中医治疗鼻鼽(变应性鼻炎)的临床研究及北京城区670例变应性鼻炎变应原分析
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
1目的评价中医治疗鼻鼽(变应性鼻炎)的疗效,并分析北京城区变应性鼻炎患者的变应原特点。
     2方法
     2.1检索鼻鼽的古代相关文献和近十年来变应性鼻炎的文献,整理分析中医、西医对变应性鼻炎的研究现状。
     2.2采用多中心、随机、对照的试验设计方法,将来自北京市海淀区、西城区、东城区、朝阳区、宣武区、崇文区、丰台区等城区符合纳入病例标准的670例变应性鼻炎患者分为四组,即单纯中药组407例、单纯西药组133例、中医综合组98例、西医综合组32例,分别给予中药汤剂、西药盐酸西替利嗪、中药汤剂加辛细滴鼻液、西替利嗪加丙酸倍氯米松鼻喷雾剂,用药20天。在单纯中药组中将患者分为肺气虚型、脾虚湿困型、肺经郁热型、肺肾阴虚型和肾阳虚型五种类型,分别应用玉蝉卫肺丸、健脾通窍汤、清热通窍汤、滋阴润肺汤和温肾止涕汤进行治疗;在中医综合组中也分为以上五种证型,分别采用上述五种方剂同时配合辛细滴鼻液、辛麻滴鼻液进行局部治疗,观察用药20天和停药后30天时的治疗效果,分析评价药物的证候等级疗效、症状积分疗效、证候总积分疗效以及对鼻黏膜嗜酸性粒细胞的作用。
     2.3检测北京城区这670名变应性鼻炎患者的变应原,总结其分布规律。
     3结果
     3.1单纯中药组、单纯西药组、中医综合组及西医综合组四大组间治疗结果比较
     3.1.1中医证候等级疗效:治疗后各组均具有很好的疗效,单纯中药组的总有效率是87.00%,单纯西药组是78.40%,中医综合组是94.68%,西医综合组是90.62%。经Ridit分析,单纯中药组与单纯西药组相比,单纯中药组中医证候等级疗效明显优于单纯西药组(P<0.01);中医综合组与西医综合组相比,中医综合组中医证候等级疗效优于西医综合组(P<0.05);单纯中药组与中医综合组相比,中医综合组中医证候等级疗效优于单纯中药组(P<0.05)。
     3.1.2症状积分比较:治疗后20天单纯中药组、单纯西药组、中医综合组及西医综合组四组的症状积分都较治疗前有显著的下降,经统计学比较,差异有非常显著意义(P<0.01);组间比较,单纯中药组与单纯西药组比较无统计学意义(P>0.05),中医综合组与西医综合组比较无统计学意义(P>0.05),单纯中药组与中医综合组比较有统计学意义(P<0.05)。
     治疗后50天症状积分比较,单纯中药组与单纯西药组症状积分与治疗前比较有非常显著意义(P<0.01),与治疗后20天比较无统计学意义(P>0.05),但均较治疗后20天略有升高;中医综合组较治疗后20天症状积分有所下降,但是两者比较并无统计学差异(P>0.05),与治疗前比较有非常显著意义(P<0.01);西医综合组与治疗前比较有统计学意义(P<0.01),但是症状积分较治疗后20天略有升高,经统计学处理发现无统计学意义(P>0.05)。
     3.1.3证候总积分比较:治疗后20天四组的证候总积分都较治疗前有显著的下降,经统计学比较,差异有非常显著意义(P<0.01);组间比较,单纯中药组与单纯西药组比较无统计学意义(P>0.05),中医综合组与西医综合组比较无统计学意义(P>0.05),单纯中药组与中医综合组比较有统计学意义(P<0.05)。
     3.1.4治疗后20天鼻腔分泌物涂片中嗜酸性粒细胞变化比较:治疗后20天鼻腔分泌物涂片中嗜酸性粒细胞下降率,单纯中药组为48.75%,单纯西药组为50.4%,中医综合组为70.21%,西医综合组为75%。组间比较,经CMH统计方法分析,单纯中药组与单纯西药组疗效无统计学意义(P>0.05),中医综合组与西医综合组比较无统计学意义(P>0.05),单纯中药组与中医综合组比较有非常显著意义(P<0.01)。
     3.2单纯中药组中各治疗亚组与相应对照组间治疗结果比较
     3.2.1中医证候等级疗效:
     单纯中药组中各治疗亚组治疗后均显示出很好的疗效,玉蝉卫肺丸治疗组的总有效率是89.00%,玉蝉卫肺丸对照组的总有效率是79.59%;健脾通窍汤治疗组的总有效率是87.29%,健脾通窍汤对照组的总有效率是78.85%;清热通窍汤治疗组的总有效率是88.24%,清热通窍汤对照组的总有效率是75.00%;滋阴润肺汤治疗组的总有效率是80.77%,滋阴润肺汤对照组的总有效率是83.33%;温肾止涕汤治疗组的总有效率是80.00%,温肾止涕汤对照组的总有效率是66.67%。
     单纯中药组中各治疗亚组证候等级疗效比较,玉蝉卫肺丸组与相应对照组相比、健脾通窍汤治疗组与相应对照组相比、清热通窍汤治疗组与相应对照组相比、温肾止涕汤治疗组与相应对照组相比,差异均具有非常显著意义(P<0.01),治疗组疗效明显优于对照组。滋阴润肺汤治疗组疗效与相应对照组相比,两组比较无统计学意义(P>0.05)。
     3.2.2症状积分:治疗后单纯中药组中各治疗亚组与相应对照组症状积分均较治疗前均明显下降(P<0.01),但是组间比较无显著性差异(P>0.05)。停药后一个月(治疗后第50天),各治疗组与相应对照组症状积分与治疗前比较仍有显著性差异(P<0.01),与治疗第20天时比较无显著性差异(P>0.05),组间比较亦无显著性差异(P>0.05)。
     3.2.3证候总积分比较:治疗后单纯中药组中各治疗亚组与相应对照组证候总积分均较治疗前明显下降(P<0.01),但是组间比较无显著性差异(P>0.05)。单纯中药组中各治疗亚组组间比较无显著性差异(P>0.05)。
     3.2.4嗜酸性粒细胞变化比较:经CMH统计方法分析,单纯中药组各治疗亚组与相应对照治疗后20天鼻腔分泌物涂片中嗜酸性粒细胞下降率组间比较,无统计学意义(P>0.05),单纯中药组各治疗亚组之间比较无统计学意义(P>0.05)。
     3.3变应原测试结果:在670例变应性鼻炎患者中,至少对一种变应原呈阳性反应共487例,阳性率72.69%。北京城区变应性鼻炎患者中变应原种类分布由强到弱依次排列为屋尘螨、粉尘螨、杂草、树Ⅰ、树Ⅱ、藜、大豚草、动物毛、室内霉菌、室外霉菌、羽毛等。豚草花粉在本研究中占有较高的皮试阳性率,且其再生能力极强、花粉量很大,应引起重视。
     3.4安全性监测结果:在本研究中,各组均具有良好的安全性,治疗前后血常规、尿常规变化均无显著性差异(P>0.05)。各组患者ALT、CREA、BUN在服药前后均在正常范围内,治疗前后没有波动超过正常值50%的病例。
     4结论
     4.1中医药分证型辨证治疗变应性鼻炎具有很好的疗效,能够很好地改善患者的症状和体征,明显降低患者的症状和证候积分。
     4.2中药汤剂能够显著降低鼻腔分泌物涂片中嗜酸性粒细胞的数目。
     4.3中药汤剂内服合用局部滴鼻剂能够明显提高治疗变应性鼻炎的疗效。
     4.4北京城区变应性鼻炎阳性率为72.69%,变应原种类分布由强到弱依次排列为屋尘螨、粉尘螨、杂草、树Ⅰ、树Ⅱ等。
     4.5豚草花粉在本研究中占有较高的皮试阳性率,且其再生能力极强、花粉量很大,应引起重视。
     4.6中医药治疗本病具有较好的安全性,无明显毒副作用。
1 Objective:To evaluate the effect of traditional Chinese medicine treatment on allergic rhinitis, and analyze the characteristics of rhinitis allergens in Beijing area.
     2 Methods
     2.1 Searched the ancient and modern literature of allergic rhinitis published in the last ten years, and analysed the current research situation of Chinese medicine and western medicine on allergic rhinitis.
     2.2 670 cases of Patients in this multi-centers, randomized and controlled trial were randomly assigned to four groups:407 cases in traditional Chinese medicine group,133 cases in western medicine group,98 cases in Comprehensive traditional Chinese medicine group, and 32 cases in comprehensive western medicine group. Which were respectively given Chinese decoction, cetirizine hydrochloride, Chinese decoction combined XinXi naristillae, and cetirizine combined Beconase AQ Nasal Spray. Besides, The Chinese traditional medicine group was divided into 5 types according to their syndrome:Lung qi deficiency type, Spleen deficiency and fluid-retention type, lung heat stagnation type, yin deficiency of lung and kidney type, kidney-yang deficiency type. Each of them was treated by the following prescription:Yuchanweifei pill, Jianpitongqiao decoction, Qingretongqiao decoction, Ziyinrunfei decoction and Wenshenzhiti decoction. The Comprehensive traditional Chinese medicine group was also divided into 5 types as the traditional Chinese medicine group, and XinXi or XinMa naristillae was added to each type on the basis of the treatment of traditional Chinese medicine group.The total treatment period was 20 days. Then observed the treatment effect just at the 20 days and after 30 days of withdrawal of drugs, to analyze and evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of drugs on syndrome degree, total symptom scores and effect on nasal membrane eosinophils.
     2.3 Detected the rhinitis allergens of 670 patients with allergic rhinitis in Beijing area to summarize their distribution characteristics.
     3 Results
     3.1 The comparison of results of traditional Chinese medicine group, western medicine group, Comprehensive traditional chinese medicine group and comprehensive western medicine group
     3.1.1 Rating effect of traditional Chinese medicine syndrome:All the groups had proved to be effective. The total effective percentage of traditional Chinese medicine group was 87.00%, western medicine group 78.40%, Comprehensive traditional Chinese medicine group 94.68% and comprehensive western medicine group 90.62%. By the ridit analysis, the total effect of traditional Chinese medicine group was better than western medicine group (P<0.05); and the total effect of comprehensive traditional Chinese medicine group was better than comprehensive western medicine group (P<0.05); besides the total effect of comprehensive traditional Chinese medicine group was better than traditional Chinese medicine group (P<0.05).
     3.1.2 Comparison of symptom scores:After 20 days' treatment, the symptom scores of all groups decreased than before treatment, which had significant difference (P<0.01). And there was statistical significance on symptom scores between comprehensive traditional Chinese medicine group and traditional Chinese medicine group (P<0.05). However, there was no statistical difference on symptom scores between traditional Chinese medicine group and western medicine group, neither was between comprehensive traditional Chinese medicine group and comprehensive western medicine group (P>0.05).
     30 days after withdrawal of drugs, compared to before treatment, there was remarkable significance of symptom scores in traditional Chinese medicine group, western medicine group and comprehensive western medicine group (P<0.01), while compared to 20 days after treatment, there was little increase but had no statistical significance(P>0.05);In comprehensive traditional Chinese medicine group, the symptom score decreased compared to 20 days after treatment, but had no statistical significance (P>0.05), while had remarkable significance compared to before treatment(P<0.01),
     3.1.3 Comparison of syndrome scores:After the treatment, the syndrome scores of every group had obviously decreased than before treatment (P <0.01). There was no statistical difference on syndrome scores between traditional Chinese medicine group and western medicine group, between comprehensive traditional Chinese medicine group and comprehensive western medicine group (P>0.05). But there was statistical difference between traditional Chinese medicine group and comprehensive traditional Chinese medicine group (P<0.05).
     3.1.4 Comparison of the changes of eosinophil numbers:20 days later, the eosinophils of rhinal secretion smear of every group had decreased obviously. With the rate in traditional Chinese medicine group was 48.75%. Western medicine group 50.40%. Comprehensive traditional Chinese medicine group 70.21% and comprehensive Western medicine group 75.00%. There was no statistical difference between traditional Chinese medicine group and western medicine group, neither was between comprehensive traditional Chinese medicine group and comprehensive western medicine group (P>0.05). But there was statistical difference between comprehensive traditional Chinese medicine group and traditional Chinese medicine group (P<0.01).
     3.2 The comparison of results of subgroups in traditional Chinese medicine group with relevant control groups
     3.2.1 Rating effect of syndromes in traditional Chinese medicine:Every subgroup of traditional Chinese medicine group had achieved good efficacy. The total effective rate of Yuchanweifei pill treatment group was 89.00%. Yuchanweifei pill control group was 79.59%. The total effective rate of Jianpitongqiao decoction treatment group was 87.29%. Jianpitongqiao decoction control group was 78.85%. Total effective rate of Qingretongqiao decoction treatment group was 88.24%, and Qingretongqiao decoction control group was75.0%. Total effective rate of Ziyinrunfei decoction treatment group was 80.77%, and Ziyinrunfei decoction control group was 83.33%. Total effective of Wenshenzhiti decoction treatment group was 80.00%, and Wenshenzhiti decoction control group was 66.67%.
     Among the subgroups, except for the Ziyinrunfei decoction group, the rest groups all had statistical significance compared to their corresponding control groups. The effect of treatment groups were better than those of control groups (P<0.01).
     3.2.2 Comparison of symptom scores:After treatment, the symptom scores of every subgroup had obviously decreased than before (P<0.01). There was no statistical difference between every subgroup and corresponding control group (P>0.05). After one month of withdrawal, compared to before treatment, the symptom scores had statistical significance, while had no difference compared to 20 days' treatment and among the subgroups (P >0.05).
     3.2.3 Comparison of syndrome scores:After treatment, the syndrome scores of every subgroup had obviously decreased than before (P<0.01). There was no statistical difference between every subgroup and corresponding control group (P>0.05).
     3.2.4 Comparison of changes of eosinophil numbers:After statistical analysis, there was no difference of eosinophil numbers changes before and after treatment (P>0.05), and there was no statistical difference between every subgroup and their corresponding control group (P> 0.05).
     3.3 Allergens test results:Among the 670 allergic rhinitis patients of Beijing city, there were 487 patients which showed positive reaction to at least one allergen, with positive rate 72.69%. The distribution of allergens species from strong to weak were as follows:House dust mites, Dust mites, Weeds, TreesⅠ, TreesⅡ, Chenopodiaceae, Ragweed, Animals' wool, Indoor mold, Outdoor mold, Feathers, and so on. In this study, ragweed pollen occupied a high positive rate of skin test. We should pay more attention to it, as it had strong regeneration ability and large dose of pollen.
     3.4 Safety monitoring results:In this study, each group had good safety. Changes of blood and urine routine examinations had no significance before and after treatment(P> 0.05). ALT, CREA and BUN were all in normal range, the fluctuation was no more than 50% of the normal value.
     4 Conclusions
     4.1 The treatment of allergic rhinitis according to syndrome differentiation of traditional Chinese medicine had good effect, and could greatly decrease the scores of their symptom and syndrome, so as to improve their life quality.
     4.2 Traditional Chinese decoction could significantly reduce the number of eosinophil in rhinal secretion smear.
     4.3 Traditional Chinese decoction combined with nose drops could significantly improve the treatment effect of allergic rhinitis.
     4.4 The positive rate of allergic rhinitis in Beijing city was 72.69 %, the distribution of allergens species from strong to weak were as follows:House dust mites, Dust mites, Weeds, TreesⅠ, TreesⅡ, et al.
     4.5 Attention should be paid to Ragweed pollen, as it occupied a high positive rate of skin test, meanwhile had strong regeneration ability and large dose of pollen.
     4.6 Traditional Chinese medicine treatment on allergic rhinitis was safe and had no significant side-effects.
引文
1.郝建莹,郝雪莹,关洁,等.补肺益脾温肾法治疗变应性鼻炎60例[J].中医杂志,2006,47(6):423.
    2.田进强,严道南,王东方.变应性鼻炎虚寒证研究初探[J].吉林中医药,2004,24(10):57-58.
    3.张仲林.从“肺开窍于鼻”理论探讨玉屏风散对变应性鼻炎的治疗[J].江苏中医药,2009,41(10):11-12.
    4.邱宝珊,刘蓬,马林霞,等.脾虚与变应性鼻炎的相关性实验研究[J].中医药学刊,2003,21(7):1040-1041.
    5.邱宝珊,刘蓬,黄可儿,等.补中益气汤对脾虚型变应性鼻炎的治疗作用[J].中药新药与临床药理,2003,14(3):147-149.
    6.李淑良.从肾虚论治变应性鼻炎[J].江苏中医药,2007,39(2):4.
    7.吴拥军.益气温阳法治疗老年性变应性鼻炎30例疗效观察[J].时珍国医国药,2006,17(3):414.
    8.徐可信.从鼻黏膜变异辨治过敏性鼻炎体会[J].中医杂志,2000,41(12):714.
    9.李凡成.分型治疗变应性鼻炎100例总结[J].新中医,1986,(2):27.
    10.王士贞,等.中医耳鼻咽喉科学[M].北京:中国中医药出版社,2003,124-130.
    11.王东方,郭少武.变应性鼻炎郁热证临床研究[J].辽宁中医杂志,2003,30(8):650-651.
    12.胡陟,张世中.凉血脱敏法治疗血热型变应性鼻炎36例疗效观察[J].时珍国医国药,2006,17(12):2578-2579.
    13.严试.调水化气利水毒治疗过敏性鼻炎[J].河南中医,2000,20(6):16.
    14.郭杨志.从饮证论治变应性鼻炎[J].河北中医,2009,31(10):1494-1495.
    15.王树鹏,刘书宇.小青龙汤加味治疗变应性鼻炎的中医理论探讨[J].辽宁中医杂志,2007,34(5):575-576.
    16.王炎,马伟民.过敏性鼻炎的辨证论治[J].现代中医药,2004(1):35-37.
    17.袁颖.瘀血与变应性鼻炎的证治[J].中国中医基础医学杂志,2005,11(3):217-219.
    18.王德鉴,王士贞主编.中医耳鼻咽喉口腔科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1994:349-351.
    19.王永钦主编.中医耳鼻咽喉口腔科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2001:493-504.
    20.陆小左,董显庸主编.中医鼻病大全[M].天津:天津科学技术出版社,1995:131.
    21.刘静,李蕾.李淑良老师辨证论治变应性鼻炎经验.第15届全国中医耳鼻喉科学术研讨和继续教育年会论文汇编,2009:262-264.
    22.贯剑,何裕民.中医药治疗变应性鼻炎的研究进展[J].江苏中医,2001,22(7):44-45.
    23.冯荣昌.灵活运用玉屏风散治疗变应性鼻炎[J].江苏中医药,2007,39(2):6.
    24.骆斌,骆庆峰,赵京宁,等.宣肺通窍法治疗变应性鼻炎临床观察[J].北京中医药大学学报,2005,28(6):80-82.
    25.李曼,翟长云,朱爱勤.益气固表治疗变应性鼻炎80例临床观察[J].中国现代医,2008,46(36):104.
    26.王永钦.益气收敛法治疗变应性鼻炎100例[J].世界中医药,2007,2(3):157.
    27.耿引循,整理.中国百年百名中医临床家丛书——耿鉴庭[M].北京:中国中医药出版社,2001:240.
    28.朱伟嵘,张守杰,邓德厚,等.地参祛风合剂治疗变应性鼻炎的随机对照临床研究[J].中西医结合学报,2008,6(7):700-703.
    29.沈峰,陈小宁.消风冲剂治疗变应性鼻炎80例[J].辽宁中医杂志,2004,31(1):54.
    30.黄兆坤.复方鼽灵汤治疗过敏性鼻炎72例[J].黑龙江中医药,1996,(1):12-13.
    31.傅晓东.陈国丰治疗变应性鼻炎十法[J].中医杂志,2008,49(7):592.
    32.唐月英,宋凯,曾屹生,等.加味四君子汤治疗脾气虚型常年性变应性鼻炎的临床疗效研究[J].中国中西医结合耳鼻咽喉科杂志,2008,16(6):422-424.
    33.吴洪俊.补中益气汤加减治疗变应性鼻炎64例[J].辽宁中医杂志,2004,31(2):131.
    34.于圣立.补中益气汤加减治疗变应性鼻炎疗效的对比观察[J].中国药物与临床,2005,5(1):60.
    35.韦子章.参苓白术散为主治疗变应性鼻炎50例[J].陕西中医,2008,29(7):832-833.
    36.李瑛,万雪梅,彭顺林.温补肾阳法治疗变应性鼻炎之浅见[J].四川中医,2008,26(2):23-25.
    37.曹焕光,韦明壮.金匮肾气丸加减配合按摩治疗变应性鼻炎[J].按摩与康复医学,2010,1(7):35-37.
    38.孙一枚.右归饮治疗肾阳虚型变应性鼻炎47例临床观察[J].湖南中医药导报,2004,10(5):40-41.
    39.吴拥军.益气温阳法治疗老年性变应性鼻炎30例疗效观察[J].时珍国医国药,2006,17(3):414.
    40.廖月红,欧爱华,向建文,等.清金法治疗变应性鼻炎的疗效观察及其证候学研究[J].中国中西医结合耳鼻咽喉科杂志,2007,15(6):427-429.
    41.张虹.清心法在变应性鼻炎中的应用[J].中华中医药杂志,2008,增刊:287-288.
    42.张肇宇.清热通窍法对肺经郁热型变应性鼻炎的临床研究[J].中医耳鼻喉科学研究杂志,2006,5(2):30-35.
    43.徐英,李凡成.清热止嚏汤治疗变应性鼻炎热证临床观察[J].湖南中医药大学学报,2009,29(4):59-60.
    44.柴向斌,王斌全.血瘀证与常年性变应性鼻炎关系初探[J].中医药研究,2001,17(4):25.
    45.韩静.益气活血法治疗变应性鼻炎32例[J].陕西中医,2002,23(9):794-795.
    46.潘风军.小青龙汤加味治疗过敏性鼻炎30例[J].包头医学,1999,23(2):77.
    47.刘巧平,刘建华,李玉兰,等.养阴平肝法治疗变态反应性鼻炎[J].北京中医药大学学报,2001,24(2):68-69.
    48.吴敏,张婧延,张欣,等.辛夷挥发油纳米脂质体滴鼻剂治疗儿童变应性鼻炎的临床观察[J].中国中西医结合杂志,2009,29(8):740-742.
    49.安立钢,刘宇.中药蒸汽吸入法治疗变应性鼻炎54例疗效观察[J].齐齐哈尔医学院学报,2007,28(10):1204.
    50.刘钢,吴飞虎,屠彦红,等.滴鼻灵治疗变应性鼻炎300例的临床观察[J].安徽医学,2005,26(4):319.
    51.许泽典.中药鼻用乳膏治疗变应性鼻炎36例疗效观察[J].中国中医药信息杂志,2008,15(4):85.
    52.何天有,李惠琴,赵耀东,等.透刺为主治疗过敏性鼻炎60例[J].中国针灸,2006,26(2):110.
    53.米德萍,青淑元.针刺治疗变应性鼻炎45例[J].山东中医杂志,2005,24(9):548-549.
    54.饶艳秋,韩乃沂.针刺治疗变应性鼻炎疗效观察及对血清免疫学的影响[J].中国针灸,2006,26(8):557-560.
    55.曹明根,张丽.赵氏雷火灸治疗变应性鼻炎疗效分析[J].中国中西医结合耳鼻咽喉科杂志,2006,14(5):293-295.
    56.杨桂荣.艾灸为主治疗过敏性鼻炎135例[J].中国针灸,1995,15(4):55.
    57.安杨,王俊杰,张焱.隔药饼灸治疗变应性鼻炎32例[J].陕西中医,2010,31(2):214-216.
    58.刘岩红.穴位贴敷治疗过敏性鼻炎1000例[J].中国针灸,1997,17(1):34.
    59.王红,王鑫,夏令琼.天灸治疗常年变应性鼻炎的疗效观察与护理[J].中国中医急症,2008,17(10):1487-1488.
    60.李国徽,胡雨华,陈凌,等.三伏天灸治疗变应性鼻炎600例[J].陕西中医,2009,30(7):885-886.
    61.王景文.迎香穴注射治疗变应性鼻炎108例分析[J].中国误诊学杂,2008,8(6):1420-1421.
    62.谷美云.迎香穴注射治疗变应性鼻炎疗效观察[J].现代中西医结合杂志,2007,16(10):1357.
    63.石天山,任聪敏,刘喜军,等.穴位注射治疗变应性鼻炎90例疗效观察[J].中国中西医结合耳鼻咽喉科杂志,2009,17(3):165-166.
    64.谢奕彬.温灸球(生物陶瓷)隔姜灸治疗变应性鼻炎疗效观察[J].针灸临床杂志,2004,20(3):45-46.
    65.杜艳,蒙珊.培土生金穴位埋线法治疗变应性鼻炎临床观察[J].针灸临床杂志,2007,23(4):23-24.
    66.胡克信,严道南.激光照射上迎香穴治疗变应性鼻炎31例疗效观察[J].长春中医药大学学报,2009,25(2):266-267.
    67.李漫.耳穴贴压法治疗变应性鼻炎的疗效观察[J].医学综述,2007,13(23):1888-1889.
    68.黄选兆,汪吉宝,孔维佳.实用耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学(第2版)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2008,1:218-225.
    69.韩德民,张罗,黄丹,等.我国11城市变应性鼻炎自报患病率调查[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2007,42:83-89.
    70.朱秀青,姜宝法,时光刚.鲁西地区变应性鼻炎的流行病学调查分析[J].山东医药,2009,49(29):67-68.
    71.钱迪,洪苏玲,杨玉成,等.我国西部部分地区变应性鼻炎流行病学抽样调查[J].第三军医大学学报,2008,30(6):539-542.
    72. Bousquet J, Khaltaev N, Cruz AA, et al. Allergic rhinitis and its impact on asthma(ARIA) 2008 update. Allergy,2008,63(Suppl 86):8-160.
    73.顾之燕,韩德民.变应性鼻炎——一个曾经被低估了的疾病[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2005,40(3):161-162.
    74.中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志编委会鼻科组,中华医学会耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学分会鼻科学组.变应性鼻炎诊断和治疗指南[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2009,44(12):977-978.
    75.张迎俊.常见过敏原的种类和检测[J].中国临床医生,2008,36(12):15-17.
    76.杜爱萍,李星军,张莉.SPT法和IVT法检测儿童哮喘变应原比较分析研究[J].现代预防医学,2009,36(3):574-577.
    77.翟月明,陈蕴光,赖荷,等.变应性鼻炎变应原皮肤检测与体外检测的相关关系[J].现代医院,2010,10(4):64-65.
    78.李玉洁,王林娥,杨小丽,等.变应性鼻炎常见变应原调查分析[J].浙江临床医 学,2010,12(5):531-532.
    79.黄春雷,赵京,谷庆隆,等.北京地区学龄儿童变应性鼻炎相关因素分析[J].临床儿科杂志,2008,26(5):403-405.
    80.王成硕,张罗,韩德民,等.北京地区变应性鼻炎患者吸入变应原谱分析[J].临床耳鼻咽喉科杂志,2006,20(5):204-207.
    81.邝立,冯惠玲,梅晓峰,等.广东佛山地区1560例变应性鼻炎患者变应原皮肤点刺结果分析[J].临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2010,24(5):229-230.
    82.徐庆文,孙一帆,李巧荣,等.中山地区变应性鼻炎常见变应原调查分析[J].中国中西医结合耳鼻咽喉科杂志,2009,17(2):112-114.
    83.钱迪,洪苏玲,杨玉成,等.重庆地区变应性鼻炎患者变应原谱分析[J].重庆医科大学学报,2008,33(5):531-535.
    84.张勇,李泽卿,江满杰,等.南京地区变应性鼻炎患者致敏原皮肤点刺试验结果分析及其临床意义[J].实用医学杂志,2008,24(22):3876-3878.
    85.宋薇薇,高军,冯晓娟,等.辽宁地区变应性鼻炎过敏原调查及其临床意义[J].中国中西医结合耳鼻咽喉科杂志,2009,17(1):46-47.
    86.李宗华,朱蔚,郭新薇,等.宁夏地区变应性鼻炎患者的变应原分析[J].中国当代医药,2010,17(9):35-36.
    87.朱丽,刘仲奇,辛颖,等.从皮肤试验分析变应性鼻炎的诊断[J].中国耳鼻咽喉颅底外科杂志,2007,13(2):123-125.
    88.徐慧珍,徐林根,姜辉,等.变应原皮肽点刺试验在变应性鼻炎中的临床意义[J].中国临床医学,2004,11(3):435-436.
    89.禹华玮,徐大韬,李筱勇.变应性鼻炎患者鼻黏膜分泌物嗜酸性粒细胞观察[J].华北煤炭医学院学报,2005,7(6):703-704.
    90.姜孝芳,高丽,李惠武,等.辛芷鼻敏胶囊对变应性鼻炎大鼠血清一氧化氮和鼻黏膜嗜酸性粒细胞浸润的影响[J].新疆医科大学学报,2007,30(8):821-823.
    91.许秋荣,余振亚,司秀红,等.下鼻甲注射得宝松对变应性鼻炎分泌物嗜酸性粒细胞的影响[J].河北医药,2009,31(20):2731-2732.
    92.张传栋.变应性鼻炎与急性鼻炎患者鼻分泌物中嗜酸粒细胞及IgE的比较[J].医学检验与临床,2009,20(2):63-64.
    93. Pope SM, Zimmermann N, Stringer KF, et al. The eotaxin chemokines and CCR3 are fundamental regulators of allergen-induced pulmonary eosinophilia. J Immunol,2005,175:5341-5350.
    94.燕志强,章如新,余少卿,等.嗜酸细胞活化趋化因子在变应性鼻炎中的作用[J].中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科,2008,15(5):262-266.
    95.燕志强,章如新,余少卿,等.Eotaxin在变应性鼻炎中的表达及组胺调控作用的研究[J].临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2009,23(23):1086-1088.
    96.杜敬东,李丹,陈焕均,等.变应性鼻炎患者血清IL-13和Eotaxin测定及其临床意义[J].临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2007,27(2):87-88.
    97. Sanchez-segure A, Brieva JA, Rodriguez C. Lymphocytes that infiltrate nasal polyps have a specialized phenotype and produce a mixed Thl/Th2 pattern of cytokines. J Allergy Clin Immunol,1998,102:953-960.
    98. Romagnani S. The Thl/Th2 paradigm. Immunol Today,1997,18:263-266.
    99.吴文璎,凌红阳,周慧,等.变应性鼻炎患者Thl/Th2相关细胞因子的检测及其临床意义[J].江苏医药,2005,31(11):859-861.
    100.彭华,陈勇挺,汪建,等.白介素4与白介素12在变应性鼻炎、哮喘和特应性皮炎中的表达及意义[J].广东医学,2010,36(2):727-728.
    101.刘颖慧,成炜,蒋捍东.变应性鼻炎和哮喘患者血清工L-9、IL-4、IL-5变化及临床意义[J].山东医药,2009,49(5):10-12.
    102. Hershey GK, Friedrich MF, Esswein LA, et al. The association of atopy with a gene-of-function mutation in the alpha subunit of the interleukin-4 receptor. N Engl J Med,1997,337:1720-1725.
    103.马静,董超,张瀛,等.白细胞介素4受体基因多态性与变应性鼻炎的相关性[J].中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科,2006,13(4):247-249.
    104.黎毓光,卢建鹏,李敏雄,等.白介素4受体基因Q576R多态性及与变应性鼻炎的相关性[J].解剖学研究,2008,30(4):261-263.
    105.中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志编委会鼻科组.变应性鼻炎诊断和治疗指南解读[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2009,44(12):972-976.
    106.中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志编辑委员会,中华医学会耳鼻咽喉科分会.变应 性鼻炎的诊治原则和推荐方案(2004年,兰州)[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2005,40(3):166-167.
    107.国家中医药管理局.中医病证诊断疗效标准[S].南京:南京大学出版社,1994:24.
    108.刘永贵,于鹏,徐颂,等.抗组胺药研究进展[J].现代药物与临床,2010,25(1):19-21.
    109.赵文丽,编译.第二代抗组胺药在治疗过敏性疾病中的作用和效果[J].国外医学药学分册,2005,32(4):261-264.
    110.徐道华.第三代抗组胺药地氯雷他定[J].中国新药杂志,2005,14(12):1486-1488.
    111.周伟,周正波,张玲.左旋西替利嗪治疗作用的研究进展[J].国外医学皮肤性病学分册,2003,29(6):333-335.
    112.谢正平,李忠铭,尤庆亮,等.盐酸西替利嗪的合成与应用[J].化学与生物工程,2009,26(1):53-57.
    113.史剑锋.第二代抗组胺药西替利嗪的临床应用[J].河北北方学院学报(医学版),2007,24(2):81-82.
    114.董震,程雷.重视变应性鼻炎药物的合理应用[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2008,43(7):481-482.
    115.孙小青,殷敏,程雷.鼻内糖皮质激素在过敏性鼻炎治疗中的合理应用[J].中华临床免疫和变态反应杂志,2010,4(3):216-220.
    116.江文辉,邓力,温惠虹,等.孟鲁司特改善2-5岁哮喘伴过敏性鼻炎儿童鼻炎症状的效果观察[J].临床用药研究,2007,28(12):2014-2015.
    117.黄英凯,洪浩波.鼻中隔矫正术改善变应性鼻炎症状的临床观察[J].现代医院,2008,8(7):60-61.
    118.黄保文,李本农,周成平,等.鼻内窥镜下微波热凝筛前神经治疗变应性鼻炎[J].临床耳鼻咽喉科杂志,2000,14(9):413-415.
    119.刘新义,刘艳,张恩东,等.鼻腔神经血管切断术治疗变应性鼻炎[J].中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科,2005,12(8):505-507.
    120.李远良.微波烧灼下鼻甲治疗季节性变应性鼻炎[J].临床和实验医学杂 志,2007,6(4):111-113.
    121.郑筱萸.中药新药临床研究指导原则[S].北京:中国医药科技出版社,2002.
    122.陈淑莹,周大兴.辛夷挥发油的抗炎、抗过敏作用[J].中国现代应用药学杂志,1998,15(2):7-8.
    123.黄淑英,陈家佩,王广义.熊胆和辛夷等中药的抗过敏作用[J].中药药理与临床,1996,(3):28-30.
    124.李小莉,张永忠.辛夷挥发油的抗过敏实验研究[J].中国医院药学杂志,2002,22(9):520-522.
    125. Bousquet J, Khaltaev N, Cruz AA, et al. Allergic rhinitis and its impact on asthma(ARIA)2008 update(in collaboration with the World Health Organization, GA21, EN and AllerGen). Allergy,2008,63(Suppl 86):8-160.
    126.Platts-Mills T A E, de Weck A. Dust mite allergens and asthmar a worldwide problem[J]. Journal of Allergy Clinical & Immunology,1989, 83:416-427.
    127. Munir A K, Bjorksten B, Einarsson R, et al. Mite allergens in relation to home conditions and sensitization of asthmatic children from three climatic regions. Allergy,1995,50:55-64.
    128.叶世泰.中国气传致敏花粉与自然地理、气候、植被及其它诸因素的关系.见:中国气传致敏花粉调查领导小组主编.中国气传致敏花粉调查.北京:人民出版社,1991:40-42.
    129.梁维敏,王绍武.豚草的危害及防控措施[J].现代农业科技,2010,(24):160-161.
    130.叶世泰,主编.变态反应学.北京:科技出版社,1998:195-224.