摘要
目的:建立鹿衔草及其伪品红花鹿蹄草的鉴别方法。方法:分别对鹿蹄草、普通鹿蹄草、红花鹿蹄草从原植物形态、药材性状、叶横切面的显微特征、薄层鉴别方面进行比较。结果:鹿蹄草和普通鹿蹄草与红花鹿蹄草原植物在叶形、叶面特征、花色、花萼形状等方面有显著区别;药材在叶形、花萼形状方面也有显著区别;在叶的横切面和薄层鉴别方面,鹿衔草及其伪品红花鹿蹄草亦有差异。结论:鹿衔草药材及其伪品红花鹿蹄草可通过原植物形态、性状、显微特征及薄层色谱进行鉴别。
Objective:To identify Luxiancao(Pyrolae Herba) and its pseudo species Pyrola incamata Fisch.ex DC.. Methods:The botanical morphology,medicinal material characters and TLC identification,as well as microscopic characteristics of leaf transverse section were compared between Pyrola calliantha H. Andres and Pyrola decorata H. Andres and Pyrola incamata Fisch. ex DC.. Results:The differences between the three plants were obvious in the shape and facial characteristics of leaf and flower color and calyx shape of the original plant. There were also differences in phylliform and calyx shape of the medicinal parts,as well as leaf transverse section and TLC identification. Conclusion :Luxiancao(Pyrolae Herba) and its pseudo species Pyrola incamata Fisch. ex DC. could be identified by botanical morphology,characters and microscopic characteristics and TLC identification.
引文
[1]国家药典委员会.中华人民共和国药典:一部[M].北京:中国医药科技出版社,2015:324.
[2]赵敏,吴浪安,金双,等.鹿衔草配方颗粒质量标准的研究[J].中成药,2013,31(5):148-150.
[3]李东,杨松,宋宝安,等.鹿蹄草属植物的研究进展[J].贵州大学学报(自然科学版),2008,25(2):188-194.
[4]张绍轩,扬军,王学农,等.颈康片中鹿衔草及钩藤的薄层色谱鉴别[J].中成药,2008,30(7):17-18.
[5]林泉,应钶.中药鹿衔草的原植物调查[J].中药通报,1984,9(4):12-13.