摘要
走、跑、跳、投是人体最基本的活动能力,同时也是各项运动的基础。在远古时代人类对生存的需要迫使他们逐渐形成了对走、跑、跳、投等基本的生活能力,随着时代的发展,这些最基本的生活技能逐渐的演变成现如今竞技体育运动的基础,提高生产劳动能力的首要条件,同时这些基本运动技能的学习也被列入了小学体育课的重要组成部分,
本文主要以《国家学生体制健康标准》解读为基础,访问了东北师范大学体育学院、吉林体院、长春市部分高校的专家、学者,对论文的框架、研究思路、研究方法等问题向他们进行咨询,认真听取建议。根据《国家学生体制健康标准》和各位专家的意见制定出了测量小学生走、跑、跳、投运动能力掌握情况的评价标准,在白城市10所小学一年级、三年级、六年级的各个年级随机抽取20学名学生,为了能更好的体现小学生走、跑、跳、投运动能力掌握情况,本次调查从学生的运动技能和运动成绩两个方面进行分组、分级别的测评,得出相关数据利用EXCEL2003软件包进行数据统计处理,客观、有效的反映了各个年级的学生走、跑、跳、投运动能力的掌握情况,对一年级、三年级、六年级学生走、跑、跳、投的掌握情况进行对比分析,从中发现问题给出相关意见和结论,为今后学校体育教学的改革添砖加瓦。从本次调查的结果来看,一年级、三年级、六年级学生走、跑、跳、投掌握的情况各个年级学生之间运动能力水平并没有随着年级的提高而提高,优秀和良好数量比例所占较少,说明我们走、跑、跳、投的教学并没有系统化、科学化,缺乏对高尖技术人才的培养,从学生走、跑、跳、投基本运动能力横向对比来看,学生跑的运动能力掌握情况较好,走次之,跳和投相对较差。总体评价不是令人很满意。
从微观上讲,本次调查是反映目前小学生走、跑、跳、投基本运动能力的掌握情况;从宏观上而言,反应的是整个社会群体对青少年健康的关注程度。认真贯彻《新课程标准》的指导思想,真正转变教学观念,尊重学生身心发展特点和成长规律,使学生养成坚持锻炼身体的终身思想,体现以人为本的人文理念,以学生的身心健康均衡发展为中心,全面推进素质教育。
Walk, run, jump, is for the most basic human activity, but also the basis of the movement. In ancient times mankind's survival needs of forcing them to gradually take on the form, run, jump, cast, and other basic life skills, along with the development of the times, these basic life skills gradually evolved intoacompetitive sport is now the basis for Increase production capacity of the primary labor conditions,
These basic sports skills of learning were also included in the primary school physical education an important part of In this paper, "national student system and health standards," interpreted as foundation, visited the Northeast Normal University Sports Institute, the Institute of Jilin, Changchun City College of experts, academics, in the framework of the papers, research ideas, methods and other issues to them Advisory, seriously listen to recommendations. According to "national student system and health standards" and that the views of experts to develop primary and secondary school students take the measurement, run, jump, ability to control movement of the evaluation criteria, in the White City 10 first grade of primary school, third grade and sixth grade in all grades 20 students randomly selected scientific name, in order to better reflect the primary and secondary school students walk, run, jump, ability to control movement, the survey of students from the campaign skills and performance aspects of the two groups, the level of assessment, that EXCEL2003 use of the data packages for statistical data processing, objective, effective reflects the various grades of students walk, run, jump, the ability to control movement, the first grade, third grade and sixth grade students walk, run, jump, To grasp the situation comparative analysis, which found that the problem is related observations and conclusions for the future school physical education contribute to the reform. From the results of this survey, the first grade, third grade and sixth grade students walk, run, jump, to grasp the situation between the various grade students and the level of athletic ability did not improve as the grade increased, the number of outstanding and good Ratio of less that we walk, run, jump, for the teaching and not systematic, scientific, and the lack of high-sharp technical personnel training, students take, running, jumping, cross-cutting exercise capacity for basic comparison of , The students ability to run the campaign better grasp the situation and take the second, and jumped to relatively poor. Overall rating is not very satisfactory.
From the micro perspective, the survey reflects the current primary school students walk, run, jump, for the ability to master the basic movements; From a macro point of view, the reaction of the whole community groups concerned about the health of young people. Conscientiously implement "the new curriculum standards," the guiding ideology, the concept of real change in teaching, respect for the students physical and mental development and growth characteristics of the law so that students develop a lifelong physical activity persist thinking of the people
引文
[1] 毛振明..体育教学科学化探索[M].北京:高等教育出版社,1999.
[2] 孙联荣.日本中小学教育的"适应个体"教学,教育发展研究.2003,(2):74-75.
[1] 毛振明..体育教学科学化探索[M].北京:高等教育出版社,1999.
[2] 孙联荣.日本中小学教育的"适应个体"教学,教育发展研究.2003,(2):74-75.
[3] 曹卫民,许秀萍.小学体育课中走和跑教学内容的扩展和延伸[J].中国学校体育,2003,(6)69—70.
[4] 国家教育委员会 九年义务教育全日制小学体育教学大纲[M]1995
[5] 李晋裕《中学小体育教学改革与发展的探讨》.[J].体育学刊 2001.1
[6] 陈智寿.体育课程整体改革研究成果专辑[M].福建教育出版社,1994.9
[7] 赖天德.学校体育改革热点探究 [M], 北京:北京体育大学出版社,2003.
[8] 曲宗湖.构建《体育与健康》大课程模式的思考[J].体育教学,2001,(4).
[9] 潘少敏,胡丽萍.关于小学体育课教学改革的一些思考[J].体育师友,2002.2
[10] 冯洁,浅谈小学体育课中的活动教学[J].教育探索,2001,1.
[11] 孙桂卿.提高小学体育课教学质量初探[J].山东体育科技,1999,9.
[12] 阮光清.小学体育课贯彻"健康第一"指导思想的思考[J].福建体育科技,2001,12.
[13] 毛振明,圆山和夫.日本学校体育关键词 100[M].2005.1
[14] 李天白,顾城.我国近现代普通高校体育教材的走向[J].福建体育科技,2001,(05).
[15] 陈智寿.二十年学校体育改革的回顾[J].体育学刊,1999.6
[16] 刘历红.小学体育课心理健康教育渗透浅议[J].中国学校体育,2001,4.
[17] 邵伟德,等.论体育教学模式研究的现状与未来发展[J].北京体育大学学报,2005,32(1):85-88.
[18] 曹卫民.小学体育课中跳跃教材内容的延伸与扩展[J].中国学校体育,2003,5.
[19] 李建军.中国体育与健康课程与日本保健体育课程目标的比较分析[J].成都体育学院学报,2001,(6).
[20] 黄汗升,季克异.我国普通高校体育教育本科专业课程体系改革的研究[J].体育科学,2004 (3 ) 51-57.
[21] 龚旭东.小学体育课中有效合作学习的实施策略[J].中国学校体育,2005,5
[22] 章雪峰.利用"从众"心理上好小学体育课[J].体育师友,2004,2.
[23] 宋玉梅,王宵春.小学体育课评价的实验研究[J].沈阳体育学院学报,2006,4.
[24] 杨宇飞,刘海峰.浅谈小学体育课中如何激发学生的创新意识[J].湖北三峡学院学报,2000,4.
[25] 季浏,汪晓赞.小学体育新课程教学法[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2003.
[26] 王翠英.掌握标准切实作好基本技术教学[J].体育教学.2001,1
[27] 毛振明.《育教学改革新视野》.北京体育大学出版社.2003.1
[28] 祝蓓里,季浏.体育心理学心编[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,1995.
[29] 薛留成.《体育测量与评价》.河南大学出版社.1993.6
[30] 秦东红,张强.从学生体质下降看中小学教学中存在的问题[J].中小学教师培训,2003,(3).
[31] 张学忠.学校体育教学论[M].北京:人民体育出版社,2002
[32] 毛振明.探索成功的体育教学[M].北京:北京体育大学出版社,2001.9
[33] 徐本力.早期训练的科学化[J].竞技体育信息,2003.7.
[34] 龚正伟.《学校体育改革与发展论》.北京体育大学出版社.2002.4
[35] 苏 军.小学体育课学生自评和互评[J].中国学校体育,2006,7.
[36] 陈志山.中小学体育教学改革存在的问题与对策[J].体育学刊,2003(5):102-103.
[37] Memories.T.(1998).Teaching games for understanding: Its contrbution to the knowledge of skiil acquisition from a motor learning perspective.European Journal of Physical Education.3.65-74
[38] Ntoumanis,Motivational clusters in s sample of British physical education classes,psychology of sport and Exercise,2002.
[39]A.Barry Joyner,Quality Contorl in Altemative Assessment,Journal of Physical Education ,Recreation and Dance,1997.
[40] Kirk.David.Mikhail.Ann.Teaching games for understanding and situated learning:Rething the Bunker-Thorpe model. Journal of teaching in physical Education.Jan2002.Vol.21.Issue2.1-15
[41]Anderson,L.W,InternationnalencryclopediaTeachingandteacereducalion(2th),pargamon press,1995
[42] Larry D.Hensley,Alternative assessment for physical education,Journal of physical Education for life long Fitness,United states:Human kinetics,1999
[43]James H. McMillan. Fundamental Assessment Principles for Teachers and SchoolAdministrators [J/OL]. http://pareonline.net ,2004