用户名: 密码: 验证码:
基于羊群效应的投资者跟随行为研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
现有羊群行为理论将跟随者观察到其他投资者行为作为投资的前提假设,已经成功解释了诸多复杂金融现象。但是,已有理论并没有对影响跟随者跟随策略的因素进行深入的探讨,也缺少在微观方面对对跟随者行为特点的研究。本文的目的就是在对经典羊群行为理论梳理的基础上,找到影响我国证券市场投资者跟随行为的影响因素,并研究这些具体因素是如何影响跟随者的行为。
     本文通过分析我国证券市场的环境特色,将投资者在证券市场上观察到的由其他投资者投资行为所反映出未来股票价格信息看作是一个随机过程。通过建立跟随者的效用函数,利用动态最优化理论构建了羊群跟随者决策模型,分析了不同因素对投资者跟随行为的影响。在考虑其他跟随者的影响基础上将模型进行了扩展,并与初始模型结论进行比较,探讨了存在其他跟随者时对研究目标最优跟随策略的影响。最后,将行为金融学中时间偏好不一致的假设引入到最优跟随策略的模型中,讨论具有该特点的跟随者的行为模式。通过上述三个模型得到了六个有待检验的结论。
     根据本文第三章模型Ⅰ、模型Ⅱ的结论,投资者的跟随行为会受到必要报酬率、股票波动率等因素的影响,为我们研究我国机构投资者的羊群效应提供了切入口。运用所建模型对机构投资者的跟随行为进行经验研究。首先对机构投资者的特点进行分析;其次回顾了机构投资者的非理性行为,结合中外研究结果,分析研究我国机构投资者的独特之处;然后利用面板数据的分析方法,考察股票收益率因素、上市公司财务因素以及公司股权结构等不同因素对整体机构投资者当期的持股数量和持股比例的影响;最后考察了不同类型投资者的投资行为。
     在当前中国股票市场上已上市流通的股票,一般情况下均有涨跌幅的限制,每天股票价格只能在前一交易日收盘价格的上下10%内进行浮动。这种制度设计的目的是防止股票在一日之内剧烈波动,使得引起股票价格上涨的信息能够有足够的时间披露给市场,起到了稳定股票市场的作用。但事物总有正反两个方面:涨跌幅的限制会引起股票的价格在当日没有充分反映股票的内在价值。根据第三章模型Ⅲ的结论,当股票价格上涨至一定程度后,其他投资人会由于决策时间变短而变得更不理智,引起跟随者提前投资。很多有资金实力的投资者会利用市场的这种机制,通过操纵股票价格使其在短期内获得不菲的收益。但这种操纵出现的频率往往在整体股票市场比较活跃的阶段比较高,因为整体证券市场活跃会使得更多的跟随者跟随,因此在整体证券市场活跃的阶段,每一交易日涨停的股票较多。
     为了研究该现象背后的形成机制以及对股票价格的影响,本文在模型Ⅲ的基础上,针对股票涨跌停的制度进行了专门研究。考虑在股票涨停的事件下,对其他投资者由于不能按照常规的效用进行决策,所引起投资者非理性行为的影响进行实证分析,并利用马尔可夫模型对中国证券市场状态进行科学区分,根据分析的结果选择研究涨停事件的时间段;在分类的基础上利用多元统计分析,重点考察在股票涨停情况下,各种投资者的投资行为,并分析这种投资行为能否为投资者带来长期的超额收益。
     通过上述研究,找到了影响投资跟随者投资决策的各种因素,并且对机构投资者投资行为的实证检验也验证了模型的有效性,同时还对我国涨停事件的形成机制提出了相关的政策建议。
     综上,本文的创新点体现在以下三个方面:
     一、应用行为金融理论,构筑了不同状态下羊群行为跟随者的跟随时机选择模型,研究影响其行为的因素;
     二、应用跟随时机选择模型,对影响机构投资者跟随行为的主要因素分别构建了相应的测量模型并进行验证;
     三、针对股票涨停事件中的中小投资者跟随行为,应用跟随时机选择模型构建了相应的测量模型,并对股票价格的影响进行分析。
In this paper, we expand the classic herd behavior theory. Though analyzing the Chinese specific stock market environment, we treat the stock price, which inferred from the first investor's behavior, as a stochastic process. Using the dynamic theory, we find when one of the herd do invest and analyze the impact factors. After that, we expand our model to include all herds to follow. We compare the outcome of new model to the previous finding. Finally, we take the time-inconsistency preference into consideration, which would occur when the stock price suddenly rise into the upper price limit, and draw interesting findings. Above all, we have six conclusions, which will be empirically tested.
     According to the Model I and ModelⅡ's conclusion, stock market average returns, stock volatility and other factors would impact herd behavior. This provides us the entry point to study the herding of institutional investor. We successfully test the model's conclusion. First, we analyze the characteristics of institutional investors; Second we review of the irrational behavior of institutional investors; then we use the panel data analyze various factors, how which would impact the overall institutional investors herding behavior. Finally, we examine and compare the investment behavior of different types of investor:funds, brokerage, brokerage financial products, QFII, insurance companies, pension funds, annuity, trust companies, finance companies, banks, general corporate, non-financial listed companies.
     According to the ModelⅢ's conclusion, when the stock price rapidly rises to the upper limit, the investor may be surfer the time-inconsistency preference problem, which would strongly trigger herding behavior. So there are someone would utilize this mechanism to get profit. We use high-frequency data to study whether stock rise to the upper limit is manipulated or not. Firstly, we utilizes Markov switching model to study Chinese stock market volatility. Based on Shanghai Composite Index's historical data, we estimate the parameters of Markov switching model and get the figure of the whole sample smooth probability. WE uses this nonlinear method to accurately classify the different period by the volatility. Based the classified period, utilizing the high frequency stock data, we statistically analyze various factors impact the second day's stock price return after the stock up to the limit broad. We empirically verify the stock price's different behaviors respectively caused by new information or price manipulation. According to our conclusion, we propose advises to improve Chinese Stock Price Limit System.
引文
[1]Scharfstein D. S., Stein J. C., Herd Behavior and Investment, American Economic Review, 1990,80(3):465-479
    [2]Lakonishok J., Shleifer A., Vishny R.W., the Impact of Institutional Trading on Stock Prices, Journal of Financial Economics,1992,32:23-43
    [3]Banerjee A. V., A Simple Model of Herd Behavior, Quarterly Journal of Economics,1992, 107(3):797-817
    [4]Devnow A., Welch I., Rational Herding in Financial Economics, European Economic Review, 1996 (40):603-615
    [5]Shiller R. J., Conversation, Information and Herd Behavior, American Economic Review,1995, (85):181-185
    [6]Bikhchandani S., Sharma S., Herd Behavior in Financial Markets, IMF Staff Papers,2001, 47(3):279-310
    [7]Nofsinger J. R., Sias R. D., Herding and feedback trading by institutional and individual investors, Journal of Finance,1999,54(6):2263-2295
    [8]Avery C., Zemsky P., "Multidimensional Uncertainty and Herd Behavior in Financial Markets", American Economic Review,1998,88(4):724-728
    [9]Hirshleifer D. A., Teoh S. H., Herd Behavior and Cascading in Capital Markets:A Review and Synthesis, European Financial Management,2003,9 (1):25-66
    [10]Wermers R., Mutual Fund Herding and the Impact on Stock prices, Journal of Finance,1999, 54:581-622
    [11]Froot K. A., Scharfstein D. S., Stein J. C., Herd on the Street:Informational Inefficiencies in a Market with Short-term Speculation, Journal of Finance,1992,47:1461-1484
    [12]Hirshleifer D. A., Subrahmanyam A., Titman S., Security Analysis and Trading Patterns when Some Investors Receive Information before Others, Journal of Finance,1994,49(5): 1665-1698
    [13]Falkenstein E. G., Preferences for Stock Characteristics as Revealed by Mutual Fund Portfolio Holdings, Journal of Finance,1996,51:111-135
    [14]宋军,证券市场中的羊群行为研究,上海:复旦大学出版社,2006
    [15]Akerlof G. A., A theory of social custom, of which unemployment may be one consequence, The Quarterly Journal of Economics,1980,94(4):749-775
    [16]Ellison G., Fudenberg D., Rules of thumb for social learning, Journal of Political Economy, 1993,101:612-643
    [17]Ellison G., Fudenberg D., Word of mouth communication and social learning, Quarterly Journal of Economics,1995,11-0:93-126
    [18]Hirshleifer D. A., Lim S. S., Teoh S. H., Disclosure to an Audience with Limited Attention, SSRN Working Paper,2004, October 11
    [19]Shleifer A., Summers L. H., The Noise Trader Approach to Finance, Journal of Economic Perspectives,1990,4(2):19-33
    [20]Bernardo A., Welch I., On the evolution of overconfidence and entrepreneurs, Journal of Economics and Management Strategy,2001,10:301-330
    [21]Bikhchandani S., Hirshleifer D., Welch I., A theory of Fads, Fashion, Custom and Cultural Change as Informational Cascades, Journal of Political Economy,1992,100(5):992-1026
    [22]Scharfstein D. S., Stein J. C., Herd Behavior and Investment, American Economic Review, 1990,80(3):465-479
    [23]Trueman B., Analyst Forecasts and Herding Behavior, Review of Financial Studies,1994, (7): 97-124
    [24]Zwiebel J. C., Conservatism and Relative Compensation, Journal of Political Economy,1995, 103(1):1-25
    [25]Lee I. H., on the Convergence of Informational Cascades, Journal of Economics Theory,1993, 61:395-411
    [26]Chamley C., Gale D., Information Revelation and Strategic Delay in a Model of Investment, Econometrica,1994,62:1065-1085
    [27]Pesrons J., Warther V. B., Bust Patterns in the Adoption of Financial Innovations, Review of Financial Studies,1997,10(4):939-967
    [28]Chamley C., Coordinating Regime Switches, Quarterly Journal of Economics,1999,114(4): 869-905
    [29]Chari V., Kehoe P., Financial Crises as herds, Working Paper, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis,2002
    [30]Scharfstein D. S., Stein J. C., Herd Behavior and Investment, American Economic Review, 1990,80(3):465-479
    [31]Graham J. R., Herding among Investment Newsletters:Theory and Evidence, Journal of Finance,1999,54:237-268
    [32]Prendergast C., Stole L., Impetuous Youngsters and Jaded Old timers:An Analysis of Behavioral Decision-Making Rules, Journal of Political Economy,1996,104(6):1105-1134
    [33]Trueman B., Analyst Forecasts and Herding Behavior, Review of Financial Studies,1994, (7): 97-124
    [34]Roll R., A Mean/Variance Analysis of Tracking Error, Journal of PortfolioManagement,1992, 18(4):13-22
    [35]Maug E., Naik N., Herding and Delegated Portfolio Management, mimeo, London Business School,1996
    [36]Admati A. R., Pfleiderer P., Does It All Add Up? Benchmarks and the Compensation of Active Portfolio Managers, Journal of Business,1997,70(3):323-350
    [37]孙培源,施东晖,中国证券市场羊群行为实证研究,证券市场导报,2004,(8):39-43
    [38]Friend I., Blume M., Crockett J., Mutual Funds and Other Institutional Investors, McGraw Hill, New York,1970
    [39]Kraus A., Stoll H. R., Parallel Trading by Institutional Investors, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,1972,7(5):2107-2138
    [40]Grinblatt M., Titman S., Wermers R., Momentum Investment Strategies, Portfolio Performance, and Herding:A Study of Mutual Fund Behavior, American Economic Review, 1995,85:1088-1105
    [41]Chevalier J., Ellison G., Career Concerns of Mutual Fund Managers, Quarterly Journal of Economics,1999,114(2):389-432
    [42]饶育蕾,王盛,张轮,基于行业投资组合的投资基金羊群行为模型与实证,管理评论,2004,16(12):24-32
    [43]祁斌,袁克,胡倩,周春生,我国证券投资基金羊群行为的实证研究,证券市场导报,2006,(12):49-57
    [44]陈浩,中国股票市场机构投资者羊群行为实证研究,南开经济研究,2004,(2):91-94
    [45]吴福龙,曾勇,唐小我,中国证券投资基金羊群行为的进一步研究,中国管理科学, 2004,12(4):6-11
    [46]施东晖,证券投资基金的交易行为及其市场影响,世界经济,2001,(10):26-31
    [47]Stickel S. E., Predicting Individual Analyst Earnings Forecasts, Journal of Accounting,1990, 28:409-417
    [48]Welch I., Herding among Security Analysts, Journal of Financial Economics,2000,58: 369-396
    [49]Hong H., Kubik J., Solomon A., Security Analysts, Career Concerns and Herding of Earnings Forecasts, Rand Journal of Economics,2000,31:121-144
    [50]Bernhardt D., Campello M., Kutsoati E., Who Herds? Journal of Financial Economics,2006, 80:657-675
    [51]宋军,吴冲锋,中国股评家的羊群行为研究,管理科学学报,2003,6(1):68-74
    [52]Patel J., Zeckhauser R., Hendrick S. D., the Rationality Struggle:Illustrations from Financial Markets, American Economic Review,1991,81:231-236
    [53]Berger A. N., Humphrey D. B., "Efficiency of financial institutions:International survey and directions for future research", European Journal of Operational Research,1997,98: 175-212
    [54]Todd M., Arnoud W. A., Anjan V., Megamergers and expanded scope:Theories of bank size and activity diversity, Journal of Banking & Finance,1999,23(2-4):195-214
    [55]Kinoshita Y., Mody A., Private Information for Foreign Investment in Emerging Countries, Canadian Journal of Economics,2001,34:448-464
    [56]黄娟娟,行为股利政策——基于我国上市公司股利“群聚”现象的研究,厦门大学博士学位论文,2009
    [57]赵保国、甘茂智,市场压力与羊群行为--基于中国证券市场实证分析的一个改进,财经问题研究,2005(11):22-26
    [58]常志平,蒋馥,基于上证30及深圳成指的我国股票市场“羊群行为”的实证研究,预测,2002,21(3):49-51
    [59]蒋学雷、陈敏、王国明、吴国富,股票市场的流动性度量的动态ACD模型,统计研究,2004,No.4,42-44
    [60]徐瑾,侯晓阳,中国证券投资基金羊群行为的实证研究,当代经济科学,2004(06):20-22
    [61]向锐;,李琪琦,中国机构投资者羊群行为实证分析,山西财经大学学报,2006(02):40-43
    [62]祁斌,袁克,胡倩,周春生,我国证券投资基金羊群行为的实证研究,证券市场导报,2006(12):31-35
    [63]胡赫男、吴世农,我国基金羊群行为:测度与影响因素,经济学家,2006(06):41-47
    [64]Banerjee, Abhijit V. (1992) "A Simple Model of Herd Behavior." Quarterly Journal of Economics,107 (3), pp.797-817.
    [65]Bikhchandani, Sushil; Hirshleifer, David and Welch, Ivo. (1992) "A Theory of Fashion,Custom,and Cultural Change." Journal of Political Economy,100(5), pp.992-1026.
    [66]Lee, Charles.,Andrei Shleifer and Richard Thaler(1991)"Investor Sentiment and the Closed-End Fund Puzzle."Journal of finance,46,75-109.
    [67]Malkii, Burton G. (1977) "The Valuation of Closed-end Investment Company Shares." Journal of Finance,32,847-859.
    [68]Sehartfein,D., and Stein, J. (1990), "HerdBehaviorandInvestment", The Ameriean Eeonomie Review,80:465-479.
    [69]DEVENOW, A. and I. WELCH,1996. Rational Herding in Financial Economics. European Economic Review.
    [70]Smith, L.& Sorensen, P.,1994. "An Exemple of Non-Martingale Learning," Working papers 94-25, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
    [71]Avery, Christopher and Peter Zemsky.1998. "Multidimensional Uncertainty and Herd Behavior in Financial Markets" American Economic Review,88 (4),724-748.
    [72]Ellison, Glenn & Fudenberg, Drew,1995. "Word-of-Mouth Communication and Social Learning," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press, vol.110(1), pages 93-125, February.
    [73]Cont, R. (1997), "Scaling Properties of Intro-day Price changes", working paper of Science and Finance
    [74]Maug, E. and N. Naik (1995), "Herding and delegated portfolio management:The impact of relative performance evaluation on asset allocation", London Business School Working Paper.
    [75]Allen, Franklin & Gale, Douglas,1992. "Measurement Distortion and Missing Contingencies in Optimal Contracts," Economic Theory, Springer, vol.2(1), pages 1-26, January.
    [76]Hamilton J.1989, "A new app roach to the economic analysis of nonstationary time series and the business cycle". Econometrica,57:357-384.
    [77]Kim C J.1994, "Dynamic linear models with Markov switching". Journal of Econometrics, 60:1-22.
    [78]Hamilton J.1990, "Analysis of time series subject to changes in regime" Journal of Econometrics,45:39-70.
    [79]Schwert G William.1990, "Stock volatility and the crash of 87". The Review of Financial Studies,3(1):77-102.
    [80]Greenwald B C, Stein J C.1991, "Transaction risk, market crashes, and the role of circuit breakers". Journal of Business,64,443-462.
    [8q]Chan K C, Chen N F.1991 "Structural and return characteristics of small and large firms". Journal of Finance,46:1467-1484.
    [82]Chen H.1998 "Price limits, overreaction, and price resolution in futures markets" Journal of Futures Markets 18:243-263.
    [83]Lauterbach, Beni,Vri Ben-Zion.1993, "Stock market crashes and the performance of circuit breakers:Empirical evidence ". Journal of Finance,48:1909-1925.
    [84]Lehmann B N, Modest D M.1994, "Trading and liquidity on the Tokyo Stock Exchange:A bird's eye view ". Journal of Finance,48(4):1595-1628.
    [85]Kenneth A.Kim Piman Limpaphayom 2000,'Characteristics of stocks that frequently hit price limits:empirical evidence from Taiwan and Thailand". Journal of Financial Markets,3: 315-332.
    [86]饶育蕾,刘达峰著,《行为金融学》,上海,上海财经大学出版社,2003
    [87]施东晖著,《中国股市微观行为:理论与实证》,上海,上海远东出版社,2001
    [88]俞乔市场有效、周期异常与股价波动——对上海、深圳股票市场的实证分析[J]经济研究,1994,(9)
    [89]韩德宗,徐剑刚沪深股票市场相关性的实证研究[J]统计研究,1995,(1)
    [90]施东晖上海股票市场风险性实证研究[J]经济研究,1996,(10)
    [91]李学中国股市的星期效应研究[J]统计研究,2001,(8)
    [92]张水泉,德宗上海股票市场股利与配股效应的实证研究[J]预测,1997,(3)
    [93]张人骥,朱平方,王怀芳上海证券市场过度反应的实证检验[J]经济研究,1998,(5)
    [94]戴国强,陆蓉中国股票市场的周末效应检验[J]金融研究,1999,(4)
    [95]沈艺峰,吴世农我国证券市场过度反应了吗?[J]经济研究,1999,(2)
    [96]陈伟上海股票市场股利政策信息传递效应的实证研究[J]中国管理科学,1999,(3)
    [97]林翔对中国证券咨询机构预测的分析[J]经济研究,2000,(2)
    [98]陈君宁,马治天股票市场规模效应的实证研究[J]华中理工大学学报(社会科学版),2000,(4)
    [99]朱宝宪,王怡凯证券媒体选股建议效果的实证分析[J]经济研究,2001,(4)
    [100]丁亮,孙慧中国股市股票推荐效应研究[J]管理世界,2001,(5)
    [101]王永红,赵学军.中国股市“惯性策略”和“反转策略”的实证分析[J]经济研究,2001,(6)
    [102]张胜,陈金贤深圳股票市场“庄股市场”特征的实证分析[J]经济科学,2001,(3)
    [103]马洪潮中国股市投机的实证研究[J]经济研究,2001,(3)
    [104]陈保华交易机制对股价行为的影响——对中国股票市场的实证检验[J]经济研究,2001,(5)
    [105]许均华,李启亚宏观政策对我国股市影响的实证研究[J]经济研究,2001,(9)
    [106]钟伟股票红利政策的理论及实证分析[J]山西财金大学学报,2001,(8)
    [107]李心丹,王冀宁,傅浩中国个体证券投资者交易行为的实证研究[J]经济研究,2002,(11)
    [108]屈文洲,吴世农中国股票市场微观结构的特征分析——买卖报价价差模式及影响因素的实证研究[J]经济研究,2002,(1)
    [109]金晓斌,高道德,石建民,刘红忠中国封闭式基金折价问题实证研究[J]中国社会科学,2002,(5)
    [110]蒋馥,常志平基于上证30及深圳成指的我国股票市场“羊群行为”的实证研究[J]预测,2002,(3)
    [111]张俊喜,张华解析我国封闭式基金折价之谜金融研究[J]金融研究,2002,(12)
    [112]周琳杰中国股票市场动量策略赢利性研究[J]世界经济,2002,(8)
    [113]孙培源,施东晖投资者总是风险厌恶吗——来自中国股市的证据[N]证券市场导报,2002-09-06
    [114]张勇个体风险因子在解释噪声交易者行为中的应用[J]天津商学院学报,2003,(1)
    [115]吴世农,吴超鹏我国股票市场“价格惯性策略”和“盈余惯性策略”的实证研究[J]经济科学,2003,(4)
    [116]朱永安,曲春上海股票市场两阶段波动非对称性实证研究[J]统计与信息论坛,2003,(4)
    [117]饶育蕾 行为金融学[M]上海财经大学出版社,2003
    [118]邹小鹏 我国证券市场回报率过度反应的实证分析[J]经济科学,2003,(4)
    [119]丁松良中国新股长期走势实证研究[J]南开经济研究,2003,(3)
    [120]刘力昌,朱忠贤 投资者决策行为与股价形成及波动[J]当代经济,2003,(5)
    [121]李诗林,李扬 沪深股票市场过度反应效应研究[J]管理评论,2003,(6)
    [122]朱战宇,吴冲锋,王承炜 不同检验周期下中国股市价格动量的盈利性研究[J]世界经济,2003,(8)
    [123]吴风云;赵静梅;统一监管与多边监管的悖论:金融监管组织结构理论初探[J]金融研究,2002(09)
    [124]许均华、李启亚等 宏观政策对我国股市影响的实证研究[J]《经济研究》2001(9)pp:12-21
    [125]彭文平、肖继辉 股市政策与股市波动[J]《上海经济研究》2002(3)
    [126]邹昊平、唐利民、袁国良 政策性因素对中国股市的影响:政府与股市投资者的博弈分析[J]《世界经济》 2000年11
    [127]赵振全、张宇 中国股票市场波动和宏观经济波动关系的实证分析[J]《数量经济技术经济研究》,2000(6)
    [128]严武、肖民赞 我国股市收益波动特征及政策因素影响分析[J]《当代财经》2005(12)pp:29-33
    [129]唐齐鸣、李春涛 影响上海股市波动的因素分析[J]《数量经济技术经济研究》2000年11期pp:62-65
    [130]方园,陈收 涨跌停板制度对上海股市日内价格变动和投资者行为的影响[J]系统工程Vol.25,No.11 Nov.,2007
    [131]穆启国,刘海龙,吴冲锋 影响股票达到涨跌幅限制的因素分析[J]系统工程理论与实践2003年9月pp:61-66
    [132]钟凡,韩文强 股本规模、价格触限频率与波动溢出效应——来自沪深股市的实证研究[J]系统工程2008年26(4)

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700