摘要
辩论是社会日常生活、工作中广泛存在的一种重要群体活动,基于Web的辩论支持系统是目前群体决策支持系统领域研究的重点。辩论支持系统以计算机为媒介,主要用来解决对抗性强的复杂问题,人们可以利用该平台综合发挥人的智慧与计算机的高性能,提高辩论的效率和辩论的科学性。
本文研究的辩论支持系统是华中科技大学综合集成研讨环境的重要组成部分,其理论基础是辩论模型。本文在对目前国内外有影响的辩论模型和辩论支持系统深入研究的基础上结合用户的实际需要,分析了辩论支持系统的主要功能和系统构成,设计了一个功能强大,通用性强的Web辩论支持系统。该系统基于B/S体系结构,选用Oracle 10g数据库,以MyEclipse7.0作为开发工具完成。系统为解决复杂决策问题提供更客观、更符合实际、更具有参考价值的决策结果。主要的研究工作有：
1)分析研究现有几种影响较大的辩论模型,采用一种新的辩论框架作为本系统设计的理论基础,结合该辩论模型设计了系统的辩论信息组织结构。
2)对整个辩论系统进行了需求分析,确立了系统设计原则,系统设计目标,完成了系统体系结构设计、功能模块设计和数据库设计,建立了系统的体系结构。
3)采用统一建模语言(UML)对辩论研讨支持系统进行建模,建立了用例图、顺序图和活动图。使得开发人员对系统的结构和执行流程有清晰的认识,降低开发风险。
4)给出了系统开发和设计过程中的关键技术问题、解决方案,编程实现了辩论研讨支持原型系统,并在Web环境下进行了实例演示验证系统的有效性。整个系统功能完善、具有简便灵活、数据安全可靠等优点。
最后,对全文的工作进行了总结,讨论了辩论支持系统需进一步研究的方向和未来发展趋势及存在的问题。
Argument is an important group activity, which widespread exist in social daily life and work. web_based Argument support system is the focus in research fields of group decision support system at present. ASS uses computer as a medium, it is mainly used to solve the complex and strong confrontational problems in order to make people can use the platform to integrate the wisdom of people with the high performance of computer. Accordingly, ASS improves the efficiency and the scientificity of argument.
Argument support system which is researched in this paper, is the important part of Hall for Workshop of Meta-synthetic Engineering of Hua zhong University of Science and Technology. Its theoretical basis is argument model. This paper analyses the main function and the system architecture of ASS, ultimately designs a powerful and versatile web_based Ass, which is based on deeply analyzing and studying influential argument model and argument support system at home and abroad. It combines with the Practical needs of users. The system is based on B/S architecture, selects Oracle 10g database and MyEclipse7.0 development tool implement Ass. The system provide a more objective, more realistic, more referenced value decision result for solving complex decision issue. So the main research work are:
1) The paper analyses several kinds of existing argument models which have great influence, it chooses a new framework of argument as the theoretical basis for this system, and it design organization structure of argument information combines with the argument model.
2) The paper analyses the requirement of the whole argument system, establishes the principles and the goals of system designing. Furthermore, the paper finished the designed of the system architecture, function module and database. Finally, the system architecture is built.
3) The paper adopts UML to build the model of static structural and dynamic behavior for argument support system. It establishes use case diagrams, sequence diagrams as well as activity diagrams in order to let the developers have a clear understanding about the system structure and the implementation process. it can reduce the development risks.
4) The paper gives the key technical problems of the system development and the design process, solves the program of scheme, and then achieves the prototype of argument support system. Finally, Using a real example of argument is demonstrated in the Web_based Ass.lt validates the effectiveness of the system, The study finds that the whole system with fully functional, and it has some advantages, for instance, simple, flexible, data's security and reliability etc.
In the end, this dissertation concludes the whole work with suggestions for the future research direction needed to improve Ass and future development trend,and also exsisting problems.
引文
[1]张兴学,张朋柱.群体决策研讨意见分布可视化研究—电子公共大脑视听室(ECBAR)的设计与实现[J].管理科学学报.2005,8(4)：15-27.
[2]谭俊峰,张朋柱,黄丽宁.综合集成研讨厅中的研讨信息组织模型[J].系统工程理论与实践.2005,1(9)：86-92.
[3]程少川,张朋柱.电子公共大脑的信息组织设计研究[J].西安交通大学学报(社会科学版).2001,21(1)：42-47.
[4]宿彦,薛惠锋,孙景乐,蒋御柱.用户驱动的研讨信息可视化平台的设计与实现.计算机工程与应用.2007,43(23)：106-109.
[5]Toulmin SE. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge:Cambridge Univ. Press,.1958.
[6]Rittel H, Webber M. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning[J]. Pol Sci.1973,4:155-169.
[7]胡斯另.头脑风暴法在创造性决策中的应用[J].决策探索,2004,(10).
[8]胡晓峰,司光亚,吴琳.战略决策模拟中协作对抗空间的研究与设计[J].小型微型计算机系统.2000,21(9)：901-904.
[9]戴汝为,操龙兵.综合集成研讨厅的研制[J].管理科学学报.2004,5(3)：10-16.
[10]Gordon TF, Karacapilidis N. The Zeno argumentation framework. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law,1997. Melbourne, Australia,1997.10-18.
[11]Gordon TF, Prakken H, Walton D. The Carneades model of argument and burden of proof. Artificial Intelligence.2007,171:875-896.
[12]Dung PM. On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence.1995:321-357.
[13]Kunz W, Rittel HWJ. Issues as elements of information systems. Berkeley: University of California.1970.
[14]陈荣,姜云飞.一种新的辩论推理模式及其应用[J].计算机学报.2001,2.
[15]伍京华,蒋国瑞,黄梯云.基于辩论的社会性Agent间的谈判模型.计算机工程与应用.2007,43(12)：23-25,39.
[16]黄河笑,覃征,郭俊文.一种改进的辩论协商模型及其算法.西安交通大学学报.2006,40(2)：129-132,156.
[17]熊才权,李德华.一种研讨模型,软件学报,Vol.20, No.8, August 2009, pp.2181-2190.
[18]Kunz W, Rittel HWJ. Issues as elements of information systems [R]. Berkeley. University of California,1970.
[19]Conklin J, Begeman M L. glBIS:A hypertext tool for exploratory policy discussion[J]. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems,1988,6(4): 303-331.
[20]Rein G L, Ellis C A. r1BIS:A real-time group hypertext system[J]. International Journal of Man Machine Studies,1991,34(3):349-368.
[21]Dung PM. On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence,1995,77(2):321-357.
[22]谭俊峰,张朋柱,程少川,孔彬.群体研讨中的共识分析和评价技术[J].系统工程理论方法应用.2005,14(1)：55-61.
[23]程少川,张朋柱,卢明德.群体过程信息的树状结构及定性决策收敛途径的研究[J].系统工程学报.2001,16(5)：371-375.
[24]崔霞,李耀东,戴汝为.HWME中基于学习型组织的专家有效互动对话模型[J].管理科学学报.2004,7(2)：80-87.
[25]刘怡君,唐锡晋.对偶刻度法及其在群体研讨中的应用[J].管理评论.2004,16(10)：39-42.
[26]Carneades, an argument mapping application. Available from: http://carneades.berlios.de.
[27]李莉,李彤,冯珊.面向决策支持系统的可视化用户界面[J].武汉城市建设学院学报.1998,15(3)：5-6.
[28]李德华,熊才权.一种研讨信息组织模型及其在研讨厅中的应用[J].计算机应用研究,2008,25(9)：2730-2733.
[29]Prakken H. On formalising burden of proof in legal argument [A]. In HJ Herik(Ed), Legal Knowledge-based Systems JURIX, The Twelfth ConferenceNijmegen:Gerard Noodt Instituut,1999:85-97.
[30]张磊.军事战略问题的对抗式研讨方法初探[J].军事运筹与系统工程.2008,22(1)：34-37.
[31]李德华.军事战略综合集成研讨厅总体设计[R],2005.
[32]McDermott D, Doyle J. Nonmonotonic logic I. Artif Intell.1980,13:41-72.
[33]Ramchurn S, Jennings N, Sierra C. Persuasive negotiation for autonomousagents: A rhetorical approach[A]. In:Working Notes of the 3rd IntWorkshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument ~CMNA2003, Acapulco, Mexico,2003: 9-18.
[34]Rich E, Knight K. Artificial intelligence,2nd edition. New York:McGraw Hill,1991.
[35]司光亚.战略决策综合集成研讨与模拟环境与实现[博士学位论文].长沙：国防科技大学.2000.
[36]黄河笑,覃征,郭俊文.一个改进的传统协商模型和算法[J].微电子学与计算.2006,23(1)：74-76.
[37]张志强,张朋柱.面向复杂决策任务的综合集成决策研讨总体框架设计[J].系统工程理论与实践.2006.1.
[38]毛文燕.辩论协商中的逻辑论证框架[J].微电子学与计算机,2007年第24卷第4期.
[39]邱昭继.法律中的可辩驳推理[M],西北政法学院学报.2005.4.
[40]祝世京,王书宁,陈挺.谈判支持系统(NSS)研究[J],计算机研究与发展.1995,4.
[41]程少川,张朋柱,卢明德.群体过程信息的树状结构及定性决策收敛途径的研究[J].系统工程学报.2001,16(5)：371-375.
[39]熊才权.军事战略综合集成研讨厅综合集成研讨环境研究[D][博士论文].华中科技大学.2008.
[40]张家才.综合集成研讨厅支撑环境的设计与实现[D][博士论文].北京：中国科学院研究生院,2004.
[41]刘怡君.基于Web的群研讨环境的设计与开发[D][硕士论文].天津工业大学,2003.
[42]万建明.SBA系统中综合集成研讨厅的研究与实现[D].南京：南京理工大学,2005.
[43]操龙兵,戴汝为.综合集成研讨厅的软件体系结构[J].软件学
报.2002,13(8)：1430-1435.
[43]李耀东,崔霞,戴汝为.综合集成研讨厅的理论框架、设计与实现[J].复杂系统与复杂性科学,2004,1(1)：27-35.
[44]姜江,杨克巍,褚智超,唐鸿毅.装备论证协同决策支持系统的设计与实现[J].计算机工程2009.35(6)：283-285.
[45]顾基发,唐锡晋.综合集成系统建模[J].复杂系统与复杂性科学.2004,1(2)：32-42.
[46]屈喜龙.UML及面向对象的分析与设计的研究[J].计算机应用研究.2005,(9)：51-52.
[47]MarkPriestley.面向对象设计UML实践.第二版.北京：清华大学出版社,2005.5.
[48]oradyBooeh, JamesRumbaugh.UML用户指南.北京：机械工业出版社,2005.3.
[49]J2EE分布式系统框架设计,http://www.java114.com.
[50]梁建全,周力,精通JavaEE框架整合方案.北京：人民邮电出版社,2008.
[51]曹伟.如何进行软件需求分析[EB/OL]. http://se.csai.cn/Requirement/No020.htm.
[52]闫术卓,杨强.Struts2技术详解：基于WebWork核心的MVC开发与实践[M].北京：电子工业出版社,2008.