江苏沿江城市泰州市水环境安全研究

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：Study on water environment security of Taizhou City along the Yangtze River in Jiangsu Province 作者：王胜艳 ; 傅国圣 ; 王为攀 英文作者：WANG Shengyan;FU Guosheng;WANG Weipan;Taizhou Branch of Jiangsu Hydrology and Water Resources Investigation Bureau;Taizhou Yinjiang Canal Administration of Jiangsu Province; 关键词：PSR ; 水环境安全 ; AHP ; 泰州市 英文关键词：PSR;;water environment safety;;AHP;;Taizhou 中文刊名：水资源开发与管理 英文刊名：Water Resources Development and Management 机构：江苏省水文水资源勘测局泰州分局;江苏省泰州引江河管理处; 出版日期：2019-10-25 出版单位：水资源开发与管理 年：2019 期：10 语种：中文; 页：61-66 页数：6 CN：10-1326/TV ISSN：2096-0131 分类号：TV213.4;X52

摘要

本文通过构建江苏沿江城市泰州市水环境安全压力-状态-响应(PSR)模型,结合AHP方法,系统地对泰州市水环境安全进行研究,分析近年来水环境安全的动态演变及其影响因素。结果显示:泰州市水环境安全的PSR评价指标准则层中,响应层权重最大,人均GDP、万元GDP用水量和环境污染治理投入占GDP比重分别在三个准则层中占有最大权重;2010—2017年泰州市水环境安全指数呈升高趋势,水环境质量趋于好转。建议泰州市通过增加科技研发及环保投入,开展节水技术研究,加快产业结构调整升级,严格控制污染排放,优化水资源配制,增加城市绿地覆盖率,促进水生态系统的良性循环发展,以保障区域经济的可持续发展。
        Based on the construction of the pressure-state-response(PSR) model of water environment safety in Taizhou along the Yangtze River in Jiangsu and AHP method, this paper systematically studies the water environment safety in Taizhou and analyzes the dynamic evolution of water environment safety and its influencing factors in recent years. The results show that the response layer has the largest weight in the PSR evaluation index criterion layer of Taizhou water environment safety, and the per capita GDP, water consumption of 10,000 yuan GDP and the proportion of environmental pollution control investment in GDP have the largest weight in the three criterion layers respectively. From 2010 to 2017, the water environment safety index of Taizhou showed an upward trend, and the water environment quality tended to improve. It is suggested that Taizhou should increase investment in scientific research and development and environmental protection, carry out research on water-saving technologies, speed up the adjustment and upgrading of industrial structure, strictly control pollution discharge, optimize water resources allocation, increase the coverage rate of urban green space, and promote the virtuous circle development of water ecosystem so as to ensure the sustainable development of regional economy.

引文

[1] OECD.Core set of indicators for environmental performance review.Environmentalmonograph No.83[R].Paris:OECD,1993.
    [2] 何月峰,沈海萍,冯晓飞,等.基于压力-状态-响应模型和“五水共治”决策的浙江省水环境安全评价[J].水资源保护,2016,32(6):104-109,122.
    [3] Saaty TL.The Analytic Hierarchy Process[M].USA:mCgraw Hill,1980.
    [4] 邱宇.汀江流域水环境安全评估[J].环境科学研究,2013,26(2):152-159.
    [5] 何贝贝,李绍飞,朱习爱.天津市水环境安全评价及其指标体系研究[J].水资源保护,2016,32(1):125-129.
    [6] 孙法圣.流域水资源配置与水环境安全演变耦合关系研究[D].长春:吉林大学,2015.
    [7] 崔明哲,杨凤海,李佳.基于组合赋权法的哈尔滨市耕地生态安全评价[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(6):184-187,192.
    [8] 章无恨.城市化进程中南昌市水环境安全问题及对策研究[D].南昌:南昌大学,2014.
    [9] 吴舜泽,王金南,周劲松,等.国家环境安全评估报告[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2006.