摘要
草莓生长于开放的大田系统，光合生产易受变化光强的影响。过高或过低的光
强都会影响草莓的光合生产，从而影响其产量。本研究从遗传种质的角度出发，探
讨了草莓在遮荫和光氧化逆境条件下草莓的光合特性变化，为生产上减轻其危害提
供理论依据。
1．对5个草莓品种于生育结果期进行遮荫处理，测定其干重的变化。结果发
现5个草莓品种之间存在一定的差异。宝交早生干重下降27％，为耐荫品种。硕丰下
降了80％，为不耐荫品种。比较两者在遮荫处理后各项生理指标的变化，结果表明：
在遮荫处理条件下，宝交早生的光饱和速率下降了20％，而硕丰下降了47％。遮荫处
理使两者的表观量子效率都有所提高，分别提高了13％和8％。遮荫处理没有改变宝
交早生和硕丰光合速率对温度的响应，但在不同的温度条件下，遮荫处理使宝交早
生光合速率下降较少，而硕丰下降较多。进一步测定草莓叶片中的叶绿素含量和可
溶性蛋白含量的变化，结果表明：在遮荫条件下，宝交早生的叶绿素含量上升了17％，
而硕丰略有增加。两者的Chla/Chlb都有所减少。遮荫处理使宝交早生叶片中可溶
性蛋白含量下降了16％，而硕丰则下降了32％。测定光反应的关键指标结果表明：遮
荫处理使宝交早生和硕丰的PSII活性分别下降了22.5％和53.7％。测定卡尔文循环
的关键酶Rubisco活性，结果表明遮荫处理使两者分别降低了19.6％和35.3％。
2．对5个草莓品种进行人工光氧化处理，并测定各项光合生理指标的变化。结
果表明：光氧化处理使明宝的叶绿素含量下降了69％，为光氧化敏感品种。宝交早生
叶绿素含量则下降了29％，为耐光氧化品种。明宝的可溶性蛋白含量下降了70％，而
硕丰只下降了60％。为探讨两者的光合生理基础的差异，测定了光氧化条件下草莓
叶片中氧自由基含量的变化。结果表明：在光氧化条件下草莓叶片中的O_2~-和过氧化
氢含量都有所上升。其中硕丰的0。“和过氧化氢分别增加了116％和125兄 而明宝的
0。“和过氧化氢分别增加了179％和180％。进一步测定活性氧清除的关键酶SOD、POD
和CAT活性变化。结果表明：在光氧化处理条件下SOD活性先被诱导至一个峰值，
然后逐渐下降。POD活性则随处理时间的延长而逐渐升高。CAT活性则随处理时间的
延长而下降。三者变化规律明显不同。但与明宝比较，硕丰的酶活性表现更为稳定。
为研究光氧化处理下，光能利用效率的变化，测定了光氧化处理下荧光参数的变化。
结果表明：光氧化处理使硕丰的光化学效率Fv／F．下降较少，保持了较高的光化学效
率。进一步分析荧光的变化发现，在光氧化条件下硕丰较大程度地启动了叶黄素循
环等耗散过程，耗散了多余的光能，因而保持了较高的光化学效率。
The strawberries, which are planted infield, are often affected by light.
Too high or low light leads to a reduction in the rate of photosynthesis and
therefore a reduction in the rate of growth .The physiological changes of
strawberries under shading and photooxidition were studied in this research.
1. Five strawberry varieties were treated under shading condition and
dry weight was measured . It had been found that there were some differences
aniong them. Baojiaozaosheng whose dry weight decreased by 27% was considered
as variety with strong shading tolerance. Shuofeng whose weight decreased
by 80% was considered as variety with less shading tolerance .The
physiological index of them was compared after shading treatment. The
results showed that under shading condition, the net photosynthesis rate
of Baojiaozaosheng decreased by 20% while that of Shuofeng decreased by 47%.
However, the AQY of them was enhanced by 13%and 8%, respectively. The shading
treatment did not change the response of photosynthesis rate to temperature
at the two varieties, but at different temperature, the decrease of
photosynthesis rate of Baojiaozaosheng under shading condition was less that
that of Shuofeng . The chlorophyll content and soluble protein content were
also determined. The chlorophyll content Baojiaozaosheng was enhanced by
17% while that of Shuofeng was enhanced less under shading condition. The
Chla/Chlb decrease less. The soluble protein of Baojiaozaosheng decreased
by 16% while that of Shuofeng decreased by 32%. The PSII activity, the key
index of photochemical reaction, was also measured .The PSII activity of
Baojiaozaosheng and Shuofeng decreased by 22. 5%and 53. 7% respectively under
shading condition. The activity of Rubisco was determined and it was found
that the Rubisco activity of the two varieties decreased by 19. 6%and 35. 3%
respectively.
2. Five strawberry varieties were treated under photooxidition condition
and their physiology index was measured. The results revealed that Mingbao
whose chlorophyll content decreased by 69% was considered as photooxidition
sensitive variety. Shuofeng whose chlorophyll content decrease by 29% was
considered as photooxdition tolerant variety. The soluble protein content of
Mingbao decreased by 70% while that of Shuofeng decreased by 60%. To study
the physiology basis, The active oxygen of strawberry under photooxidition
condition was determined. The results showed that:the 02~ and I~1202 were enhanced
by l16%and 125% respectively while those of Mingbao were enhanced by 179%and
180% respectively. The activity of active oxygen scavenger including SOD, POD
and CAT were determined .The results showed that under photooxidition
condition SOD activity was induced to a highlight then decreased progressively.
POD activity was enhanced progress while CAT activity decreased progressively
under photooxidition condition. There was significant difference among them.
Compared with Mingbao, the scavenger activity of Shuofeng was kept steady . The
fluorescence value was also determined in order to study the photochemical
efficiency under photooxdition condition .The results showed that under
photooxdition condition, Fv/Fm decreased less on Shuofeng compared with
Mingbao. The fluorescence quench was also determined and the results showed
that Shuofeng started the xanthyll cycle intensively to clear off more energy
and it was the reason that Shuofeng kept higher photochemical efficiency.
引文
1． Corree W J Growth and morphogenesis of sun and shade plants. Acta Botanica Neerlandica ,1983 ,32:49-62
2． Marshall B, Willey. R. W Radiation interception growth in an intercrop of pearl millet/groundnut Field Crop Research 1983 7,141-160
3． Huxley P The effects of artificial shading on some growth characteristics of arabiaca and robusta coffee seedlings I The effects of shade on dry weight, leaf area and derived growth data. Journal pf Applied Ecology 1987 4:291-318
4． Blackman G E, Wilson GL Physiological and ecological studies in the analysis of plant environment VII An analysis of the differential effects of light intensity on the net assimilation rate, leaf area ratio and relative growth rate of different species Anal of Botany 1986 15:373-408
5． Boardman N K 1977 Photosynthesis of sun and shading plant In: Winslow R Briggs ed Annu Rev Plant Physiol Palo Hlto, Califorinas: Annal Reviews inc , 28:355-371
6． Dobben W H The influence of light intensity on morphology and growth rate of bean seedlings Acta Botaninca Neerlantica 1981 30: 33-45
7． Hunt W F Growth and development of perennial ryegrass growth at constant temperature I Influent of light and temperature on growth and net assimilation Australian Journal of plant physiology 1981 8:181-190
8． 周佩珍等 见：戴云玲主编，光合作用的原初过程。科学出版社，北京 1987 1-12
9． Bjorkman O, Boardman N K, et al. Effect of light intensity during growth of Atriplex patula on the capacity of photosynthetic reactions, chloroplast components and structure. Carnegie Inst. Washington Year .1972,71:115-135
10． Nobel P S. Leaf anatomy and water-use efficiency. In:Adaptation of plant to water and temperature stress. Turner N C, Kramer P J. Wiley-Interscience. 1980, 43-45
11． Chow. W S, Anderson J M 1996 Light regulation of the photosynuemII and photosyntem I reaction centers of plant thylakoid membrane. In: Baltscheffsky M ed. Current Research in photosynthesis, Dordrecht :Kluwer academic Publisher. 315-326
12． Lyons J M Chilling injury in plants Annu Rev Plant Physiol, 1973 24:445-452
13． Jung S Lee H J Comparative photoinhibition of a high and a low altititude ecotype of tomato to chilling and stress under high and low light Plant Sci 1998 134:69-77
14． Lasley SE After effects of light and chilling temperature on photosynthesis J Amer Soc Hortic Sci 1979, 104 477-480
15． Long sp, Humphries S Photoinhibition of photosynthesis in nature . Annul Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol, 1994, 45:633-662
16． Barder J, Molecular basis of the vulnerability of photosystem II to damage by light. Aust J plant Physiol ,1996,22:201-208
17． Salvucci M E Comparative photoinhibition of a high and a low altititude ecotype of tomato to chilling and high and low light. Photosynth Res , 1985 7:193-201
18． Hideg E, petea C , Vass I, Singlet oxygen production in thylakoid membrances during photoinhibition as detected by EPR spectroscopy Photosynth Res ,1994,39:11191-199
19． Inouek, Fujii Y, Yokoyama E et al , The photoinhibition site of Photosystem I in isolated chloroplast under extremely reducing conditions . Plant cell
Physiol, 1989,39:65-71
20．巫继拓，沈允钢 菠菜叶绿体的光抑制部位。植物生理学报，1990，16 (1)：31-36
21. Aro EM, Virgin I, Anderson B。Photoinhibition of photosystem Ⅱ inactivation, protein damage and turnover. Biochim Biophys Acta, 1993, 1143: 113-134
22. Leitsch J, Schnettger B ,Critchley C et al Two mechanisms of recovery from photoinhibition in vivo: reactivation of photosystem Ⅱ related and unrelated to D1 protein turnover. Planta, 1994, 194:15-21
23. Gilmor AM, Mechanistic aspects of xanthophyll cycle-dependent photoprotection in higher plant chloroplast and leaves. Physiol Plant, 1997,99:197-209
24. Alscher RG, Donahue JL Cramer CL, Reactive oxygen species and antioxidants: Relationship in green cells. Physiol Plant, 1997, 100:224-233
25．焦得茂等 水稻耐光氧化和耐阴特性得鉴定及其生理基础研究中国水稻科学 1993 9 (4)：245-248
26. Cleland W T, Lastey S E After effects of light and chilling temperature on photosynthesis. J Amer Soc Hort Sci 1979, 104:477-480
27．郭连旺，沈允钢 高等植物光合机构避免强光破坏的保护机制。植物生理学通讯，1996，32：1-8
28．罗广华，王爱国 中国科学院华南植物研究所集刊，第四集，北京：科学出版社，1989，169-193
29. Hodges DM, Anderews CJ ,Johnson DA et al Antioxidant enzyme responses to chilling stress in differentially sensitive inbred maize line. J Exp Bot, 1997, 48:1105-1113
30. C W J Wright, Sandrang A K. Efficiency of light utilizition in the strawberry (Fragraria×ananassa cv Hapil). J Horcultural Sci, 1995, 70(5): 705-711
31. Chen-c Variability in fourth derivate leaf attendence spectroscopy of Fragraia sp and its relationship to Photosynthesis. Plant-physiology and Bichemistry-Paris 1992 30(1):71-80
32．焦德茂，顾行影等 水稻耐光氧化种质资源的简易筛选鉴定技术．中国水稻科学，1991，5 (3)：133-136
33. Xu D-Q(许大全), Xu B-J(徐宝基), Shen Y-G(沈允钢), Diurnal variation of photosynthetic effciency in C_3 plants. Acta Phytophysiol Sini (植物生理学报) 1990 16(1): 1-5(in Chinese)
34. Li D-Y(李德耀), Ye J-Y(叶济宇). Some technical problems in using oxygen electrode. Plant Physiol communi (植物生理学通讯) 1986 (5): 56-58 (in Chinese)
35. Arnon D. I. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts: Polyphenol oxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant physiol 1949. 24:1-5
36. Bradford M. Arapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantity of protein utilizing the principle of protein dye binding. Annu Biochem, 1976, 72:248-254
37. Ji B-H(季本华), Li Ch-G(李传国), G M-Zh(葛明治), Traits related to photoinhibition of photosynthesis in Indica and Japonica subspecies of rice and their reciprocal cross F1 Hybrids. Acta Phytophysiol Sini (植物生理学报), 1994, 20 (1): 8-16 (in Chinese)
38. Kung SD, Chollet R, Marsho TV Crystallizaation and assay procedures of tobacco Ribulose-1, 5-bisphosphate Carboxylase-oxygenase. In: Anthony San Pietro eds: Method in Enzymology, NewYork: Academic Press. 1980, 69(3): 326-335
39．王爱国，罗广华 植物的超氧化物自由基与羟胺反应的定量关系．植物生理学通讯，1990，(6)：55-57
40．赵世杰，许长成等 植物组织中丙二醛含量测定方法的改进．植物生理学通讯，1994，30 (3)：207-217
41. Giannopolitic CN, Riess K superoxide dismutases. plant physiol, 1977, 19 (1): 309-314
42．华东师范大学，植物生理学试验指导北京：人民教育出版社，1983，78-81
43．邹琦 植物生理生化试验指导北京：中国农业出版社 1995，76-77
44. Powl B. Photoinhibition of photosynthesis induced by visible light. Annu Rev Plant physical 1984, 35: 15-44
45. Zhang Zh-X(张振贤), Ai X-Zh(艾希珍), Zou Q(邹崎), Studies on the diurnal changes of photosynthetic efficiency of Ginger. Acta Hort Sini (园艺学报) 2000, 27 (2): 107-118 (in Chinese)
46. Xu K-Zh (徐克章), Shi Y-L (史跃林), Xu G-M (许贵民), Studies on photosynthtic temperature characteristic of cucumber leaves in protected fields. Acta Hort Sini (园艺学报), 1993, 20 (1): 51-55(in Chinese)
47．柯德森 中国科学院华南植物研究所集刊 第9集，北京：科学出版社 1992，80-92
48. Mishra NP, Mishra RK et al Changes in the activities of anti-oxidiant enzyme during exposure of intact wheat leaves to strong visible light at different temperature in the presence of protein inhibitor. Plant Phsiol, 1993,102:903-910
49. Hodges DM, Andrews CJ et al Antioxidant enzyme responses to chilling stress in differentially sensitive inbred maize line. J. Exp Bot, 1997, 48: 1105-1113
50. Cakmak I, Horst W J Effect of aluminium on lipid peroxidation, superoxide dismutase catalase and peroxidases in root tips of soybean. Physiol Plant, 1991, 83:463-468
51. Xu D-Q(许大全), Shen Y-G(沈允钢) The limit factor of photosynthesis In::Y Sh-W(余叔文)eds, Plant Physiology and Molecular Biology (2nd edition), Beijing: Sciences Press 223-236 (in Chinese)
52．刘鹏，孟庆伟等 冷敏感植物的低温光抑制及其生化保护机制植物生理学通讯，2001，37 (1)：76-82
53. Baker NR, Bradbury M et al Measurement of the quantum yields of carbon assimilation and chlorophyll fluorescence for assessment of crops in the fields, Philos Trans R soc。London 1989 90: 1609-1615
54．刘友良 水分逆境生理．北京：农业出版社 1992：144-145
55．王荣福，崔继林等 水稻品种超氧物歧化酶活性与氧抑光合的关系，主要作物生理特性生长发育及控制技术课题 研究报告(江苏农业科学院主编)。1980 (1)：19-27
56. Jiao D-M (焦德茂), Ji B-H (季本华), Yan J-M (严建民), The varietal difference of rice adaptation to high and low light intensity. Acta Agronomica Sinica (作物学报) 1996, 22 (6): 668-672 (in Chinese)
57. Juhler RK Andreasson E Compositionof photosynthesis pigments in thylakoid membrane vesicles from spinach. Photosynth Res. 1993, 35:171-178
58. Miyao M, Involvement of active oxygen species in degradation of the D1 protein under strong illumination in isolated subcomplexes of photosystem Ⅱ. Biochemistry, 1994, 33:9722-9730
59. Hideg E, Spetea C, Vass Ⅰ. Superoxide radicats are not the main promoters of acceotor-side-induceed photoinhibition damage in spinach thylakoids.
Photosynth Res , 1995, 46:399-407