丙磺舒对氨苄西林在犬体内的药物动力学影响的研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
目的:应用液相色谱-串联质谱法(LC/MS/MS)测定比格犬给药后血浆中氨苄西林和丙磺舒的血药浓度,绘制血药浓度-时间变化曲线,根据曲线计算主要药动学参数,并进行方差分析。
    方法:本试验采用双周期随机交叉试验设计,分别对6只比格犬静脉注射给予低、中、高三个剂量水平的氨苄西林钠(对照组)和氨苄西林钠/丙磺舒钠(试验组)的药动学行为进行考察。采用液相色谱-质谱-质谱联用法(LC/MS/MS) ,分别测定了给药后不同时刻比格犬血浆中氨苄西林钠和氨苄西林钠/丙磺舒钠浓度,绘制了血药浓度-时间曲线。根据血药浓度-时间数据,采用梯形法计算AUC ;以半对数作图法,由消除相末端后四个浓度点计算t1/2,求出主要药动学参数并对其进行方差分析。
    结果与结论:6只比格犬静脉给予氨苄西林钠(对照组),剂量分别为40, 80和160 mg(kg-1时,血浆中氨苄西林的t1/2分别为0.70±0.10 ,0.92±0.07和 1.49±0.13 h;AUC0-t分别为129.8±28.04,142.8±24.92和233.7±48.71 (g(h(ml-1;AUC0-(分别为130.1±28.07,143.0±24.94和234.0±48.78 (g(h(ml-1。
    6只比格犬静脉给予氨苄西林钠/丙磺舒钠(试验组),剂量分别为40/13.5, 80/27和160/54 mg(kg-1时,血浆中氨苄西林的t1/2分别为0.98±0.09 ,1.15±0.11和 1.75±0.21 h;AUC0-t分别为160.2±16.27,171.8±41.79和275.5±79.55 (g(h(ml-1;AUC0-(分别为160.5±16.29,172.1±41.79和276.1±79.77 (g(h(ml-1。血浆中丙磺舒的t1/2分别为10.63±3.92 ,13.78±5.06和 9.91±2.93 h;AUC0-t分别为709.4±170.5,1832.6±650.8和2632.8±980.2 (g(h(ml-1;AUC0-(分别为756.3±216.2,2250.6±994.9和2773.2±1101.9 (g(h(ml-1。
    
    将对照组(氨苄西林钠)和试验组(氨苄西林钠/丙磺舒钠)的主要药物动力学参数进行方差分析(AUC0-t和AUC0-(需进行对数转换),结果表明:对照组和试验组之间(两制剂间)氨苄西林的药物动力学参数t1/2 、AUC0-t和AUC0-(都有显著性差异(P<0.05)。与对照组相比,试验组氨苄西林的消除半衰期t1/2有所延长,AUC0-t和AUC0-(有所提高,可以认为丙磺舒确实具有延缓氨苄西林消除的作用。
Aim: To develop a LC/MS/MS method for determination of ampicillin and probenecid in beegles dogs’ plasma. Use this method, we could obtain the concentration-time profiles of the two drugs. Furthermore, after calculated the PK parameters, the main parameters obtained were analyzed by ANOVA.
    Method: To study the different behaviors on pharmacokinetics of ampicillin (reference) and ampicillin / probenecid (test) after administrated to 6 beegles dogs designed by two period cross-over at high, middle and low dose level, respectively. The concentration was determined by LC/MS/MS and a concentration-time profiles could be obtained. The values of AUC were calculated with trapezoid method, t1/2 was calculated according to the last four points in the elimination phase.
    Results and conclusion: The values of t1/2 of ampicillin (in the reference group) in 6 beegles dogs are 0.70±0.10, 0.92±0.07 and 1.49±0.13 h at the intravenous dosage of 40, 80 and 160 mg(kg-1 respectively. And the values of AUC0-t were 129.8±28.04,142.8±24.92 and 233.7±48.71 (g(h(ml-1, the values of AUC0-( were 130.1±28.07,143.0±24.94 and 234.0±48.78 (g(h(ml-1, respectively. However, the corresponding values of ampicillin (in the test group) were as follows: t1/2, 0.98±0.09, 1.15±0.11and 1.75±0.21 h; AUC0-t, 160.2±16.27, 171.8±41.79 and 275.5±79.55 (g(h(ml-1; AUC0-(, 160.5±16.29, 172.1±41.79 and 276.1±79.77 (g(h(ml-1。The values of t1/2 of probenecid in the test group were 10.63±3.92 , 13.78±5.06 and 9.91±2.93 h; The values of AUC0-t were 709.4±170.5, 1832.6±650.8 and 2632.8±980.2 (g(h(ml-1; And the values of AUC0-( were 756.3±216.2, 2250.6±994.9 and 2773.2±1101.9 (g(h(ml-1, respectively.
    
    The main parameters including t1/2 、AUC0-t and AUC0-( were analyzed with ANOVA(AUC0-t and AUC0-( were transferred by logarithm first). The results showed that there were significant differences in these three parameters in the two groups. Contrary to the reference group, the values of t1/2 were longer and the values of AUC0-t and AUC0-( were higher in the test group. All of these indicated that probenecid could reduce the elimination rate of ampicillin in beegles dog after intravenously dosed.
引文
[1] 刘云丽. 氨苄青霉素临床应用中存在的问题[J]. 大理学院学报,2003,2(3):62-63
    [2] 江明性.药理学[M](第四版).人民卫生出版社,2000,280-282
    [3] 李 端. 药理学[M](第四版). 人民卫生出版社,2002,303-305
    [4] 陈新谦, 金有豫. 新编药物学[M].(第十四版).人民卫生出版社, 1998,48
    [5] 王 睿.何谓抗生素后效应?它是否取决于药物的半衰期?[J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志,2002, 25(12): 716-717
    [6] 林能明,吴烨芳.抗生素后效应及其临床意义[J].杭州医学高等专科学校学报,2000,21(3): 166-168
    [7] 于福文,李娜,王冰晖.从抗生素后效应谈临床用药[J].中国临床药学杂志,2001,10(4):258-260
    [8] 李 军,刘振章,孙淑娟,扬久丽. β-内酰胺抗生素的后效应及其临床意义[J]. 山东医药工业, 2000,9(1):27-29
    [9] Hanberger H Pharmacodynamic effects of antibiotics.studies on bacterial morphology, initial killing, postantibiotic effect and effective regrowth time [J]. scand J Infect Dis, 1992,82(suppl):1-52
    [10] 陈新谦,金有豫. 新编药物学[M] .人民卫生出版社,1997,45
    [11] 李 端. 药理学[M](第四版).人民卫生出版社,2002,157
    [12] 汪长生, 刘晓平, 马张庆, 宋建国. 不同剂量丙磺舒对头孢克罗药物动力学的影响 [J]. 中国临床药理学与治疗学, 2002 , 7(2) : 130-133
    [13] Cunningham RF , Israili ZH , Dayton PG . Clinical Pharmacokineftcs of probenecid[J]. Clin Pharmacokinet , 1981,6:135-51
    
    [14] Levison ME,Santoro J , Ayarwal BN .In vitro activity and pharmacokinetics ofcefaclor in normal volunteer and patients with renal failure[J].Postgrad Med J,1979,55(Supple4):12-6
    [15] Tsuji A , Terasai T ,Tanai I ,et al .In vitro evidence for carrier mediated uptake of Blactam antibiotics through organic anion transport systems in rat kidney and liver [J].J Pharmacol Exp Ther , 1990, 253:315-20
    [16] Bonate PL, Reith K , Weir S . Drug interactions at the renal level [J].Clin pharmacokinet , 1998,34:375-404
    [17] Barbhaiya RH , Shukla UA , Gleason CR ,et al . Phase I study of multiple dose cefprozil and comparison with cefaclor [J].Antimicrob Agens Che mother ,1990,34:1198-203
    [18] 李 端. 药理学[M](第四版).人民卫生出版社,2002,29-30.
    [19] 陈新谦, 金有豫. 新编药物学[M].(第十四版).人民卫生出版社. 1998,163.
    [20] 王勇忠, HPLC法测定恩普洛胶囊中丙磺舒的含量[J]. Strait Pharmaceutical Journal, 2002 ,14(5):45-47
    [21] Gibaldi M, Swartz MA. Apparent effect of probenecid on the distribution of penicillins in man [J]. Clin Pharmacol Ther, 1968,9:345-9
    [22] Agarwal BN,Martinelli R,et al. Pharmacology of cefaclor in normal volunteers and patients with renal failure [J] . Antimicrob Agens Che mother, 1978,13:951-4
    [23] 樊举广. 浅谈丙磺舒对头孢三嗪的作用 [J].皮肤病与性病. 2000,22(3):55
    [24] Ermer J, Vogel M.Application of hyphenated LC-MS techniques in
    
    
    pharmaceutical analysis. Biomed.Chromatogr. 2000, 14:373-383
    [25] Wu Y. The use of liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry for the identification of drug degradation products in pharmaceutical formulations. Biomed Chromatogr. 2000,14:384-396
    [26] Jemal M. High-throughput quantitative bioanalysis by LC/MS/MS. Biomed . Chromatogr. 2000, 14:422-429
    [27] Wang T. A new ultra-high throughput method for characterizating combinatorial libraries incorporating a multiple probe autosampler coupled with flow injection mass spectrometry analysis. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 1998,12:1123-1129
    [28] Niessen WMA. State of the art liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry . J . Chromatogr.A 1999,856:179-197
    [29] Van Bocxlaer JF, Clauwaert KM, Lambert WE. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry in forensic toxicology. Mass Spectrom . Rev. 2000,19:165-214
    [30] 胡 蓓, 江 骥. 串联质谱在药品及其代谢产物分析中的应用. 现代药理实验方法. 张均田主编.北京医科大学中国协和医科大学联合出版社,1998,1637-1642
    [31] 李慧义, 罗淑荣, 周同惠. 液相色谱-质谱联用技术及其在药物代谢研究中的应用[J]. 国外医学药学分册 1997,24:257-263
    [32] Lim J , Jang B , Lee R , Park S , Yun H . Determination of roxithromycin residues in the flounder muscle with electrospray liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry . J . Chromatogr .B 2000, 746:219-225
    [33] Motta M , Ribeiro W , Ifa DR, Moraes MO , Corrado AP , De Nucci G.
    
    
    Bioequivalence evaluation of two roxithromycin formulation in healthy human volunteers by high performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry . Acta Physiol .Pharmacol .Ther . latinoam .1999 , 49:233-241
    [34] Zahir H , Nand RA , Brown KF , Tattam BN , McLachlan AJ . Validation of methods to study the distribution and protein binding of tacrolimus in human blood .J .Pharmacol Toxicol . Methods. 2001 , 46:27-35
    [35] Lerner FE , Caliendo G , Santagada V ,Santana GSM , Moraes MEA , De Nucci G . Clarithromycin bioequivalence study of two oral formulation in healthy human volunteers . Int . J . Clin . Pharmacol . ther . 2000,38:345-354
    [36] Delepine B , Hurtaud-Pessel D , Sanders P . Multiresidue method for confirmation of macrolide antibiotics in bovine muscle by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry . J . AOAC Int . 1996 , 79:397-404
    [37] Delepine B , Hurtaud D , Sanders P . Identification of tylosin in bovine muscle at the maximum residue limit level by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry , using a particle beam interface . Analyst .1994 , 119:2717-2721
    [38] 牛长群,祝仕清. 氨苄西林、阿莫西林中相关物质的LC/MS分析[J]. 药学学报,2001,36(10):758-761
    [39] 钟大放. 以加权最小二乘法建立生物分析标准曲线的若干问题[J]. 药物分析杂志, 1996, 16:343
    [40] 郑筱萸. 化学药品临床前药代动力学研究指导原则(试行).[见:化学药品和治疗用生物制品研究指导原则(试行)].国家药品监督管理局. 中国医药科技出版社,2002,51
    
    [41] 胡 蓉. 注射用氨苄青霉素钠在常用输液中的稳定性[J] Jouranal of Occupational Health and Damage 2002, 17(2):162
    [42] 张瑞坤,章桂芳, 氨苄青霉素钠可溶性粉的稳定性研究[J] 中国兽药杂志,1998,32(1):21-23  
    [43] Wenhong Luo, Catharina Y.W.Ang, Harold C. Thompson Jr. [J] Journal of Chromatography B. 1997,694: 401-407
    [44] Sourgens H ,Derendorf H ,et al. Pharmacokinetic profile of cefaclor [J] .Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther .1977,35:374-80
    [45] Selen A ,Amidon GL ,Welling PG,et al. Pharmacokinetics of probenecid following oral doses to human volunteers[J].J Pharm Sci. 1982,71:1238-42