯》文中对两者思想进行了具体评述,从中可以找到他对于经济层面的特别关注和强调。
② Perry Anderson.The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci.New Left Review,1976,100,50.
① 俞吾金、陈学明.国外马克思主义哲学流派新编——西方马克思主义卷.上海,复旦大学出版社,2002,122.
② Perry Anderson. The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci. New Left Review,1976,100,35.
③ 马克思恩格斯全集第11卷.北京,人民出版社,1995,172.
① 阿尔都塞.哲学与政治——阿尔都塞读本.陈越译,长春,吉林人民出版社,2011,282.
② Ralph Milibad. The Capitalist State:Reply to Nicos Poulantzas. The New Left Review,1970,59,59.
① Perry Anderson. The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci. New Left Review,1976,100,45.
② 俞开金、陈学明.国外马克思生义哲学流派新编(西方马克思主义卷).上海,复旦大学出版社,2002,124.
② Perry Anderson. The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci. New Left Review,1976,100,46.
① 彼得·伯克.历史学与社会理论.姚朋等译,上海,上海人民出版社,2010,81-82.
① 佩里·安德森.W.G.朗西曼的新进化论.交锋地带.郭英剑、郝素玲等译,北京,中国社会科学出版社,2008.174.
② Perry Anderson. A Culture in Contraflow-Ⅰ. New Left Review,1990,180,66.
① 佩里·安德森.迈克尔·曼的权力社会学.载交锋地带.郭英剑、郝素玲等译,北京,中国社会科学出版社,2008,91.100.101.
② 乔瑞金、李瑞艳.对安德森“类型学”权力思想的几点思考.中国人民大学学报,2012,6,69.
① E. P. Thompson. The Peculiarities of the English. The Socialist Register,1965,358.
② E. P. Thompson. The Peculiarities of the English. The Socialist Register,1965,358-359.
③ 佩里·安德森.绝对主义国家的系谱.刘北成、龚晓庄译,上海,上海人民出版社,2001,前言6.
① 乔瑞金、李瑞艳.对安德森“类型学”权力思想的几点思考.中国人民大学学报,2012,6,69-70.
① Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,1980,186.
② 佩里·安德森.西方马克思主义探讨.高铦等译,北京,人民出版社,1981,61.
① 佩里·安德森.当代西方马克思主义.余文烈译,北京,东方出版社,1989,50.
② Perry Anderson. Problems of Socialist Strategy. Towards Socialism, with Robin Blackburn (eds.), London, Collins, 1966,223-224.
① Perry Anderson. Problems of Socialist Strategy. Towards Socialism, with Robin Blackburn (eds.), London, Collins, 1966,224.
① Perry Anderson. Problems of Socialist Strategy. Towards Socialism, with Robin Blackburn (eds.), London, Collins, 1966,227-228.
② Perry Anderson. Problems of Socialist Strategy. Towards Socialism, with Robin Blackburn (eds.), London, Collins, 1966,226.
③ Perry Anderson. Problems of Socialist Strategy. Towards Socialism, with Robin Blackburn (eds.), London, Collins, 1966,235.
① Perry Anderson. The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci. New Left Review, November/December,1976, no.100,9-10
③ Perry Anderson. The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci. New Left Review,1976,100,69.
② 戴维·麦克莱伦.马克思以后的马克思主义.李智译,北京,中国人民大学出版社,2004,260.
④ Perry Anderson. The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci. New Left Review,1976,100,70.
① Perry Anderson. The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci. New Left Review,1976,100,69.
② 佩坦·安德森.西方马克思主义探讨.高铦等译,北京,人民出版社,1981,146.
① Perry Anderson. The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci. New Left Review,1976,100,78.
① Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,195.
② Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,190-191.
① 佩坚·安德森.马歇尔·伯曼：现代性与革命,载交锋地带,.郭英剑、郝素玲等译,北京,中国社会科学出版社,2008,56.
① Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,194.
② Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,194-195.
③ Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,185.
① 马克思恩格斯全集第1卷,北京,人民出版社,1956,488-489.
② 马克思恩格斯全集第4卷,北京,人民出版社,1958,477.
① Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,196.
② Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,197.
① Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,206.
② Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,85.
① 佩里·安德森.马歇尔·伯曼：现代性与革命.载交锋地带.郭英剑、郝素玲等译,北京,中国社会科学出版社,2008,43.
① 佩里·安德森.后现代性的起源.柴辰、合章译,北京,中国社会科学出版社,2008,84.96.
② 佩里·安德森.后现代性的起源.柴辰、合章译,北京,中国社会科学出版社,2008,123-124.
③ 佩里·安德森.文明及其内涵.读书,1997,12,70.
① Perry Anderson.Renewals.New Left Review,2000,1,16.
② 佩里·安德森.文明及其内涵.读书,1997,11,66.
③ 甘琦.向右的时代向左的人.读书,2005,6,39-40.
① Perry Anderson,Perry Anderson.Renewals.New Left Review,2000,1,15.
② 佩坚·安德森等.三种新的全球化国际关系理论.读书,2002,10,10.
③ 佩里·安德森.新自由主义的历史和教训.费新录译,天涯,2002,3,170.
④ 施雨华、杨子.我们的支持和反对——对话安德森.南方人物周刊,2007,3,63.
① 施雨华、杨子.我们的支持和反对——对话安德森.南方人物周刊,2007,3,62.
② 马克思恩格斯全集第4卷.北京,人民出版社,1958,470.
① 佩里·安德森.文明及其内涵.读书,1997,11,43.
② 佩里·安德森.当代西方马克思主义.余文烈译,东方出版社,1989,140-141.
① 佩里·安德森.历史的终结.载交锋地带.郭英剑、郝素玲等译,北京,中国社会科学出版社,2008,419.
② 佩里·安德森.绝对主义国家的系谱.刘北成、龚晓庄译，上海,上海人民出版社,2001,前言6.
③ Perry Anderson. Problems of Socialist Strategy. Towards Socialism. with Robin Blackburn (eds.), London, Collins, 1966,246.
① 佩里·安德森.诺贝托·波比奥和他的主义.载交锋地带.郭英剑、郝素玲等译,北京,中国社会科学出版社,2008,134.
② 马克思恩格斯全集第3卷,北京,人民出版社,2002,584-585.
③ 安德森在《武器与权利：可调整的中心》一文中认为,尤尔根·哈贝马斯的《在事实与规范之间》、约翰·罗尔斯的《政治自由主义》和诺贝托·波比奥的《左翼和右翼》的代表性著作中将注意力集中于西方自由民主国家的内部关系方面,而后哈贝马斯在《康德的永久和平思想：200年的历史变迁》(1995)和《后民族国家体系与民主的未来》(1998)两篇文章,罗尔斯的《万民法》(1999)；波比奥的《民主和国际体系》(1989)这些文章中,他们将注意力转移到了国际关系方面。
① 佩里·安德森.思想的谱系：西方思潮左与右.袁银传、曹荣湘等译,北京,社会科学文献出版社,2010,196-187.
② 佩里·安德森.当代西方马克思主义.余文烈译,北京,东方出版社,1989,135.
③ Lin Chun. The British New Left. Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press,1993,112.
④ 马克思恩格斯全集第17卷,北京,人民出版社,1963,700.
① 戴维·麦克莱伦.马克思思想导论.郑一明、陈喜贵译,北京,中国人民大学出版社,2008,225.231.
① 佩里·安德森.当代西方马克思主义.余文烈译,北京,东方出版社,1989,133.
① Antony Easthope. British Post-Structuralism Since 1968, Routledge,1988,5.
② Raymond Williams. Base and Superstructure in Marxist Cultural Theory. New Left Review,82,1973,6.
③ Raymond Williams. Base and Superstructure in Marxist Cultural Theory. New Left Review,82,1973,12.
① Lin Chun. The British New Left. Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press,1993,130.
② E.P.Thompson. Socialist Humanism. The New Reasoner,1,1957,111-113.
③ Edward Thompson. The Peculiarities of the English. The Poverty of the Theory and Other Essays, London, Merlin Press,1978,289.
④ Edward Thompson. The Peculiarities of the English. The Poverty of the Theory and Other Essays, London, Merlin Press,1978,292.
① Edward Thompson. The Peculiarities of the English. The Socialist Register,1965,351.
① Edward Thompson. The Peculiarities of the English. The Socialist Register,1965,356-357.
① Perrv Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,1980,55-56.
③ Perry Anderson. Problems of Socialist Strategy. Towards Socialism, with Robin Blackburn (eds.), London, Collins,
④ Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London and New York, Verso,1980,10. 1966,229.
① 卡尔·波普尔.历史决定论的贫困.杜汝楫 邱仁宗译，上海,上海人民出版社,2009,102-103.
② Perry Anderson. The Notion of Bourgeois Revolution. English Questions, London and New York:Verso,1992, 110-113.
① Perry Anderson. Portugul and the End of Ultra-Colonialism Ⅲ. New Left Review,1962,17,113.
② Perry Anderson. Socialism and Pseudo-Empiricism. New Left Review,1966,35,39.
① Perry Anderson. Socialism and Pseudo-Empiricism. New Left Review,1966,35,32-33.
② Perry Anderson. Socialism and Pseudo-Empiricism. New Left Review,1966,35,39.
③ Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London and New York, Verso,1980,10.
① 佩里·安德森.绝对主义国家的系谱.刘北成,龚晓庄译.上海，上海人民出版社,2001,前言5-6.
② Perry Anderson. Component of the National Culture. New Left Review,1968,50,57.
① Perry Anderson. Socialism and Pseudo-Empiricism. New Left Review,1966,35,33.
① 彼得·伯克.历史学与社会理论.姚朋等译,上海,上海人民出版社,2010,2.
② 佩里·安德森.迈克尔·曼的权力社会学.载佩里·安德森.交锋地带.北京,中国社会科学出版社,2008,101.
① [瑞士]皮亚杰.结构主义.倪连生,王琳译,北京,商务印书馆,2010,109.
① E.P.汤普森.论阿尔都塞的结构主义马克思主义.张亮译,马克思主义美学研究,2008,1,256.
② 徐浩、侯建.新当代西方史学流派.北京,中国人民大学出版社,2009,131-132.
① 乔瑞金等著.英国的新马克思主义.北京，人民出版社,2012,33-44.
② Perry Anderson. A Culture in Contraflow-Ⅱ. New Left Review,1990,182,106-107.
① Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London and New York, Verso,1980,152-153.
③ E.P. Thompson. Revolution. New Left Review.3.8.
② Perry Anderson. Socialism and Pseudo-Empiricism. New Left Review,1966,35,34.
④ E.P. Thompson. The New Left. The New Reason,9,7.
① Edward Thompson. The Peculiarities of the English. The Poverty of the Theory and Other Essays, London, Merlin Press,1978,337.
② E.P. Thompson. Outside the Whale. Out of Apathy,5,192-193.
③ Perry Anderson. Socialism and Pseudo-Empiricism. New Left Review,1966,35,36.
④ Tom Nairn. The English Working Class. New Left Review,1964,24,44.
① E. P. Thompson. Socialism and the Intellectuals. Universities & Left Review,1957,1,36.
② 丹尼斯·德沃金.文化马克思主义在战后英国.李丹凤译,北京,人民出版社,2008,75.
② E. P. Thompson. Socialist Humanism. The New Reasoner, Summer,1957,1,122.
① 佩里·安德森.文明及其内涵(上).读书,1997,12,69.
② E. P. Thompson. The Poverty of the Theory and Other Essays. London, Merlin and New York, Monthly Review Press,1978,109.
① 乔瑞金等.英国的新马克思主义.北京,人民出版社,2012,7-17.
② 佩里·安德森.西方马克思主义探讨.高铦等译,北京,人民出版社，1981,133.
③ Lin Chun. The British New Left. Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press,1993, ⅩⅤ.
① Paul Blackledge. Perry Anderson, Marxism and the New Left. London, The Merlin Press Ltd.,2004,14.
② Perry Anderson. The Left in the Fifties. New Left Review,29,11-13.
③ Paul Blackledge. Perry Anderson, Marxism and the New Left. London, The Merlin Press Ltd.,2004,28
① Paul Blackledge.Perry Anderson,Marxism and the New Left.London,The Merlin Press Ltd.,2004,171.
① 参见创建一个更美好的替代世界——2008年全球左翼论坛综述.当代世界与社会主义,2008,3.② 甘琦.向右的时代向左的人.读书,2005,6,41.
[1]Perry Anderson. Towards Socialism, with Robin Blackburn (eds.), London, Collins, 1966.
[2]Perry Anderson. Passages from Antiquity to Feudalism. London, New left Books, 1974.
[3]Perry Anderson. Lineages of the Absolute State. London, New left Books,1974.
[4]Perry Anderson. Considerations on Western Marxism. London, New left Books, 1976.
[5]Perry Anderson. Arguments within English Marxism. London, Verso,1980.
[6]Perry Anderson. In the Tracks of Historical Materialism. London, Verso,1983.
[7]Perry Anderson. English Questions. London and New York, Verso,1992.
[8]Perry Anderson. A Zone of Engagement. London and New York, Verso,1992.
[9]Perry Anderson. Mapping the West European Left, with Patrick Camiller (eds.), London and New York, Verso,1994.
[10]Perry Anderson. The Origins of Postmodernity. London and New York, Verso,1998.
[11]Perry Anderson. Spectrum:From Right to Left in the World of Ideas. London and New York, Verso,2005.
[12]Perry Anderson. The New Old World. London and New York, Verso.
[13]Perry Anderson. Origins of the Present Crisis. New Left Review, January/February, 1964, no.23,26-53.
[14]Perry Anderson. Critique of Wilsonism. New Left Review,1964,27,3-27.
[15]Perry Anderson. The Left in the Fifties. New Left Review,1965,29,3-18.
[16]Perry Anderson. Socialism and Pseudo-Empiricism. New Left Review,1966,35, 2-42.
[17]Perry Anderson. Components of the National Culture. New Left Review,1968,50, 3-57.
[18]Perry Anderson. The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci. New Left Review,1976,100, 5-78.
[19]Perry Anderson, The Notion of Bourgeois Revolution. English Questions, London and New York:Verso,1992,105-118.
[20]Perry Anderson. Modernity and Revolution. New Left Review,1984,144,96-113.
[21]Perry Anderson. The Figures of Descent. New Left Review,1987,161,20-77.
[22]Perry Anderson. The Affinities of Norberto Bobbio. New Left Review,1988,.170, 3-36.
[23]Perry Anderson. A Culture in Contraflow-I. New Left Review,1990,180,41-78.
[24]Perry Anderson. A Culture in Contraflow-II. New Left Review,1990,182,5-137.
[25]Perry Anderson. The Light of Europe. English Questions, London and New York: Verso,1992,302-353.
[26]Perry Anderson. A Sense of the Left. New Left Review,1998,231,73-81.
[27]Perry Anderson. Renewals. New Left Review,2000,1,5-24.
[28]Perry Anderson. Testing Formula Two. New Left Review,2001,8,5-22.
[29]Perry Anderson. Internationalism:A Breviary. New Left Review,2002,14,5-25.
[30]Perry Anderson. Force and Consent. New Left Review,2002,17,5-30.
[31]Perry Anderson. The River of Time. New Left Review,2004,26,67-77.
[32]Perry Anderson. Arms and Rights. New Left Review,2005,31,5-40.
[33]Perry Anderson.A New German?. New Left Review,2009,57,5-40.
[34]Perry Anderson. Two Revolutions. New Left Review,2010,61,59-96.
[35]Perry Anderson. The Age of EJH. London Review of Books,2002,19,3-7.
[36]Perry Anderson. Casuistries of Peace and War. London Review of Books,2003,5, 12-13.
[37]Perry Anderson. Stand-off in Taiwan. London Review of Books,2004,11,12-17.
[38]Perry Anderson. Inside Man. The Nation,2006,23-29.
[39]Perry Anderson. Made in USA. The Nation,2007,25-30.
[40]Perry Anderson. The Common and the Particular. International Labour and Working-Class History,1989,36,31-36.
[41]Perry Anderson. Class Struggle in the Ancient World. History Workshop,1983,16, 57-73.
[1]Paul Blackledge. Perry Anderson, Marxism and the New Left. London, The Merlin Press Ltd.,2004.
[2]Elliott Gregory. Perry Anderson:The Merciless Laboratory of History. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press,1998.
[3]Lin Chun. The British New Left. Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press,1993.
[4]Dennis Dworkin. Cultural Marxism in Postwar Britain:History, the New Left, and the Origins of Cultural Studies. London, Duke University Press,1997.
[5]Antony Easthope. British Post-structuralism since 1968. London and New York, Routledge,1988.
[6]E. P. Thompson. The Making of the English Class. London, Victor Gollancz,1963.
[7]E. P. Thompson. William Morris:Romantic to Revolution. New York, Pantheon, 1977.
[8]E. P. Thompson. The Poverty of the Theory and Other Essays. London, Merlin and New York, Monthly Review Press,1978.
[9]E. P. Thompson. Socialist Humanism. The New Reasoner,1,1957.105-143.
[10]Edward Thompson. The Peculiarities of the English. The Socialist Register,1965, 311-362.
[11]E. P. Thompson. Eighteenth-century English Society:Class Struggle Without Class? Social History,1978,2,133-165.
[12]Tom Nairn. The English Working Class. New Left Review,1964,no.24,43-57.
[13]Raymond Williams. Base and Superstructure in Marxist Culture Theory. New Left Review,1973,82,3-16.
[14]Raymond Williams. Notes on Marxisn in Britain since 1945.1976,100,81-94
[15]Terry Eagleton. Criticism and Politics:The Work of Raymond Williams. New Left Review,1976,95,3-23.
[16]Terry Eagleton. Capitalism, Modernism and Postmodernism. New Left Review,1985, 152,60-73.
[17]Robin Blackburn. Marxism:Theory of Proletarian Revolution. New Left Review, 1976,97,3-35.
[18]Robin Blackburn. Raymond Williams and the Politics of a New Left. New Left Review,1988,168,12-22.
[19]Ralph Miliband. State Power and Class Interests. New Left Review,1983,138, 57-68.
[20]Peter Linebaugh. In the Flight Path of Perry Anderson. History Workshop,1986,21, 141-146.
[21]Wade Matthews. The Poverty of Strategy:E. P. Thompson, Perry Anderson and the Transition to Socialism. Labour/Le Travail,2002,50,217-241.
[22]Mark A. Pollack. Review:[untitled]. The Journal of Politics,1998,4,1202-1208.
[23]Tim Walsh. Review:[untitled]. International Affairs,1998,1,223.
[24]Maurice Meilleur. Review:Spectrum:From Right to Left in the World of Ideas. The Antioch Review,2006,3,578-579.
[25]Anthony Ashbolt. Review:[untitled]. Labour History,2006,88,268-270.
[26]Martin Jay. Review:[untitled]. Theory and Society,1977,2,298.
[27]Richard Ashcraft. Review:[untitled]. Political Theory,1978,1,134-138.
[28]David Macgregor. Review:The End of Western Marxism?. Contemporary Sociology, 1978,2,143-147.
[29]Gary S. Orgel. Review:[untitled]. Studies in Soviet Thought,1979,3,251-256.
[30]Marian Sawer & Marian Sawyer. Review:[untitled]. Labour History,1977,33, 115-119.
[31]Raymond Morrow. Review:[untitled]., The Canadian Journal of Sociology,1986,4, 469-473.
[32]Terry Eagleton. Review:Marxism, Structuralism, and Post-Structuralism. Diacritics, 1985,4,2-12.
[33]James A. Winders. Review:Poststructuralist Theory, Praxis, and the Intellectual", Contemporary Literature,1986,1,73-84.
[34]Russell Jacoby. Review:[untitled]. Theory and Society,1982,2,251-257.
[35]F. J. Donnelly. Review:[untitled]. Labour,1983,12,.400-402.
[36]Susan Magarey. Review:That History Old Chestnut, Free Will and Determinism: Culture vs. Structure, or History vs. Theory in Britain. Comparative Studies in Society and History,1987,3,626-639.
[37]Bernice Martin. Review:Feudalism and absolutism. The British Journal of Sociology,1976,2,267-271.
[38]Betty Behrens. Review:[untitled]. The Historical Journal,1976,1,245-250.
[39]R. Porter &C. R. Whittaker. Review:States and Estates", Social History,1976,3, 367-376.
[40]Peter Gourevitch. Review:The International System and Regime Formation:A Critical Review of Anderson and Wallerstein. Comparative Politics,1978,3,419-438.
[41]Frank Mcmahon. Review:Up, Up and Away. Oxford Art Journal,1993,1,158-160.
[42]Michael Hechter. Review:Lineages of the Capitalist State. The American Journal of Sociology,1977,5,1057-1074.
[43]Raymond B. Pratt. Review:[untitled]. The Western Political Quarterly,1978,1, 130-131.
[44]Lionel Rothkrug. Review:[untitled], The American Historical Review,1978,2, 373-374.
[45]Richard Lachmann. Comparisons Within a Single Social Formation:A Critical Appreciation of Perry Anderson's Lineages of the Absolutist State. Qualitative Sociology, 2002,1,83-92.
[46]Dick Howard. Marxist Misunderstandings:Perry Anderson and French Politics. Democratiya 5,2006,31-43.
[47]Alex Callinicos. Perry Anderson and Western Marxism. International Socialism, 1984,23,113-128.
[48]Paul Blackledge. Realism and Renewals:Perry Anderson and the Prospects for the Left. Contemporary Politics,2001,4,261-262.
[49]Paul Blackledge. Perry Anderson and the End of History, Historical Materialism, 2000,1,199-219.
[50]Edward Skidelsky. The New Statesman Profile-Perry Anderson. New Statesman, March 19,1999, http://www.newstatesman.com/199903190015.
[51]The Antinomies of Perry Anderson, January 13,2001. http://www.oocities.org/edgeorge2001 es/mywritings/Perry_Anderson.html.
[52]Conversations with history:Reflections on the Left from the Left with Perry Anderson, http://www.uctv.tv/search-details.aspx?showID=7123
[1]佩里·安德森.西方马克思主义探讨.高铦等译,北京,人民出版社,1981.
[2]佩里·安德森.当代西方马克思主义.余文烈译,北京,东方出版社,1989.
[3]佩里·安德森.从古代到封建主义的过渡.郭方、刘健译,上海,上海人民出版社,2001.
[4]佩里·安德森.绝对主义国家的系谱.刘北成、龚晓庄译,上海,上海人民出版社,2001.
[5]佩里·安德森.交锋地带.郭英剑、郝素玲等译,北京,中国社会科学出版社,2008.
[6]佩里·安德森.后现代性的起源.柴辰、合章译,北京,中国社会科学出版社,2008.
[7]佩里·安德森.思想的谱系：西方思潮左与右.袁银传、曹荣湘等译,北京,社会科学文献出版社,2010.
[8]佩里·安德森.文明及其内涵(上).读书,1997,11.
[9]佩里·安德森.文明及其内涵(下).读书,1997,12.
[10]佩里·安德森.后现代的由来.张子清译,当代外国文学,1999,1.
[11]佩里·安德森.新自由主义的历史和教训——一种独特道路的确立.费新录译,当代世界与社会主义,2001,3.
[12]佩里·安德森.三种新的全球化国际关系理论.读书,2002,10.
[13]佩里·安德森.褐色蝶蛹内的艳丽蝴蝶——评《赫鲁晓夫：其人及其时代》,容平译,国外社会科学文摘,2003,7.
[14]佩里·安德森.内部人.读书,2006,8.
[15]佩里·安德森.尤根·哈贝马斯：规范事实,袁银传、李孟一译,马克思主义哲学研究,2009,00.
[16]胡战利编写.佩里·安德森的历史悲观主义.国外理论动态,2001,7.
[17]邓广编写.《新左派评论》的更新.国外理论动态,2001,7.
[18]胡鸣剑写.《新左派评论》的自杀.国外理论动态,2001,7.
[19]龙宏甫.评安德森历史社会学的理论与方法.安庆师范学院学报(社会科学版),2001,1.
[20]黄力之.佩里·安德森的西方马克思主义观点与马克思主义的发展.上海党史与党建,2002,1.
[21]吴冠军.“左翼”：“界线”问题与“场域”分析——安德森“犯规”事件再思 考.开放时代,2003,1.
[22]张亮.从激进的乐观主义到现实主义——佩里·安德森与《新左派评论》杂志的理论退却,马克思主义研究,2003,2.
[23]段忠桥.对安德森“扩大”西方马克思主义概念的说法的质疑.马克思主义研究,2004.2.
[24]甘琦.向右的时代向左的人.读书,2005,6.
[25]王晋新.评佩里·安德森的封建主义社会形态研究.东北师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005,3.
[26]姜芃.霍布斯鲍姆和佩里·安德森对唯物史观的理解.史学理论研究,2006,3.
[27]郭方.评佩里·安德森的《从古代到封建主义的过渡》.史学理论研究,2006,3.
[28]谢济光.佩里·安德森的后现代主义追溯.广西社会科学,2006,7.
[29]王金强.继承与超越：评佩里·安德森的工人阶级观.北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2007,2.
[30]施雨华、杨子.我们的支持和反对——对话安德森.高任华译,南方人物周刊,2007,3.
[31]鲁绍臣.佩里·安德森对历史主义和结构主义的扬弃及其启示.当代国外马克思主义评论,2007,00.
[32]鲁绍臣.反思与重构——佩里·安德森的历史唯物主义“图绘”.北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2007,2.
[33]鲁绍臣.佩里·安德森：传统反思与理论重构.当代国外马克思主义评论,2008，00.
[34]鲁绍臣.佩里·安德森的历史唯物主义“图绘”.兰州学刊,2008,3.
[35]鲁绍臣.反思与重构——佩里·安德森的历史唯物主义“图绘”.复旦大学博士学位论文,2008.
[36]张文涛.析E.P.汤普森与佩里·安德森之间的争论.山东社会科学,2008,11.
[37]王雨辰.佩里·安德森的西方马克思主义观述评.长江论坛,2008,1.
[38]张勇.佩里·安德森论当代世界形势(上).国外理论动态,2009,4.
[39]张勇.佩里·安德森论当代世界形势(下).国外理论动态,2009,5
[40]杨生平.后现代主义：晚期资本主义的文化主导——佩里·安德森《后现代性 的起源》.马克思主义研究.2009,9.
[41]蒋素琼.佩里·安德森的务实性乐观主义.名作欣赏,2009,21.
[42]王琛.艰难时世：危机中生存的世界与中国——佩里·安德森访问记.现代中文学刊,2010,1.
[43]乔瑞金、李瑞艳.试论安德森的“类型学”唯物史观思想及其意义.哲学研究,2011,7.
[44]乔瑞金、李瑞艳.对安德森“类型学”权力思想的几点思考.中国人民大学学报,2012,6.
[45]李瑞艳.基于民族性的社会主义诉求——安德森从英国民族性特征对发达国家走向社会主义的哲学思考.当代国外马克思主义评论,2012,10.
[1]马克思恩格斯全集.北京,人民出版社,1956、1957、1958、1960、1963、1971、1973、1995、1998、2002.
[2]马克思恩格斯选集.北京,人民出版社,1995.
[3]列宁选集.北京,人民出版社,1995.
[4]普列汉诺夫哲学著作选集第2卷.北京,三联书店,1961.
[5]路易·阿尔都塞.保卫马克思.北京,商务印书馆,2006.
[6]路易·阿尔都塞、艾蒂安·巴里巴尔.读《资本论》.李其庆、冯文光译,北京,中央编译出版社,2008.
[7]路易·阿尔都塞.哲学与政治：阿尔都塞读本.陈越编译,长春,吉林人民出版社,2010.
[8]马尔库塞.单向度的人.刘继译,上海,上海译文出版社,2006.
[9]安东尼奥·葛兰西.狱中札记.北京,中国社会科学出版社,2000.
[10]葛兰西文选(1916-1935)北京,人民出版社,1992.
[11]卢卡奇.历史与阶级意识.杜章智、任立、燕宏远译,北京,商务印书馆,2009.
[12]皮亚杰.结构主义.倪连生、王琳译,北京,商务印书馆,2010.
[13]施密特.历史和结构——论黑格尔马克思主义和结构主义的历史学说.重庆,重庆出版社,1993.
[14]卡尔·波普尔.历史决定论的贫困,杜汝楫、邱仁宗译,上海,上海人民出版 社,2009.
[15]柯林武德.历史的观念.何兆武、张文杰译,北京,商务印书馆,2009.
[16]西达·斯考切波.历史社会学的视野与方法.封积文译,上海,上海人民出版社,2007.
[17]丹尼斯·史密斯.历史社会学的兴起.周辉荣等译,上海,上海人民出版社,2002.
[18]彼得·伯克.历史学与社会理论.姚朋等译,上海,上海人民出版社,2010
[19]戴维·麦克莱伦.马克思以后的马克思主义.李智译,北京,中国人民大学出版社,2004.
[20]戴维·麦克莱伦.马克思思想导论.郑一明、陈喜贵译,北京,中国人民大学出版社,2008.
[21]E.P.汤普森.英国工人阶级的形成.钱乘旦译,南京,译林出版社,2001.
[22]E.P.汤普森.共有的习惯.沈汉、王加丰译,上海,上海人民出版社,2002.
[23]G.A.柯亨.卡尔·马克思的历史理论——一个辩护.岳长龄译,重庆,重庆出版社,1989.
[24]丹尼斯·德沃金.文化马克思主义在战后英国.李丹凤译,北京,人民出版社,2008.
[25]埃伦·梅克新斯·伍德和约翰·贝拉米·福斯特主编.保卫历史：马克思主义与后现代主义.北京,社会科学文献出版社,2009.
[26]威廉姆·肖.马克思的历史理论.阮仁慧、钟石韦译,重庆,重庆出版社,2007.
[27]伯恩斯(Burns, R.M.)、皮卡德(Pickard, H.R.).历史哲学：从启蒙到后现代性.张羽佳译,北京,北京师范大学出版社,2008.
[28]徐浩、侯建新.当代西方史学流派(第二版).北京,中国人民大学出版社,2009.
[29]罗伯特·K.默顿.社会理论和社会结构.唐少杰等译,南京,译林出版社,2006.
[30]艾伦·梅克森斯·伍德主编.民主反对资本主义——重建历史唯物主义.吕微洲、刘海霞、邢文增译,重庆,重庆出版社,2007.
[31]乔瑞金.英国的新马克思主义.北京,人民出版社,2012.
[32]乔瑞金.马克思思想研究的新话语——技术与文化批判的英国新马克思主义. 太原,书海出版社,2005.
[33]薛勇民.走向社会历史的深处——唯物史观的当代探析,北京,人民出版社,2002.
[34]薛勇民.走向社会实践的深处——马克思主义历史理性的当代沉思,太原,山西人民出版社,2005年。
[35]张亮编.英国新左派思想家.南京,江苏人民出版社,2010.
[36]当代国外马克思主义评论(5).复旦大学当代国外马克思主义研究中心编.北京,人民出版社,2007.
[37]衣俊卿等著.20世纪的文化批判——西方马克思主义的深层解读.北京,中央编译出版社,2003.
[38]俞吾金、陈学明著.国外马克思主义哲学流派新编(西方马克思主义卷).上海,复旦大学出版社,2002.
[39]徐崇温主编.西方马克思主义理论研究.海南,海南出版社,2000.
[40]陈炳辉.西方马克思主义的国家理论.北京,中央编译出版社,2004.
[41]乔瑞金.我们为什么需要研究英国的新马克思主义?马克思主义与现实,2011,6.
[42]乔瑞金.论英国新马克思主义的思想特征.理论探索,2006,4.
[43]乔瑞金.英国新马克思主义的发展历程及其思想特征.当代国外马克思主义评论,2007,00.
[44]师文兵、乔瑞金.英国新马克思主义历史学派的政治的意识.哲学研究,2007,3.
[45]乔瑞金、师文兵.历史主义与结构主义——英国新马克思主义哲学探索的主导意识.哲学研究,2005,2.
[46]乔瑞金、师文兵.破解主体与结构之谜——英国新马克思主义关于阶级问题的争论及其启示.理论探索,2005,2.
[47]乔瑞金、师文兵.马克思主义是社会历史的整体视界——英国新马克思主义的“事实”与“理论”之争及其启示.山西大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005,4.
[48]乔瑞金、李瑞艳.英国新马克思主义的哲学探索.现代哲学,2007,5.
[49]薛勇民.再论社会进步的动力系统.系统辩证学学报,2002,2.
[50]薛勇民.唯物史观的当代反思.马克思主义研究,2002,2.
[51]薛勇民、李侠.论福柯权力视野下的技术.自然辩证法研究,2002,1.
[52]薛勇民、侯永刚.简论马克思关于“世界历史”演进的思想.东方论坛,2002,2.
[53]王喜平.论实践的本质特征.系统辩证学学报,2003,4.
[54]王喜平.物质和意识的关系及哲学史的构建原则.山西大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2003,4.
[55]邢媛.青年马克思的社会冲突思想探析.理论探索,2009,3.
[56]邢媛.评吉登斯对马克思的“两种商品化”理论的分析.现代哲学,2009,3.
[57]邢媛.吉登斯“自我认同”的社会哲学思想探析.马克思主义与现实,2010,3.
[58]戴维·麦克莱伦.历史与现在：马克思和马克思主义.陈亚军译,马克思主义、列宁主义研究,2005,2.
[59]戴维·麦克莱伦.英国马克思主义.陈亚军译,国外社会科学文摘,1981,1.
[60]保尔·布莱克雷治.道德革命：英国新左派中的伦理论争.现代哲学,2007,1.
[61]梁民愫.社会变革与学术流派：当代英国马克思主义史学渊源综论.史学月刊,2003.12.
[62]赵国新.新左派.外国文学,2004,3.
[63]赵国新.文化研究.外国文学,2004,4,
[64]周穗明编译.西方左翼思潮四十年回顾及其九十年代的复兴.当代世界社会主义问题,2001,1.
[65]周穗明.西方新社会运动与新马克思主义.马克思主义、列宁主义研究,2006,9.
[66]徐崇温.国外马克思主义研究的若干新动向.马克思主义与现实,1998,1.
① 参见玛丽·福布鲁克和西达·斯考切波.命定的路径：佩里·安德森的历史社会学.载西达·斯考切波.历史社会学的视野与方法.上海,上海人民出版社,2007,177-178.
① Paul Blackledge. Perry Anderson, Marxism and the New Left. London, The Merlin Press Ltd.,2004, x.
② Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London and New York, Verso,1980,207.
① Paul Blackledge. Perry Anderson, Marxism and the New Left. London, The Merlin Press Ltd.,2004, xi.
① Perry Anderson.Portugul and the End of Ultra-Colonialism Ⅲ.New Left Review,1962,17,113.
① 马克思恩格斯全集第3卷.北京，人民出版社,1960,43.
② 普列汉诺夫哲学著作选集第2卷.北京,三联书店,1961,510.
① 马克思恩格斯全集第31卷,北京,人民出版社,1998,413.
① Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,1980,62.
② Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,1980,63.
③ Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,1980,81.
① Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,1980,66.
② Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,1980,64.
③ 佩里·安德森.西方马克思主义探讨.高铦等译,北京,人民出版社,1981,136.
④ 马克思恩格斯全集第2卷.北京,人民出版社,1995,118.
① 马克思恩格斯选集第1卷.北京,人民出版社,1995,66.
② 马克思恩格斯选集第4卷.北京.人民出版社,1995,126-127.
③ 马克思恩格斯选集第1卷.北京,人民出版社,1995,13.
④ See Antony Easthope.British Post-structuralism since 1968.London and New York,Routledge,1988,1.
① Perrv Anderson. Arguments Within Enelish Marxism. London. Verso.1980.9-11.
③ 佩里·安德森.西方马克思主义探讨.高铦等译,北京,人民出版社,1981,138.
② Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,1980,9-12.
① 佩里·安德森.当代西方马克思主义.余文烈译,北京,东方出版社,1989,28.
② 佩里·安德森.西方马克思主义探讨.高铦等译,人民出版社,1981,139.
③ 佩里·安德森.当代西方马克思主义.余文烈译,北京,东方出版社,1989,121.
① Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,1980,84.
② 佩里·安德森.西方马克思主义探讨.高铦等译,北京,人民出版社,1981,133.
① Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,1980,149.
② Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,1980,149.
① Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,1980,207.
② Perry Anderson. Origins of the Present Crisis. New Left Review,1964,23,38-39.
① Perry Anderson.Origins of the Present Crisis.New Left Review,1964,23,28.
① Perry Anderson. Origins of the Present Crisis. New Left Review,1964,23,37.
② Perry Anderson. Origins of the Present Crisis. New Left Review,1964,23,39.
① E. P. Thompson. The Pecularity of the English, in The Poverty of Theory & Other Essays. New York and London, Monthly Review Press,290.
② Perry Anderson. Origins of the Present Crisis. New Left Review,1964,23,28.
③ Edward Thompson. The Peculiarities of the English. The Poverty of the Theory and Other Essays, London, Merlin Press,1978,358.
④ 李瑞艳.基于民族性的社会主义诉求——安德森从英国民族性特征对发达国家走向社会主义的哲学思考.当代国外马克思主义评论,2012,10,252.
① Edward Thompson. The Peculiarities of the English. The Poverty of the Theory and Other Essays, London, Merlin Press,1978,247.
② Edward Thompson. The Peculiarities of the English. The Poverty of the Theory and Other Essays, London, Merlin Press,1978,257.
③ Edward Thompson. The Peculiarities of the English. The Poverty of the Theory and Other Essays, London, Merlin Press,1978,267.
④ Edward Thompson. The Peculiarities of the English. The Poverty of the Theory and Other Essays, London, Merlin Press,1978,286.
① Perry Anderson. Origins of the Present Crisis. New Left Review,1964,23,30.
② Perry Anderson. Socialism and Pseudo-Empiricism.New Left Review,1966,35,24.
③ Perry Anderson. Component of the National Culture. New Left Review,1968,50,57.
① Perry Anderson. Component of the National Culture. New Left Review,1968,50,13.
① Perry Anderson. Component of the National Culture. New Left Review,1968,50,18.
② Perry Anderson. Component of the National Culture. New Left Review,1968,50,56.
③ Perry Anderson. Component of the National Culture. New Left Review,1968,50,18-19.
④ Antony Easthope. British Post-structuralism since 1968. London and New York, Routledge,1988,11.
① Perry Anderson.A Culture in Contraflow-Ⅰ. New Left Review,1990,180,52.
① Perry Anderson. Socialism and Pseudo-Empiricism.New Left Review,1966,35,31.
① Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,1980,149.
② Perry Anderson. Renewals. New Left Review,2000,1,8.
③ 佩里·安德森.西方马克思主义探讨.高铦等译,北京,人民出版社,1981,36.
① 佩里·安德森.西方马克思主义探讨.高铦等译,北京,人民出版社,1981,71.
② 参见陈学明.“西方马克思主义”命题词典.北京,东方出版社,2004,299.
① 佩里·安德森.西方马克思主义探讨.高铦等译,北京,人民出版社,1981,118.
② 佩里·安德森.当代西方马克思主义.高铦等译,北京,人民出版社,1981,30.
③ Lin Chun. The British New Left. Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press,1993,110.
④ 佩里·安德森.西方马克思主义探讨.高铦等译,北京,人民出版社,1981,89.
① 丹尼斯·德沃金.文化马克思主义在战后英国.李丹凤译,北京,人民出版社,2008,189-190.
① Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,1980,65.
② 阿尔都塞.保卫马克思.顾良译,北京,商务印书馆,2006,103.
② Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,1980,67.68.
① Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,1980,67.68.79.
② 阿尔都塞.保卫马克思.顾良译,北京,商务印书馆,2006,197-198.
① Perry Anderson.Arguments Within English Marxism.London,Verso,1980,55-56.
②佩里·安德森.当代西方马克思主义.余文烈译,东方出版社,1989，39.
① Louis Althusser. Reading Capital. trans. by Ben Brewster, London, New Left Books,1970,39.
② Louis Althusser. Lenin and Philosophy and other Essays. New York and London, Monthly Review Press,1971,180.
③ 佩里·安德森.西方马克思主义探讨.高铦等译,人民出版社,1981,68.
④ 佩里·安德森.当代西方马克思主义.余文烈译,东方出版社,1989,74.
① Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,1980,58.
② Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,1980,84.
③ 马尔库塞.单向度的人.刘继译,上海,上海译文出版社,2006,中译者序言.
① Perry Anderson. Components of the National Culture. New Left Review,1968,50,57.
② Paul Blackledge. Perry Anderson, Marxism and the New Left. London, The Merlin Press Ltd.,2004,61.
③ Paul Blackledge. Perry Anderson, Marxism and the New Left. London, The Merlin Press Ltd.,2004,68.
④ 佩里·安德森.西方马克思主义探讨.高铦等译,北京,人民出版社,1981,121.
⑤ 参见徐崇温主编.西方马克思主义理论研究.海南,海南出版社,2000,30.
① 佩里·安德森.当代西方马克思主义.余文烈译,北京,东方出版社,1989,116.
② 佩里·安德森.当代西方马克思主义.余文烈译,北京,东方出版社,1989,148.
③ 佩里·安德森.西方马克思主义探讨.高铦等译,北京,人民出版社,1981,122.
① 佩里·安德森.西方马克思主义探讨.高铦等译,北京,人民出版社,1981,122-123.
① 佩里·安德森.西方马克思主义探讨.高铦等译,北京,人民出版社,1981,136.
② 马克思恩格斯全集第2卷.1957,118-119.
③ 乔瑞金、李瑞艳.试论安德森的“类型学”唯物史观思想及其意义.哲学研究,2011,7.31.
① Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,1980,64.
② 佩里·安德森.绝对主义国家的系谱.刘北成、龚晓庄译,上海,上海人民出版社,2001,452.
③ Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,1980,66
① 马克思恩格斯全集第30卷,北京,人民出版社,1995,48.
② 阿尔都塞、巴里巴尔.读《资本论》.李其庆、冯文光译,北京,中央编译出版社,2008,87.
① Perry Anderson.Arguments within English Marxism.London,Verso,1980,73-76.
① 佩里·安德森.从古代到封建主义的过渡.郭方、刘健译,上海,上海人民出版社,2001,194-195.
① 马克思恩格斯选集第2卷,北京,人民出版社,1995,32-33.
② 佩里·安德森.从古代到封建主义的过渡.郭方、刘健译,上海,上海人民出版社,2001,216.
① Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,1980,81.
② Lin Chun. The British New Left. Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press,1993,129.
③ 佩里·安德森.绝对主义国家的系谱.刘北成、龚晓庄译,上海,上海人民出版社,2001,431.
① 佩里·安德森.绝对主义国家的系谱.刘北成、龚晓庄译,上海,上海人民出版社,2001,438.
② 佩里·安德森.绝对主义国家的系谱.刘北成、龚晓庄译,上海,上海人民出版社,2001,438.
③ 佩里·安德森.绝对主义国家的系谱.刘北成、龚晓庄译,上海,上海人民出版社,2001,432.
④ 佩里·安德森.绝对主义国家的系谱.刘北成、龚晓庄译,上海,上海人民出版社,2001,433-434.
① 佩里·安德森.绝对主义国家的系谱.刘北成、龚晓庄译,上海，上海人民出版社.2001.26.
② 佩里·安德森.绝对主义国家的系谱.刘北成、龚晓庄译,上海,上海人民出版社,2001,17.
① 乔瑞金、李瑞艳.试论安德森的“类型学”唯物史观思想及其意义.哲学研究,2011,7.33.
② 马克思恩格斯全集第31卷,北京,人民出版社,1998,413.
③ 佩里·安德森.绝对主义国家的系谱.刘北成、龚晓庄译,上海,上海人民出版社,2001,449.
④ 佩里·安德森.从古代到封建主义的过渡.郭方、刘健译,上海,上海人民出版社,2001,130.
① 佩里·安德森.从古代到封建主义的过渡.郭方、刘健译,上海,上海人民出版社,2001,159-160.
① 佩里·安德森.从古代到封建主义的过渡.郭方、刘健译,上海,上海人民出版社,2001,161-162.
① 佩里·安德森.绝对主义国家的系谱.刘北成、龚晓庄译,上海,上海人民出版社,2001,前言4.
② 佩里·安德森.绝对主义国家的系谱.刘北成、龚晓庄译,上海,上海人民出版社,2001,6.
③ Paul Blackledge. Perry Anderson, Marxism and the New Left. London, The Merlin Press Ltd.,2004.74.
④ Betty Behrens. Review:[untitled]. The Historical Journal,1976,1,249.
① 佩里·安德森.绝对主义国家的系谱.刘北成、龚晓庄译,上海,上海人民出版社,2001,203.
② 佩里·安德森.绝对主义国家的系谱.刘北成、龚晓庄译,上海,上海人民出版社,2001,213.
③ 佩里·安德森.绝对主义国家的系谱.刘北成、龚晓庄译,上海,上海人民出版社,2001,210.
④ 佩里·安德森.绝对主义国家的系谱.刘北成、龚晓庄译,上海,上海人民出版社,2001,13.
⑤ 佩里·安德森.绝对主义国家的系谱.刘北成、龚晓庄译,上海,上海人民出版社,2001,460.
① 乔瑞金、李瑞艳.试论安德森的“类型学”唯物史观思想及其意义.哲学研究,2011,7.35.
② 佩里·安德森.绝对主义国家的系谱.刘北成、龚晓庄译,上海,上海人民出版社,2001,450.
① 佩里·安德森.绝对主义国家的系谱.刘北成、龚晓庄译,上海,上海人民出版社,2001,455.
② 佩里·安德森.绝对主义国家的系谱.刘北成、龚晓庄译,上海,上海人民出版社,2001,451.
① 马克思恩格斯全集第19卷,北京,人民出版社,1963,129.130.430.
① 佩里·安德森.绝对主义国家的系谱.刘北成、龚晓庄译,上海,上海人民出版社,2001,前言5-6.
② 佩里·安德森.迈克尔·曼的权力社会学.载佩里·安德森.交锋地带.北京,中国社会科学竖版社,2008：101.
③ 佩里·安德森.绝对主义国家的系谱.刘北成、龚晓庄译,上海,上海人民出版社,2001,前言3.
④ 玛丽·福布鲁克,西达·斯考切波.命定的路径：佩里·安德森的历史社会学.载[美]西达·斯考切波编.历史社会学的视野与方法.上海,上海人民出版社,2007,186.
① 佩坐·安德森.绝对主义狗屁家的系谱.刘北成、龚晓庄译,上海,上海人民出版社,2001,567.
② 见玛丽·福布鲁克和西达·斯考切波.命定的路径：佩里·安德森的历史社会学.载西达·斯考切波.历史社会学的视野与方法.上海,上海人民出版社,2007,212.
① 郑陆霖.试析安德森《绝对国家之系谱》的历史方法.2006,32.
② 见玛丽·福布鲁克和西达·斯考切波.命定的路径：佩里·安德森的历史社会学.载西达·斯考切波.历史社会学的视野与方法.上海,上海人民出版社,2007,204.
③ 见玛丽·福布鲁克和西达·斯考切波.命定的路径：佩里·安德森的历史社会学.载西达·斯考切波.历史社会学的视野与方法.上海,上海人民出版社,2007,205.
④ E. P. Thompson. The Poverty of the Theory and Other Essays. London, Merlin and New York, Monthly Review Press,1978.37.
① 彼得·伯克.历史学与社会理论.姚朋等译, 上海,上海人民出版社,2010,2.
② R. Porter &C. R. Whittaker. Review:States and Estates", Social History,1976,3,376.
③ Martin Jay. Review:[untitled]. Theory and Society,1977,2,267
① Paul Blackledge. Perry Anderson, Marxism and the New Left. London, The Merlin Press Ltd.,2004,168.
① Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,1980,17.
② E. P. Thompson. The Poverty of the Theory and Other Essays. London, Merlin and New York, Monthly Review Press,1978,280.280.244
③ Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,1980,50.
④ 马克思恩格斯全集第37卷,北京,人民出版社,1971,461-462.
① Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,1980,19.
② Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,1980,19-20.
① E.P汤普森.英国工人阶级的形成.钱乘旦等译,南京,译林出版社,2001,前言1.213.
② Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,1980,33-34.
③ Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,1980,35.36.37.
① E. P. Thompson. The Making of the English Class. London,Victor Gollancz,1963,9.
② E. P. Thompson. The Poverty of the Theory and Other Essays. London, Merlin and New York, Monthly Review Press,1978,298-299.
① E. P. Thompson. The Making of the English Class. London, Victor Gollancz,1963,915.
② Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,1980,46.
③ Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,1980,44-45.
① See Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,1980,40.
② E. P. Thompson. Eighteenth-century English Society:Class Struggle Without Class? Social History,1978,2,150.
① E. P. Thompson. The Poverty of the Theory and Other Essays. London, Merlin and New York, Monthly Review Press,1978,357.
② E.P汤普森.民俗学、人类学与社会史.载蔡少卿.再现过去：社会史的理论视野.204。
③ E.P汤普森.英国工人阶级的形成.钱乘旦等译,南京,译林出版社,2001,211.
① 戴维·麦克莱伦.马克思思想导论.郑一明、陈喜贵译,北京,中国人民大学出版社,2008,191.
① Perry Anderson. Origins of the Present Crisis. New Left Review,1964,23,39.
② Perrv Anderson. Components of the National Culture. New Left Review,1968,50,15.
③ Perry Anderson, Origins of the Present Crisis. New Left Review,1964,23,41.
④ Perry Anderson, Origins of the Present Crisis. New Left Review,1964,23,30.
① Perry Anderson. Origins of the Present Crisis. New Left Review,1964,23,44.
② Perry Anderson. Origins of the Present Crisis. New Left Review,1964,23,43.
③ Perry Anderson. Origins of the Present Crisis. New Left Review,1964,23,44.
① Tom Nairn. The English Working Class. New Left Review,1964,24,52.57.
② 李瑞艳.基于民族性的社会主义诉求——安德森从英国民族性特征对发达国家走向社会主义的哲学思考.当代国外马克思主义评论,2012,10,256-257.
③ Perry Anderson. Socialism and Pseudo-Empiricism. New Left Review,1966,35,26.
④ Perry Anderson. Components of the National Culture. New Left Review,1968,50,11.
⑤ Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,148-149.
① Paul Blackledge. Perry Anderson, Marxism and the New Left. London, The Merlin Press Ltd.,2004,40.
② E.P汤普森.英国工人阶级的形成.钱乘旦等译,译林出版社,2001,862.
③ E. P. Thompson. The Pecularity of the English. in The Poverty of Theory & Other Essays, New York and London, Monthly Review Press,286.
④ E. P. Thompson. The Pecularity of the English. in The Poverty of Theory & Other Essays, New York and London, Monthly Review Press,284.
① 卢卡奇.历史与阶级意识.杜章智等译,商务印书馆,2009,131-132.
② Edward Thompson. The Peculiarities of the English. The Socialist Register,1965,346.
① Perry Anderson. Socialism and Pseudo-Empiricism.New Left Review,1966,35,27.
② E. P. Thompson. Eighteenth-century English Society:Class Struggle Without Class? Social History,1978,2,164.
① Perry Anderson. A Culture in Contraflow-Ⅰ. New Left Review,1990,180,41.
② Lin Chun. The British New Left. Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press,1993,90.
① Perry Anderson.A Culture in Contraflow-Ⅰ.New Left Review,1990,180,58.
② Lin Chun.The British New Left.Edinburgh,Edinburgh University Press,1993,112.
③ Lin Chun.The British New Left.Edinburgh,Edinburgh University Press,1993,113.
① Paul Blackledge. Perry Anderson, Marxism and the New Left. London, The Merlin Press Ltd.,2004.12.
② Paul Blackledge. Perry Anderson, Marxism and the New Left. London, The Merlin Press Ltd.,2004.13.
① Paul Blackledge. Perry Anderson, Marxism and the New Left. London, The Merlin Press Ltd.,2004,103.
② 马克思恩格斯全集第28卷,北京,人民出版社,1973,509.
③ 马克思恩格斯令集第4卷,北京,人民出版社,1958,465.
④ Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,1980,55.
⑤ 马克思恩格斯全集第22卷,北京,人民出版社,1963,346.
⑥ 列宁选集第4卷,北京,人民出版社,1995,11.
① 乔瑞金等.英国的新马克思主义.北京,人民出版社,2012,70-71.
② 列宁选集第1卷,北京,人民出版社,1995,363.
① 列宁选集第1卷,北京,人民出版社,1995,326.
② 葛兰西文选(1916-1935)北京,人民出版社,1992,83.
① Laymond Williams. Notes on Marxisn in Britain since 1945. New Left Review,1976,100,87.
① Laymond Williams. Notes on Marxisn in Britain since 1945. New Left Review,1976,.100,87.
② Perry Anderson. Components of the National Culture. New Left Review,1968,50,9.
① 佩里·安德森.西方马克思主义探讨.高铦等译,北京,人民出版社,1981,131.
① Perry Anderson. Origins of the Present Crisis. New Left Review,1964,23,47.
② Perry Anderson. Origins of the Present Crisis. New Left Review,1964,23,49.
③ Perry Anderson. The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci. New Left Review,1976,100,28.
① Perrv Anderson.Origins of the Present Crisis. New Left Review,1964,23,44. London, Monthly Review Press,1978,284.
② E. P. Thompson. The Pecularity of the English, in The Poverty of Theory & Other Essays, New York and
③ 李瑞艳.基于民族性的社会主义诉求——安德森从英国民族性特征对发达国家走向社会主义的哲学思考.当代国外马克思主义评论,2012,10,255.
① Perry Anderson. The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci. New Left Review,1976,100,5.
② 列宁选集第1卷.北京,人民出版社,1995,558.
③ Perry Anderson. The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci. New Left Review,1976,100,17.17.
① 安东尼奥·葛兰西.狱中札记.葆煦译,北京,人民出版社,1993,41.
② Perry Anderson. The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci. New Left Review,1976.100,18.
③ Perry Anderson. The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci. New Left Review,1976,100,17.
① Antonio Gramsci.Selection from political Writings(1921-1926),Lawrence and Wishart,1978,443.
③ Perry Anderson.The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci.New Left Review,1976,100,21-22.
② Perry Anderson.The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci.New Left Review,1976,100,21. ④ Perry Anderson.The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci.New Left Review,1976,100,10.
① Perry Anderson.The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci.New Left Review,1976,100,28.
① Perry Anderson. The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci. New Left Review,1976,100,32-34.
③ Perry Anderson. The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci. New Left Review,1976,100,33-34.
④ Perry Anderson. The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci. New Left Review,1976,100,32.
① 这里做了一些改动,把阿尔都塞有关“强制性的国家机器”与“意识形态的国家机器”改为“强制性的机器”和“意识形态的机器”,因为阿尔都塞的这一表述就把市民社会并入国家中而丧失了市民社会的自主性,因此把“国家”这一限定去掉之后,这一表述更加符合葛兰西的原意。
① Perry Anderson. The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci. New Left Review,1976,100,42.
② Perry Anderson. Problems of Socialist Strategy. Towards Socialism, with Robin Blackburn (eds.), London, Collins,1966,230.
③ Perry Anderson. The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci. New Left Review,1976,100,25-26.
① 参见《思想的谱系：西方思潮左与右》一书,安德森在《设计共识：约翰·罗尔斯》、《规范事实：尤尔根·哈贝马斯》文中对两者思想进行了具体评述,从中可以找到他对于经济层面的特别关注和强调。
② Perry Anderson.The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci.New Left Review,1976,100,50.
① 俞吾金、陈学明.国外马克思主义哲学流派新编——西方马克思主义卷.上海,复旦大学出版社,2002,122.
② Perry Anderson. The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci. New Left Review,1976,100,35.
③ 马克思恩格斯全集第11卷.北京,人民出版社,1995,172.
① 阿尔都塞.哲学与政治——阿尔都塞读本.陈越译,长春,吉林人民出版社,2011,282.
② Ralph Milibad. The Capitalist State:Reply to Nicos Poulantzas. The New Left Review,1970,59,59.
① Perry Anderson. The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci. New Left Review,1976,100,45.
② 俞开金、陈学明.国外马克思生义哲学流派新编(西方马克思主义卷).上海,复旦大学出版社,2002,124.
② Perry Anderson. The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci. New Left Review,1976,100,46.
① 彼得·伯克.历史学与社会理论.姚朋等译,上海,上海人民出版社,2010,81-82.
① 佩里·安德森.W.G.朗西曼的新进化论.交锋地带.郭英剑、郝素玲等译,北京,中国社会科学出版社,2008.174.
② Perry Anderson. A Culture in Contraflow-Ⅰ. New Left Review,1990,180,66.
① 佩里·安德森.迈克尔·曼的权力社会学.载交锋地带.郭英剑、郝素玲等译,北京,中国社会科学出版社,2008,91.100.101.
② 乔瑞金、李瑞艳.对安德森“类型学”权力思想的几点思考.中国人民大学学报,2012,6,69.
① E. P. Thompson. The Peculiarities of the English. The Socialist Register,1965,358.
② E. P. Thompson. The Peculiarities of the English. The Socialist Register,1965,358-359.
③ 佩里·安德森.绝对主义国家的系谱.刘北成、龚晓庄译,上海,上海人民出版社,2001,前言6.
① 乔瑞金、李瑞艳.对安德森“类型学”权力思想的几点思考.中国人民大学学报,2012,6,69-70.
① Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,1980,186.
② 佩里·安德森.西方马克思主义探讨.高铦等译,北京,人民出版社,1981,61.
① 佩里·安德森.当代西方马克思主义.余文烈译,北京,东方出版社,1989,50.
② Perry Anderson. Problems of Socialist Strategy. Towards Socialism, with Robin Blackburn (eds.), London, Collins, 1966,223-224.
① Perry Anderson. Problems of Socialist Strategy. Towards Socialism, with Robin Blackburn (eds.), London, Collins, 1966,224.
① Perry Anderson. Problems of Socialist Strategy. Towards Socialism, with Robin Blackburn (eds.), London, Collins, 1966,227-228.
② Perry Anderson. Problems of Socialist Strategy. Towards Socialism, with Robin Blackburn (eds.), London, Collins, 1966,226.
③ Perry Anderson. Problems of Socialist Strategy. Towards Socialism, with Robin Blackburn (eds.), London, Collins, 1966,235.
① Perry Anderson. The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci. New Left Review, November/December,1976, no.100,9-10
③ Perry Anderson. The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci. New Left Review,1976,100,69.
② 戴维·麦克莱伦.马克思以后的马克思主义.李智译,北京,中国人民大学出版社,2004,260.
④ Perry Anderson. The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci. New Left Review,1976,100,70.
① Perry Anderson. The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci. New Left Review,1976,100,69.
② 佩坦·安德森.西方马克思主义探讨.高铦等译,北京,人民出版社,1981,146.
① Perry Anderson. The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci. New Left Review,1976,100,78.
① Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,195.
② Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,190-191.
① 佩坚·安德森.马歇尔·伯曼：现代性与革命,载交锋地带,.郭英剑、郝素玲等译,北京,中国社会科学出版社,2008,56.
① Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,194.
② Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,194-195.
③ Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,185.
① 马克思恩格斯全集第1卷,北京,人民出版社,1956,488-489.
② 马克思恩格斯全集第4卷,北京,人民出版社,1958,477.
① Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,196.
② Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,197.
① Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,206.
② Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,85.
① 佩里·安德森.马歇尔·伯曼：现代性与革命.载交锋地带.郭英剑、郝素玲等译,北京,中国社会科学出版社,2008,43.
① 佩里·安德森.后现代性的起源.柴辰、合章译,北京,中国社会科学出版社,2008,84.96.
② 佩里·安德森.后现代性的起源.柴辰、合章译,北京,中国社会科学出版社,2008,123-124.
③ 佩里·安德森.文明及其内涵.读书,1997,12,70.
① Perry Anderson.Renewals.New Left Review,2000,1,16.
② 佩里·安德森.文明及其内涵.读书,1997,11,66.
③ 甘琦.向右的时代向左的人.读书,2005,6,39-40.
① Perry Anderson,Perry Anderson.Renewals.New Left Review,2000,1,15.
② 佩坚·安德森等.三种新的全球化国际关系理论.读书,2002,10,10.
③ 佩里·安德森.新自由主义的历史和教训.费新录译,天涯,2002,3,170.
④ 施雨华、杨子.我们的支持和反对——对话安德森.南方人物周刊,2007,3,63.
① 施雨华、杨子.我们的支持和反对——对话安德森.南方人物周刊,2007,3,62.
② 马克思恩格斯全集第4卷.北京,人民出版社,1958,470.
① 佩里·安德森.文明及其内涵.读书,1997,11,43.
② 佩里·安德森.当代西方马克思主义.余文烈译,东方出版社,1989,140-141.
① 佩里·安德森.历史的终结.载交锋地带.郭英剑、郝素玲等译,北京,中国社会科学出版社,2008,419.
② 佩里·安德森.绝对主义国家的系谱.刘北成、龚晓庄译，上海,上海人民出版社,2001,前言6.
③ Perry Anderson. Problems of Socialist Strategy. Towards Socialism. with Robin Blackburn (eds.), London, Collins, 1966,246.
① 佩里·安德森.诺贝托·波比奥和他的主义.载交锋地带.郭英剑、郝素玲等译,北京,中国社会科学出版社,2008,134.
② 马克思恩格斯全集第3卷,北京,人民出版社,2002,584-585.
③ 安德森在《武器与权利：可调整的中心》一文中认为,尤尔根·哈贝马斯的《在事实与规范之间》、约翰·罗尔斯的《政治自由主义》和诺贝托·波比奥的《左翼和右翼》的代表性著作中将注意力集中于西方自由民主国家的内部关系方面,而后哈贝马斯在《康德的永久和平思想：200年的历史变迁》(1995)和《后民族国家体系与民主的未来》(1998)两篇文章,罗尔斯的《万民法》(1999)；波比奥的《民主和国际体系》(1989)这些文章中,他们将注意力转移到了国际关系方面。
① 佩里·安德森.思想的谱系：西方思潮左与右.袁银传、曹荣湘等译,北京,社会科学文献出版社,2010,196-187.
② 佩里·安德森.当代西方马克思主义.余文烈译,北京,东方出版社,1989,135.
③ Lin Chun. The British New Left. Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press,1993,112.
④ 马克思恩格斯全集第17卷,北京,人民出版社,1963,700.
① 戴维·麦克莱伦.马克思思想导论.郑一明、陈喜贵译,北京,中国人民大学出版社,2008,225.231.
① 佩里·安德森.当代西方马克思主义.余文烈译,北京,东方出版社,1989,133.
① Antony Easthope. British Post-Structuralism Since 1968, Routledge,1988,5.
② Raymond Williams. Base and Superstructure in Marxist Cultural Theory. New Left Review,82,1973,6.
③ Raymond Williams. Base and Superstructure in Marxist Cultural Theory. New Left Review,82,1973,12.
① Lin Chun. The British New Left. Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press,1993,130.
② E.P.Thompson. Socialist Humanism. The New Reasoner,1,1957,111-113.
③ Edward Thompson. The Peculiarities of the English. The Poverty of the Theory and Other Essays, London, Merlin Press,1978,289.
④ Edward Thompson. The Peculiarities of the English. The Poverty of the Theory and Other Essays, London, Merlin Press,1978,292.
① Edward Thompson. The Peculiarities of the English. The Socialist Register,1965,351.
① Edward Thompson. The Peculiarities of the English. The Socialist Register,1965,356-357.
① Perrv Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London, Verso,1980,55-56.
③ Perry Anderson. Problems of Socialist Strategy. Towards Socialism, with Robin Blackburn (eds.), London, Collins,
④ Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London and New York, Verso,1980,10. 1966,229.
① 卡尔·波普尔.历史决定论的贫困.杜汝楫 邱仁宗译，上海,上海人民出版社,2009,102-103.
② Perry Anderson. The Notion of Bourgeois Revolution. English Questions, London and New York:Verso,1992, 110-113.
① Perry Anderson. Portugul and the End of Ultra-Colonialism Ⅲ. New Left Review,1962,17,113.
② Perry Anderson. Socialism and Pseudo-Empiricism. New Left Review,1966,35,39.
① Perry Anderson. Socialism and Pseudo-Empiricism. New Left Review,1966,35,32-33.
② Perry Anderson. Socialism and Pseudo-Empiricism. New Left Review,1966,35,39.
③ Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London and New York, Verso,1980,10.
① 佩里·安德森.绝对主义国家的系谱.刘北成,龚晓庄译.上海，上海人民出版社,2001,前言5-6.
② Perry Anderson. Component of the National Culture. New Left Review,1968,50,57.
① Perry Anderson. Socialism and Pseudo-Empiricism. New Left Review,1966,35,33.
① 彼得·伯克.历史学与社会理论.姚朋等译,上海,上海人民出版社,2010,2.
② 佩里·安德森.迈克尔·曼的权力社会学.载佩里·安德森.交锋地带.北京,中国社会科学出版社,2008,101.
① [瑞士]皮亚杰.结构主义.倪连生,王琳译,北京,商务印书馆,2010,109.
① E.P.汤普森.论阿尔都塞的结构主义马克思主义.张亮译,马克思主义美学研究,2008,1,256.
② 徐浩、侯建.新当代西方史学流派.北京,中国人民大学出版社,2009,131-132.
① 乔瑞金等著.英国的新马克思主义.北京，人民出版社,2012,33-44.
② Perry Anderson. A Culture in Contraflow-Ⅱ. New Left Review,1990,182,106-107.
① Perry Anderson. Arguments Within English Marxism. London and New York, Verso,1980,152-153.
③ E.P. Thompson. Revolution. New Left Review.3.8.
② Perry Anderson. Socialism and Pseudo-Empiricism. New Left Review,1966,35,34.
④ E.P. Thompson. The New Left. The New Reason,9,7.
① Edward Thompson. The Peculiarities of the English. The Poverty of the Theory and Other Essays, London, Merlin Press,1978,337.
② E.P. Thompson. Outside the Whale. Out of Apathy,5,192-193.
③ Perry Anderson. Socialism and Pseudo-Empiricism. New Left Review,1966,35,36.
④ Tom Nairn. The English Working Class. New Left Review,1964,24,44.
① E. P. Thompson. Socialism and the Intellectuals. Universities & Left Review,1957,1,36.
② 丹尼斯·德沃金.文化马克思主义在战后英国.李丹凤译,北京,人民出版社,2008,75.
② E. P. Thompson. Socialist Humanism. The New Reasoner, Summer,1957,1,122.
① 佩里·安德森.文明及其内涵(上).读书,1997,12,69.
② E. P. Thompson. The Poverty of the Theory and Other Essays. London, Merlin and New York, Monthly Review Press,1978,109.
① 乔瑞金等.英国的新马克思主义.北京,人民出版社,2012,7-17.
② 佩里·安德森.西方马克思主义探讨.高铦等译,北京,人民出版社，1981,133.
③ Lin Chun. The British New Left. Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press,1993, ⅩⅤ.
① Paul Blackledge. Perry Anderson, Marxism and the New Left. London, The Merlin Press Ltd.,2004,14.
② Perry Anderson. The Left in the Fifties. New Left Review,29,11-13.
③ Paul Blackledge. Perry Anderson, Marxism and the New Left. London, The Merlin Press Ltd.,2004,28
① Paul Blackledge.Perry Anderson,Marxism and the New Left.London,The Merlin Press Ltd.,2004,171.
① 参见创建一个更美好的替代世界——2008年全球左翼论坛综述.当代世界与社会主义,2008,3.② 甘琦.向右的时代向左的人.读书,2005,6,41.
[1]Perry Anderson. Towards Socialism, with Robin Blackburn (eds.), London, Collins, 1966.
[2]Perry Anderson. Passages from Antiquity to Feudalism. London, New left Books, 1974.
[3]Perry Anderson. Lineages of the Absolute State. London, New left Books,1974.
[4]Perry Anderson. Considerations on Western Marxism. London, New left Books, 1976.
[5]Perry Anderson. Arguments within English Marxism. London, Verso,1980.
[6]Perry Anderson. In the Tracks of Historical Materialism. London, Verso,1983.
[7]Perry Anderson. English Questions. London and New York, Verso,1992.
[8]Perry Anderson. A Zone of Engagement. London and New York, Verso,1992.
[9]Perry Anderson. Mapping the West European Left, with Patrick Camiller (eds.), London and New York, Verso,1994.
[10]Perry Anderson. The Origins of Postmodernity. London and New York, Verso,1998.
[11]Perry Anderson. Spectrum:From Right to Left in the World of Ideas. London and New York, Verso,2005.
[12]Perry Anderson. The New Old World. London and New York, Verso.
[13]Perry Anderson. Origins of the Present Crisis. New Left Review, January/February, 1964, no.23,26-53.
[14]Perry Anderson. Critique of Wilsonism. New Left Review,1964,27,3-27.
[15]Perry Anderson. The Left in the Fifties. New Left Review,1965,29,3-18.
[16]Perry Anderson. Socialism and Pseudo-Empiricism. New Left Review,1966,35, 2-42.
[17]Perry Anderson. Components of the National Culture. New Left Review,1968,50, 3-57.
[18]Perry Anderson. The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci. New Left Review,1976,100, 5-78.
[19]Perry Anderson, The Notion of Bourgeois Revolution. English Questions, London and New York:Verso,1992,105-118.
[20]Perry Anderson. Modernity and Revolution. New Left Review,1984,144,96-113.
[21]Perry Anderson. The Figures of Descent. New Left Review,1987,161,20-77.
[22]Perry Anderson. The Affinities of Norberto Bobbio. New Left Review,1988,.170, 3-36.
[23]Perry Anderson. A Culture in Contraflow-I. New Left Review,1990,180,41-78.
[24]Perry Anderson. A Culture in Contraflow-II. New Left Review,1990,182,5-137.
[25]Perry Anderson. The Light of Europe. English Questions, London and New York: Verso,1992,302-353.
[26]Perry Anderson. A Sense of the Left. New Left Review,1998,231,73-81.
[27]Perry Anderson. Renewals. New Left Review,2000,1,5-24.
[28]Perry Anderson. Testing Formula Two. New Left Review,2001,8,5-22.
[29]Perry Anderson. Internationalism:A Breviary. New Left Review,2002,14,5-25.
[30]Perry Anderson. Force and Consent. New Left Review,2002,17,5-30.
[31]Perry Anderson. The River of Time. New Left Review,2004,26,67-77.
[32]Perry Anderson. Arms and Rights. New Left Review,2005,31,5-40.
[33]Perry Anderson.A New German?. New Left Review,2009,57,5-40.
[34]Perry Anderson. Two Revolutions. New Left Review,2010,61,59-96.
[35]Perry Anderson. The Age of EJH. London Review of Books,2002,19,3-7.
[36]Perry Anderson. Casuistries of Peace and War. London Review of Books,2003,5, 12-13.
[37]Perry Anderson. Stand-off in Taiwan. London Review of Books,2004,11,12-17.
[38]Perry Anderson. Inside Man. The Nation,2006,23-29.
[39]Perry Anderson. Made in USA. The Nation,2007,25-30.
[40]Perry Anderson. The Common and the Particular. International Labour and Working-Class History,1989,36,31-36.
[41]Perry Anderson. Class Struggle in the Ancient World. History Workshop,1983,16, 57-73.
[1]Paul Blackledge. Perry Anderson, Marxism and the New Left. London, The Merlin Press Ltd.,2004.
[2]Elliott Gregory. Perry Anderson:The Merciless Laboratory of History. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press,1998.
[3]Lin Chun. The British New Left. Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press,1993.
[4]Dennis Dworkin. Cultural Marxism in Postwar Britain:History, the New Left, and the Origins of Cultural Studies. London, Duke University Press,1997.
[5]Antony Easthope. British Post-structuralism since 1968. London and New York, Routledge,1988.
[6]E. P. Thompson. The Making of the English Class. London, Victor Gollancz,1963.
[7]E. P. Thompson. William Morris:Romantic to Revolution. New York, Pantheon, 1977.
[8]E. P. Thompson. The Poverty of the Theory and Other Essays. London, Merlin and New York, Monthly Review Press,1978.
[9]E. P. Thompson. Socialist Humanism. The New Reasoner,1,1957.105-143.
[10]Edward Thompson. The Peculiarities of the English. The Socialist Register,1965, 311-362.
[11]E. P. Thompson. Eighteenth-century English Society:Class Struggle Without Class? Social History,1978,2,133-165.
[12]Tom Nairn. The English Working Class. New Left Review,1964,no.24,43-57.
[13]Raymond Williams. Base and Superstructure in Marxist Culture Theory. New Left Review,1973,82,3-16.
[14]Raymond Williams. Notes on Marxisn in Britain since 1945.1976,100,81-94
[15]Terry Eagleton. Criticism and Politics:The Work of Raymond Williams. New Left Review,1976,95,3-23.
[16]Terry Eagleton. Capitalism, Modernism and Postmodernism. New Left Review,1985, 152,60-73.
[17]Robin Blackburn. Marxism:Theory of Proletarian Revolution. New Left Review, 1976,97,3-35.
[18]Robin Blackburn. Raymond Williams and the Politics of a New Left. New Left Review,1988,168,12-22.
[19]Ralph Miliband. State Power and Class Interests. New Left Review,1983,138, 57-68.
[20]Peter Linebaugh. In the Flight Path of Perry Anderson. History Workshop,1986,21, 141-146.
[21]Wade Matthews. The Poverty of Strategy:E. P. Thompson, Perry Anderson and the Transition to Socialism. Labour/Le Travail,2002,50,217-241.
[22]Mark A. Pollack. Review:[untitled]. The Journal of Politics,1998,4,1202-1208.
[23]Tim Walsh. Review:[untitled]. International Affairs,1998,1,223.
[24]Maurice Meilleur. Review:Spectrum:From Right to Left in the World of Ideas. The Antioch Review,2006,3,578-579.
[25]Anthony Ashbolt. Review:[untitled]. Labour History,2006,88,268-270.
[26]Martin Jay. Review:[untitled]. Theory and Society,1977,2,298.
[27]Richard Ashcraft. Review:[untitled]. Political Theory,1978,1,134-138.
[28]David Macgregor. Review:The End of Western Marxism?. Contemporary Sociology, 1978,2,143-147.
[29]Gary S. Orgel. Review:[untitled]. Studies in Soviet Thought,1979,3,251-256.
[30]Marian Sawer & Marian Sawyer. Review:[untitled]. Labour History,1977,33, 115-119.
[31]Raymond Morrow. Review:[untitled]., The Canadian Journal of Sociology,1986,4, 469-473.
[32]Terry Eagleton. Review:Marxism, Structuralism, and Post-Structuralism. Diacritics, 1985,4,2-12.
[33]James A. Winders. Review:Poststructuralist Theory, Praxis, and the Intellectual", Contemporary Literature,1986,1,73-84.
[34]Russell Jacoby. Review:[untitled]. Theory and Society,1982,2,251-257.
[35]F. J. Donnelly. Review:[untitled]. Labour,1983,12,.400-402.
[36]Susan Magarey. Review:That History Old Chestnut, Free Will and Determinism: Culture vs. Structure, or History vs. Theory in Britain. Comparative Studies in Society and History,1987,3,626-639.
[37]Bernice Martin. Review:Feudalism and absolutism. The British Journal of Sociology,1976,2,267-271.
[38]Betty Behrens. Review:[untitled]. The Historical Journal,1976,1,245-250.
[39]R. Porter &C. R. Whittaker. Review:States and Estates", Social History,1976,3, 367-376.
[40]Peter Gourevitch. Review:The International System and Regime Formation:A Critical Review of Anderson and Wallerstein. Comparative Politics,1978,3,419-438.
[41]Frank Mcmahon. Review:Up, Up and Away. Oxford Art Journal,1993,1,158-160.
[42]Michael Hechter. Review:Lineages of the Capitalist State. The American Journal of Sociology,1977,5,1057-1074.
[43]Raymond B. Pratt. Review:[untitled]. The Western Political Quarterly,1978,1, 130-131.
[44]Lionel Rothkrug. Review:[untitled], The American Historical Review,1978,2, 373-374.
[45]Richard Lachmann. Comparisons Within a Single Social Formation:A Critical Appreciation of Perry Anderson's Lineages of the Absolutist State. Qualitative Sociology, 2002,1,83-92.
[46]Dick Howard. Marxist Misunderstandings:Perry Anderson and French Politics. Democratiya 5,2006,31-43.
[47]Alex Callinicos. Perry Anderson and Western Marxism. International Socialism, 1984,23,113-128.
[48]Paul Blackledge. Realism and Renewals:Perry Anderson and the Prospects for the Left. Contemporary Politics,2001,4,261-262.
[49]Paul Blackledge. Perry Anderson and the End of History, Historical Materialism, 2000,1,199-219.
[50]Edward Skidelsky. The New Statesman Profile-Perry Anderson. New Statesman, March 19,1999, http://www.newstatesman.com/199903190015.
[51]The Antinomies of Perry Anderson, January 13,2001. http://www.oocities.org/edgeorge2001 es/mywritings/Perry_Anderson.html.
[52]Conversations with history:Reflections on the Left from the Left with Perry Anderson, http://www.uctv.tv/search-details.aspx?showID=7123
[1]佩里·安德森.西方马克思主义探讨.高铦等译,北京,人民出版社,1981.
[2]佩里·安德森.当代西方马克思主义.余文烈译,北京,东方出版社,1989.
[3]佩里·安德森.从古代到封建主义的过渡.郭方、刘健译,上海,上海人民出版社,2001.
[4]佩里·安德森.绝对主义国家的系谱.刘北成、龚晓庄译,上海,上海人民出版社,2001.
[5]佩里·安德森.交锋地带.郭英剑、郝素玲等译,北京,中国社会科学出版社,2008.
[6]佩里·安德森.后现代性的起源.柴辰、合章译,北京,中国社会科学出版社,2008.
[7]佩里·安德森.思想的谱系：西方思潮左与右.袁银传、曹荣湘等译,北京,社会科学文献出版社,2010.
[8]佩里·安德森.文明及其内涵(上).读书,1997,11.
[9]佩里·安德森.文明及其内涵(下).读书,1997,12.
[10]佩里·安德森.后现代的由来.张子清译,当代外国文学,1999,1.
[11]佩里·安德森.新自由主义的历史和教训——一种独特道路的确立.费新录译,当代世界与社会主义,2001,3.
[12]佩里·安德森.三种新的全球化国际关系理论.读书,2002,10.
[13]佩里·安德森.褐色蝶蛹内的艳丽蝴蝶——评《赫鲁晓夫：其人及其时代》,容平译,国外社会科学文摘,2003,7.
[14]佩里·安德森.内部人.读书,2006,8.
[15]佩里·安德森.尤根·哈贝马斯：规范事实,袁银传、李孟一译,马克思主义哲学研究,2009,00.
[16]胡战利编写.佩里·安德森的历史悲观主义.国外理论动态,2001,7.
[17]邓广编写.《新左派评论》的更新.国外理论动态,2001,7.
[18]胡鸣剑写.《新左派评论》的自杀.国外理论动态,2001,7.
[19]龙宏甫.评安德森历史社会学的理论与方法.安庆师范学院学报(社会科学版),2001,1.
[20]黄力之.佩里·安德森的西方马克思主义观点与马克思主义的发展.上海党史与党建,2002,1.
[21]吴冠军.“左翼”：“界线”问题与“场域”分析——安德森“犯规”事件再思 考.开放时代,2003,1.
[22]张亮.从激进的乐观主义到现实主义——佩里·安德森与《新左派评论》杂志的理论退却,马克思主义研究,2003,2.
[23]段忠桥.对安德森“扩大”西方马克思主义概念的说法的质疑.马克思主义研究,2004.2.
[24]甘琦.向右的时代向左的人.读书,2005,6.
[25]王晋新.评佩里·安德森的封建主义社会形态研究.东北师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005,3.
[26]姜芃.霍布斯鲍姆和佩里·安德森对唯物史观的理解.史学理论研究,2006,3.
[27]郭方.评佩里·安德森的《从古代到封建主义的过渡》.史学理论研究,2006,3.
[28]谢济光.佩里·安德森的后现代主义追溯.广西社会科学,2006,7.
[29]王金强.继承与超越：评佩里·安德森的工人阶级观.北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2007,2.
[30]施雨华、杨子.我们的支持和反对——对话安德森.高任华译,南方人物周刊,2007,3.
[31]鲁绍臣.佩里·安德森对历史主义和结构主义的扬弃及其启示.当代国外马克思主义评论,2007,00.
[32]鲁绍臣.反思与重构——佩里·安德森的历史唯物主义“图绘”.北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2007,2.
[33]鲁绍臣.佩里·安德森：传统反思与理论重构.当代国外马克思主义评论,2008，00.
[34]鲁绍臣.佩里·安德森的历史唯物主义“图绘”.兰州学刊,2008,3.
[35]鲁绍臣.反思与重构——佩里·安德森的历史唯物主义“图绘”.复旦大学博士学位论文,2008.
[36]张文涛.析E.P.汤普森与佩里·安德森之间的争论.山东社会科学,2008,11.
[37]王雨辰.佩里·安德森的西方马克思主义观述评.长江论坛,2008,1.
[38]张勇.佩里·安德森论当代世界形势(上).国外理论动态,2009,4.
[39]张勇.佩里·安德森论当代世界形势(下).国外理论动态,2009,5
[40]杨生平.后现代主义：晚期资本主义的文化主导——佩里·安德森《后现代性 的起源》.马克思主义研究.2009,9.
[41]蒋素琼.佩里·安德森的务实性乐观主义.名作欣赏,2009,21.
[42]王琛.艰难时世：危机中生存的世界与中国——佩里·安德森访问记.现代中文学刊,2010,1.
[43]乔瑞金、李瑞艳.试论安德森的“类型学”唯物史观思想及其意义.哲学研究,2011,7.
[44]乔瑞金、李瑞艳.对安德森“类型学”权力思想的几点思考.中国人民大学学报,2012,6.
[45]李瑞艳.基于民族性的社会主义诉求——安德森从英国民族性特征对发达国家走向社会主义的哲学思考.当代国外马克思主义评论,2012,10.
[1]马克思恩格斯全集.北京,人民出版社,1956、1957、1958、1960、1963、1971、1973、1995、1998、2002.
[2]马克思恩格斯选集.北京,人民出版社,1995.
[3]列宁选集.北京,人民出版社,1995.
[4]普列汉诺夫哲学著作选集第2卷.北京,三联书店,1961.
[5]路易·阿尔都塞.保卫马克思.北京,商务印书馆,2006.
[6]路易·阿尔都塞、艾蒂安·巴里巴尔.读《资本论》.李其庆、冯文光译,北京,中央编译出版社,2008.
[7]路易·阿尔都塞.哲学与政治：阿尔都塞读本.陈越编译,长春,吉林人民出版社,2010.
[8]马尔库塞.单向度的人.刘继译,上海,上海译文出版社,2006.
[9]安东尼奥·葛兰西.狱中札记.北京,中国社会科学出版社,2000.
[10]葛兰西文选(1916-1935)北京,人民出版社,1992.
[11]卢卡奇.历史与阶级意识.杜章智、任立、燕宏远译,北京,商务印书馆,2009.
[12]皮亚杰.结构主义.倪连生、王琳译,北京,商务印书馆,2010.
[13]施密特.历史和结构——论黑格尔马克思主义和结构主义的历史学说.重庆,重庆出版社,1993.
[14]卡尔·波普尔.历史决定论的贫困,杜汝楫、邱仁宗译,上海,上海人民出版 社,2009.
[15]柯林武德.历史的观念.何兆武、张文杰译,北京,商务印书馆,2009.
[16]西达·斯考切波.历史社会学的视野与方法.封积文译,上海,上海人民出版社,2007.
[17]丹尼斯·史密斯.历史社会学的兴起.周辉荣等译,上海,上海人民出版社,2002.
[18]彼得·伯克.历史学与社会理论.姚朋等译,上海,上海人民出版社,2010
[19]戴维·麦克莱伦.马克思以后的马克思主义.李智译,北京,中国人民大学出版社,2004.
[20]戴维·麦克莱伦.马克思思想导论.郑一明、陈喜贵译,北京,中国人民大学出版社,2008.
[21]E.P.汤普森.英国工人阶级的形成.钱乘旦译,南京,译林出版社,2001.
[22]E.P.汤普森.共有的习惯.沈汉、王加丰译,上海,上海人民出版社,2002.
[23]G.A.柯亨.卡尔·马克思的历史理论——一个辩护.岳长龄译,重庆,重庆出版社,1989.
[24]丹尼斯·德沃金.文化马克思主义在战后英国.李丹凤译,北京,人民出版社,2008.
[25]埃伦·梅克新斯·伍德和约翰·贝拉米·福斯特主编.保卫历史：马克思主义与后现代主义.北京,社会科学文献出版社,2009.
[26]威廉姆·肖.马克思的历史理论.阮仁慧、钟石韦译,重庆,重庆出版社,2007.
[27]伯恩斯(Burns, R.M.)、皮卡德(Pickard, H.R.).历史哲学：从启蒙到后现代性.张羽佳译,北京,北京师范大学出版社,2008.
[28]徐浩、侯建新.当代西方史学流派(第二版).北京,中国人民大学出版社,2009.
[29]罗伯特·K.默顿.社会理论和社会结构.唐少杰等译,南京,译林出版社,2006.
[30]艾伦·梅克森斯·伍德主编.民主反对资本主义——重建历史唯物主义.吕微洲、刘海霞、邢文增译,重庆,重庆出版社,2007.
[31]乔瑞金.英国的新马克思主义.北京,人民出版社,2012.
[32]乔瑞金.马克思思想研究的新话语——技术与文化批判的英国新马克思主义. 太原,书海出版社,2005.
[33]薛勇民.走向社会历史的深处——唯物史观的当代探析,北京,人民出版社,2002.
[34]薛勇民.走向社会实践的深处——马克思主义历史理性的当代沉思,太原,山西人民出版社,2005年。
[35]张亮编.英国新左派思想家.南京,江苏人民出版社,2010.
[36]当代国外马克思主义评论(5).复旦大学当代国外马克思主义研究中心编.北京,人民出版社,2007.
[37]衣俊卿等著.20世纪的文化批判——西方马克思主义的深层解读.北京,中央编译出版社,2003.
[38]俞吾金、陈学明著.国外马克思主义哲学流派新编(西方马克思主义卷).上海,复旦大学出版社,2002.
[39]徐崇温主编.西方马克思主义理论研究.海南,海南出版社,2000.
[40]陈炳辉.西方马克思主义的国家理论.北京,中央编译出版社,2004.
[41]乔瑞金.我们为什么需要研究英国的新马克思主义?马克思主义与现实,2011,6.
[42]乔瑞金.论英国新马克思主义的思想特征.理论探索,2006,4.
[43]乔瑞金.英国新马克思主义的发展历程及其思想特征.当代国外马克思主义评论,2007,00.
[44]师文兵、乔瑞金.英国新马克思主义历史学派的政治的意识.哲学研究,2007,3.
[45]乔瑞金、师文兵.历史主义与结构主义——英国新马克思主义哲学探索的主导意识.哲学研究,2005,2.
[46]乔瑞金、师文兵.破解主体与结构之谜——英国新马克思主义关于阶级问题的争论及其启示.理论探索,2005,2.
[47]乔瑞金、师文兵.马克思主义是社会历史的整体视界——英国新马克思主义的“事实”与“理论”之争及其启示.山西大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005,4.
[48]乔瑞金、李瑞艳.英国新马克思主义的哲学探索.现代哲学,2007,5.
[49]薛勇民.再论社会进步的动力系统.系统辩证学学报,2002,2.
[50]薛勇民.唯物史观的当代反思.马克思主义研究,2002,2.
[51]薛勇民、李侠.论福柯权力视野下的技术.自然辩证法研究,2002,1.
[52]薛勇民、侯永刚.简论马克思关于“世界历史”演进的思想.东方论坛,2002,2.
[53]王喜平.论实践的本质特征.系统辩证学学报,2003,4.
[54]王喜平.物质和意识的关系及哲学史的构建原则.山西大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2003,4.
[55]邢媛.青年马克思的社会冲突思想探析.理论探索,2009,3.
[56]邢媛.评吉登斯对马克思的“两种商品化”理论的分析.现代哲学,2009,3.
[57]邢媛.吉登斯“自我认同”的社会哲学思想探析.马克思主义与现实,2010,3.
[58]戴维·麦克莱伦.历史与现在：马克思和马克思主义.陈亚军译,马克思主义、列宁主义研究,2005,2.
[59]戴维·麦克莱伦.英国马克思主义.陈亚军译,国外社会科学文摘,1981,1.
[60]保尔·布莱克雷治.道德革命：英国新左派中的伦理论争.现代哲学,2007,1.
[61]梁民愫.社会变革与学术流派：当代英国马克思主义史学渊源综论.史学月刊,2003.12.
[62]赵国新.新左派.外国文学,2004,3.
[63]赵国新.文化研究.外国文学,2004,4,
[64]周穗明编译.西方左翼思潮四十年回顾及其九十年代的复兴.当代世界社会主义问题,2001,1.
[65]周穗明.西方新社会运动与新马克思主义.马克思主义、列宁主义研究,2006,9.
[66]徐崇温.国外马克思主义研究的若干新动向.马克思主义与现实,1998,1.