区域科技创新平台网络化发展模式与路径研究
|
摘要
随着科技全球化和知识经济的发展,创新成为一个区域持续发展的不竭动力。科技创新平台作为支撑全社会创新活动的重要载体,在区域科技与经济发展中发挥着重要的作用。在激烈的国际科技与经济竞争环境下,要使区域科技创新平台持续、快速且平稳地发展,亟需建立一套科学的理论和方法体系。因此,在我国大力加强创新型国家和创新型省市建设的背景下,研究并设计区域科技创新平台发展的理论及方法具有重要的理论价值和现实意义。
本文围绕区域科技创新平台网络化发展模式与路径这一主题,借鉴创新理论、社会网络理论和现代系统理论的有关思想,从区域科技创新平台网络化演进的特点及过程出发,研究区域科技创新平台网络化发展的理论、方法及策略体系。
在对国内外区域科技创新平台相关研究进行评述,系统分析网络化发展的相关问题的基础上,阐释区域科技创新平台的内涵,运用现代系统理论分析其特征,并基于不同标准对区域科技创新平台的类型进行划分,给出平台发展所依托的主体;在对网络和网络组织相关概念辨析的基础上,提出并界定区域科技创新平台网络的概念,刻画平台网络的结构和功能;揭示平台网络化发展的内涵和驱动力,剖析平台网络的形成及发展过程;运用系统设计与分析方法,从多因素协同作用的战略高度和平台发展的战略管理视角出发,创建区域科技创新平台网络化发展理论框架,提出形成网络是区域科技创新平台发展方向的核心思想。
提出区域科技创新平台网络化发展模式。在系统剖析区域科技创新平台网络化发展内外部影响因素的基础上,提出区域科技创新平台网络化发展的三种基本模式:均衡发展模式、点极发展模式、点轴发展模式;深入剖析三种模式的内涵、特点及其适用条件;给出区域科技创新平台网络化发展模式选择的原则和思路。
设计区域科技创新平台网络化发展水平评价体系。从区域科技创新平台网络化发展效率和发展能力两个方面,设计平台网络化发展水平评价体系:给出区域科技创新平台网络化发展水平的内涵,建立发展效率与发展能力关系的发展水平数学模型;从科技创新平台投入和产出效率角度,设计基于DEA方法的区域科技创新平台网络化发展效率评价体系;从网络特征和结构角度,设计基于D-S理论的区域科技创新平台网络化发展能力评价体系。
设计区域科技创新平台网络化发展路径。科技创新平台具有公益性、战略性等特点,其发展离不开政府的支持,从这一角度出发,提出基于政府主导的平台网路化发展路径;从产学研联盟的独特优势出发,提出基于官产学研合作的平台网络化发展路径;从企业是创新主体的角度出发,提出基于企业主导的平台网络化发展路径;并给出不同路径下,区域科技创新平台网络化发展的相关策略。
在上述研究的基础上,以黑龙江省科技创新平台为实证对象,对其网络化发展的模式与路径进行研究。通过分析黑龙江省科技创新平台发展的现状、优势和劣势、机遇和威胁,确定黑龙江省科技创新平台网络化发展模式,给出其发展思路,并对平台网络化发展水平进行评价,提出黑龙江省科技创新平台网络化发展的路径。
本文对区域科技创新平台网络化发展模式与路径的研究以及对黑龙江省科技创新平台的实证分析,可以为我国各区域科技创新平台的建设和发展提供科学的理论指导和方法支持。
With the development of sci-tech globalization and knowledge economy, innovation becomes the unexhausted power for regional sustainable development. As the important carrier and core strength of social innovation activities, sci-tech innovation platform plays an important role in regional economic and technological development. It’s necessary to set up a scientific theory system and methodological approach in the face of internationally strong competition milieu. Therefore, on the background of enhancing the construction of innovative country and province in China, it is of great theoretical and practical significance to study and design the theory and method approach for the development of regional sci-tech innovation platform.
This dissertation focuses on the theme of the modes and paths of networking development of regional sci-tech innovation platform based on three main theories, namely, innovation theory, social network theory and modern system theory. On the basis of analyzing network characteristics and evolutionary process of regional sci-tech innovation platform, some related approaches and strategic system are discussed in this dissertation.
This dissertation describes several aspects in the literature in the area of innovation platform, and discusses relevant issues of networking development. On the basis of these, the connotation and characteristics of regional sci-tech innovation platform are given, types of the platform are classified, the main subjects of the platform are described. Then the dissertation defines the concept of sci-tech innovation platform network, and discusses its structure and functions. By analyzing the connotation and forces of networking evolution, it also goes further beyond that and presents networking evolutionary stages. Overall, proceed from the strategic height of cooperation of multiple factors and the strategic management of sci-tech innovation platform organization, this dissertation provides a theoretical framework for networking development of sci-tech innovation platform with the system analysis and design methods. The framework is helpful for explaining the core idea that sci-tech innovation platform network is the direction of the future regional sci-tech innovation platform.
On the basis of analyzing internal and external influencing factors in the networking development of regional sci-tech innovation platform, this dissertation shows three networking development modes: balancing development mode, growth-pole development mode, pole-axis development mode. Also, it gives the connotation, feature, applicable conditions of every mode and provides principles, gists, standard for development mode selection.
This dissertation designs an evaluation system of networking development level which is composed of efficiency evaluation system and capability evaluation system for regional sci-tech innovation platform. It also presents a conception of networking development degree and builds a mathematical model of the relation between efficiency and capability. The efficiency evaluation system is designed with DEA based on the input and output of the platform. The capability evaluation system is designed with D-S theory based on the network characteristic and structure of the platform.
This paper designs three networking development pathes. Regional sci-tech innovation platform with characteristics of public welfare and strategic can’t develop healthily and smoothly without the support from government. From this perspective, government-led path is designed. Then based on the unique advantages of cooperation of government, industry, university and research, IURA-led path is designed. And enterprise-led path is designed from the angle of the enterprise as a main body in innovation. Also, the corresponding development strategies are put forward in various pathes.
On the basis of the above study, this dissertation makes an empirical research on the development mode and path of Heilongjiang’s sci-tech innovation platform. By analyzing its current situation, strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats, the development mode is established, the networking development level is evaluated, and corresponding strategies are put forward.
In a word, this dissertation attempts to make contributes to the formation and development of Chinese regional sci-tech innovation platform network by providing theoretical guidance and methodological support.
本文围绕区域科技创新平台网络化发展模式与路径这一主题,借鉴创新理论、社会网络理论和现代系统理论的有关思想,从区域科技创新平台网络化演进的特点及过程出发,研究区域科技创新平台网络化发展的理论、方法及策略体系。
在对国内外区域科技创新平台相关研究进行评述,系统分析网络化发展的相关问题的基础上,阐释区域科技创新平台的内涵,运用现代系统理论分析其特征,并基于不同标准对区域科技创新平台的类型进行划分,给出平台发展所依托的主体;在对网络和网络组织相关概念辨析的基础上,提出并界定区域科技创新平台网络的概念,刻画平台网络的结构和功能;揭示平台网络化发展的内涵和驱动力,剖析平台网络的形成及发展过程;运用系统设计与分析方法,从多因素协同作用的战略高度和平台发展的战略管理视角出发,创建区域科技创新平台网络化发展理论框架,提出形成网络是区域科技创新平台发展方向的核心思想。
提出区域科技创新平台网络化发展模式。在系统剖析区域科技创新平台网络化发展内外部影响因素的基础上,提出区域科技创新平台网络化发展的三种基本模式:均衡发展模式、点极发展模式、点轴发展模式;深入剖析三种模式的内涵、特点及其适用条件;给出区域科技创新平台网络化发展模式选择的原则和思路。
设计区域科技创新平台网络化发展水平评价体系。从区域科技创新平台网络化发展效率和发展能力两个方面,设计平台网络化发展水平评价体系:给出区域科技创新平台网络化发展水平的内涵,建立发展效率与发展能力关系的发展水平数学模型;从科技创新平台投入和产出效率角度,设计基于DEA方法的区域科技创新平台网络化发展效率评价体系;从网络特征和结构角度,设计基于D-S理论的区域科技创新平台网络化发展能力评价体系。
设计区域科技创新平台网络化发展路径。科技创新平台具有公益性、战略性等特点,其发展离不开政府的支持,从这一角度出发,提出基于政府主导的平台网路化发展路径;从产学研联盟的独特优势出发,提出基于官产学研合作的平台网络化发展路径;从企业是创新主体的角度出发,提出基于企业主导的平台网络化发展路径;并给出不同路径下,区域科技创新平台网络化发展的相关策略。
在上述研究的基础上,以黑龙江省科技创新平台为实证对象,对其网络化发展的模式与路径进行研究。通过分析黑龙江省科技创新平台发展的现状、优势和劣势、机遇和威胁,确定黑龙江省科技创新平台网络化发展模式,给出其发展思路,并对平台网络化发展水平进行评价,提出黑龙江省科技创新平台网络化发展的路径。
本文对区域科技创新平台网络化发展模式与路径的研究以及对黑龙江省科技创新平台的实证分析,可以为我国各区域科技创新平台的建设和发展提供科学的理论指导和方法支持。
With the development of sci-tech globalization and knowledge economy, innovation becomes the unexhausted power for regional sustainable development. As the important carrier and core strength of social innovation activities, sci-tech innovation platform plays an important role in regional economic and technological development. It’s necessary to set up a scientific theory system and methodological approach in the face of internationally strong competition milieu. Therefore, on the background of enhancing the construction of innovative country and province in China, it is of great theoretical and practical significance to study and design the theory and method approach for the development of regional sci-tech innovation platform.
This dissertation focuses on the theme of the modes and paths of networking development of regional sci-tech innovation platform based on three main theories, namely, innovation theory, social network theory and modern system theory. On the basis of analyzing network characteristics and evolutionary process of regional sci-tech innovation platform, some related approaches and strategic system are discussed in this dissertation.
This dissertation describes several aspects in the literature in the area of innovation platform, and discusses relevant issues of networking development. On the basis of these, the connotation and characteristics of regional sci-tech innovation platform are given, types of the platform are classified, the main subjects of the platform are described. Then the dissertation defines the concept of sci-tech innovation platform network, and discusses its structure and functions. By analyzing the connotation and forces of networking evolution, it also goes further beyond that and presents networking evolutionary stages. Overall, proceed from the strategic height of cooperation of multiple factors and the strategic management of sci-tech innovation platform organization, this dissertation provides a theoretical framework for networking development of sci-tech innovation platform with the system analysis and design methods. The framework is helpful for explaining the core idea that sci-tech innovation platform network is the direction of the future regional sci-tech innovation platform.
On the basis of analyzing internal and external influencing factors in the networking development of regional sci-tech innovation platform, this dissertation shows three networking development modes: balancing development mode, growth-pole development mode, pole-axis development mode. Also, it gives the connotation, feature, applicable conditions of every mode and provides principles, gists, standard for development mode selection.
This dissertation designs an evaluation system of networking development level which is composed of efficiency evaluation system and capability evaluation system for regional sci-tech innovation platform. It also presents a conception of networking development degree and builds a mathematical model of the relation between efficiency and capability. The efficiency evaluation system is designed with DEA based on the input and output of the platform. The capability evaluation system is designed with D-S theory based on the network characteristic and structure of the platform.
This paper designs three networking development pathes. Regional sci-tech innovation platform with characteristics of public welfare and strategic can’t develop healthily and smoothly without the support from government. From this perspective, government-led path is designed. Then based on the unique advantages of cooperation of government, industry, university and research, IURA-led path is designed. And enterprise-led path is designed from the angle of the enterprise as a main body in innovation. Also, the corresponding development strategies are put forward in various pathes.
On the basis of the above study, this dissertation makes an empirical research on the development mode and path of Heilongjiang’s sci-tech innovation platform. By analyzing its current situation, strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats, the development mode is established, the networking development level is evaluated, and corresponding strategies are put forward.
In a word, this dissertation attempts to make contributes to the formation and development of Chinese regional sci-tech innovation platform network by providing theoretical guidance and methodological support.
引文
[1] SCHUMPETER J A. Capitalism, socialism and democracy[M]. New York: Harper and Row, 1942:134-138.
[2] DOUGLASS C N. Economic performance through time: the limits to knowledge[J]. American Economic Review, 1994, 84(3): 68-359.
[3] FREEMAN C. The“National System of Innovation”in historical perspective[J]. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1995, (19): 5-24.
[4] MORGAN K. The learning region: institutions, innovation and region renewal[J]. Regional Studies, 1997, (5):233-247.
[5] DRUCKER P F. Management challenges for the 21st century[M]. New York: Harper Press, 1999: 124-125.
[6]沈岚,岳玉珠.制度创新推动科技创新的理论与实践[J].商业研究,2007,(7):57-58.
[7] MIREILLE M C, WIM J N. Factors influencing knowledge creation and innovation in an organization[J]. Journal of European Industrial Training, 2005, 29(2): 135-147.
[8]尚林,林泉.论技术创新和制度创新的关系——从四次技术革命中得到的启示[J].中国科技论坛,2004,(1):42-45.
[9] FELDMAN M P. The geography of innovation[M]. New York: Harper Press, 1994: 90-95.
[10] COOK P, HEIDENREICH M. Regional innovation system[M]. London and Bristol: UCL,1998: 451-452.
[11] WIIG H, WOOD M. What comprises a regional innovation system? An empirical study[C]. Regional Association Conference, Regional Futures: Past and Present,East and West,Gothenburg. Sweden, 1995, (5):231-238.
[12] CASSIOLATO J E, LASTRES H. National and regional systems of innovation in the Mercosur[C]. Prepared for the DRUIDs conferences on national innovation, 1999: 123-136.
[13] NEWMAN M E. Scientific collaboration networks.Ⅱ: shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality[J]. Physical Review E., 2001, 64(1): 016132.
[14] ADLER P S, KWON S. Social capital: prospects for a new concept [J].Academy of Management Review, 2002, 27(1): 17-40.
[15] BARABASI A L, JEONG H, NEDA Z. Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations[J]. Physica A, 2002, 311(3-4): 590-614.
[16] ELIZABETH C, THOMAS W V. The stability of centrality measures when network are sampled[J]. Social Network, 2003, (25): 283-307.
[17] JENSEN M. The use of relational discrimination to manage market entry when do social status and structural holes work against you[J]. The Academy of Management Journal, 2008, 51(4): 723-743.
[18] BONACICH P, HOLDREN A C, JOHNSTON M. Hyper-edges and multidimensional centrality[J]. Social Network, 2004, (26): 189-203.
[19]李愿.试论现代系统论对整体与部分范畴的丰富和发展[J].中央民族大学学报(社会科学版),1999,(1):99-107.
[20] FERENCZI T, CAMPOY-QUILES M, AGOSTINELLI T (eds.). Morphology evolution via self-organization and lateral and vertical diffusion in polymer: fullerene solar cell blends[J]. Nature Materials, 2008, (7): 158-164.
[21] CORNING P A. Synergy and self-organization in the evolution of complex systems [J]. Systems Research, 1995, (6): 89-121.
[22] ROBERT W R, DON E K. Self-organizing innovation networks: implications for globalization[J]. Technovation, 2004, (24): 187-197.
[23] EDWARD N. LORENZ. Deterministic nonperiodic flow[J]. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 1963, (20): 130-141.
[24] MANDELBROT B B. How long is the coast of Britain? Statistical self-similarity and fractional dimension[J]. Science, 1967, (155): 636-638.
[25] KRISHNAN V, GUPTA S. Appropriateness and impact of platform-based product development[J]. Management Science, 2001, 47(1):52-68.
[26] MCGRATH M E. Product strategy for high-technology companies[M]. Homewood IL: Irwin, 1995: 120-124.
[27] ROBERTSON D, ULRICH K. Planning for product platform[J]. Sloan Management Review, 1998, 39(4): 19-31.
[28] BALDWIN D, CLARK K B. Managing in an age of modularity[J]. Harvard Business Review, 1997, 75(5): 84-93.
[29] OTTATI G D. Cooperation and competition in the industrial district as an organization model[J]. European Planning Studies, 1994, 2(4): 463-483.
[30] SCHMITZ H, MUSYCK B. Industrial districts in Europe: policy lessons for developing countries[J]. World Developing, 1994, 22(6): 889-910.
[31] SHANE S, VENKATARAMAN S, MACMILLAN I. Cultural differences in innovation championing strategies[J]. Journal of Management, 1995, (21): 931-952.
[32] ASHEIM B T, ISAKSEN A. Regional innovation system: integration of local“Sticky”and global“Ubiquitous”knowledge[J]. Journal of Technology Transfer, 2002, (27): 77-86.
[33] CAMAGINI R. Innovation networks: spatial perspectives[M]. London, Belhaven Press, 1991: 213-218.
[34] COOKER P, URANGE M, ETXEBARRIA G. Regional innovation system: institutional and organizational dimension[J]. Research Policy, 1997, (26): 475-491.
[35] PARTHIBAN D, JONATHAN P. The implications of debt heterogeneity for R&D investment and firm performance[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2008, 51(2): 165-181.
[36] MOHNEN P, ROLLER L H. Complementarities in innovation policy[J]. European Economic Review, 2005, (49): 1431-1450.
[37] SAFIDADEH M H, FIELD G M, RITZMAN L P. Sourcing practices and boundaries of firm in the financial services industry[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2008, (29): 79-91.
[38] JOHNSON J L, SOHI R S. The development of interfirm partnering competence: platform for learning, learning activities, and consequences of learning[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2003, (56): 757-766.
[39] LARANJA M, UYARRA E, FLANAGAN K. Policies for science, technology and innovation: translating rationales into regional policies in a multi-level setting[J]. Research Policy, 2008, 37(5): 823-835.
[40] NICOLAS B, KARA G. Building an innovation platform[J]. European Business Forum, 2007, (8): 11-12.
[41] HICK D, SYLAN K J. Science policy for a highly collaborative science system[J]. Science and Public Policy, 1996, 23(1): 39-44.
[42] JACQUELINE Z, ANNE Z, LYNDA H. Identifying indicators of laboratory management performance: a multiple constituency approach[J]. Health CareManagement Review, 2001, 26(1): 40-54.
[43] BEHARA R S, TOJO T, CON K. Emphatic knowledge management: reverse simulation experiments in a learning laboratory[J]. International Journal of Information Technology & Management, 2008, 7(3): 1.
[44] FELDMAN J M. The managerial equation and innovation platforms: the case of link?ping and berzelius science park[J]. European Planning Studies, 2007, 15(9): 1027-1045.
[45] MAURA M, RODNEY M. High tech start-ups in University Science Park incubators: the relationship between the start-up's lifecycle progression and use of the incubator's resources[J]. Technovation, 2008, 28(5): 277-290.
[46] MICHAEL S, CHRISTOPH H. Specialization as strategy for business incubators: an assessment of the central German multimedia center[J]. Technovation, 2008, 28(7): 436-449.
[47] HU TAISHAN. Interaction among high-tech talent and its impact on innovation performance: a comparison of Taiwanese science parks at different stages of development[J]. European Planning Studies, 2008, 16(2): 163-187.
[48] VáZQUEZ M A, SIJDE P. Entrepreneurship encouragement and business development support at universities and science parks proposal for a new conceptualization[J]. Industry & Higher Education, 2008, 22(2): 37-48.
[49] SARFRAZ A. Main assessing and managing the university technology business incubator: an integrative framework[J]. Journal of Business 2005, (12): 285-351.
[50] PAULSON S K. Research notes: organizational size, technology, and structure: replication of study of study of social service agencies among small retail firms[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1980, 23(6): 341-347.
[51] STIFTER M, MAYR C, BRUNNER H. Idea: a GIS-based multi criteria decision platform to evaluate der integration[C]. International Conference on Electricity Distribution, Prague, June 2009: 8-11.
[52]刘继云.科技基础条件平台的运行机制初探[J].中国科技论坛,2005,(9):56-59.
[53]魏淑艳,娄成武.我国区域科技基础条件平台建设研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2006,(9):42-47.
[54]胡卓君.科技基础条件平台资源共享的本质与机理研究[J].科学管理研究,2006,(10):40-42.
[55]王桂凤,卢凡.我国科技条件平台建设进展及其思考[J].科技进步与对策,2006,(11):9-13.
[56]贺德方,谢科范.国家科技基础条件平台的系统动力学分析[J].中国软科学,2006,(12):52-57.
[57]张杰军,郭联卫,周元.国家科技基础条件平台建设与工程建设项目管理对比分析[J].中国科技论坛,2007,(4):20-23.
[58]张德英.国家科技基础平台与创新体系建设的思索[J].科学管理研究,2008,(8):52-55.
[59]王蓉,廖明丹,刘磊.国家自然科技资源共享平台安全保障措施研究[J].中国科技论坛,2007,(7):26-29.
[60]吴根,朱星华.关于国家重点实验室布局的分析与思考[J].中国科技论坛2007,(11):77-80.
[61]朱中群.加强区域科技创新体系平台建设的战略思考[J].科技与产业化,2005,(5):50-52.
[62]李晓娴,刘杰.上海研发公共服务平台子系统间协同机制研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2006,(10):31-34.
[63]黄晓虹,王东红,谢沛善.南宁高新企业科技创新信息服务平台的构建[J].商场现代化,2007,(10):219-220.
[64]张利华,陈钢,李颖明.基于系统失灵理论的区域科技创新服务平台研究[J].中国科技论坛,2007,(11):85-89.
[65]李立,矫学荣,王志虎.青岛楼山精细化工科技创新公共服务平台运行模式研究[J].中国科技论坛,2007,(9):91-95.
[66]陆立军,郑小碧.区域创新平台的企业参与机制研究[J].科研管理,2008,(3):122-127.
[67]吴国林.区域技术创新平台研究——大涌红木家具专业镇的技术创新平台建设[J].科技进步与对策,2005,(1):162-164.
[68]王意峰,马凤莉,杨志平,赵亚民等.对阳泉市科技服务平台建设的思考[J].科技情报开发与经济,2005,(24):136-138.
[69]郝立勤,赖于民.公共科技基础条件平台建设与政策探讨[J].科学学研究,2006,(8):103-107.
[70]魏淑艳,孟繁元.东北区域科技基础条件平台建设对策研究[J].科技进步与对策,2006,(12):91-93.
[71]肖雪葵.关于湖南省科技信息与科学数共享平台建设的研究报告[J].科技进步与对策,2007,(2):124-127.
[72]陈杰英.搭建全省科技人才服务平台,提升企业自主创新能力[J].科技管理研究,2007,(9):59-60.
[73]曹芙.创新服务传递知识——天津市科技文献共享服务平台建设纪实[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2007,(12):218-219.
[74]李啸,朱星华.广东科技创新平台建设的经验与启示[J].中国科技论坛,2007,(9):17-20.
[75]李啸,朱星华.浙江科技创新平台建设的经验与启示[J].中国科技论坛,2008,(3):39-43.
[76]郑庆昌,谭文华.试论地方科技条件平台建设的定位——以福建省为例[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2005,(6):46-49.
[77]谭文华,郑庆昌.论国家和地方科技条件建设的分工与互补关系[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2007,(4):37-39.
[78]薛捷,张振刚.国外产业共性技术创新平台建设的经验分析及其对我国的启示[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2006,(12):87-92.
[79]汪秀婷,胡树华.面向自主发展的产业技术创新平台的构建实践经验分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2007,(2):103-106.
[80]李聪,杜伟锦.浅谈行业技术创新平台的构建及评价[J].经济论坛,2007,(22):35-37.
[81]林莉,章守明.构建浙江丝绸产业技术创新公共平台的对策[J].改革与管理,2007,(9):5-7.
[82]陈艳莹,姜滨滨.共性技术创新平台与辽宁省企业自主创新能力的提升[J].科技管理研究,2008,(2):92-94.
[83]叶建木,张传红.民营高科技企业创新平台协同模式研究[J].武汉理工大学学报,2007,(8):38-41.
[84]马仁钊,翟运开.基于生态种群理论的虚拟企业创新平台研究[J].武汉理工大学学报,2007,(10):914-917.
[85]马仁钊,翟运开.面向知识经济的虚拟企业创新平台及其结构分析[J].科技进步与对策,2007,(11):89-92.
[86]马仁钊,翟运开.虚拟企业创新平台的运行模式研究[J].科技管理研究,2007,(12):39-41.
[87]苏跃增,徐剑波.高校科技创新平台建设的几个问题[J].教育发展研究,2006,(12):39-41.
[88]马卫华等.组建我国高校科技创新平台的对策分析[J].科技进步与对策,2007,(3):162-164.
[89]李学斌,樊新刚.民族地区地方院校科技创新平台建设的实践与探索[J].科研管理,2007,(4):37-40.
[90]于国波,张永宁,陈磊.高校科技创新平台的合作动力与运行机制研究[J].中国石油大学学报,2007,(8):98-101.
[91]罗震等.天津大学:搭建创新平台加快技术转移[J].中国高校科技与产业化,2008,(3):34-36.
[92]刘毅.高科技园区创新平台的运行机制研究[J].科技进步与对策,2005,(2):75-77.
[93]张平,姚威,陈劲.论大学科技园的产品创新平台建设[J].科研管理,2005,(10):62-67.
[94]叶春阳,刘璠.基于高新区的自主创新平台构建路径研究[J].特区经济,2007,(8):214-216.
[95]李文博,郑文哲.论企业集成创新系统的复杂性:混沌与分形[J].科学学研究,2006,(8):618-622.
[96] TAKASHI, TANIGUCHI. Self-consistent field theory and density functional theory for self-organization in polymeric systems[J]. Journal of the physical society of Japan, 2009, (78): 78-89.
[97]卢福财、周鹏.外部网络化与企业组织创新[J].中国工业经济,2004,(2):l01-106.
[98]田艳,周艳春.网络组织的动因及类型研究[J].山西高等学校社会科学学报,2003,(9):31-34.
[99]陈德权,司晓悦,王作宝.我国非营利科技中介机构发展模式探究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2007,(1):29-32.
[100] LAN P. Three new features of innovation brought about by information and communication technology information[J]. Information Technology and Management, 2004, (3): 3-17.
[101] MANNER M, GOWDY J. The evolution of social and moral behavior: evolutionary insights for public policy[J]. Ecological Economics, 2010, 69(4): 753-761.
[102] BONTIS N. National intellectual capital index: a United Nations initiative for the Arab region[J]. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2004, 1(5): 13-39.
[103] FAULKNER A. Regulatory policy as innovation: constructing rules of engagement for a technological zone of tissue engineering in the European Union[J]. Research Policy, 2009, 38 (4): 637-646.
[104] KLEINBERG J. The small-world phenomenon and decentralized search[J]. SIAM News, 2004, 37(3): 1-2.
[105] NILL J, KEMP R. Evolutionary approaches for sustainable innovation policies: from niche to paradigm?[J]. Research Policy, 2009, 38(4): 668-680.
[106]王黎娜,龚建立,温瑞珺.创新模型选择与自主创新能力提升机理研究[J].科技进步与对策,2006,(7):5-7.
[107]王子龙,谭清美.区域高新技术主导产业选择基准[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2004,(9):67-70.
[108]刘克立,彭水军,陈富华.主导产业的评价选择模型及应用[J].系统工程, 2003,(5):62-68.
[109]梁小依,高建平.自主创新引领区域发展的战略选择[J].科技进步与对策,2005,(10):21-22.
[110] CHARNES A, COOPER W W, PHODES E. Measuring the efficiency of DMU[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1978, (2): 429-444.
[111] CROSBY M. Patents: innovation and growth[J]. Economic Record, 2000, 76(3): 255-262.
[112] JAFFE A B. The U.S. patent system in transition: policy innovation and the innovation process[J]. Research Policy, 2000, 29(4-5): 531-557.
[113]李果,沈小勇,王应明.对决策单元进行排序的一种方法[J].预测,2000,(4):51-53.
[114] SIMSEK Z, MICHAEL H L, STEVEN W F. Inter-firm networks and entrepreneurial behavior: A structural embeddedness perspective[J]. Journal of Management, 2003, 29(3): 427-442.
[115] DEMPSTER A P. Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping[J]. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1967, 38(2): 325-339.
[116] SHAFER G A. A mathematical theory of evidence[M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1976: 12-36.
[117] DEMPSTER A P. Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multi-valued mapping[J]. Annuals of Mathematical Statistics, 1967, 38(2): 325-339.
[118] ZADEH L A. Review of books: a mathematical theory of evidence[J]. The AIMagazine, 1984, (3): 81-83.
[119] SMETS P. Belief functions on real numbers[J]. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 2005, 40(3):181-223.
[120] RONALD R, YAGER. On the dempster-shafer framework and new combination rules[J]. Information Sciences, 1987, (41): 93-138.
[121] LEFEVRE E, COLOT O, VANNOORENBERGHE P. Belief function combination and conflict management[J]. Information Fusion, 2002, 3(3): 149-162.
[122] MURPHY C K. Combining belief functions when evidence conflicts[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2000, 29(1): 1-9.
[123] YANG J B. Rule and utility based evidential reasoning approach for multiple attribute decision analysis under uncertainty[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2001, 31(1): 31-61.
[124] PODVEZKO, VALENTINAS. Application of AHP technique[J]. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 2009, (2): 181-189.
[125] RONDE P,HUSSLER C. Innovation in Regions: What does really Matter?[J]. Research Policy,2005, (34): 1150-1172.
[126] PIERCY N, GILES W. Making SWOT analysis work[J]. Marketing Intelligence & Planning. 1989, (7): 5-7.
[127]许涤龙.SPSS应用实验教程[M].湖南:湖南大学出版社,2007:230.
[128] PATRICK H, MARK I. Implementing TRIZ at pratt & whitney rocketdyne[J]. Knowledge Management Review, 2007, 9(6): 16-19.
[2] DOUGLASS C N. Economic performance through time: the limits to knowledge[J]. American Economic Review, 1994, 84(3): 68-359.
[3] FREEMAN C. The“National System of Innovation”in historical perspective[J]. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1995, (19): 5-24.
[4] MORGAN K. The learning region: institutions, innovation and region renewal[J]. Regional Studies, 1997, (5):233-247.
[5] DRUCKER P F. Management challenges for the 21st century[M]. New York: Harper Press, 1999: 124-125.
[6]沈岚,岳玉珠.制度创新推动科技创新的理论与实践[J].商业研究,2007,(7):57-58.
[7] MIREILLE M C, WIM J N. Factors influencing knowledge creation and innovation in an organization[J]. Journal of European Industrial Training, 2005, 29(2): 135-147.
[8]尚林,林泉.论技术创新和制度创新的关系——从四次技术革命中得到的启示[J].中国科技论坛,2004,(1):42-45.
[9] FELDMAN M P. The geography of innovation[M]. New York: Harper Press, 1994: 90-95.
[10] COOK P, HEIDENREICH M. Regional innovation system[M]. London and Bristol: UCL,1998: 451-452.
[11] WIIG H, WOOD M. What comprises a regional innovation system? An empirical study[C]. Regional Association Conference, Regional Futures: Past and Present,East and West,Gothenburg. Sweden, 1995, (5):231-238.
[12] CASSIOLATO J E, LASTRES H. National and regional systems of innovation in the Mercosur[C]. Prepared for the DRUIDs conferences on national innovation, 1999: 123-136.
[13] NEWMAN M E. Scientific collaboration networks.Ⅱ: shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality[J]. Physical Review E., 2001, 64(1): 016132.
[14] ADLER P S, KWON S. Social capital: prospects for a new concept [J].Academy of Management Review, 2002, 27(1): 17-40.
[15] BARABASI A L, JEONG H, NEDA Z. Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations[J]. Physica A, 2002, 311(3-4): 590-614.
[16] ELIZABETH C, THOMAS W V. The stability of centrality measures when network are sampled[J]. Social Network, 2003, (25): 283-307.
[17] JENSEN M. The use of relational discrimination to manage market entry when do social status and structural holes work against you[J]. The Academy of Management Journal, 2008, 51(4): 723-743.
[18] BONACICH P, HOLDREN A C, JOHNSTON M. Hyper-edges and multidimensional centrality[J]. Social Network, 2004, (26): 189-203.
[19]李愿.试论现代系统论对整体与部分范畴的丰富和发展[J].中央民族大学学报(社会科学版),1999,(1):99-107.
[20] FERENCZI T, CAMPOY-QUILES M, AGOSTINELLI T (eds.). Morphology evolution via self-organization and lateral and vertical diffusion in polymer: fullerene solar cell blends[J]. Nature Materials, 2008, (7): 158-164.
[21] CORNING P A. Synergy and self-organization in the evolution of complex systems [J]. Systems Research, 1995, (6): 89-121.
[22] ROBERT W R, DON E K. Self-organizing innovation networks: implications for globalization[J]. Technovation, 2004, (24): 187-197.
[23] EDWARD N. LORENZ. Deterministic nonperiodic flow[J]. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 1963, (20): 130-141.
[24] MANDELBROT B B. How long is the coast of Britain? Statistical self-similarity and fractional dimension[J]. Science, 1967, (155): 636-638.
[25] KRISHNAN V, GUPTA S. Appropriateness and impact of platform-based product development[J]. Management Science, 2001, 47(1):52-68.
[26] MCGRATH M E. Product strategy for high-technology companies[M]. Homewood IL: Irwin, 1995: 120-124.
[27] ROBERTSON D, ULRICH K. Planning for product platform[J]. Sloan Management Review, 1998, 39(4): 19-31.
[28] BALDWIN D, CLARK K B. Managing in an age of modularity[J]. Harvard Business Review, 1997, 75(5): 84-93.
[29] OTTATI G D. Cooperation and competition in the industrial district as an organization model[J]. European Planning Studies, 1994, 2(4): 463-483.
[30] SCHMITZ H, MUSYCK B. Industrial districts in Europe: policy lessons for developing countries[J]. World Developing, 1994, 22(6): 889-910.
[31] SHANE S, VENKATARAMAN S, MACMILLAN I. Cultural differences in innovation championing strategies[J]. Journal of Management, 1995, (21): 931-952.
[32] ASHEIM B T, ISAKSEN A. Regional innovation system: integration of local“Sticky”and global“Ubiquitous”knowledge[J]. Journal of Technology Transfer, 2002, (27): 77-86.
[33] CAMAGINI R. Innovation networks: spatial perspectives[M]. London, Belhaven Press, 1991: 213-218.
[34] COOKER P, URANGE M, ETXEBARRIA G. Regional innovation system: institutional and organizational dimension[J]. Research Policy, 1997, (26): 475-491.
[35] PARTHIBAN D, JONATHAN P. The implications of debt heterogeneity for R&D investment and firm performance[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2008, 51(2): 165-181.
[36] MOHNEN P, ROLLER L H. Complementarities in innovation policy[J]. European Economic Review, 2005, (49): 1431-1450.
[37] SAFIDADEH M H, FIELD G M, RITZMAN L P. Sourcing practices and boundaries of firm in the financial services industry[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2008, (29): 79-91.
[38] JOHNSON J L, SOHI R S. The development of interfirm partnering competence: platform for learning, learning activities, and consequences of learning[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2003, (56): 757-766.
[39] LARANJA M, UYARRA E, FLANAGAN K. Policies for science, technology and innovation: translating rationales into regional policies in a multi-level setting[J]. Research Policy, 2008, 37(5): 823-835.
[40] NICOLAS B, KARA G. Building an innovation platform[J]. European Business Forum, 2007, (8): 11-12.
[41] HICK D, SYLAN K J. Science policy for a highly collaborative science system[J]. Science and Public Policy, 1996, 23(1): 39-44.
[42] JACQUELINE Z, ANNE Z, LYNDA H. Identifying indicators of laboratory management performance: a multiple constituency approach[J]. Health CareManagement Review, 2001, 26(1): 40-54.
[43] BEHARA R S, TOJO T, CON K. Emphatic knowledge management: reverse simulation experiments in a learning laboratory[J]. International Journal of Information Technology & Management, 2008, 7(3): 1.
[44] FELDMAN J M. The managerial equation and innovation platforms: the case of link?ping and berzelius science park[J]. European Planning Studies, 2007, 15(9): 1027-1045.
[45] MAURA M, RODNEY M. High tech start-ups in University Science Park incubators: the relationship between the start-up's lifecycle progression and use of the incubator's resources[J]. Technovation, 2008, 28(5): 277-290.
[46] MICHAEL S, CHRISTOPH H. Specialization as strategy for business incubators: an assessment of the central German multimedia center[J]. Technovation, 2008, 28(7): 436-449.
[47] HU TAISHAN. Interaction among high-tech talent and its impact on innovation performance: a comparison of Taiwanese science parks at different stages of development[J]. European Planning Studies, 2008, 16(2): 163-187.
[48] VáZQUEZ M A, SIJDE P. Entrepreneurship encouragement and business development support at universities and science parks proposal for a new conceptualization[J]. Industry & Higher Education, 2008, 22(2): 37-48.
[49] SARFRAZ A. Main assessing and managing the university technology business incubator: an integrative framework[J]. Journal of Business 2005, (12): 285-351.
[50] PAULSON S K. Research notes: organizational size, technology, and structure: replication of study of study of social service agencies among small retail firms[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1980, 23(6): 341-347.
[51] STIFTER M, MAYR C, BRUNNER H. Idea: a GIS-based multi criteria decision platform to evaluate der integration[C]. International Conference on Electricity Distribution, Prague, June 2009: 8-11.
[52]刘继云.科技基础条件平台的运行机制初探[J].中国科技论坛,2005,(9):56-59.
[53]魏淑艳,娄成武.我国区域科技基础条件平台建设研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2006,(9):42-47.
[54]胡卓君.科技基础条件平台资源共享的本质与机理研究[J].科学管理研究,2006,(10):40-42.
[55]王桂凤,卢凡.我国科技条件平台建设进展及其思考[J].科技进步与对策,2006,(11):9-13.
[56]贺德方,谢科范.国家科技基础条件平台的系统动力学分析[J].中国软科学,2006,(12):52-57.
[57]张杰军,郭联卫,周元.国家科技基础条件平台建设与工程建设项目管理对比分析[J].中国科技论坛,2007,(4):20-23.
[58]张德英.国家科技基础平台与创新体系建设的思索[J].科学管理研究,2008,(8):52-55.
[59]王蓉,廖明丹,刘磊.国家自然科技资源共享平台安全保障措施研究[J].中国科技论坛,2007,(7):26-29.
[60]吴根,朱星华.关于国家重点实验室布局的分析与思考[J].中国科技论坛2007,(11):77-80.
[61]朱中群.加强区域科技创新体系平台建设的战略思考[J].科技与产业化,2005,(5):50-52.
[62]李晓娴,刘杰.上海研发公共服务平台子系统间协同机制研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2006,(10):31-34.
[63]黄晓虹,王东红,谢沛善.南宁高新企业科技创新信息服务平台的构建[J].商场现代化,2007,(10):219-220.
[64]张利华,陈钢,李颖明.基于系统失灵理论的区域科技创新服务平台研究[J].中国科技论坛,2007,(11):85-89.
[65]李立,矫学荣,王志虎.青岛楼山精细化工科技创新公共服务平台运行模式研究[J].中国科技论坛,2007,(9):91-95.
[66]陆立军,郑小碧.区域创新平台的企业参与机制研究[J].科研管理,2008,(3):122-127.
[67]吴国林.区域技术创新平台研究——大涌红木家具专业镇的技术创新平台建设[J].科技进步与对策,2005,(1):162-164.
[68]王意峰,马凤莉,杨志平,赵亚民等.对阳泉市科技服务平台建设的思考[J].科技情报开发与经济,2005,(24):136-138.
[69]郝立勤,赖于民.公共科技基础条件平台建设与政策探讨[J].科学学研究,2006,(8):103-107.
[70]魏淑艳,孟繁元.东北区域科技基础条件平台建设对策研究[J].科技进步与对策,2006,(12):91-93.
[71]肖雪葵.关于湖南省科技信息与科学数共享平台建设的研究报告[J].科技进步与对策,2007,(2):124-127.
[72]陈杰英.搭建全省科技人才服务平台,提升企业自主创新能力[J].科技管理研究,2007,(9):59-60.
[73]曹芙.创新服务传递知识——天津市科技文献共享服务平台建设纪实[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2007,(12):218-219.
[74]李啸,朱星华.广东科技创新平台建设的经验与启示[J].中国科技论坛,2007,(9):17-20.
[75]李啸,朱星华.浙江科技创新平台建设的经验与启示[J].中国科技论坛,2008,(3):39-43.
[76]郑庆昌,谭文华.试论地方科技条件平台建设的定位——以福建省为例[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2005,(6):46-49.
[77]谭文华,郑庆昌.论国家和地方科技条件建设的分工与互补关系[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2007,(4):37-39.
[78]薛捷,张振刚.国外产业共性技术创新平台建设的经验分析及其对我国的启示[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2006,(12):87-92.
[79]汪秀婷,胡树华.面向自主发展的产业技术创新平台的构建实践经验分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2007,(2):103-106.
[80]李聪,杜伟锦.浅谈行业技术创新平台的构建及评价[J].经济论坛,2007,(22):35-37.
[81]林莉,章守明.构建浙江丝绸产业技术创新公共平台的对策[J].改革与管理,2007,(9):5-7.
[82]陈艳莹,姜滨滨.共性技术创新平台与辽宁省企业自主创新能力的提升[J].科技管理研究,2008,(2):92-94.
[83]叶建木,张传红.民营高科技企业创新平台协同模式研究[J].武汉理工大学学报,2007,(8):38-41.
[84]马仁钊,翟运开.基于生态种群理论的虚拟企业创新平台研究[J].武汉理工大学学报,2007,(10):914-917.
[85]马仁钊,翟运开.面向知识经济的虚拟企业创新平台及其结构分析[J].科技进步与对策,2007,(11):89-92.
[86]马仁钊,翟运开.虚拟企业创新平台的运行模式研究[J].科技管理研究,2007,(12):39-41.
[87]苏跃增,徐剑波.高校科技创新平台建设的几个问题[J].教育发展研究,2006,(12):39-41.
[88]马卫华等.组建我国高校科技创新平台的对策分析[J].科技进步与对策,2007,(3):162-164.
[89]李学斌,樊新刚.民族地区地方院校科技创新平台建设的实践与探索[J].科研管理,2007,(4):37-40.
[90]于国波,张永宁,陈磊.高校科技创新平台的合作动力与运行机制研究[J].中国石油大学学报,2007,(8):98-101.
[91]罗震等.天津大学:搭建创新平台加快技术转移[J].中国高校科技与产业化,2008,(3):34-36.
[92]刘毅.高科技园区创新平台的运行机制研究[J].科技进步与对策,2005,(2):75-77.
[93]张平,姚威,陈劲.论大学科技园的产品创新平台建设[J].科研管理,2005,(10):62-67.
[94]叶春阳,刘璠.基于高新区的自主创新平台构建路径研究[J].特区经济,2007,(8):214-216.
[95]李文博,郑文哲.论企业集成创新系统的复杂性:混沌与分形[J].科学学研究,2006,(8):618-622.
[96] TAKASHI, TANIGUCHI. Self-consistent field theory and density functional theory for self-organization in polymeric systems[J]. Journal of the physical society of Japan, 2009, (78): 78-89.
[97]卢福财、周鹏.外部网络化与企业组织创新[J].中国工业经济,2004,(2):l01-106.
[98]田艳,周艳春.网络组织的动因及类型研究[J].山西高等学校社会科学学报,2003,(9):31-34.
[99]陈德权,司晓悦,王作宝.我国非营利科技中介机构发展模式探究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2007,(1):29-32.
[100] LAN P. Three new features of innovation brought about by information and communication technology information[J]. Information Technology and Management, 2004, (3): 3-17.
[101] MANNER M, GOWDY J. The evolution of social and moral behavior: evolutionary insights for public policy[J]. Ecological Economics, 2010, 69(4): 753-761.
[102] BONTIS N. National intellectual capital index: a United Nations initiative for the Arab region[J]. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2004, 1(5): 13-39.
[103] FAULKNER A. Regulatory policy as innovation: constructing rules of engagement for a technological zone of tissue engineering in the European Union[J]. Research Policy, 2009, 38 (4): 637-646.
[104] KLEINBERG J. The small-world phenomenon and decentralized search[J]. SIAM News, 2004, 37(3): 1-2.
[105] NILL J, KEMP R. Evolutionary approaches for sustainable innovation policies: from niche to paradigm?[J]. Research Policy, 2009, 38(4): 668-680.
[106]王黎娜,龚建立,温瑞珺.创新模型选择与自主创新能力提升机理研究[J].科技进步与对策,2006,(7):5-7.
[107]王子龙,谭清美.区域高新技术主导产业选择基准[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2004,(9):67-70.
[108]刘克立,彭水军,陈富华.主导产业的评价选择模型及应用[J].系统工程, 2003,(5):62-68.
[109]梁小依,高建平.自主创新引领区域发展的战略选择[J].科技进步与对策,2005,(10):21-22.
[110] CHARNES A, COOPER W W, PHODES E. Measuring the efficiency of DMU[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1978, (2): 429-444.
[111] CROSBY M. Patents: innovation and growth[J]. Economic Record, 2000, 76(3): 255-262.
[112] JAFFE A B. The U.S. patent system in transition: policy innovation and the innovation process[J]. Research Policy, 2000, 29(4-5): 531-557.
[113]李果,沈小勇,王应明.对决策单元进行排序的一种方法[J].预测,2000,(4):51-53.
[114] SIMSEK Z, MICHAEL H L, STEVEN W F. Inter-firm networks and entrepreneurial behavior: A structural embeddedness perspective[J]. Journal of Management, 2003, 29(3): 427-442.
[115] DEMPSTER A P. Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping[J]. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1967, 38(2): 325-339.
[116] SHAFER G A. A mathematical theory of evidence[M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1976: 12-36.
[117] DEMPSTER A P. Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multi-valued mapping[J]. Annuals of Mathematical Statistics, 1967, 38(2): 325-339.
[118] ZADEH L A. Review of books: a mathematical theory of evidence[J]. The AIMagazine, 1984, (3): 81-83.
[119] SMETS P. Belief functions on real numbers[J]. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 2005, 40(3):181-223.
[120] RONALD R, YAGER. On the dempster-shafer framework and new combination rules[J]. Information Sciences, 1987, (41): 93-138.
[121] LEFEVRE E, COLOT O, VANNOORENBERGHE P. Belief function combination and conflict management[J]. Information Fusion, 2002, 3(3): 149-162.
[122] MURPHY C K. Combining belief functions when evidence conflicts[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2000, 29(1): 1-9.
[123] YANG J B. Rule and utility based evidential reasoning approach for multiple attribute decision analysis under uncertainty[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2001, 31(1): 31-61.
[124] PODVEZKO, VALENTINAS. Application of AHP technique[J]. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 2009, (2): 181-189.
[125] RONDE P,HUSSLER C. Innovation in Regions: What does really Matter?[J]. Research Policy,2005, (34): 1150-1172.
[126] PIERCY N, GILES W. Making SWOT analysis work[J]. Marketing Intelligence & Planning. 1989, (7): 5-7.
[127]许涤龙.SPSS应用实验教程[M].湖南:湖南大学出版社,2007:230.
[128] PATRICK H, MARK I. Implementing TRIZ at pratt & whitney rocketdyne[J]. Knowledge Management Review, 2007, 9(6): 16-19.