用户名: 密码: 验证码:
陕西省西部某县农产品产地土壤重金属污染评价
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Evaluation of heavy metal pollution in soil of agricultural products producing areas in western Shaanxi province
  • 作者:李艳 ; 张丽 ; 杨毅哲
  • 英文作者:Li Yan;Zhang Li;Yang Yizhe;Shaanxi Farmland quality and Agricultural Environment Protection Work Station;
  • 关键词:农产品产地土壤 ; 重金属 ; 污染评价 ; 陕西
  • 英文关键词:agricultural producing area soil;;heavy metal;;pollution assessment;;Shaanxi province
  • 中文刊名:中国农业信息
  • 英文刊名:China Agricultural Informatics
  • 机构:陕西省耕地质量与农业环境保护工作站;
  • 出版日期:2019-06-25
  • 出版单位:中国农业信息
  • 年:2019
  • 期:03
  • 基金:农业部农业生态环境保护重大专项(农科教发〔2012〕3号)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:110-115
  • 页数:6
  • CN:11-4922/S
  • ISSN:1672-0423
  • 分类号:X825
摘要
【目的】为了解陕西省西部某县农产品产地土壤重金属污染状况。【方法】采用单项污染指数法、内梅罗综合污染指数法和Hakanson潜在生态风险指数法对该区域表层土壤中5种重金属元素进行污染及生态风险评价。【结果/结论】结果表明:Cd、Pb、Hg、As、Cr等5种元素的平均值分别为0.318 mg/kg、29.6 mg/kg、0.138 mg/kg、14.0 mg/kg、68.4 mg/kg,污染累积指数表现为Cd>Pb>Hg>As>Cr特征,各元素含量超过背景值的比例分别为96.75%、99.77%、80.97%、76.57%、51.28%;研究区域综合潜在生态风险指数为266.1,属中等生态危害程度,其中52.67%土壤样点达到中等生态危害,9.28%土壤样点达到强及以上生态危害,应该引起相关政府部门的高度重视。
        [Purpose]The main purpose of this study is to explore the contamination status of heavy metal in agricultural producing area soils in a western county of Shaanxi province. [Method]The single factor index method,the Nemerow comprehensive pollution index method and the potential ecological risk index method were used to assess the pollution degree and ecological risk of five heavy metal elements in the topsoil(0~20 cm)in the district. [Result/Conclusion]The results showed that:The average contents of heavy metal Cd,Pb,Hg,As and Cr in soils were 0.318,29.6,0.138,14.0 and 68.4 mg · kg~(-1),respectively. The percentage of heavy metal elements in soil exceeding the background values of the elements in the study area were as follow respectively:Cd(96.75%),Pb(99.77%),Hg(80.97%),As(76.57%)and Cr(51.28%). The results showed that the pollution rank was Cd>Pb>Hg>As>Cr. The average value of comprehensive potential ecological risk index is 266.1,which ranks at the degree of moderate ecological damage,52.67% samples reached moderate ecological harm,and 9.28% samples reached strong or above ecological hazards,which should be paid attention by relevant government agencies.
引文
[1]赵其国,黄国勤,钱海燕.生态农业与食品安全.土壤学报, 2007, 44(6):1127~1134.
    [2]赵其国,骆永明.论我国土壤保护宏观战略.中国科学院院刊, 2015, 30(4):452~458.
    [3]路子显.中国粮食重金属污染现状及防控对策.粮食科技与经济, 2016, 41(6):6~11, 53.
    [4]中华人民共和国农业部. NY/T 395-2012农田土壤环境质量监测技术规范.北京:中国标准出版社, 2012.
    [5]姜菲菲,孙丹峰,李红,等.北京市农业土壤重金属污染环境风险等级评价.农业工程学报, 2011, 27(8):330~337.
    [6]陈景辉,卢新卫,翟萌.西安城市路边土壤重金属来源与潜在风险.应用生态学报, 2011, 22(7):1810~1816.
    [7]江宏,马友华,尹国庆,等.安徽省某县农田土壤重金属污染及潜在生态风险评价.农业资源与环境学报, 2017,34(4):352~359.
    [8]赵杰,罗志军,赵越,等.环鄱阳湖区农田土壤重金属空间分布及污染评价.环境科学学报, 2018, 38(6):2475~2485.
    [9]徐争启,倪师军,庹先国,等.潜在生态危害指数法评价中重金属毒性系数计算.环境科学与技术, 2008, 31(2):112~115.
    [10]张菊,陈诗越,邓焕广,等.山东省部分水岸带土壤重金属含量及污染评价.生态学报, 2012, 32(10):3144~3153.
    [11]邢宇鑫,闫广新,侯秋丽,等.北京门头沟矿集区土壤重金属空间分布及污染特征.农业资源与环境学报, 2016,33(6):499~507.
    [12]李健,郑春江,郭希利,等.环境背景值数据手册.北京:中国环境科学出版社, 1989.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700