藏北高寒草地生态系统服务功能及其价值评估与生态补偿机制研究
|
摘要
藏北高寒草地是我国重要的畜牧业生产基地和生态安全屏障。然而,高寒草地退化使藏北高原陷入了生态环境恶化、经济发展滞后和牧民生活贫困的窘境,由此引发了一系列的生态、经济、环境和社会问题,不仅严重影响藏北高原畜牧业生产和牧民生活,而且直接威胁到区域生态安全和东亚水资源安全。为了遏制草地退化趋势,维护草地的生态服务功能,提高草地生产能力,协调人口、资源、环境和经济发展的关系,实现生态、经济和社会的可持续发展,需要将自然科学问题与社会经济发展政策紧密结合起来,评估高寒草地生态系统服务功能价值,建立有效的草地生态补偿机制,对制定合理的生态屏障保护与畜牧业经济发展策略具有重要意义。本研究基于生态经济学原理和可持续发展理论,以藏北那曲地区为例,采用定量与定性相结合的方法,分析藏北高寒草地生态系统现状与发展态势,以及生态屏障保护与经济发展之间不同利益主体为了各自利益诉求进行博弈的均衡关系,定量评估了高寒草地生态系统的可持续发展水平。针对高寒草地生态系统的特点以及造成退化的自然和社会经济驱动因素,阐明了高寒草地生态系统生态、生产和生活功能(“三生功能”)的互作机制。建立了基于“三生功能”的高寒草地生态系统服务功能评估体系和方法,定量评估了不同类型与不同退化程度草地的生态服务价值及其损益水平,揭示了不同退化程度草地放牧获取经济价值与草地退化损耗生态服务价值的关系,构建了基于草地功能分区的分区分级生态补偿机制,提出了藏北高寒草地生态系统可持续发展的对策,取得以下主要结论：
1)生态屏障保护与经济发展之间的博弈失衡是高寒草地退化的主要外部驱动力,目前,藏北那曲地区的高寒草地生态系统处于不可持续发展状态。
通过分析藏北高寒草地生态系统现状及发展态势,阐明了中央政府、地方政府和牧民在生态屏障保护与经济发展之间的博弈失衡是导致高寒草地退化,生态服务功能下降的主要外部驱动因素。利用复合生态系统场论分析方法,构建了以“三生功能”为基础的草地生态系统可持续发展评价体系和计算模型,对藏北那曲高寒草地生态系统的可持续发展度进行了定量评价,结果表明藏北那曲高寒草地生态系统的发展位已达到或超过了系统的最大承载能力,发展势缺乏潜能,协调性较差,可持续发展度很低,目前处于不可持续发展状态。
2)在人口压力和放牧压力与资源环境承载力之间的相互作用下,高寒草地生态系统“三生功能”的互作机制表现为非线性的多元耦合、多维连锁和多重反馈的内在关系。
当高寒草地生态系统的人口压力和放牧压力低于其环境承载力时,系统处于平衡或健康状态,反之,人口压力和放牧压力与环境承载力关系失衡,造成高寒草地生态系统功能紊乱,导致高寒草地退化,最终使系统处于不可持续的发展状态。因此,通过分析人口压力和放牧压力与资源与环境承载力之间的相互作用,阐明了高寒草地生态系统生态、生产和生活功能的互作机制,其表现为非线性的多元耦合、多维连锁和多重反馈的内在关系。通过明晰“三生功能”结构变化对生态系统服务功能的影响,提出了草地生态服务功能当量的概念,以此确定了“三生功能”量比关系。在这一基础上,以国家公布的2008年农牧民脱贫线和小康线标准,估算了藏北那曲地区牧民在这2个标准下,高寒草地生态系统的人口承载量。根据高寒草地健康状况估算,草地退化与未退化的人口承载量相比,脱贫线和小康标线均下降了60%；根据2008年那曲地区的牧业GDP估算,实际牧业人口占了脱贫线的96.3%,但与小康线相比,超载了489.2%；以2008年那曲地区实际牧业人口与草地未退化状态时估算人口承载量相比,实际人口分别占了脱贫和小康线的14.2%和85.9%,但与草地退化的估算人口承载量相比,实际牧业人口占脱贫线的36%,但小康线超载了118.9%。
3)构建了草地生态服务价值评价体系和方法,对藏北那曲地区高寒草地生态系统服务价值评估结果为1199.07亿元／年,草地退化造成的生态服务价值损失达586.27亿元／年。
综合考虑了高寒草地的地域差异性、空间异质性和区域经济发展水平差异性,选择贡献率较高的12项指标,构建了草地生态系统服务价值评估体系和方法,并对藏北那曲不同类型和退化程度高寒草地的生态服务价值及其损失进行了评估。表明藏北那曲地区高寒草地生态系统的年总生态服务价值是1199.07亿元。其中,高寒草原、高寒荒漠、高寒荒漠草原和高寒草甸提供的生态服务价值分别占总生态服务价值的62.9%、1.5%、8%和28.1%。从退化程度上看,未退化、轻度退化、中度退化和严重退化草地提供的生态服务价值分别占总生态服务价值的54.9%,29.3%,11%和4.8%。通过对2008年藏北那曲高寒草地生态服务价值损益评估表明,高寒草地退化造成的生态服务价值损失达586.27亿元/年,平均损失率32.8%。而高寒草地在未退化状态时可产出的总经济价值为22.94亿元/年,年损失生态服务价值相当于总经济价值的25.6倍,即超载放牧1个羊单位损失的生态服务价值是其获取经济价值的13.9倍。显然,高寒草地生态屏障保护产生的生态服务价值远大于超载放牧获取的经济价值。
4)提出了基于高寒草地功能分区的分级生态补偿机制,设计了针对不同功能区的生态补偿方案。
依据高寒草地的生产力、季节放牧重要性、生态服务价值、生态环境敏感性指标,构建了高寒草地功能分区模型,并从空间上将藏北那曲地区高寒草地划分为适度生产功能区、减畜恢复功能区和禁牧封育功能区。3个功能区的面积分别占藏北那曲地区总草地面积的24%、50%和26%。提出了基于高寒草地功能分区的分区分级生态补偿机制,设计了针对不同功能区特点的生态补偿方案和约束奖惩机制。核算出那曲地区的生态补偿周期为5年时,共需补偿资金35.77亿元,年需7.16亿元,其中,适度生产功能区、减畜恢复功能区和禁牧封育保护功能区分别需要补偿资金19.4亿元、15.77亿元和0.6亿元。
5)构建了藏北高寒草地生态系统可持续发展的战略框架,提出了藏北那曲高寒草地生态系统可持续发展的对策。
在政府主导,牧民参与基础上,由制度、政策、项目、资金、技术和管理等要素,构建高寒草地生态系统可持续发展的战略框架,建立环境成本核算体系和草地动态监测评估体系,实施生态补偿政策,完善草地管理的法律法规,明确高寒草地生态系统在生态屏障安全和区域经济发展中主导动能,实行生态移民工程,发展生态畜牧业。从制度建设,观念转变,模式创新,技术集成等方面,提出了藏北高寒草地生态系统恢复与重建的可持续发展对策。
Alpine rangeland in the Northern Tibetan region of China is not only a material base for livestock production, but also plays important role in the ecological safety shelter zone for China, even southeast Asia region. However, the alpine rangeland degradation of local region caused the ecological deterioration, low economic development, and poor living of herders, resulting in dilemma of sustainable development of the northern Tibetan region. Thus alpine rangeland degradation not only threatens the local ecological safety and life of the local residents, but also threatens further ecological security of the down-streams of the rivers and the Southeast Asia Rivers. Therefore, on the basis of closely combining the problems in natural science and economical development policy in social science, evaluating ecological services value of rangeland and establishing effective compensation mechanism of rangeland are urgent to maintain ecological services function of rangeland and coordinate the relationships among population, resource environment and economic development, which will provide useful information for protecting rangelands from the further degradation and achieving sustainable development of ecological, economic and social.
As a case of the Naqu region in northern Tibet, firstly, this study analyzed the current situation of alpine rangelands ecosystem and the game relationship between protection of ecological safety shelter zone and development of animal husbandry economy; secondly, this study evaluated sustainable development degree and disclosed interaction mechanism among ecological function, productive function and livelihood function (EPLF); thirdly, this study established the evaluation system and proposed methods of ecological services value of rangeland ecosystem based on EPLF, and used this established evaluation system and methods to evaluate the ecological services value of different rangeland type and loss value of different degradation degree rangeland, and then analyzed the relationship between economic value resulting from grazing and loss value of ecological services value caused by alpine rangeland degradation; fourthly, Mechanism of ecological compensation for alpine rangeland was designed based on the function subarea and grading of alpine rangeland and proposed the plan of ecological compensation; finally, this study presented the countermeasure of sustainable development of alpine rangelands. The main results in this study are as following.
First, the out-of-balance gaming between ecological safety shelter zone and animal husbandry economy was the main external driver of alpine rangeland degradation, and alpine rangelands ecosystem in the Naqu region of northern Tibet was unsustainable development situation.
After analyzing the current situation of the alpine rangelands ecosystem in the Naqu region, northern Tibet, this study found that the out-of-balance gaming between ecological safety shelter zone and development of local animal husbandry economy among central government, local government and herdsman caused the degradation of alpine rangeland, and this degradation weaken the ecological services function of alpine rangeland ecosystem; therefore, it was drew a conclusion that the out-of-balance gaming between ecological safety shelter zone and animal husbandry economy was the main external driver of alpine rangeland degradation. Based on the EPLF of alpine rangeland ecosystem, this study applied complex ecosystem field theory to establish the evaluation system and models of rangeland sustainable development, and the quantitative evaluation results showed that the development location of alpine rangeland ecosystem exceeded its maximum value of carrying capacity, and that development potential, harmonious degree and the sustainable development degree of alpine rangeland ecosystem was very low, indicating that alpine rangelands ecosystem was unsustainable development situation in the Naqu region in the northern Tibet.
Second, the interaction mechanism of EPLF for alpine rangeland ecosystem was not linear internal relation, but was polybasic coupling, multidimensional linkage and multiple feedbacks with the interaction of population pressure, grazing pressure and environmental carrying capacity.
The alpine rangeland ecosystem was balance and health when population and grazing pressure was below the threshold of environmental carrying capacity, and vice versa. The interaction of population pressure, grazing pressure and environmental carrying capacity developed an interaction mechanism of EPLF, which was not linear internal relation, but was polybasic coupling, multidimensional linkage and multiple feedbacks. The Equivalent of the Ecological Services Function (EESF) was designed to compare the relationship of EPLF in this study, and EESF was used to quantify the relationship among EPLF by determining the effect of on structure and functions of alpine rangeland ecosystem. The quantitative relationship among EPLF was used to estimate the population carrying capacity of alpine rangelands in the Naqu region under the different economic requirements. Here, per-capita income of well-to-do society and overcome-poverty life line for the herdsman proclaimed by China government in 2008 were considered as threshold to estimate the population carrying capacity of alpine rangelands in study region, the estimated results showed that the population carrying capacity of current alpine rangeland in well-to-do society and overcome-poverty life line decreased by 60% when compared to population carrying capacity of original rangeland. Based on the gross domestic product of animal husbandry of the Naqu region in 2008, the current population carrying capacity accounted for 96.3% of population carrying capacity in overcome-poverty life, but accounted for 489.2% of population carrying capacity in well-to-do society. The current population carrying capacity accounted for 14.2% and 85.9% of population in overcome-poverty life line and well-to-do society, respectively, when compared to population carrying capacity of original alpine rangeland. The current population carrying capacity accounted for accounted for 36% and 118.9% of estimated population carrying capacity in the overcome-poverty life line and well-to-do society in the Naqu region, respectively.
Third,evaluation system and models of ecological services value of rangeland ecosystem were designed and established in this study, and they was used to evaluate ecological services value of alpine rangeland ecosystem in the Naqu region of northern Tibet. The evaluation results indicated that total annual ecological services value was 119.907 billion RMB, but total loss of annual ecological services value was 586.27 billion RMB.
The 12 indicators with high contribution to ecological services function of alpine rangeland ecosystem were selected in this study by combing regional difference, spatial heterogeneity, and difference of economic development level at different areas. Based on the theory of ecological economic, the selected 12 indicator was applied to establish the index system and models to evaluate the ecological services value of alpine rangeland ecosystem of the Naqu region in northern Tibet. The evaluation results indicated that the total annual ecological services value of alpine rangeland was 119.907 billion RMB in the Naqu region, in which ecological services value of alpine steppe, alpine desert, alpine desert steppe, alpine meadow were 62.9%,1.5%, 8%, and 28.1% of the total ecological services value, respectively. This study also showed that ecological services value of original vegetation, slight degradation, moderate degradation, and severe degradation made up of 54.9%,29.3%,11%, and 4.8% of the total ecological services value, respectively. The loss of total annual ecological services value was 586.27 billion RMB due to alpine rangeland degradation in Naqu region, the average loss rate was 32.8% when compared to the total annual ecological services value of original alpine rangeland with 1800 billion RMB. The annual total economic income would reach 2.294 billion RMB when the rangeland was original in Naqu, this is to say, and the loss of ecological services value caused by rangeland degradation was 25.6 times of economic income from animal production in the original rangeland. This study further indicated that the loss of ecological services value caused by overgrazing one sheep unit was 13.9 times of economic value from overgrazing one sheep unit in the Naqu region of northern Tibet.
Fourth, the function subarea and grading of alpine rangeland was used to establish the mechanism of ecological compensation for alpine rangeland, and the corresponding ecological compensation plan was designed in the Naqu region of northern Tibet.
Four indicators, including productivity, importance of seasonal grazing, ecological services value, and ecological environmental sensitivity of each alpine rangeland subtype, were applied to design the functional subarea model in this study for determining ecological compensation regions. The alpine rangelands of the Naqu region in northern Tibet were classified into the production sector with moderate grazing, restoration sector with reducing livestock number, and conservation sector by anti-grazing, and they accounted for 24%,50%, and 26% of the total rangeland area of the Naqu region, respectively. These function subarea and grading of alpine rangeland was used to establish the mechanism of ecological compensation for alpine rangeland, in which measures of rewards and punishment for different function sector were presented. The corresponding ecological compensation plan was designed in the Naqu region of northern Tibet, in which the ecological compensation period was considered as 5 yeares and the total ecological compensation fund for alpine rangeland of the Naqu region was 35.77 billion RMB, which was allocated for the moderate production sector with 19.4 billion RMB, restoring sector with 15.77 billion RMB, and conservation sector with 0.6 billion RMB.
Final, the framework of sustainable development strategy of alpine rangeland ecosystem was established, and the six countermeasures of sustainable development were presented to keep the health of alpine rangeland ecosystem in the Naqu region of northern Tibet.
Based on government leading and herdsman participating, the framework of sustainable development strategy of alpine rangeland was established from aspect of institution, policy, project, fund, technology and management. The systems of cost accounting of environment and dynamic monitor of rangeland should be established. It was effort to carry out ecological compensation, perfect laws and regulations, ascertaining main function between ecological safety shelter zone and development of region economy, practice ecological emigration and develop ecological animal husbandry. The countermeasures of sustainable development of alpine rangelands were presented to keep the health of alpine rangeland ecosystem in the Naqu region of northern Tibet in the view of institutional arrangement, concept improvement, pattern innovation and technology integration.
1)生态屏障保护与经济发展之间的博弈失衡是高寒草地退化的主要外部驱动力,目前,藏北那曲地区的高寒草地生态系统处于不可持续发展状态。
通过分析藏北高寒草地生态系统现状及发展态势,阐明了中央政府、地方政府和牧民在生态屏障保护与经济发展之间的博弈失衡是导致高寒草地退化,生态服务功能下降的主要外部驱动因素。利用复合生态系统场论分析方法,构建了以“三生功能”为基础的草地生态系统可持续发展评价体系和计算模型,对藏北那曲高寒草地生态系统的可持续发展度进行了定量评价,结果表明藏北那曲高寒草地生态系统的发展位已达到或超过了系统的最大承载能力,发展势缺乏潜能,协调性较差,可持续发展度很低,目前处于不可持续发展状态。
2)在人口压力和放牧压力与资源环境承载力之间的相互作用下,高寒草地生态系统“三生功能”的互作机制表现为非线性的多元耦合、多维连锁和多重反馈的内在关系。
当高寒草地生态系统的人口压力和放牧压力低于其环境承载力时,系统处于平衡或健康状态,反之,人口压力和放牧压力与环境承载力关系失衡,造成高寒草地生态系统功能紊乱,导致高寒草地退化,最终使系统处于不可持续的发展状态。因此,通过分析人口压力和放牧压力与资源与环境承载力之间的相互作用,阐明了高寒草地生态系统生态、生产和生活功能的互作机制,其表现为非线性的多元耦合、多维连锁和多重反馈的内在关系。通过明晰“三生功能”结构变化对生态系统服务功能的影响,提出了草地生态服务功能当量的概念,以此确定了“三生功能”量比关系。在这一基础上,以国家公布的2008年农牧民脱贫线和小康线标准,估算了藏北那曲地区牧民在这2个标准下,高寒草地生态系统的人口承载量。根据高寒草地健康状况估算,草地退化与未退化的人口承载量相比,脱贫线和小康标线均下降了60%；根据2008年那曲地区的牧业GDP估算,实际牧业人口占了脱贫线的96.3%,但与小康线相比,超载了489.2%；以2008年那曲地区实际牧业人口与草地未退化状态时估算人口承载量相比,实际人口分别占了脱贫和小康线的14.2%和85.9%,但与草地退化的估算人口承载量相比,实际牧业人口占脱贫线的36%,但小康线超载了118.9%。
3)构建了草地生态服务价值评价体系和方法,对藏北那曲地区高寒草地生态系统服务价值评估结果为1199.07亿元／年,草地退化造成的生态服务价值损失达586.27亿元／年。
综合考虑了高寒草地的地域差异性、空间异质性和区域经济发展水平差异性,选择贡献率较高的12项指标,构建了草地生态系统服务价值评估体系和方法,并对藏北那曲不同类型和退化程度高寒草地的生态服务价值及其损失进行了评估。表明藏北那曲地区高寒草地生态系统的年总生态服务价值是1199.07亿元。其中,高寒草原、高寒荒漠、高寒荒漠草原和高寒草甸提供的生态服务价值分别占总生态服务价值的62.9%、1.5%、8%和28.1%。从退化程度上看,未退化、轻度退化、中度退化和严重退化草地提供的生态服务价值分别占总生态服务价值的54.9%,29.3%,11%和4.8%。通过对2008年藏北那曲高寒草地生态服务价值损益评估表明,高寒草地退化造成的生态服务价值损失达586.27亿元/年,平均损失率32.8%。而高寒草地在未退化状态时可产出的总经济价值为22.94亿元/年,年损失生态服务价值相当于总经济价值的25.6倍,即超载放牧1个羊单位损失的生态服务价值是其获取经济价值的13.9倍。显然,高寒草地生态屏障保护产生的生态服务价值远大于超载放牧获取的经济价值。
4)提出了基于高寒草地功能分区的分级生态补偿机制,设计了针对不同功能区的生态补偿方案。
依据高寒草地的生产力、季节放牧重要性、生态服务价值、生态环境敏感性指标,构建了高寒草地功能分区模型,并从空间上将藏北那曲地区高寒草地划分为适度生产功能区、减畜恢复功能区和禁牧封育功能区。3个功能区的面积分别占藏北那曲地区总草地面积的24%、50%和26%。提出了基于高寒草地功能分区的分区分级生态补偿机制,设计了针对不同功能区特点的生态补偿方案和约束奖惩机制。核算出那曲地区的生态补偿周期为5年时,共需补偿资金35.77亿元,年需7.16亿元,其中,适度生产功能区、减畜恢复功能区和禁牧封育保护功能区分别需要补偿资金19.4亿元、15.77亿元和0.6亿元。
5)构建了藏北高寒草地生态系统可持续发展的战略框架,提出了藏北那曲高寒草地生态系统可持续发展的对策。
在政府主导,牧民参与基础上,由制度、政策、项目、资金、技术和管理等要素,构建高寒草地生态系统可持续发展的战略框架,建立环境成本核算体系和草地动态监测评估体系,实施生态补偿政策,完善草地管理的法律法规,明确高寒草地生态系统在生态屏障安全和区域经济发展中主导动能,实行生态移民工程,发展生态畜牧业。从制度建设,观念转变,模式创新,技术集成等方面,提出了藏北高寒草地生态系统恢复与重建的可持续发展对策。
Alpine rangeland in the Northern Tibetan region of China is not only a material base for livestock production, but also plays important role in the ecological safety shelter zone for China, even southeast Asia region. However, the alpine rangeland degradation of local region caused the ecological deterioration, low economic development, and poor living of herders, resulting in dilemma of sustainable development of the northern Tibetan region. Thus alpine rangeland degradation not only threatens the local ecological safety and life of the local residents, but also threatens further ecological security of the down-streams of the rivers and the Southeast Asia Rivers. Therefore, on the basis of closely combining the problems in natural science and economical development policy in social science, evaluating ecological services value of rangeland and establishing effective compensation mechanism of rangeland are urgent to maintain ecological services function of rangeland and coordinate the relationships among population, resource environment and economic development, which will provide useful information for protecting rangelands from the further degradation and achieving sustainable development of ecological, economic and social.
As a case of the Naqu region in northern Tibet, firstly, this study analyzed the current situation of alpine rangelands ecosystem and the game relationship between protection of ecological safety shelter zone and development of animal husbandry economy; secondly, this study evaluated sustainable development degree and disclosed interaction mechanism among ecological function, productive function and livelihood function (EPLF); thirdly, this study established the evaluation system and proposed methods of ecological services value of rangeland ecosystem based on EPLF, and used this established evaluation system and methods to evaluate the ecological services value of different rangeland type and loss value of different degradation degree rangeland, and then analyzed the relationship between economic value resulting from grazing and loss value of ecological services value caused by alpine rangeland degradation; fourthly, Mechanism of ecological compensation for alpine rangeland was designed based on the function subarea and grading of alpine rangeland and proposed the plan of ecological compensation; finally, this study presented the countermeasure of sustainable development of alpine rangelands. The main results in this study are as following.
First, the out-of-balance gaming between ecological safety shelter zone and animal husbandry economy was the main external driver of alpine rangeland degradation, and alpine rangelands ecosystem in the Naqu region of northern Tibet was unsustainable development situation.
After analyzing the current situation of the alpine rangelands ecosystem in the Naqu region, northern Tibet, this study found that the out-of-balance gaming between ecological safety shelter zone and development of local animal husbandry economy among central government, local government and herdsman caused the degradation of alpine rangeland, and this degradation weaken the ecological services function of alpine rangeland ecosystem; therefore, it was drew a conclusion that the out-of-balance gaming between ecological safety shelter zone and animal husbandry economy was the main external driver of alpine rangeland degradation. Based on the EPLF of alpine rangeland ecosystem, this study applied complex ecosystem field theory to establish the evaluation system and models of rangeland sustainable development, and the quantitative evaluation results showed that the development location of alpine rangeland ecosystem exceeded its maximum value of carrying capacity, and that development potential, harmonious degree and the sustainable development degree of alpine rangeland ecosystem was very low, indicating that alpine rangelands ecosystem was unsustainable development situation in the Naqu region in the northern Tibet.
Second, the interaction mechanism of EPLF for alpine rangeland ecosystem was not linear internal relation, but was polybasic coupling, multidimensional linkage and multiple feedbacks with the interaction of population pressure, grazing pressure and environmental carrying capacity.
The alpine rangeland ecosystem was balance and health when population and grazing pressure was below the threshold of environmental carrying capacity, and vice versa. The interaction of population pressure, grazing pressure and environmental carrying capacity developed an interaction mechanism of EPLF, which was not linear internal relation, but was polybasic coupling, multidimensional linkage and multiple feedbacks. The Equivalent of the Ecological Services Function (EESF) was designed to compare the relationship of EPLF in this study, and EESF was used to quantify the relationship among EPLF by determining the effect of on structure and functions of alpine rangeland ecosystem. The quantitative relationship among EPLF was used to estimate the population carrying capacity of alpine rangelands in the Naqu region under the different economic requirements. Here, per-capita income of well-to-do society and overcome-poverty life line for the herdsman proclaimed by China government in 2008 were considered as threshold to estimate the population carrying capacity of alpine rangelands in study region, the estimated results showed that the population carrying capacity of current alpine rangeland in well-to-do society and overcome-poverty life line decreased by 60% when compared to population carrying capacity of original rangeland. Based on the gross domestic product of animal husbandry of the Naqu region in 2008, the current population carrying capacity accounted for 96.3% of population carrying capacity in overcome-poverty life, but accounted for 489.2% of population carrying capacity in well-to-do society. The current population carrying capacity accounted for 14.2% and 85.9% of population in overcome-poverty life line and well-to-do society, respectively, when compared to population carrying capacity of original alpine rangeland. The current population carrying capacity accounted for accounted for 36% and 118.9% of estimated population carrying capacity in the overcome-poverty life line and well-to-do society in the Naqu region, respectively.
Third,evaluation system and models of ecological services value of rangeland ecosystem were designed and established in this study, and they was used to evaluate ecological services value of alpine rangeland ecosystem in the Naqu region of northern Tibet. The evaluation results indicated that total annual ecological services value was 119.907 billion RMB, but total loss of annual ecological services value was 586.27 billion RMB.
The 12 indicators with high contribution to ecological services function of alpine rangeland ecosystem were selected in this study by combing regional difference, spatial heterogeneity, and difference of economic development level at different areas. Based on the theory of ecological economic, the selected 12 indicator was applied to establish the index system and models to evaluate the ecological services value of alpine rangeland ecosystem of the Naqu region in northern Tibet. The evaluation results indicated that the total annual ecological services value of alpine rangeland was 119.907 billion RMB in the Naqu region, in which ecological services value of alpine steppe, alpine desert, alpine desert steppe, alpine meadow were 62.9%,1.5%, 8%, and 28.1% of the total ecological services value, respectively. This study also showed that ecological services value of original vegetation, slight degradation, moderate degradation, and severe degradation made up of 54.9%,29.3%,11%, and 4.8% of the total ecological services value, respectively. The loss of total annual ecological services value was 586.27 billion RMB due to alpine rangeland degradation in Naqu region, the average loss rate was 32.8% when compared to the total annual ecological services value of original alpine rangeland with 1800 billion RMB. The annual total economic income would reach 2.294 billion RMB when the rangeland was original in Naqu, this is to say, and the loss of ecological services value caused by rangeland degradation was 25.6 times of economic income from animal production in the original rangeland. This study further indicated that the loss of ecological services value caused by overgrazing one sheep unit was 13.9 times of economic value from overgrazing one sheep unit in the Naqu region of northern Tibet.
Fourth, the function subarea and grading of alpine rangeland was used to establish the mechanism of ecological compensation for alpine rangeland, and the corresponding ecological compensation plan was designed in the Naqu region of northern Tibet.
Four indicators, including productivity, importance of seasonal grazing, ecological services value, and ecological environmental sensitivity of each alpine rangeland subtype, were applied to design the functional subarea model in this study for determining ecological compensation regions. The alpine rangelands of the Naqu region in northern Tibet were classified into the production sector with moderate grazing, restoration sector with reducing livestock number, and conservation sector by anti-grazing, and they accounted for 24%,50%, and 26% of the total rangeland area of the Naqu region, respectively. These function subarea and grading of alpine rangeland was used to establish the mechanism of ecological compensation for alpine rangeland, in which measures of rewards and punishment for different function sector were presented. The corresponding ecological compensation plan was designed in the Naqu region of northern Tibet, in which the ecological compensation period was considered as 5 yeares and the total ecological compensation fund for alpine rangeland of the Naqu region was 35.77 billion RMB, which was allocated for the moderate production sector with 19.4 billion RMB, restoring sector with 15.77 billion RMB, and conservation sector with 0.6 billion RMB.
Final, the framework of sustainable development strategy of alpine rangeland ecosystem was established, and the six countermeasures of sustainable development were presented to keep the health of alpine rangeland ecosystem in the Naqu region of northern Tibet.
Based on government leading and herdsman participating, the framework of sustainable development strategy of alpine rangeland was established from aspect of institution, policy, project, fund, technology and management. The systems of cost accounting of environment and dynamic monitor of rangeland should be established. It was effort to carry out ecological compensation, perfect laws and regulations, ascertaining main function between ecological safety shelter zone and development of region economy, practice ecological emigration and develop ecological animal husbandry. The countermeasures of sustainable development of alpine rangelands were presented to keep the health of alpine rangeland ecosystem in the Naqu region of northern Tibet in the view of institutional arrangement, concept improvement, pattern innovation and technology integration.
引文
[1]Allen A. O., Feddema J. J. Wetland loss and substitution by the permit program in southern California, US [J]. Environmental Management,1996,22,263-274.
[2]Alexander S. P. P., Garturo S. A. Deforestation pressure and biological reserve planning:A conceptual approach and an illustrative application for Costa Rica [J]. Resource and Energy Economics,2004, (26):237-254.
[3]Alexander A. M., List J. A., Margolis M., et al. A method for valuing global ecosystem services [J]. Ecological Economics,1998,27:161-170.
[4]Anwar T., Mahmut H., Frnak. T., et al. communities structure differences between farmland and ecological compensation area [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2005,25(9):2284-2290.
[5]Ayling, R. D., Kelly, K. Dealing with conflict:Natural resources and dispute resolution [J]. Conservation Forestry Review,1997,3:182-185.
[6]Babcock B. A., Lakshminarayan P. G., Wu J., et al. Targeting tools for the purchase of environmental amenities [J]. Land Economics,1997,73 (3):325-339.
[7]Barbier E. B. Valuing environmental functions:tropical wetlands[J]. Land Economics,1994,70, 155-173.
[8]Barkmanna J., Glenka K., Keila A., et al. Confronting unfamiliarity with ecosystem functions:The case for an ecosystem service approach to environmental valuation with stated preference methods[J]. Ecological Economics,2008,65,48-62.
[9]Bingham G., Bishop R., Brody M., et al. Issues in ecosystem valuation:improving information for decision making [J]. Ecological Economics,1995,14:73-90.
[10]Brendan, F., Kerry, T. R., Paul, M. Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making [J]. Ecological Economics,2009,68,643-653.
[11]Buchmann S. L., Nabhan G. P. The Forgotten pollinators[R]. Island Press, Washington D C. 1996.
[12]Burghard W., Anne R., Kemmermannb, et al. An indicator species approach for result-orientated subsidies of ecological services in grasslands-A study in northwestern Germany [J]. Biological Conservation,2006,133,186-197.
[13]Cacha M. D. M. Starting resource accounting in protected areas [M]//In:Munasinghe, McNeely J. (eds). Protected Area Economics and Policy.Cambridge:IUCN,1994:151-157.
[14]Cairns J. Protecting the Delivery of Ecosystem Services [J]. Ecosystem Health,1997,3: 185-194.
[15]Carolyn M. M., Scott, B. H., Christopher, B., et al. Using remote sensing to evaluate the influence of grassland restoration activities on ecosystem forage provisioning services [J]. storation Ecology,2009,17 (4),526-538.
[16]Carson R T. Valuation of tropical rainforests:philosophical and practical issues in the use of contingent valuation [J]. Ecological Economics,1998,24:15-29.
[17]Chauvel M. Grimaldi E. Barros E., et al. Pasture damage by an Amazonian earthworm [J]. Nature,2000,39832-33.
[18]Chee Y. E. An ecological perspective on the valuation of ecosystem services [J]. Biological Conservation,2004,120:549-565.
[19]Claassen R., Cattaneo A., Johansson R. Cost effective design of agri-environmental payment programs:U.S. experience in theory and practice[J]. Ecological Economics,2008,65: 737-752.
[20]Costanza R., d'Arge R., de Groot R., et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital [J]. Nature,1997,387,253-260.
[21]Costanza R., Stern D., Fisher B., et al. Influential publications in ecological economics:a citation analysis [J]. Ecological economics,2004,50:261-292.
[22]Critchley C. N. R., Burke, M. J. W., Stevens, D. P. Conservation of lowland semi-natural grasslands in the UK:a review of botanical monitoring results from agri-environmental schemes[J]. Biological Conservation,2003,115,263-278.
[23]Cuperus R., Canters K. J., de Haes H., et al. Guidelines for ecological compensation associated with highways [J]. Biological Conservation,1999,90:41-51.
[24]Cuperus R., Caters K. J., Piepers A. A. G. Ecological compensation of the impacts of a road. Preliminary method of A50 road link [J]. Ecological Engineering,1996,7,327-349.
[24]Curtis I. A. Valuing ecosystem goods and services:a new approach using a surrogate market and the combination of a multiple criteria analysis and a Delphi panel to assign weights to the attributes [J]. Ecological Economics,2004,50,163-194.
[25]Daily G. C. What are ecosystem services? [M]//In:Daily G. C. (ed.). Nature's services: Societal dependence on natural ecosystems[M]. Island Press, Washington, DC,1997:1-10.
[26]Daily G. C., Soderquist T., Aniyar S., et al. The value of nature and the nature of value [J]. Science,2000,289:395-396.
[27]Decaens T., Jimenez J. J., Gioia C., et al. The values of soil animals for conservation biology [J]. European Journal of Soil Biology,2006,42, S23-S38
[28]de Groot R. S., Van der Perk J., Chiesura A., et al. Ecological functions and socio-economic values of critical natural capital as admeasure for ecological integrity and environmental health [J]. Earth and Environmental Sciences,2000,1,191-214.
[29]de Groot R., Wilson M. A., Boumans R. M. J. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services[J]. Ecological Economics,2002,41, 393-408.
[30]Dietschi S., Holderegger R., Schmidt S. G., et al. Agri-environment incentive payments and plant species richness under different management intensities in mountain meadows of Switzerland [J]. Acta Oecolo,2007,31 (2):216-222.
[31]Donald C. C., John E., Brian L., Gibson L. Indicators of human health in ecosystems:what do we measure [J] The Science of the Total Environment,1998,224:201-213.
[32]Farber S. C., Costanza R., Wilson M. A. Economic and ecological concepts for valuing ecosystem services [J]. Ecological Economics,2002,41:375-392.
[33]Ferraro P. J. Targeting conservation investments in heterogeneous landscapes-A distance function approach and application to watershed management [J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics,2004,86 (4):905-918.
[34]Geoffrey H. Valuing ecosystem services. Ecological Economics,2000,3:24-30.
[35]Guo Z. G., Liang T. G., Liu X. Y., et al. A new approach to grassland management for the arid Aletai region in northern China[J].The Rangeland Journal,2006,28,97-104.
[36]Gustafsson B. Scope and limits of the market mechanism in environmental management [J]. Ecological Economics,1998,24:259-274.
[36]Hannon B. Ecological pricing and economic efficiency[J]. Ecological Economics,2001,36:19-30.
[37]Hardi P., Barg S., Hodge T., et al. Measuring sustainable development:review of current practice[M]. Ottawa:Industry, Canada,1997.
[38]Hardin G.. The Tragedy of The Commons. Science,1968,10:13-23.
[39]Harpinder S. S., Stephen D. W., Ross C., et al. The future of farming:The value of ecosystem services in conventional and organic arable land. An experimental approach [J]. Ecological Economics,2008,64,835-848.
[40]Hein L., van Koppen K., de Groot R.S., et al. Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services [J]. Ecological Economics,2006,57,209-228.
[41]Herzog F., Dreier S., Hofer G., et al. Effect of ecological compensation areas on floristic and breeding bird diversity in Swiss agricultural landscapes[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment [J].2005(108):189-204.
[42]Holdren J. P., Ehrlich P. R. Human population and the global environment[J]. American Scientist,1974,62:282-292.
[43]Holling C. S. Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological and social systems[J]. Ecosystems,2001,(4):390-405.
[44]Hueting R., Reijnders L., de Boer B., et al. The concept of environmental function and its valuation [J]. Ecological.Economic,1998,25:31-35.
[45]Huyghe C. New utilizations for the grassland areas and the forage plants:what matters[J]. Fourrages,2010,203:213-219.
[46]ae Young Ko, Day J. W., Lane R. R., et al. A comparative evaluation of money-based and energy-based cost-benefit analyses of tertiary municipal wastewater treatment using forested wetlands vs. sand filtration in Louisiana [J]. Ecological.Economics,2004,49: 331-347.
[47]Klauer B. Ecosystem Prices:Activity Analysis Applied to Ecosystems [J]. Ecological Economics,2000,33:473-486.
[48]Konarska K. M., Sutton P. C., Castellon M. Evaluating scale dependence of ecosystem service valuation:a comparison of NOAA-AVHRR and Landsat TM datasets [J]. Ecological Economics,2002,41,491-507.
[49]Kosoy N., Martinez T.M., Muradian R., Martinez A. J. Payments for environmental services in watersheds:Insights from a comparative study of three cases in Central America. Ecological Economics,2007,446-455.
[50]Kreuter U. P., Harris H. G., Matlock M. D., et al. Change in ecosystem service values in the San Antonio area, Texas [J]. Ecological Economics,2001,39,333-346.
[51]Kulshreshtha S. N., Gillies J. A. Economic evaluation of aesthetic amenities:A case study of river view [J]. Water Resources Bulletin,1993,29(2):257-266.
[52]Lewandrowski J., Darwin R. F., Tsigas M., et al. Estimating costs of protecting global ecosystem diversity[J].Ecological Economics,1999,29,111-125.
[53]Limburg K. E., O' Neill R. V., Costanza R., et al. Complex systems and valuation [J]. Ecological Economics,2002,41,409-420.
[54]Long R. J., Ding L. M., Shang Z. H., et al. The yak grazing system on the Qinghai-Tibetan plateauand its status[J].The Rangeland Journal,2008,30,241-246.
[55]MA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment). Millennium ecosystem assessment:frameworks[M]. Washington D C:World Resources Institute,2001.
[56]McNeely J. A., Miller K. R., Reid W. V., et al. Conserving the world biological diversity[M]. World Bank,1990.
[57]Monfreda C., Wackernagel M., Deumling D. Establishing national natural capital accounts based on detailed ecological footprint and biological capacity assessments [J]. Land Use Policy,2004,21:231-246.
[58]Moran D., McVittie A., Allcroft D. J., et al. Quantifying public p references for agrienvironmental policy in Scotland:a comparison of methods[J]. Ecological Economics, 2007,63(1):42-53.
[59]Morris J., Gowing D. J. G., Mills J., et al. Reconciling agricultural economic and environmental objectives:the case of recreating wetlands in the Fenland area of eastern England [J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment,2000, (79):245-257.
[60]Nabhan G. P., Buchmann S.L. Pollination services:Biodiversity's direct link to world food stability[R]//In:Daily G. C. (ed.). Nature's services:Societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Island Press, Washington, D C,1997:133-150.
[61]Nick H.Environmental Economics in Theory and Practice [M].New York:Oxford University Press,1997.
[62]Odum H. T. Environmental accounting:energy and decision making[M]. New York:John wiley & sons,1996.
[63]Pagiola S. Assessing the efficiency of payments for environmental services programs:A framework for analysis[R]. World Bank, Washington D C,2005.
[64]Pagiola S., Arcenas A., Platais G. Can payments for environmental services help reduce poverty? An exploration of the issues and the evidence to date from Latin America[J].Jorld Development,2005,33 (2):237-253.
[65]Patterson M.G. Ecological production based pricing of biosphere processes[J]. Ecological Economics,2002,1:457-478.
[66]Pearce D.W. Economic values and the natural world [M]. London:Earthscan,1993.
[67]Pimental D., W ilson C., Mc Cullum C., et al. Economic and environmental benefits of biodiversity [J]. Bio Science,1997,47(11):747-757.
[68]Rapport D. J., Gaudet C., Karr J. R., et al. Evaluating landscape health:integrating societal goals and biophysical process[J] Journal of Environmental Management,1998,53:1-15.
[69]Rasul G.., Thapa G. B. Sustainability of ecological and conventional agricultural systems in Bangladesh:An assessment based on environmental, economic and social perspectives [J]. Agricultural Systems,2004,79(2):327-351.
[70]Rees W. E. Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity:what urban economics leaves out [J]. Environ Urban,1992,4:121-130.
[71]Rees E., ackernagel W. M. Monetary analysis:turning a blind eye on sustainability [J]. Ecological Economics,1999,29:47-52.
[72]Rigby D., Woodhouse P., Young T., et al. Constructing A Farm Level Indicator of Sustainable Agricultural Practice[J].Ecological Economics,2001,39 (3):463-478.
[73]Richard T., Woodward, R.T., Wui, Y.S. The economic value of wetland services:a meta-analysis[J]. Ecological Economics,2001,37:257-270.
[74]Sagoff M. Aggregation and deliberation in valuing environmental public goods:a look beyond contingent valuation [J]. Ecological Economics,1998,24:213-230.
[75]Sala O. E., Paruelo J. M. Ecosystem services in grasslands [A]. In:Daily G.C. Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Eeosysterns[C]. Washington D C:Island Press.1997.
[76]Sachs J. D. Sustainable development. Science,2004,304:649.
[77]Scott M., S., Frank L., Philip R. G.,et al. Ecosystem services and agriculture:Cultivating agricultural ecosystems for diverse benefits [J]. Ecological Economies,2007,64:245-252.
[78]Serafy S. E. Pricing the invaluable:the value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital [J]. Ecological Economics,1998,25:25-27.
[79]SCEP (Study of Critical Environmental Problems). Man's impact on the global environment: Assessment and recommendations for action [M], Cambridge, MA:MIT Press,1970.
[80]Sharply A. N., Williams J. R. EPIC-erosion productivity impact calculator:1.model documentation. USDA Technical Bulletin,1990. No.1768.
[81]Simpson R. D. and Christensen N. L. J. Ecosystem Function and Human Activities: Reconciling Economics and Ecology [M]. New York:Chapman and Hall; 1997.
[82]Sierra R., Russman E. On the efficiency of environmental service payments:A forest conservation assessment in the Osa Peninsula, Costa Rica [J]. Ecological Economics,2006 (59):131-141.
[83]Simon Z., David R. L. Paying for environmental services:an analysis of participation in costa Rica's PSA Program [J]. World Development,2005,33(2):255-272.
[84]Smith E. L., Sims P., Franzen D., New concepts for assessment of grassland condition [J]. Journal of Rangeland Management,1995,48,271-282.
[85]Smith C. S., McDonald G. T., Thwaites R. N. Assessing the sustainability of agricultural land management[J]. Journal of Environmental Management,2000,60(4):267-288.
[86]Soderbaum P. Value, ideology and politics in eco logical economics (tenth anniversary invited paper) [J]. Ecological Economics,1999,28:161-170.
[87]Spash C. L. The Concerted Action on Environmental Valuation in Europe:an introduction. environmental valuation in Europe [M]. Cambridge Research for the Environment, U K,2000.
[88]Straton A. A complex systems approach to the value of ecological resources[J]. Ecological Economics,2006,56,402-411.
[89]Suttie J. M., Reynolds S. G., Batello C. Grasslands of the world [M]. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations:Rome.2005.
[90]Sutton P. C., Costanza R. Global estimates of market and non-market values derived from nighttime satellite imagery, land cover, and ecosystem service valuation [J]. Ecological Economics,2002,41:509-527.
[91]Tilman D., Downing J. A. Biodiversity and stability in grassland[J]. Nature,1994,367:363-365.
[92]Tobias W., Stefanie E., Sven W. Spatial targeting of payments for environmental services:A tool for boosting conservation benefits [J]. Ecological Economics,2008,65:822-833.
[93]Toman M. Why not to calculate the value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital [J]. Ecological Economics,1998,25:57-60.
[94]Turner R. K., van den Bergh, Jerorn C. J. M. et al. Ecological economic analysis of wetlands: scientific integration for management and policy[J]. Ecological Economics,2000,35 (1):7-23.
[95]Turner R. K., Paavola J., Cooper P., et al. Valuing nature:lessons learned and future research directions [J]. Ecological Economics,2003,46:493-510.
[96]UNEP. Guidelines for the preparations of country studies on costs, benefits and unmet needs of biological diversity conservation within the framework of the planned convention on biological diversity[M]. Niobe, United National Environmental Program.1991.
[97]Ve nkatachalam L. Environmental economics and ecological economics:where they can converge? [J]. Ecological Economics,2007,61(2-3):550-558.
[98]Vitousek P., Ehrlich P., Ehrlich A., Matson P. Human appropriation of the products of photosynthesis [J]. Bio Science,1986,36:368-373.
[99]Wackernagel M., Lewan L., Hansson C. B. Evaluating the use of natural capital with the ecological footprint:applications in Sweden and sub regions [J]. Ambio,1999,28:604-612.
[100]Waktzold F., Drechsler M. Spatially uniform versus spatially heterogeneous compensation payments for biodiversity enhancing land use mason[J]. Environmental and Resource Economics,2005,31:73-93.
[101]Wang X. Estimating non-market environmental benefits of the Conversion of Crop land to Forest and Grassland Program:A choice modelingapp roach [J]. Ecological Economics,2007, 63(1):114-125.
[102]Westman W. How much are nature's services worth?[J]. Science,1977,197,960-964.
[103]Whithy M., Saunders C. Estimating the supply of conservation goods in Britain:A comparison of the financial efficiency of the policy instruments[J]. Land Economics,1996, 72(3):313-325.
[104]Wilson M. A., Howarth R. Discourse based valuation of ecosystem services:establishing fair outcomes through group deliberation [J]. Ecological Economics,2002,41:431-443.
[105]WRI (World Resources Institute). World resources:a guide to the global environment [M]. Oxford:Oxford University Press,1994,87-90.
[106]Woodwell G. M. Biotic feedbacks from the warming of the earth[M]//In:Woodwell G. M. and Mackenzie F. T. (eds.). Biotic feedbacks in the global climatic system:Will the wanning feed the wanning? Oxford University Press, New York,1995:3-21.
[107]Wunder S. Payments for environmental services:Some nuts and bolts. CIFOR Occasional Paper, No 42,2005:3-8.
[108]白宏兵,马福婷,唐萍萍.草原生态环境价值补偿制度的研究[J].河北北方学院院报(自然科学版),2006,22(4)：55-58.
[109]鲍文.青藏高原草地资源发展面临的问题及战略选择[J].农业现代化研究,2009,30(1)：20-23.
[110]包文忠,山薇,杨晓东,孙红,等.我国北方草地资源面临的生态危机及对策[J].中国草地,1998,(2)：68-71.
[111]边多,李春,杨秀海,等.藏西北高寒牧区草地退化现状与机理分析[J].自然资源学,2008,23(2)：254-26.
[112]蔡邦成,温林泉,等.生态补偿机制建立的理论思考[J].生态经济,2005,(1)：47-51.
[113]蔡晓布,张永青,邵伟.藏北高寒草原草地退化及其驱动力分析[J].土壤,2007,39(6)：855-858.
[114]成升魁,沈镭.青藏高原人口、资源、环境与发展互动关系探讨[J].自然资源学报,2000,15(4)：297-304.
[115]陈孝胜.中国西部地区人口、环境、资源与经济可持续发展对策[J].生态经济,2007,(8)：52-54.
[116]陈佐忠,汪诗平.关于建立草原生态补偿机制的探讨[J].草地学报,2006,(3)：1-3.
[117]陈中新,张新时.中国生态系统效益的价值[J].科学通报,2000,45(1)：17-21.
[118]程秀丽.草原生态建设补偿机制建立的背景和必要性分析[J].体制改革,2008,(3)：95-96.
[119]戴淑燕,黄新建.可持续发展协调度的评价方法分析[J].科学与管理,2004,(6)：22-4.
[120]杜万平.完善西部区域生态补偿机制的建议[J].中国人口-资源与环境,2001,(3)：119-120.
[121]杜振华,焦玉良.建立横向转移支付制度实现生态补偿[J].宏观经济研究,2004,(9)：51-54.
[122]额尔敦扎布.草地资源价值新论[J].内蒙古师范大学学报,2004,33(3)：46-48.
[123]甘肃草原生态研究所.西藏那曲地区草地畜牧业资源[M].甘肃科技出版社,1991
[124]高清.生态补偿法律制度略论[J].河北法学,2008,26(9)：112-116.
[125]高清竹,李玉娥,林而达,等.藏北地区草地退化的时空分布特征[J].地理学报,2005,60(6)：965-973.
[126]高彤,杨妹影.国际生态补偿政策对中国的借鉴意义[J].国际瞭望,2006,(10)：71-76.
[127]巩芳,常青,郝晓燕,等.草原生态的空间网络化补偿模式研究[J].青海社会科学,2009,(4)：5-8.
[128]国家环境保护总局环境与经济政策研究中心.“中国建立生态补偿机制的战略与政策框架”研究报告[R].2006
[129]郭明,冯朝阳,赵善伦.生态环境价值评估方法综述[J].山东师范大学学报(自然科学版),2003,18(1)：71-74.
[130]韩炜,孙辉,唐亚.生态系统服务价值及其评估方法研究进展[J].四川环境,2005,24(1)：20-26.
[131]何敦煌.谈生态价值及其相关问题[J].未来与发展,2001,(4)：29-33.
[]32]桓曼曼.生态系统服务功能及其价值综述[J].生态经济,2001,12：41-43.
[133]《环境科学大辞典》编委会.环境科学大辞典.[M].中国环境科学出版社,1991.
[134]黄河,李永宁.关于西部退耕还林还草工程可持续性推进问题的几点思考：基于相关现实案例分析[J].理论导刊,2004,(2)：25-271.
[135]黄富祥,康慕谊,张新时.退耕还林还草过程中的经济补偿问题探讨[J].生态学报,2002,22(4)：471-478.
[136]侯向阳,杨理,韩颖.实施草原生态补偿的意义、趋势和建议[J].中国草地学报,2008,30(5)：1-6.
[137]洪尚群,马丕京,郭慧光.生态补偿制度的探索[J].环境科学与技术,2001,(5)：40-43.
[138]胡自治.青藏高原的草业发展与生态环境[M].中国藏学出版社出版,2000.
[139]姜立鹏,覃志豪,谢雯,等.中国草地生态系统服务功能价值遥感估算研究[J].自然资源学报,2007,22(2)：161-170.
[140]金蓉,石培基,王雪平.黑河流域生态补偿机制及效益评估研究[J].人民黄河,2005,27(7)：4-7.
[141]翟胜,王巨,张二勋,等.农业生态系统可持续性评价研究进展[J].地域研究与开发,2010,(1)：124-129.
[142]孔凡斌.完善我国生态补偿机制：理论实践与研究展望[J].农业经济问题,2007,10：50-54
[143]蓝盛芳,钦佩.生态系统的能值分析[J].应用生态学报,2001,12(1)：129-131.
[144]赖力,黄贤金,刘伟良.生态补偿理论方法研究进展[J].生态学报,2008,28(6)：2870-2877.
[145]李博.中国北方草地退化及其防治对策[J].中国农业科学,1997,30(6)：1-9.
[146]李明森.藏北高原草地资源合理利用[J].自然资源学报,2000,15(4)：335-339.
[147]李新一,洪军,刘杰,等.草原生态补偿的实践与探索[J].内蒙古草业,2009,21(2)：1-4.
[148]李文华,欧阳志云,赵景柱.生态系统服务功能研究[M].气象出版社,2002.
[149]李玉芳,刘硕,荀文会.基于复合生态系统场论的耕地资源可持续利用研究[J].国土资源科技管理,2008,25(2)：68-73.
[150]梁燕,韩国栋,赵萌莉,等.草地生态系统健康评价的内容与实施方法[J].生态工程,2004,(6)：107-109.
[151]梁丽娟,葛颜祥,傅奇蕾.流域生态补偿选择性激励机制-从博弈论视角的分析[J].农业科技管理,2006,5(4)：49-52.
[152]林慧龙,任继周,傅华.草地农业生态系统中的能值分析方法评价[J].草业学报,2005,14(4)：1-7.
[153]刘起.中国草地资源生态经济价值的探讨[J].四川草原,1999,(4)：124.
[154]柳文宗.生态补偿的三大经济学理论依据[J].中国林业,2007,(1)：10-11.
[155]刘春江,薛惠锋,王海燕,等.生态补偿研究现状与进展[J].环境保护科学,2009,35(1)：77-80.
[156]刘黎明,赵英伟,郑建宗.草地利用系统可持续性评价方法研究[J].中国草地,2002,24(6)：1-6.
[157]刘明远,郑奋田.论政府包办型生态建设补偿机制的低效性成因及应对策略[J].生态经济,2006,(2)：81-84.
[158]刘兴元,王锁民,郭正刚.半干旱地区农业资源的复合经营模式及生态经济耦合效应研究[J].自然资源学报,2004,19(5)：624-631.
[159]刘兴元,陈全功,王永宁.甘南草地退化对生态安全与经济发展的影响[J].草业科学,2006,23(12)：39-41.
[160]刘兴元,梁天刚,龙瑞军,等.北方牧区草地资源分类经营机制与可持续发展研究[J].生态学报,2009,29(11)：5851-5859.
[161]刘兴元,尚占环,龙瑞军.草地生态补偿机制与补偿方案探讨[J].草地学报,2010,18(1)：126-131.
[162]刘兴元,龙瑞军,尚占环.草地生态系统服务功能及其价值评估方法[J].草业学报,2011,20(1)：167-174
[163]刘向华，马忠玉，刘子刚.我国生态服务价值评估方法的述评[J].理论月刊,2005,(7)：130-131.
[164]刘玉龙,马俊杰,金学林,等.生态系统服务功能价值评估方法综述[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2005,15(1)：88-92.
[165]刘森.中国可持续发展的策略博弈[J].中国经济与管理科学,2009,(5)：11-12.
[166]龙瑞军.青藏高原草地生态系统之服务功能[J].科技导报,2007,25(9)：26-28
[167]闵庆文,李文华.区域可持续发展能力评价及其在山东五莲的应用[J].生态学报,2002,22(1)：1-9.
[168]闵庆文,刘寿东,杨霞.内蒙古典型草原生态系统服务功能价值评估研究[J].草地学报,2004a,12(3)：165-169.
[169]闵庆文,谢高地,胡聃,等.青海草地生态系统服务功能的价值评估[J].资源科学,2004b,26(3)：56-60.
[170]毛锋,曾香.生态补偿的机理与准则[J].生态学报,2006,26(11)：3841-3846.
[171]毛飞,张艳红,侯英雨.藏北那曲地区草地退化动态评价[J].应用生态学报,2008,19(2)：278-284.
[172]毛显强,钟瑜,张胜.生态补偿的理论探讨[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2002,12(4)：38-41.
[173]欧名豪,董元华.区域生态重建的经济补偿办法探讨[J].南京农业大学学报,2000,(4)：109-112.
[174]欧阳志云,王效科,苗鸿.中国陆地生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值的初步研究[J].生态学报,1999,19(5)：607-613.
[175]欧阳志云,王效科,苗鸿.中国生态环境敏感性及其区域差异规律研究[J].生态学报,2000,20(1)：9-12.
[176]任继周.草业科学研究方法[M].中国农业出版社,1998.
[177]任继周,南志标,郝敦元.草业系统中的界面论[J].草业学报,2000,9(1)：1-8.
[178]任志远.生态系统服务经济价值评价的前沿问题[J].西北大学学报(自然科学版)2003,33(1)：103-105.
[179]宋敏.生态补偿机制建立的博弈分析[J].学术交流,2009,182(5)：83-87.
[180]沈满洪.路箐.论生态补偿保护机制[J].浙江学刊,2004,12(4)：217-220.
[181]盛文萍,高清竹,李玉娥,等.藏北地区气候变化特征及其影响分析[J].高原气象,2008,27(3)：509-516.
[182]史德明,梁音.我国脆弱生态环境的评估与保护[J].水土保持学报,2002,16(1)：6-10.
[183]石益丹,李玉浸,杨殿林,等.呼伦贝尔草地生态系统服务功能价值评估[J].农业环境科学学报,2007,26(6)：2099-2103.
[184]粟晏,赖庆奎.国外社区参与生态补偿的实践及经验[J].林业与社会,2005,13(4)：40-44.
[185]万军,张惠远,王金南,等.中国生态补偿政策评估与框架初探[J].环境科学研究,2005,18(2)：1-8.
[186]王丰年.论生态补偿的原则和机制[J].自然辩证法研究,2006,22(1)：31-5.
[187]王静,尉元明,孙旭映.过牧对草地生态系统服务价值的影响-以甘肃省玛曲县为例[J].自然资源学报,2006,21(3)：109-117.
[188]王建林,常天军,李鹏,等.西藏草地生态系统植被碳贮量及其影响因子分析[J].水土保持学报,2008,22(3)：120-125.
[189]王强,杨京平.我国草地退化及其生态安全评价指标体系的探索[J].水土保持学报,2003,17(6)：27-31.
[190]王欧.退牧还草地区生态补偿机制研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2006,16(4)：33-38.
[191]王蕾,王宁,张逸.草地生态系统服务价值的研究进展[J].中国农业科学研究,2006,27(4)：50-53.
[192]王丽珂.我国发达地区环境与经济发展的协调性研究[J].科技进步与对策,2009,(8)：7-40.
[193]王黎明.区域可持续发展—基于人地关系地域系统的视角[M].中国经济出版社,1998.
[194]王庆锁,李梦先,李春和.我国草地退化及治理对策[J].中国农业气象,2004,25(3)：41-48.
[195]王瑞杰,覃志豪.基于MODIS数据的中国草地生态体系价值估算研究[J].中国草地学报,2007,29(1)：50-54.
[196]王绍令,赵林,李述训.青藏高原沙漠化与冻土相互作用研究[J].中国沙漠,2002,22(1)：33-39.
[197]王小丹,钟祥浩,范建容.西藏水土流失敏感性评价及其空间分布规律[J].地理学报,2004,59(2)：138-188.
[198]王秀红,郑度.西藏高原高寒草甸资源的可持续利用[J].资源科学,1999,(6)：38-42.
[199]王万忠,焦菊英.中国土壤侵蚀因子定量评价研究[J].水土保持通报,1996,16(5)：1-20.
[200]魏兴琥,杨萍,李森,等.超载放牧与那曲地区高山嵩草草甸植被退化及其退化指标的探讨[J].草业学报,2005,14(3)：41-49.
[201]吴玲玲,陆健健,童春富,等.长江口湿地生态系统服务功能价值的评估[J].长江流域资源与环境,2003,12(5)：411-416.
[202]吴学灿,洪尚群,李风歧.生态补偿的评价[J].资源开发与市场,2005,21(6)：534-535.
[203]吴跃明,郎东锋,张子琦,等.环境-经济系统协调度模型及其指标体系[J].中国人口.环境与资源,1996,6(2)：47-50.
[204]西藏那曲地区畜牧局.西藏那曲地区土地资源[M].中国农业科技出版,1992.
[205]西藏自治区畜牧局.西藏自治区草地资源[M].科学出版,1994.
[206]西藏统计局.西藏统计年鉴[M].中国统计出版社,1990-2009.
[207]谢高地，张忆铿，鲁春霞，等中国自然草地生态服务功能价值[J].自然资源学报，2001,16(1)：47-53.
[208]谢高地,鲁春霞,肖玉,等.青藏高原高寒草地生态系统服务价值评价[J].山地学报,2003,21(2)：50-55.
[209]徐嵩龄.生物多程性价值的经济学处理一些理论障碍及克[J].生物多样性，2001,9(3)：310-318.
[210]徐中民，程国栋，张志强.生态足迹可持续定量研究的新方法[J].生态学报，2001,21(9)：1484-1493.
[211]徐中民,张志强,龙爱华,等.环境选择模型在生态系统管理中的应用-以黑河流域额济纳旗为例[J].地理学报,2003,58(3)：398-405.
[212]熊鹰,王克林,蓝万炼,等.洞庭湖区湿地恢复的生态补偿效应评估[J].地理学报,2004,59(5)：772-780.
[213]杨光梅,闵庆文,李文华,等.基于CVM方法分析牧民对禁牧政策的受偿意愿：以锡林郭勒草原为例[J].生态环境,2006,15(4)：747-751.
[214]杨富裕,张蕴薇,苗彦军,等.藏北高寒退化草地植被恢复过程的障碍因子初探[J].水土保持通报,2003,24(4)：17-20.
[215]杨凯,高清竹,李玉娥.藏北地区草地退化空间特征及其趋势分析[J].地球科学进展,2007,22(4)：410-416.
[216]闻玉春,唐海萍,张新时.草地退化程度诊断系列问题探讨及研究展望[J].中国草地学报,2007,29(3)：89-97.
[217]鄢燕,张建国,张锦华,等.西藏那曲地区高寒草地地下生物量[J].生态学报,2005,25(11)：2819-2823.
[218]姚檀栋，朱立平.青藏高原环境变化对全球变化的响应[J].地球科学进展2006,21(5)：459-464.
[219]叶文虎,魏斌，仝川.城市生态补偿能力衡量和应用[J].中国环境科学，1998,18(4)：98-301.
[220]尹剑慧,卢欣石.草原生态服务价值核算体系构建研究[J].草地学报，2009,17(2)：174-180.
[221]于格，鲁春霞，谢高地.草地生态系统服务功能的研究进展[J].资源科学，2005,27(6)：172-179.
[222]于格,鲁春霞,谢高地,等.基于RS和GIS的青藏高原草地生态系统土壤水分保持功能及其经济价值评估-以生长季为例[J].山地学报,2006,24(4)：498-503.
[223]俞海,任勇.流域生态补偿机制的关键问题分析-以南水北调中线水源涵养区为例[J].资源科学,2007,29(2)：28-33.
[224]俞勇军,陆玉麒,杨忠臣.区域可持续发展目标下的子系统的调控[J].南京师大学报(自 然科学版),2003,26(1)：121-124.
[225]邹红美.生态补偿机制的实践与反思[J].经济与管理,2007,21(7)：27-29.
[226]张传国,方创琳.干旱区绿洲系统生态—生产—生活承载力相互作用的驱动机制分析[J1.自然资源学报,2002,17(2)：181-187.
[227]张树安,刘夏波,王昕.草原生态系统可持续发展的经济学模型新探[J].经济问题探索,2007，8：87-92.
[228]张建国,刘淑珍,李辉霞,等.西藏那曲地区草地退化驱动力分析[J].资源调查与环境,2004,25(2)：116-122.
[229]张维迎.博弈论与信息经济学[M].上海人民出版社,1996.
[230]张力小.人地作用关系中生态陷阱现象解析[J].生态学报,2006,26(7)：2167-2173.
[231]张志强,徐中民,程国栋.生态系统服务与自然资本价值评估[J1.生态学报,2001,21(11)：1918-1926.
[232]张志民,延军平,张小民.建立中国草原生态补偿机制的依据、原则及配套政策研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2007,21(8)：142-146.
[233]邹声文.我国大然草原90%在退化[J].草业科学,2002,19(4)：76.
[234]赵军,杨凯.自然资源福利计量的参数模型与表征尺度[J].自然资源学报,2004,19(6)：795-803.
[235]赵军,杨凯.生态系统服务价值评估研究进展[J].生态学报,2007,27(1)：346-356.
[236]赵桂慎，文育芬，于法稳 生态系统服务功能价值测算的研究进展、问题及趋势[J].2008,(2)：100-103.
[237]赵光，姚广红.区域经济发展中不同利益体对环境政策的博弈分析[J].生态经济,2009,(1)：84-86.
[238]赵景柱,肖寒,吴刚.生态系统服务的物质量与价值量评价方法的比较分析[J].应用生态学报,2000,11(2)：290-292.
[239]赵景柱,徐亚骏,肖寒,等.基于可持续发展综合国力的生态系统服务评价研究-13个国家生态系统服务价值的测算[J].系统工程理论与实践,2003,1(1)：121-127.
[240]赵涛,晅煜.能源-经济-环境(3E)系统协调度评价模型研究[J].理工大学学报(社会科学版),2008,10(2)：11-15.
[241]赵同谦,欧阳志云,贾良清,等.中国草地生态系统服务功能间接价值评价[J].生态学报,2004a,24(6)：1101-1110.
[242]赵同谦,欧阳志云,郑华,等.草地生态系统服务功能分析及其评价指标体系[J].生态学杂志,2004b,23(6)：155-160.
[243]赵晓鸿.西藏经济发展与生态安全的冲突及对策[J].西南民族大学学报(人文社科版),2006，10：34-37.
[244]郑海霞,张陆彪.流域生态服务补偿定量标准研究[J].环境保护,2006(1)：42-46.
[245]支玲,李怒云,王娟,等.西部退耕还林经济补偿机制研究[J].林业科学,2004,40(2)：3-9.
[246]中国生态补偿机制与政策研究课题组编著.中国生态补偿机制与政策研究[M].科学出版社,2007.
[247]钟祥浩,刘淑珍,王小丹,等.西藏高原国家生态安全屏障保护与建设[J].山地学报,2006,24(2)：129-136.
[248]钟祥浩：中国山地生态安全屏障保护与建设[J].山地学报,2008,26(1)：2-11.
[249]周伏建,陈明华,林富兴等.福建省降雨侵蚀力指标初步探讨[J].水土保持学报，1995,(1)：13-18.
[250]朱立博,王世新,陈旭呈,等.浅谈呼伦贝尔草原生态效益补偿机制[J].草原与草坪,2008,(3)：74-77.
[251]庄国泰,高鹏,王学军.中国生态环境补偿费的理论与实践[J].中国环境科学,1995,15(6)：413-418.
[2]Alexander S. P. P., Garturo S. A. Deforestation pressure and biological reserve planning:A conceptual approach and an illustrative application for Costa Rica [J]. Resource and Energy Economics,2004, (26):237-254.
[3]Alexander A. M., List J. A., Margolis M., et al. A method for valuing global ecosystem services [J]. Ecological Economics,1998,27:161-170.
[4]Anwar T., Mahmut H., Frnak. T., et al. communities structure differences between farmland and ecological compensation area [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2005,25(9):2284-2290.
[5]Ayling, R. D., Kelly, K. Dealing with conflict:Natural resources and dispute resolution [J]. Conservation Forestry Review,1997,3:182-185.
[6]Babcock B. A., Lakshminarayan P. G., Wu J., et al. Targeting tools for the purchase of environmental amenities [J]. Land Economics,1997,73 (3):325-339.
[7]Barbier E. B. Valuing environmental functions:tropical wetlands[J]. Land Economics,1994,70, 155-173.
[8]Barkmanna J., Glenka K., Keila A., et al. Confronting unfamiliarity with ecosystem functions:The case for an ecosystem service approach to environmental valuation with stated preference methods[J]. Ecological Economics,2008,65,48-62.
[9]Bingham G., Bishop R., Brody M., et al. Issues in ecosystem valuation:improving information for decision making [J]. Ecological Economics,1995,14:73-90.
[10]Brendan, F., Kerry, T. R., Paul, M. Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making [J]. Ecological Economics,2009,68,643-653.
[11]Buchmann S. L., Nabhan G. P. The Forgotten pollinators[R]. Island Press, Washington D C. 1996.
[12]Burghard W., Anne R., Kemmermannb, et al. An indicator species approach for result-orientated subsidies of ecological services in grasslands-A study in northwestern Germany [J]. Biological Conservation,2006,133,186-197.
[13]Cacha M. D. M. Starting resource accounting in protected areas [M]//In:Munasinghe, McNeely J. (eds). Protected Area Economics and Policy.Cambridge:IUCN,1994:151-157.
[14]Cairns J. Protecting the Delivery of Ecosystem Services [J]. Ecosystem Health,1997,3: 185-194.
[15]Carolyn M. M., Scott, B. H., Christopher, B., et al. Using remote sensing to evaluate the influence of grassland restoration activities on ecosystem forage provisioning services [J]. storation Ecology,2009,17 (4),526-538.
[16]Carson R T. Valuation of tropical rainforests:philosophical and practical issues in the use of contingent valuation [J]. Ecological Economics,1998,24:15-29.
[17]Chauvel M. Grimaldi E. Barros E., et al. Pasture damage by an Amazonian earthworm [J]. Nature,2000,39832-33.
[18]Chee Y. E. An ecological perspective on the valuation of ecosystem services [J]. Biological Conservation,2004,120:549-565.
[19]Claassen R., Cattaneo A., Johansson R. Cost effective design of agri-environmental payment programs:U.S. experience in theory and practice[J]. Ecological Economics,2008,65: 737-752.
[20]Costanza R., d'Arge R., de Groot R., et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital [J]. Nature,1997,387,253-260.
[21]Costanza R., Stern D., Fisher B., et al. Influential publications in ecological economics:a citation analysis [J]. Ecological economics,2004,50:261-292.
[22]Critchley C. N. R., Burke, M. J. W., Stevens, D. P. Conservation of lowland semi-natural grasslands in the UK:a review of botanical monitoring results from agri-environmental schemes[J]. Biological Conservation,2003,115,263-278.
[23]Cuperus R., Canters K. J., de Haes H., et al. Guidelines for ecological compensation associated with highways [J]. Biological Conservation,1999,90:41-51.
[24]Cuperus R., Caters K. J., Piepers A. A. G. Ecological compensation of the impacts of a road. Preliminary method of A50 road link [J]. Ecological Engineering,1996,7,327-349.
[24]Curtis I. A. Valuing ecosystem goods and services:a new approach using a surrogate market and the combination of a multiple criteria analysis and a Delphi panel to assign weights to the attributes [J]. Ecological Economics,2004,50,163-194.
[25]Daily G. C. What are ecosystem services? [M]//In:Daily G. C. (ed.). Nature's services: Societal dependence on natural ecosystems[M]. Island Press, Washington, DC,1997:1-10.
[26]Daily G. C., Soderquist T., Aniyar S., et al. The value of nature and the nature of value [J]. Science,2000,289:395-396.
[27]Decaens T., Jimenez J. J., Gioia C., et al. The values of soil animals for conservation biology [J]. European Journal of Soil Biology,2006,42, S23-S38
[28]de Groot R. S., Van der Perk J., Chiesura A., et al. Ecological functions and socio-economic values of critical natural capital as admeasure for ecological integrity and environmental health [J]. Earth and Environmental Sciences,2000,1,191-214.
[29]de Groot R., Wilson M. A., Boumans R. M. J. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services[J]. Ecological Economics,2002,41, 393-408.
[30]Dietschi S., Holderegger R., Schmidt S. G., et al. Agri-environment incentive payments and plant species richness under different management intensities in mountain meadows of Switzerland [J]. Acta Oecolo,2007,31 (2):216-222.
[31]Donald C. C., John E., Brian L., Gibson L. Indicators of human health in ecosystems:what do we measure [J] The Science of the Total Environment,1998,224:201-213.
[32]Farber S. C., Costanza R., Wilson M. A. Economic and ecological concepts for valuing ecosystem services [J]. Ecological Economics,2002,41:375-392.
[33]Ferraro P. J. Targeting conservation investments in heterogeneous landscapes-A distance function approach and application to watershed management [J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics,2004,86 (4):905-918.
[34]Geoffrey H. Valuing ecosystem services. Ecological Economics,2000,3:24-30.
[35]Guo Z. G., Liang T. G., Liu X. Y., et al. A new approach to grassland management for the arid Aletai region in northern China[J].The Rangeland Journal,2006,28,97-104.
[36]Gustafsson B. Scope and limits of the market mechanism in environmental management [J]. Ecological Economics,1998,24:259-274.
[36]Hannon B. Ecological pricing and economic efficiency[J]. Ecological Economics,2001,36:19-30.
[37]Hardi P., Barg S., Hodge T., et al. Measuring sustainable development:review of current practice[M]. Ottawa:Industry, Canada,1997.
[38]Hardin G.. The Tragedy of The Commons. Science,1968,10:13-23.
[39]Harpinder S. S., Stephen D. W., Ross C., et al. The future of farming:The value of ecosystem services in conventional and organic arable land. An experimental approach [J]. Ecological Economics,2008,64,835-848.
[40]Hein L., van Koppen K., de Groot R.S., et al. Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services [J]. Ecological Economics,2006,57,209-228.
[41]Herzog F., Dreier S., Hofer G., et al. Effect of ecological compensation areas on floristic and breeding bird diversity in Swiss agricultural landscapes[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment [J].2005(108):189-204.
[42]Holdren J. P., Ehrlich P. R. Human population and the global environment[J]. American Scientist,1974,62:282-292.
[43]Holling C. S. Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological and social systems[J]. Ecosystems,2001,(4):390-405.
[44]Hueting R., Reijnders L., de Boer B., et al. The concept of environmental function and its valuation [J]. Ecological.Economic,1998,25:31-35.
[45]Huyghe C. New utilizations for the grassland areas and the forage plants:what matters[J]. Fourrages,2010,203:213-219.
[46]ae Young Ko, Day J. W., Lane R. R., et al. A comparative evaluation of money-based and energy-based cost-benefit analyses of tertiary municipal wastewater treatment using forested wetlands vs. sand filtration in Louisiana [J]. Ecological.Economics,2004,49: 331-347.
[47]Klauer B. Ecosystem Prices:Activity Analysis Applied to Ecosystems [J]. Ecological Economics,2000,33:473-486.
[48]Konarska K. M., Sutton P. C., Castellon M. Evaluating scale dependence of ecosystem service valuation:a comparison of NOAA-AVHRR and Landsat TM datasets [J]. Ecological Economics,2002,41,491-507.
[49]Kosoy N., Martinez T.M., Muradian R., Martinez A. J. Payments for environmental services in watersheds:Insights from a comparative study of three cases in Central America. Ecological Economics,2007,446-455.
[50]Kreuter U. P., Harris H. G., Matlock M. D., et al. Change in ecosystem service values in the San Antonio area, Texas [J]. Ecological Economics,2001,39,333-346.
[51]Kulshreshtha S. N., Gillies J. A. Economic evaluation of aesthetic amenities:A case study of river view [J]. Water Resources Bulletin,1993,29(2):257-266.
[52]Lewandrowski J., Darwin R. F., Tsigas M., et al. Estimating costs of protecting global ecosystem diversity[J].Ecological Economics,1999,29,111-125.
[53]Limburg K. E., O' Neill R. V., Costanza R., et al. Complex systems and valuation [J]. Ecological Economics,2002,41,409-420.
[54]Long R. J., Ding L. M., Shang Z. H., et al. The yak grazing system on the Qinghai-Tibetan plateauand its status[J].The Rangeland Journal,2008,30,241-246.
[55]MA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment). Millennium ecosystem assessment:frameworks[M]. Washington D C:World Resources Institute,2001.
[56]McNeely J. A., Miller K. R., Reid W. V., et al. Conserving the world biological diversity[M]. World Bank,1990.
[57]Monfreda C., Wackernagel M., Deumling D. Establishing national natural capital accounts based on detailed ecological footprint and biological capacity assessments [J]. Land Use Policy,2004,21:231-246.
[58]Moran D., McVittie A., Allcroft D. J., et al. Quantifying public p references for agrienvironmental policy in Scotland:a comparison of methods[J]. Ecological Economics, 2007,63(1):42-53.
[59]Morris J., Gowing D. J. G., Mills J., et al. Reconciling agricultural economic and environmental objectives:the case of recreating wetlands in the Fenland area of eastern England [J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment,2000, (79):245-257.
[60]Nabhan G. P., Buchmann S.L. Pollination services:Biodiversity's direct link to world food stability[R]//In:Daily G. C. (ed.). Nature's services:Societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Island Press, Washington, D C,1997:133-150.
[61]Nick H.Environmental Economics in Theory and Practice [M].New York:Oxford University Press,1997.
[62]Odum H. T. Environmental accounting:energy and decision making[M]. New York:John wiley & sons,1996.
[63]Pagiola S. Assessing the efficiency of payments for environmental services programs:A framework for analysis[R]. World Bank, Washington D C,2005.
[64]Pagiola S., Arcenas A., Platais G. Can payments for environmental services help reduce poverty? An exploration of the issues and the evidence to date from Latin America[J].Jorld Development,2005,33 (2):237-253.
[65]Patterson M.G. Ecological production based pricing of biosphere processes[J]. Ecological Economics,2002,1:457-478.
[66]Pearce D.W. Economic values and the natural world [M]. London:Earthscan,1993.
[67]Pimental D., W ilson C., Mc Cullum C., et al. Economic and environmental benefits of biodiversity [J]. Bio Science,1997,47(11):747-757.
[68]Rapport D. J., Gaudet C., Karr J. R., et al. Evaluating landscape health:integrating societal goals and biophysical process[J] Journal of Environmental Management,1998,53:1-15.
[69]Rasul G.., Thapa G. B. Sustainability of ecological and conventional agricultural systems in Bangladesh:An assessment based on environmental, economic and social perspectives [J]. Agricultural Systems,2004,79(2):327-351.
[70]Rees W. E. Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity:what urban economics leaves out [J]. Environ Urban,1992,4:121-130.
[71]Rees E., ackernagel W. M. Monetary analysis:turning a blind eye on sustainability [J]. Ecological Economics,1999,29:47-52.
[72]Rigby D., Woodhouse P., Young T., et al. Constructing A Farm Level Indicator of Sustainable Agricultural Practice[J].Ecological Economics,2001,39 (3):463-478.
[73]Richard T., Woodward, R.T., Wui, Y.S. The economic value of wetland services:a meta-analysis[J]. Ecological Economics,2001,37:257-270.
[74]Sagoff M. Aggregation and deliberation in valuing environmental public goods:a look beyond contingent valuation [J]. Ecological Economics,1998,24:213-230.
[75]Sala O. E., Paruelo J. M. Ecosystem services in grasslands [A]. In:Daily G.C. Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Eeosysterns[C]. Washington D C:Island Press.1997.
[76]Sachs J. D. Sustainable development. Science,2004,304:649.
[77]Scott M., S., Frank L., Philip R. G.,et al. Ecosystem services and agriculture:Cultivating agricultural ecosystems for diverse benefits [J]. Ecological Economies,2007,64:245-252.
[78]Serafy S. E. Pricing the invaluable:the value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital [J]. Ecological Economics,1998,25:25-27.
[79]SCEP (Study of Critical Environmental Problems). Man's impact on the global environment: Assessment and recommendations for action [M], Cambridge, MA:MIT Press,1970.
[80]Sharply A. N., Williams J. R. EPIC-erosion productivity impact calculator:1.model documentation. USDA Technical Bulletin,1990. No.1768.
[81]Simpson R. D. and Christensen N. L. J. Ecosystem Function and Human Activities: Reconciling Economics and Ecology [M]. New York:Chapman and Hall; 1997.
[82]Sierra R., Russman E. On the efficiency of environmental service payments:A forest conservation assessment in the Osa Peninsula, Costa Rica [J]. Ecological Economics,2006 (59):131-141.
[83]Simon Z., David R. L. Paying for environmental services:an analysis of participation in costa Rica's PSA Program [J]. World Development,2005,33(2):255-272.
[84]Smith E. L., Sims P., Franzen D., New concepts for assessment of grassland condition [J]. Journal of Rangeland Management,1995,48,271-282.
[85]Smith C. S., McDonald G. T., Thwaites R. N. Assessing the sustainability of agricultural land management[J]. Journal of Environmental Management,2000,60(4):267-288.
[86]Soderbaum P. Value, ideology and politics in eco logical economics (tenth anniversary invited paper) [J]. Ecological Economics,1999,28:161-170.
[87]Spash C. L. The Concerted Action on Environmental Valuation in Europe:an introduction. environmental valuation in Europe [M]. Cambridge Research for the Environment, U K,2000.
[88]Straton A. A complex systems approach to the value of ecological resources[J]. Ecological Economics,2006,56,402-411.
[89]Suttie J. M., Reynolds S. G., Batello C. Grasslands of the world [M]. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations:Rome.2005.
[90]Sutton P. C., Costanza R. Global estimates of market and non-market values derived from nighttime satellite imagery, land cover, and ecosystem service valuation [J]. Ecological Economics,2002,41:509-527.
[91]Tilman D., Downing J. A. Biodiversity and stability in grassland[J]. Nature,1994,367:363-365.
[92]Tobias W., Stefanie E., Sven W. Spatial targeting of payments for environmental services:A tool for boosting conservation benefits [J]. Ecological Economics,2008,65:822-833.
[93]Toman M. Why not to calculate the value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital [J]. Ecological Economics,1998,25:57-60.
[94]Turner R. K., van den Bergh, Jerorn C. J. M. et al. Ecological economic analysis of wetlands: scientific integration for management and policy[J]. Ecological Economics,2000,35 (1):7-23.
[95]Turner R. K., Paavola J., Cooper P., et al. Valuing nature:lessons learned and future research directions [J]. Ecological Economics,2003,46:493-510.
[96]UNEP. Guidelines for the preparations of country studies on costs, benefits and unmet needs of biological diversity conservation within the framework of the planned convention on biological diversity[M]. Niobe, United National Environmental Program.1991.
[97]Ve nkatachalam L. Environmental economics and ecological economics:where they can converge? [J]. Ecological Economics,2007,61(2-3):550-558.
[98]Vitousek P., Ehrlich P., Ehrlich A., Matson P. Human appropriation of the products of photosynthesis [J]. Bio Science,1986,36:368-373.
[99]Wackernagel M., Lewan L., Hansson C. B. Evaluating the use of natural capital with the ecological footprint:applications in Sweden and sub regions [J]. Ambio,1999,28:604-612.
[100]Waktzold F., Drechsler M. Spatially uniform versus spatially heterogeneous compensation payments for biodiversity enhancing land use mason[J]. Environmental and Resource Economics,2005,31:73-93.
[101]Wang X. Estimating non-market environmental benefits of the Conversion of Crop land to Forest and Grassland Program:A choice modelingapp roach [J]. Ecological Economics,2007, 63(1):114-125.
[102]Westman W. How much are nature's services worth?[J]. Science,1977,197,960-964.
[103]Whithy M., Saunders C. Estimating the supply of conservation goods in Britain:A comparison of the financial efficiency of the policy instruments[J]. Land Economics,1996, 72(3):313-325.
[104]Wilson M. A., Howarth R. Discourse based valuation of ecosystem services:establishing fair outcomes through group deliberation [J]. Ecological Economics,2002,41:431-443.
[105]WRI (World Resources Institute). World resources:a guide to the global environment [M]. Oxford:Oxford University Press,1994,87-90.
[106]Woodwell G. M. Biotic feedbacks from the warming of the earth[M]//In:Woodwell G. M. and Mackenzie F. T. (eds.). Biotic feedbacks in the global climatic system:Will the wanning feed the wanning? Oxford University Press, New York,1995:3-21.
[107]Wunder S. Payments for environmental services:Some nuts and bolts. CIFOR Occasional Paper, No 42,2005:3-8.
[108]白宏兵,马福婷,唐萍萍.草原生态环境价值补偿制度的研究[J].河北北方学院院报(自然科学版),2006,22(4)：55-58.
[109]鲍文.青藏高原草地资源发展面临的问题及战略选择[J].农业现代化研究,2009,30(1)：20-23.
[110]包文忠,山薇,杨晓东,孙红,等.我国北方草地资源面临的生态危机及对策[J].中国草地,1998,(2)：68-71.
[111]边多,李春,杨秀海,等.藏西北高寒牧区草地退化现状与机理分析[J].自然资源学,2008,23(2)：254-26.
[112]蔡邦成,温林泉,等.生态补偿机制建立的理论思考[J].生态经济,2005,(1)：47-51.
[113]蔡晓布,张永青,邵伟.藏北高寒草原草地退化及其驱动力分析[J].土壤,2007,39(6)：855-858.
[114]成升魁,沈镭.青藏高原人口、资源、环境与发展互动关系探讨[J].自然资源学报,2000,15(4)：297-304.
[115]陈孝胜.中国西部地区人口、环境、资源与经济可持续发展对策[J].生态经济,2007,(8)：52-54.
[116]陈佐忠,汪诗平.关于建立草原生态补偿机制的探讨[J].草地学报,2006,(3)：1-3.
[117]陈中新,张新时.中国生态系统效益的价值[J].科学通报,2000,45(1)：17-21.
[118]程秀丽.草原生态建设补偿机制建立的背景和必要性分析[J].体制改革,2008,(3)：95-96.
[119]戴淑燕,黄新建.可持续发展协调度的评价方法分析[J].科学与管理,2004,(6)：22-4.
[120]杜万平.完善西部区域生态补偿机制的建议[J].中国人口-资源与环境,2001,(3)：119-120.
[121]杜振华,焦玉良.建立横向转移支付制度实现生态补偿[J].宏观经济研究,2004,(9)：51-54.
[122]额尔敦扎布.草地资源价值新论[J].内蒙古师范大学学报,2004,33(3)：46-48.
[123]甘肃草原生态研究所.西藏那曲地区草地畜牧业资源[M].甘肃科技出版社,1991
[124]高清.生态补偿法律制度略论[J].河北法学,2008,26(9)：112-116.
[125]高清竹,李玉娥,林而达,等.藏北地区草地退化的时空分布特征[J].地理学报,2005,60(6)：965-973.
[126]高彤,杨妹影.国际生态补偿政策对中国的借鉴意义[J].国际瞭望,2006,(10)：71-76.
[127]巩芳,常青,郝晓燕,等.草原生态的空间网络化补偿模式研究[J].青海社会科学,2009,(4)：5-8.
[128]国家环境保护总局环境与经济政策研究中心.“中国建立生态补偿机制的战略与政策框架”研究报告[R].2006
[129]郭明,冯朝阳,赵善伦.生态环境价值评估方法综述[J].山东师范大学学报(自然科学版),2003,18(1)：71-74.
[130]韩炜,孙辉,唐亚.生态系统服务价值及其评估方法研究进展[J].四川环境,2005,24(1)：20-26.
[131]何敦煌.谈生态价值及其相关问题[J].未来与发展,2001,(4)：29-33.
[]32]桓曼曼.生态系统服务功能及其价值综述[J].生态经济,2001,12：41-43.
[133]《环境科学大辞典》编委会.环境科学大辞典.[M].中国环境科学出版社,1991.
[134]黄河,李永宁.关于西部退耕还林还草工程可持续性推进问题的几点思考：基于相关现实案例分析[J].理论导刊,2004,(2)：25-271.
[135]黄富祥,康慕谊,张新时.退耕还林还草过程中的经济补偿问题探讨[J].生态学报,2002,22(4)：471-478.
[136]侯向阳,杨理,韩颖.实施草原生态补偿的意义、趋势和建议[J].中国草地学报,2008,30(5)：1-6.
[137]洪尚群,马丕京,郭慧光.生态补偿制度的探索[J].环境科学与技术,2001,(5)：40-43.
[138]胡自治.青藏高原的草业发展与生态环境[M].中国藏学出版社出版,2000.
[139]姜立鹏,覃志豪,谢雯,等.中国草地生态系统服务功能价值遥感估算研究[J].自然资源学报,2007,22(2)：161-170.
[140]金蓉,石培基,王雪平.黑河流域生态补偿机制及效益评估研究[J].人民黄河,2005,27(7)：4-7.
[141]翟胜,王巨,张二勋,等.农业生态系统可持续性评价研究进展[J].地域研究与开发,2010,(1)：124-129.
[142]孔凡斌.完善我国生态补偿机制：理论实践与研究展望[J].农业经济问题,2007,10：50-54
[143]蓝盛芳,钦佩.生态系统的能值分析[J].应用生态学报,2001,12(1)：129-131.
[144]赖力,黄贤金,刘伟良.生态补偿理论方法研究进展[J].生态学报,2008,28(6)：2870-2877.
[145]李博.中国北方草地退化及其防治对策[J].中国农业科学,1997,30(6)：1-9.
[146]李明森.藏北高原草地资源合理利用[J].自然资源学报,2000,15(4)：335-339.
[147]李新一,洪军,刘杰,等.草原生态补偿的实践与探索[J].内蒙古草业,2009,21(2)：1-4.
[148]李文华,欧阳志云,赵景柱.生态系统服务功能研究[M].气象出版社,2002.
[149]李玉芳,刘硕,荀文会.基于复合生态系统场论的耕地资源可持续利用研究[J].国土资源科技管理,2008,25(2)：68-73.
[150]梁燕,韩国栋,赵萌莉,等.草地生态系统健康评价的内容与实施方法[J].生态工程,2004,(6)：107-109.
[151]梁丽娟,葛颜祥,傅奇蕾.流域生态补偿选择性激励机制-从博弈论视角的分析[J].农业科技管理,2006,5(4)：49-52.
[152]林慧龙,任继周,傅华.草地农业生态系统中的能值分析方法评价[J].草业学报,2005,14(4)：1-7.
[153]刘起.中国草地资源生态经济价值的探讨[J].四川草原,1999,(4)：124.
[154]柳文宗.生态补偿的三大经济学理论依据[J].中国林业,2007,(1)：10-11.
[155]刘春江,薛惠锋,王海燕,等.生态补偿研究现状与进展[J].环境保护科学,2009,35(1)：77-80.
[156]刘黎明,赵英伟,郑建宗.草地利用系统可持续性评价方法研究[J].中国草地,2002,24(6)：1-6.
[157]刘明远,郑奋田.论政府包办型生态建设补偿机制的低效性成因及应对策略[J].生态经济,2006,(2)：81-84.
[158]刘兴元,王锁民,郭正刚.半干旱地区农业资源的复合经营模式及生态经济耦合效应研究[J].自然资源学报,2004,19(5)：624-631.
[159]刘兴元,陈全功,王永宁.甘南草地退化对生态安全与经济发展的影响[J].草业科学,2006,23(12)：39-41.
[160]刘兴元,梁天刚,龙瑞军,等.北方牧区草地资源分类经营机制与可持续发展研究[J].生态学报,2009,29(11)：5851-5859.
[161]刘兴元,尚占环,龙瑞军.草地生态补偿机制与补偿方案探讨[J].草地学报,2010,18(1)：126-131.
[162]刘兴元,龙瑞军,尚占环.草地生态系统服务功能及其价值评估方法[J].草业学报,2011,20(1)：167-174
[163]刘向华，马忠玉，刘子刚.我国生态服务价值评估方法的述评[J].理论月刊,2005,(7)：130-131.
[164]刘玉龙,马俊杰,金学林,等.生态系统服务功能价值评估方法综述[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2005,15(1)：88-92.
[165]刘森.中国可持续发展的策略博弈[J].中国经济与管理科学,2009,(5)：11-12.
[166]龙瑞军.青藏高原草地生态系统之服务功能[J].科技导报,2007,25(9)：26-28
[167]闵庆文,李文华.区域可持续发展能力评价及其在山东五莲的应用[J].生态学报,2002,22(1)：1-9.
[168]闵庆文,刘寿东,杨霞.内蒙古典型草原生态系统服务功能价值评估研究[J].草地学报,2004a,12(3)：165-169.
[169]闵庆文,谢高地,胡聃,等.青海草地生态系统服务功能的价值评估[J].资源科学,2004b,26(3)：56-60.
[170]毛锋,曾香.生态补偿的机理与准则[J].生态学报,2006,26(11)：3841-3846.
[171]毛飞,张艳红,侯英雨.藏北那曲地区草地退化动态评价[J].应用生态学报,2008,19(2)：278-284.
[172]毛显强,钟瑜,张胜.生态补偿的理论探讨[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2002,12(4)：38-41.
[173]欧名豪,董元华.区域生态重建的经济补偿办法探讨[J].南京农业大学学报,2000,(4)：109-112.
[174]欧阳志云,王效科,苗鸿.中国陆地生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值的初步研究[J].生态学报,1999,19(5)：607-613.
[175]欧阳志云,王效科,苗鸿.中国生态环境敏感性及其区域差异规律研究[J].生态学报,2000,20(1)：9-12.
[176]任继周.草业科学研究方法[M].中国农业出版社,1998.
[177]任继周,南志标,郝敦元.草业系统中的界面论[J].草业学报,2000,9(1)：1-8.
[178]任志远.生态系统服务经济价值评价的前沿问题[J].西北大学学报(自然科学版)2003,33(1)：103-105.
[179]宋敏.生态补偿机制建立的博弈分析[J].学术交流,2009,182(5)：83-87.
[180]沈满洪.路箐.论生态补偿保护机制[J].浙江学刊,2004,12(4)：217-220.
[181]盛文萍,高清竹,李玉娥,等.藏北地区气候变化特征及其影响分析[J].高原气象,2008,27(3)：509-516.
[182]史德明,梁音.我国脆弱生态环境的评估与保护[J].水土保持学报,2002,16(1)：6-10.
[183]石益丹,李玉浸,杨殿林,等.呼伦贝尔草地生态系统服务功能价值评估[J].农业环境科学学报,2007,26(6)：2099-2103.
[184]粟晏,赖庆奎.国外社区参与生态补偿的实践及经验[J].林业与社会,2005,13(4)：40-44.
[185]万军,张惠远,王金南,等.中国生态补偿政策评估与框架初探[J].环境科学研究,2005,18(2)：1-8.
[186]王丰年.论生态补偿的原则和机制[J].自然辩证法研究,2006,22(1)：31-5.
[187]王静,尉元明,孙旭映.过牧对草地生态系统服务价值的影响-以甘肃省玛曲县为例[J].自然资源学报,2006,21(3)：109-117.
[188]王建林,常天军,李鹏,等.西藏草地生态系统植被碳贮量及其影响因子分析[J].水土保持学报,2008,22(3)：120-125.
[189]王强,杨京平.我国草地退化及其生态安全评价指标体系的探索[J].水土保持学报,2003,17(6)：27-31.
[190]王欧.退牧还草地区生态补偿机制研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2006,16(4)：33-38.
[191]王蕾,王宁,张逸.草地生态系统服务价值的研究进展[J].中国农业科学研究,2006,27(4)：50-53.
[192]王丽珂.我国发达地区环境与经济发展的协调性研究[J].科技进步与对策,2009,(8)：7-40.
[193]王黎明.区域可持续发展—基于人地关系地域系统的视角[M].中国经济出版社,1998.
[194]王庆锁,李梦先,李春和.我国草地退化及治理对策[J].中国农业气象,2004,25(3)：41-48.
[195]王瑞杰,覃志豪.基于MODIS数据的中国草地生态体系价值估算研究[J].中国草地学报,2007,29(1)：50-54.
[196]王绍令,赵林,李述训.青藏高原沙漠化与冻土相互作用研究[J].中国沙漠,2002,22(1)：33-39.
[197]王小丹,钟祥浩,范建容.西藏水土流失敏感性评价及其空间分布规律[J].地理学报,2004,59(2)：138-188.
[198]王秀红,郑度.西藏高原高寒草甸资源的可持续利用[J].资源科学,1999,(6)：38-42.
[199]王万忠,焦菊英.中国土壤侵蚀因子定量评价研究[J].水土保持通报,1996,16(5)：1-20.
[200]魏兴琥,杨萍,李森,等.超载放牧与那曲地区高山嵩草草甸植被退化及其退化指标的探讨[J].草业学报,2005,14(3)：41-49.
[201]吴玲玲,陆健健,童春富,等.长江口湿地生态系统服务功能价值的评估[J].长江流域资源与环境,2003,12(5)：411-416.
[202]吴学灿,洪尚群,李风歧.生态补偿的评价[J].资源开发与市场,2005,21(6)：534-535.
[203]吴跃明,郎东锋,张子琦,等.环境-经济系统协调度模型及其指标体系[J].中国人口.环境与资源,1996,6(2)：47-50.
[204]西藏那曲地区畜牧局.西藏那曲地区土地资源[M].中国农业科技出版,1992.
[205]西藏自治区畜牧局.西藏自治区草地资源[M].科学出版,1994.
[206]西藏统计局.西藏统计年鉴[M].中国统计出版社,1990-2009.
[207]谢高地，张忆铿，鲁春霞，等中国自然草地生态服务功能价值[J].自然资源学报，2001,16(1)：47-53.
[208]谢高地,鲁春霞,肖玉,等.青藏高原高寒草地生态系统服务价值评价[J].山地学报,2003,21(2)：50-55.
[209]徐嵩龄.生物多程性价值的经济学处理一些理论障碍及克[J].生物多样性，2001,9(3)：310-318.
[210]徐中民，程国栋，张志强.生态足迹可持续定量研究的新方法[J].生态学报，2001,21(9)：1484-1493.
[211]徐中民,张志强,龙爱华,等.环境选择模型在生态系统管理中的应用-以黑河流域额济纳旗为例[J].地理学报,2003,58(3)：398-405.
[212]熊鹰,王克林,蓝万炼,等.洞庭湖区湿地恢复的生态补偿效应评估[J].地理学报,2004,59(5)：772-780.
[213]杨光梅,闵庆文,李文华,等.基于CVM方法分析牧民对禁牧政策的受偿意愿：以锡林郭勒草原为例[J].生态环境,2006,15(4)：747-751.
[214]杨富裕,张蕴薇,苗彦军,等.藏北高寒退化草地植被恢复过程的障碍因子初探[J].水土保持通报,2003,24(4)：17-20.
[215]杨凯,高清竹,李玉娥.藏北地区草地退化空间特征及其趋势分析[J].地球科学进展,2007,22(4)：410-416.
[216]闻玉春,唐海萍,张新时.草地退化程度诊断系列问题探讨及研究展望[J].中国草地学报,2007,29(3)：89-97.
[217]鄢燕,张建国,张锦华,等.西藏那曲地区高寒草地地下生物量[J].生态学报,2005,25(11)：2819-2823.
[218]姚檀栋，朱立平.青藏高原环境变化对全球变化的响应[J].地球科学进展2006,21(5)：459-464.
[219]叶文虎,魏斌，仝川.城市生态补偿能力衡量和应用[J].中国环境科学，1998,18(4)：98-301.
[220]尹剑慧,卢欣石.草原生态服务价值核算体系构建研究[J].草地学报，2009,17(2)：174-180.
[221]于格，鲁春霞，谢高地.草地生态系统服务功能的研究进展[J].资源科学，2005,27(6)：172-179.
[222]于格,鲁春霞,谢高地,等.基于RS和GIS的青藏高原草地生态系统土壤水分保持功能及其经济价值评估-以生长季为例[J].山地学报,2006,24(4)：498-503.
[223]俞海,任勇.流域生态补偿机制的关键问题分析-以南水北调中线水源涵养区为例[J].资源科学,2007,29(2)：28-33.
[224]俞勇军,陆玉麒,杨忠臣.区域可持续发展目标下的子系统的调控[J].南京师大学报(自 然科学版),2003,26(1)：121-124.
[225]邹红美.生态补偿机制的实践与反思[J].经济与管理,2007,21(7)：27-29.
[226]张传国,方创琳.干旱区绿洲系统生态—生产—生活承载力相互作用的驱动机制分析[J1.自然资源学报,2002,17(2)：181-187.
[227]张树安,刘夏波,王昕.草原生态系统可持续发展的经济学模型新探[J].经济问题探索,2007，8：87-92.
[228]张建国,刘淑珍,李辉霞,等.西藏那曲地区草地退化驱动力分析[J].资源调查与环境,2004,25(2)：116-122.
[229]张维迎.博弈论与信息经济学[M].上海人民出版社,1996.
[230]张力小.人地作用关系中生态陷阱现象解析[J].生态学报,2006,26(7)：2167-2173.
[231]张志强,徐中民,程国栋.生态系统服务与自然资本价值评估[J1.生态学报,2001,21(11)：1918-1926.
[232]张志民,延军平,张小民.建立中国草原生态补偿机制的依据、原则及配套政策研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2007,21(8)：142-146.
[233]邹声文.我国大然草原90%在退化[J].草业科学,2002,19(4)：76.
[234]赵军,杨凯.自然资源福利计量的参数模型与表征尺度[J].自然资源学报,2004,19(6)：795-803.
[235]赵军,杨凯.生态系统服务价值评估研究进展[J].生态学报,2007,27(1)：346-356.
[236]赵桂慎，文育芬，于法稳 生态系统服务功能价值测算的研究进展、问题及趋势[J].2008,(2)：100-103.
[237]赵光，姚广红.区域经济发展中不同利益体对环境政策的博弈分析[J].生态经济,2009,(1)：84-86.
[238]赵景柱,肖寒,吴刚.生态系统服务的物质量与价值量评价方法的比较分析[J].应用生态学报,2000,11(2)：290-292.
[239]赵景柱,徐亚骏,肖寒,等.基于可持续发展综合国力的生态系统服务评价研究-13个国家生态系统服务价值的测算[J].系统工程理论与实践,2003,1(1)：121-127.
[240]赵涛,晅煜.能源-经济-环境(3E)系统协调度评价模型研究[J].理工大学学报(社会科学版),2008,10(2)：11-15.
[241]赵同谦,欧阳志云,贾良清,等.中国草地生态系统服务功能间接价值评价[J].生态学报,2004a,24(6)：1101-1110.
[242]赵同谦,欧阳志云,郑华,等.草地生态系统服务功能分析及其评价指标体系[J].生态学杂志,2004b,23(6)：155-160.
[243]赵晓鸿.西藏经济发展与生态安全的冲突及对策[J].西南民族大学学报(人文社科版),2006，10：34-37.
[244]郑海霞,张陆彪.流域生态服务补偿定量标准研究[J].环境保护,2006(1)：42-46.
[245]支玲,李怒云,王娟,等.西部退耕还林经济补偿机制研究[J].林业科学,2004,40(2)：3-9.
[246]中国生态补偿机制与政策研究课题组编著.中国生态补偿机制与政策研究[M].科学出版社,2007.
[247]钟祥浩,刘淑珍,王小丹,等.西藏高原国家生态安全屏障保护与建设[J].山地学报,2006,24(2)：129-136.
[248]钟祥浩：中国山地生态安全屏障保护与建设[J].山地学报,2008,26(1)：2-11.
[249]周伏建,陈明华,林富兴等.福建省降雨侵蚀力指标初步探讨[J].水土保持学报，1995,(1)：13-18.
[250]朱立博,王世新,陈旭呈,等.浅谈呼伦贝尔草原生态效益补偿机制[J].草原与草坪,2008,(3)：74-77.
[251]庄国泰,高鹏,王学军.中国生态环境补偿费的理论与实践[J].中国环境科学,1995,15(6)：413-418.