山东丘陵区苹果园蒸腾耗水规律研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
树木整株耗水性的研究历来是树木水分生理学家、生态学家、林学家共同关心的问题,这一问题既是树木水分生理的核心,也是贯穿整个森林生态和森林培育的理论基础之一。近年来,随我国农业种植结构调整,果树栽植面积、果园的投入和产出不断增长,果园的耗水量不断增加。因此认知果树蒸腾规律和准确测定果树蒸腾量,了解果园土壤水分动态,不仅有利于合理制定灌溉制度,保证果树节水、高产、稳产,而且可以制定适合果园的节水、保水手段。
     本文以山东省丘陵地区苹果园为研究对象,采用热扩散式茎流计、光合测定系统、冠层分析仪、TRIME-FM土壤剖面水分速测仪、微型气象站等先进的仪器,于2009-2010年在山东省肥城市潮泉镇优质红富士苹果园,对苹果树叶片蒸腾特征、果园的气候变化、树干边材液流的时空变化规律、土壤水分的动态变化趋势和果园的水分盈亏变化规律等方面进行了系统试验研究和模拟,取得了以下研究成果:
     (1)夏季蒸腾作用的高峰期出现较早,而春季、初夏和秋季出现较晚,相应的蒸腾强度初夏季节最高,随后逐渐降低。红富士叶片日平均蒸腾速率的年变化呈单峰趋势,在7月15日达到最高峰,峰值为2.726mmol.m~(-2)·s(-1),11月16日达到最低,为0.5876mmol.m~(-2)·s(-1),两者相差2.139mmol.m~(-2)·s(-1)。各月份红富士叶片日平均蒸腾速率由大到小顺序为6月>7月>8月>4月>5月>9月>10月>11月。
     红富士苹果树冠不同方位的蒸腾速率,西向叶片具有较高的叶片蒸腾速率,南向叶片次之,再次为东向叶片,北向叶片蒸腾速率最小,但各方向叶片蒸腾速率之间除个别天差异不显著。不同日期环境因子与蒸腾速率的相关性大小和重要程度均不相同,但PAR与蒸腾速率均呈显著和极显著相关关系。从整个生长季节看,大气温度、PAR、GS和CI与蒸腾速率呈极显著相关。
     (2)红富士苹果离体叶片蒸腾速率是活体叶片的1.07~3.44倍,平均为1.45倍,即红富士苹果潜在最大叶片蒸腾速率是自然状态下叶片蒸腾速率的1.45倍。气孔计法与称重法测定值的比值在日进程上呈现递减趋势,校正系数在日进程上应逐渐递增,校正系数在日进程上分别为0.24、0.32、0.71、0.88、0.83、1.00,平均取值为0.495。气孔计法测定结果的偏离程度在日周期内清晨最大,并随着时间逐渐下降,6:00~10:00偏离4.24~3.11倍,10:00~14:00偏离1.40~1.14倍,14:00~18:00偏离1.20~1.00倍,生长季节平均偏离2.02倍。利用气孔计测定值估测整株蒸腾量,经过校正红富士苹果生长季节的叶片蒸腾量总计为9213kg。
     (3)红富士苹果的边材液流通量密度日变化过程基本呈现单峰曲线形式,生长季节7月份晴天、阴天和雨天3种典型天气条件下,红富士苹果日周期树干茎流变化过程分别呈单峰曲线、双峰曲线和多峰曲线;晴天液流速率与PAR的相关性最大,阴天和雨天主要受大气温度的影响。整个生长季节来看,液流通量密度月均值从大到小排列顺序为7月﹥6月﹥5月﹥8月﹥9月﹥10月﹥4月。
     利用Richards模型模拟液流通量密度日周期进程,模型表达式为W=33.573(1-(-30.588) e~(-0.395t))~(1/(-0.405)),R~2=0.99,拟合效果十分理想。
     整个生长季节内,液流速率与环境因子的滞后时间呈现先下降后上升的趋势。液流速率的变化在整个生长季节内都提前与大气温度的变化,最大可提前4h左右,平均提前1.78h。液流速率的变化在生长季节的5月份到8月初基本呈现提前Par的状态,在其他时间则滞后Par的变化情况;整个生长季节平均滞后0.13h。
     对晴天、阴天和雨天测定结果分析结果表明:3种天气状况下,液流速率与光合有效辐射和太阳净辐射之间的滞后时间差异性较小,与其它环境因子相比,雨天的滞后时间差异性较大。选择1个晴天的数据做主成分分析并利用处理结果做回归分析表明:经过滞后时间位移处理后的数据所有环境因子都作为了第一主成分,回归分析决定系数为0.932。进行时滞效应处理后的数据相关性更高,其拟合效果也更好。滞后效应处理后回归方程为:y=2.26x-1.42x~2。
     (4)通过对红富士叶片蒸腾和边材液流特征的比较可以得出:4月份、5月份和11月份蒸腾速率较小的月份,叶片蒸腾不是引起树干边材液流的主要因素,水容的存在是叶片蒸腾与边材液流相关性较小的原因。6月份到10月份蒸腾速率较大的月份,叶片蒸腾与树干液流相关性极显著,叶片蒸腾是引起树干边材液流的主要因子。因为有水容的存在,叶片蒸腾峰值出现时间提前或与边材液流峰值出现时间相同。
     (5)TDP法测定红富士苹果树7月份的月蒸腾量和日平均蒸腾量最高分别为101.75㎜和3.28㎜,4月份的月蒸腾量和日平均蒸腾量最低分别为29.59㎜和0.99㎜。红富士苹果园生长季节果园总蒸散量为682.6mm。7月份果园蒸散量最高为137.19mm,10月份最低为44.95mm,整个生长季节果园蒸散量呈现先上升再下降的趋势。整个果园的果树蒸腾量占果园蒸散的三分之二,而地表蒸发占果园蒸散的三分之一左右。地表蒸发所占果园蒸散量春季最高,尤其是4月份地表蒸发占果园蒸散的70%左右,5月份占50%左右。整个生长季节果园降雨量为598.1mm,水分亏缺84.5mm。彭曼法测定果园生长季节蒸散量为714.27mm,蒸散量最高的月份为6月份,应用彭曼法计算得到的水盈亏数值为果园亏缺116.17mm。应用彭曼法对茎流计法进行调整,调整后果园生长季节水分蒸散量为612.6mm,总计亏缺14mm。
     (6)苹果园不同深度水分含量呈明显的阶梯状分布,随土壤深度增加,土壤含水量逐渐增加。覆盖秸秆可以提高60cm以上土层的土壤含水量,但减少了60-80cm土层的土壤含水量。对覆盖和不覆盖秸秆的土壤含水量进行差异性分析表明:秸秆覆盖只对0-20cm和60-80cm土层含水量产生的显著的影响。
The study on water consumption of the whole tree has always been a common issueconcerned by physiologists, ecologists, foresters. This problem is not only the core of treewater physiology, but also one of the theoretical bases throughout the entire forest ecosystemand forest cultivation. In recent years, with the structure adjustment of agricultural planting,the increasing area of the fruit planting and orchards' inputs and outputs, the waterconsumption of orchards is increasing. Therefore, cognize the law of fruit tree transpirationand accurate determination of fruit tree's transpiration, understand the dynamic of the orchardsoil is beneficial to establishing reasonable irrigation system to ensure that the water saving,high yield, stable yield and can be suitable for orchard water-saving.
     Taking apple orchard of hilly area in Shandong as the study object, some research resultshas been made, through system test research and simulation on transpiration features of Appleleaves, climate changes of orchard, trunk sapwood liquid flow of spatio-temporal changes law,dynamic changes trend of soil water and the Space-time Variation Regularities of Soil WaterSurplus or Lack of the orchard, using Thermal Dissipation Sap Flow Probe portablephotosynthesis system plant canopy analyzer TRIME-FM soil profile moisture measureportable-meteorological station in the high-quality red Fuji apple orchards in Chaoquantown,Feicheng city, Shandong province during2009-2010.
     (1) The peak of transpiration comes early in summer and a late in spring, early summerand autumn. Highest transpiration intensity comes in early summer, then gradually decreasing.The annual variation of day average transpiration rate of Red Fuji vane showed a single peaktrend. The max peak value is2.726mmol.m~(-2)·s(-1) in July15, the mix0.5876mmol.m~(-2)·s(-1) inNovember16, a difference of2.139mmol.m~(-2)·s(-1).The order from largest to smallest ofaverage daily transpiration rate of Red Fuji leaves is June> July> August> April> May>September> October>November.
     Transpiration rate of different orientation of Red Fuji apple is different. The descendingorder is west, south, east and north. Except for the few days, the leaf transpiration rate ofdifferent direction is not significant. The leaf transpiration rate trend of different orientationhas different characteristics in different periods.
     It is different between environmental factors in different date and the relevance andimportance of the transpiration rate. But PAR and transpiration rate showed a significant and extremely significant correlation. From the point of view throughout the entire growingseason, it is significantly correlated between transpiration rate and atmospheric temperature,PAR, GS, CI. PAR and transpiration rate correlation reached0.689.
     (2) Transpiration rate of detached leaf is1.07~3.44times of living leaves, an averageof1.45times. That is to say, the maximum potential transpiration rate is1.45times of thestate of nature. The ratio of the porometer method and gravimetric method show a decreasingtrend in daily course, while the correction factor gradually increasing. The correction factorsin daily course are0.24,0.32,0.71,0.83,0.88,1.00, an average value of0.495. Departuredegree of the measured results by Porometer method shows maximum in the early morningduring daily periodicity and decreased over time. It deviates from4.24~3.11times during6:00~10:00,1.40~1.14times during10:00~14:00,1.20~1.00times during14:00~18:00, anaverage of2.02times in the growing season. The leaves transpiration rate is9213kg aftercorrection in growing season with porometer measurements.
     (3) Trunk sapwood liquid flow flux density shows a single trend in dailycourse. Change of trunk sap flow in daily course shows a single peak curve in clear day, abimodal curve in overcast day, a multi peak curve in rainy day during growing season inJuly.It is on clear day that the sap flow velocity significantly correlated with PAR, since thecorrelation is influenced by atmospheric temperature on overcast and rainy day. Throughoutthe growing season, the month mean values of sapwood liquid flow flux density showed thatJuly>June>May>August>September>October>April
     The model for the daily course of sapwood liquid flow flux density is W=33.573(1-1(-30.588) e~(-0.395t))~(1/(-0.405)),R~2=0.99, perfect fitting effect,basing on the Richards model.
     Sap flux density lag behind environmental factors, but the time is different in one day.The lag time of different seasons has certain regularity on the whole, which is different withdifferent environmental factors. Related to atmospheric temperature and atmospheric relativehumidity, sap flux density shows a delay phenomenon. The annual change law of lag timeshows a tendency that increases first and then decreases gradually. The maximum appears inMay and June, the minimum in September. Related to soil temperature, the annual change lawof sap flux density shows a positive number and then a negative number, with a tendencydecrease first and then increase gradually. Related to wind speed and soil water content thetendency increase first then decrease gradually and increase again, Related to PAR increasefirst and then decrease gradually. The maximum monthly averaged values of lag time are both12min in June and July. Minimum appears in September, is-24min. Related to environmental factors,Lag Time of Sap flux density are different between deferent trees, except atmospherictemperature,differences of lag time is not significant.
     (4) Red Fuji apple's transpiration rate is determined by TDP, maximum is in July,the rateis101.75㎜and daily average is3.28㎜, minimum is in April the rate is29.52㎜and dailyaverage is0.99㎜. In growing season, transpiration rate of the Red Fuji apple orchard is682.6㎜, and July is the maximum, the rate is137.19㎜, October is the minimum, the rate is44.95㎜. The rate in the whole growing season shows a tendency which increase first thendecrease. Apple trees' transpiration rate takes two-thirds of whole orchard; ground surfaceflux takes one-thirds. Ground surface flux rate takes highest of orchard is in spring, especiallyin April, it is about70%, and in May it is about50%. Rainfall of the orchard in the wholegrowing season is598.1㎜, water deficit is84.5㎜.
     Transpiration rate of the orchard in growing season is714.27㎜determined by PenmanMethod, maximum is in June, water deficit of the orchard is116.17㎜. Useing PenmanMethod to improve stem-flow gauge, the transpiration rate of the orchard in growing season is612.6mm, whole water deficit is14㎜
     (5) The apple orchard's moisture content has a significant difference in different depth,with the increase of soil depth, soil moisture content increased gradually. Straw-mulching canimprove soil water content in the layers of below60cm, but reduce soil water content in thelayers of60-80cm. The analysis shows that straw-mulching only obviously affected the soilwater content in the layers of10-20cm and0-80cm by straw-mulch.
引文
鲍玉海,杨吉华,李红云,等.不同灌木树种蒸腾速率时空变异特征及其影响因子的研究[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(3):184-187.
    卜玉山,王建程,邵海林,等.不同覆盖材料土壤生态效应与玉米增产效应研究[J].中国生态农业学报,2005,13(2):138-141.
    陈锡云,刘文兆.半干旱黄土丘陵区果园水分蒸散特征研究[J].水土保持学报,2000,14(3):67-70.
    曹慧,许雪峰,韩振海等.水分胁迫下抗旱性不同的两种苹果属植物光合特性的变化[J].园艺学报,2004,31(3):285~290.
    杜太生,康绍忠,夏桂敏等.滴灌条件下不同根区交替湿润对葡萄生长和水分利用的影响[J].农业工程学报,2005,21(11):43-48
    高清竹,何立环,等.皇甫川流域主要人工灌木水分生态的研究[J].自然资源学报.2002,17(1):87-94.
    丁日升,康绍忠,龚道枝.苹果树液流变化规律研究[J].灌溉排水学报,2004,23(2):21-25.
    龚道枝,康绍忠,佟玲等.分根交替灌溉对土壤水分分布和桃树根茎液流动态的影响[J].水利学报,2004,21(10):112-118.
    黄玉芹,张文才,王佩英,李振平.半干旱地区果园微喷灌节水增效试验研究[J].内蒙古林业科技,2004,1:25-29.
    黄兴法,李光永,王小伟等.充分微喷灌条件下苹果树耗水量的研究[J].中国农业大学学报,2001,6(4):42-46.
    黄兴法,李光永,王小伟,等.充分灌与调亏灌溉条件下苹果树微喷灌的耗水量研究[J].农业工程学报,2001,17(5):43-47
    郝仲勇,杨培岭,刘洪禄等.苹果树根系分布特性的试验研究[J].中国农业大学学报,1998,3(6):63-66.
    巨关升,刘奉觉,郑世锴,等.稳态气孔计与其它3种方法蒸腾测值的比较研究[J].林业科学研究,2000,13(4):360:365.
    康燕霞,蔡焕杰,王健等.夏玉米日蒸发蒸腾量计算方法的试验研究干旱地区农业研究,2006,24(2):110-113.
    康绍忠,梁银丽,蔡焕杰,等.干旱区水一土一作物关系及其最优调控原理[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1998.
    李洪建,柴宝峰,王孟本.北京杨水分生理生态特性研究[J].生态学报,2000,20(3):417-422.
    李广德,王晓辉,贾黎明,等.国槐枝叶水分特征及其对树干边材液流的影响[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2010,30(1):23-28.
    李丽萍,马履一,王瑞辉.北京市3种园林绿化灌木树种的耗水特性[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2007,27(2):44-51.
    李吉跃,周平,招礼军.干旱胁迫对苗木蒸腾耗水的影响[J].生态学报.2002,22(9):1380-1386.
    李怀有,王斌.苹果滴灌试验及节灌制度研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,2001,19(3):114-121
    李怀有,王斌,梁金战.苹果滴灌灌水定额试验研究[J].节水灌溉,1999,(6):23-25.
    李子春,周长旭,张众等.苹果需水量与灌溉管理[J].节水灌溉,1998,(4):21-23.
    李嘉瑞,任小林,王民柱等.干旱对果树光合的影响及水分胁迫信息传递[J].干早地区农业研究,1996,14(3):67-72.
    刘德辉,梁珍海,李荣锦.蒸发研究的概况与进展.江苏林业科技,1998,25(4).
    刘贤赵,黄明斌.渭北旱塬苹果园土壤水分环境效应[J].果树学报,2002,19(2):75-78.
    刘昌明等.用零通量面法计算土壤蒸发的探讨.中国地学会第四次全国水文学术会议文集,北京,1989.
    刘建立,程丽莉,余新晓.乔木蒸腾耗水的影响因素及研究进展[J].世界林业研究.2009(4):34-40.
    刘奉觉,,郑世锴,巨关升,等.树木蒸腾耗水测算技术的比较研究[J].林业科学,1997,33(2):117-126.
    刘鑫,卢桂宾,刘和,等.枣树蒸腾速率变化与气象因子的关系[J].经济林研究,2011,29(2):65-71.
    马书荣,李海英,祖元刚.裂叶沙参和泡沙参气孔行为与蒸腾特性的关系[J].植物研究.200424(l):45-48.
    马履一,王华田.油松边材液流时空变化及其影响因子的研究[J].北京林业大学学报,2002,23(4):23-37.
    马孝义,王文娥,康绍忠等.陕北、渭北苹果降雨产量关系与补灌时期初步研究[J].中国农业气象,2002,23(1):25-28.
    孟平,张劲松,王鹤松等.苹果蒸腾耗水规律及其影响机制的研究[J].生态学报,2005,25(3):143-149.
    孟平,张劲松,王鹤松,等.苹果蒸腾耗水规律及其影响机制的研究[J].生态学报,2005,25(3):143-149.
    买自珍,程炳文,王勇,等麦草与地膜覆盖对玉米田间生态环境及产量的影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2007,15(2):66-68.
    牛西午,李永山,冯永平.晋南半干旱地区果树渗灌补水效应研究[J].农业工程学报,2003,19(1):72-75.
    冉辛拓,俎文芳.干旱区苹果园的田间耗水状况探析[J].河南农业大学学报,2001,35(2):195-198.
    史胜青,袁玉欣,张金香等.不同水分胁迫方式对核桃苗叶绿素荧光动力学特性的影响[J].河北农业大学学报.2003,26(2):20-23.
    孙宏勇,刘昌明,张永强等.微型蒸发器测定土面蒸发的试验研究.水利学报,2004,(8):114-118.
    施成熙,卡毓明,朱晓原.确定水面蒸发模型.地理科学,1984,(3).
    沈明林.我国果树科技发展战略研究[D].南京:南京农业大学,2000.
    沈振西.宁夏南部柠条、沙棘和华北落叶松的液流与蒸腾耗水特性[D].中国林业科学研究院,2005.
    陕西省统计局.2002年陕西省果业发展统计公报.2003.2.28.
    宋孝玉,康绍忠,沈冰等.黄土沟壑区不同种植条件下农田土壤水分动态规律研究[J].水土保持学报,2003,17(2):130-133.
    汤章城.植物干旱生态生理的研究[J].生态学报.1983,3(3):196-204.
    王晓红,乔云峰,孙西欢.果树蓄水坑灌法单坑水分入渗数值模拟及分析[J].节水灌溉,2003,2:1-4
    王留运,岳兵.果树滴灌需水规律试验研究[J].节水灌溉,1997,(2):16-22.
    王国英,李宪松,齐国辉等.不同土壤水分调控技术对土壤含水量和鸭梨果实品质的影响[J].39河北农业大学学报.2003,26(2):24-27.
    王进鑫,张晓鹏,高保山.渭北旱塬红富士苹果需水量与限水灌溉效应研究[J].水土保持研究,2000,7(1):69-80.
    王沙生,高荣孚,吴贯明.植物生理学(第二版)[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1991.
    吴丽萍,王学东,尉全恩等.樟子松树千液流的时空变异性研究[J]..水土保持研究,2003.10(4):66-68.
    魏天兴,朱金兆,张学培.林分蒸散耗水量测定方法评述[J].北京林业大学学报,1999,21(3):85-91.
    魏小平,王根轩,吴冬秀.干旱和CO2浓度升高对不同春小麦光合作用和气孔阻力及水分蒸腾效率的影响.兰州大学学报(自然科学版),2005,41(6):42-46.
    熊伟,王彦辉,徐德应.宁南山区华北落叶松人工林蒸腾耗水规律及其对环境因子的响应[J].林业科学.2003,39(2):1-7.
    奚如春,马履一,王瑞辉,等.元宝枫等3个树种枝干水容特征[JJ.中南林学院学报.2006,26(4):22-26.
    徐兴友,杜金友,龙茹,等.干旱胁迫下6种野生耐旱花卉苗木蒸腾耗水与耐旱性的关系[J].经济林研究,2010,28(1):9-13.
    徐迎春,李绍华,孔兰静.水分胁迫后复水对苹果结果树体内14C-光合产物分配的影响[J].核农学报,2003,17(1):41-45.
    姚立民,康绍忠,龚道枝等.苹果树根系吸水模型研究[J].灌溉排水学报.2004,23(6):67-70.
    于贵瑞.不同冠层的陆地植被蒸散发模型研究进展.资源科学,2001,23(6):72-84.
    叶兵.北京延庆小叶杨与刺槐林的蒸腾耗水特性与水量平衡研究[D].北京:中国林业科学研究院,2007.
    阮成江,李代琼.半干旱黄土丘陵区沙棘的光合特性及其影响因子[J].沙棘.2007(4):6-9.
    杨洪强,接玉玲,张连忠,等.断根和剪枝对盆栽苹果叶片光合蒸腾及WUE的影响[J].园艺学报,2002,29(3):197-202.
    张有芷.我国水面蒸发实验研究概况.人民长江199930(3):6-8.
    朱德兰,吴发启.黄土高原旱地果园土壤水分管理研究[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(1):40-42.
    朱德兰,王得祥,朱首军,等.渭北地区苹果高产灌溉制度研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,2000,18(1):95-100.
    张光灿,刘霞,贺康宁,等.金矮生苹果叶片气体交换参数对土壤水分的响应[J].植物生态学报,2004,28(1):66-72.
    张劲松,孟平,尹吕君等.果粮复合系统中单株苹果蒸腾需水量的计算[J].林业科学研究,2001,14(4):384-387.
    张劲松,孟平,等.植物蒸散耗水量计算方法综述[J].世界林业研究.2001,14(2):23-28.
    张劲松,孟平尹昌君,等.果粮复合系统中单株苹果蒸腾需水量的计算[J].林业科学研究,2001,4(4):384-387.
    张利平,滕元文.沙生植物花棒气孔导度的周期波动[J].兰州大学学报:自然科学版.1996,32(4):128-131.
    张俊鹏,孙景生,刘祖贵,等.不同水分条件和覆盖处理对夏玉米籽粒灌浆特性和产量的影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2010,18(3):501-506.
    赵家义.用水利蒸发器测定农田蒸发的试验研究.地理集刊,1980,(12).
    A. Naor. The interactions of soil-and stem-water potentials with crop level, fruit size andstomatal conductance of field-grown “Black Amber” Japanese plum[J].Journal ofHorticultural Science&Biotechnology.2004,79(2):273-280.
    Arole Isberie, Bernard Cabibel, Charles Valancogne etc. Using information from sap flowmeasurements to improve soil adaptability to drip irrigation in orchards [J]. ActaHort.2004,vol.664,333-337.
    Alarcon, J.J., Ortuno, M.F., Nicolas, E.Etc, Compensation heat-pulse measurements of sapflow for estimating transpiration in young lemon trees[J]. BiologicalPlanetarium(Prague).2005,49(4):527-532.
    A.Van Vosselen, H. Verplancke and E.Van Ranst. Assessing water consumption ofbanana:traditional versus modeling approach[J].Agricultural Water Management2005,74:201-218.
    Arneth A,Kelliher F M,Bauer G,et al. Environmental regulation of xylem sap flow and totalconductance of Larix gmelinii trees in easternSiberia[Jl.Treephysiology.1996,16(l-2):247-255.
    Allen,J.R,L.Modem-Period muddy sediments in the severe estuary (Southwestern UK)-APollutant-based model for dating and correlation. Sedimentary Geology,1988,58(1):1.
    B. D. Lampinen, K. A. Shackel, S. M. Southwick etc. Leaf and canopy level photosyntheticresponses of French prune(Prunes domestica L.”French”)to stem water potential waterpotential based deficit irrigation[J].Journal of HorticulturalScience&Biotechnology.2004,79(4):638-644.
    Ben-Ami Bravdo. Physiological mechanisms involved in the production of non-hydraulic rootsignals by partial rootzone drying-A review[J].Acta Hort.2005,689:267-276.
    Cook H, Valdes G, Lee H. Mulch effects on rain fall intercept ion, soil physicalcharacteristics and temperature under Zea Mays L [J]. Soil and tillage research,2006,91(1-2):227-235.
    Duley F L, J C R. The use of crop residues for soil and moisture conservation [J]. Jour AmerSoc gron,1939,31(3):703-709.
    D.Dragoni, A.N. Lakso and R.M. Piccioni. Transpiration of an apple orchard in a cool humidclimate: Measurement and modeling [J]. Acta Hort.2004,vol.664,175-180.
    Dragoni,D., Lakso,A.N. and Piccioni, R.M. Transpiration of apple trees in a humid climateusing heat pulse sap flow gauges calibrated with whole-canopy gas exchangechambers[J].Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,2005,130(1-2):85-94.
    Dragoni D, Lakso A N, Piccioni R M. Transpiration of apple trees in a humid climate usingheat pulse sap flow gauges calibrated with whole-canopy gas exchange chambers [J].Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,2005,130(1-2):85-94.
    David A. Goldhamer and Robert H. Beede. Regulated deficit irrigation effects on yield, nutquality and water-use efficiency of mature pistachio trees[J].Journal of HorticulturalScience&Biotechnology.2004,79(4):538-545.
    Dewar R C. Interpretation of an empirical model for stomatal conductance in terms of guardcell function[J].Plant,Cell&Environment.1995,18(4):365-372.
    Devitt D A,SalaI A,Maee K A,et al. The effect of applied water on the water use of saltcedarin a desert riparian environment[J].Journal of Hydroloy.1997,192(1-4):233-246.
    Gowing DJ G,Jones H G,Davies W J. Xylem-transported abscise acid: the relativeimportance of its mass and its concentration in the control of stomatal aperture[J].Plant,Cell&Environment1993,16(4):453-459.
    Granier A. Evaluation of transpiration in a Douglas-fir stand by means of sap flowmeasurements [J].Tree physiology.1987,3(4):309-320.
    Granier A,Biron P,Kostner B,et al. Comparisons of xylem sap flow and water vapour fluxat the stand level and derivation of canopy conductance for Scots Pine[J].Theoretical andApplied Climatology.1996,53(l):115-122.
    Green Steve, Clothier Brent. The root zone dynamics of water uptake by a mature apple tree[J]. Plant and Soil,2003,206:61-77.
    Hee-Myong Ro.Water use of young “Fuji” apple trees at three soil moisture regimes indrainage lysimeters [J].Agricultural Water Management2001,50:185-196.
    Hallsted A, Mat hews O. Soil moisture and winter wheat with suggestions on abandonment[R].Bull No.273Kansas Agrie Exp Stn,1936.
    Horst W. Caspari Todd C. Einhorn, Brian G. Leib etc. Progress in the development of partialroot zone drying of apple trees[J].Acta Hort.2004,vol.664,125-132
    Hogg E H,Saugier B,Pontailler J Y,et al. Responses of trembling aspen and hazelnut tovapor pressure deficit in a boreal deciduous forest[J].Treephysiology.2000,20(11):725-734.
    J. Girona, M. Mata and J. Marsal. Regulated deficit irrigation during the kernel-filling periodand optimal irrigation rates in almond[J].Agricultural Water Management2005,75:152-167.
    J. Girona, M. Mata, E. Fereres ets. Evapotranspiration and soil water dynamics of peach treesunder water deficits[J].Agricultural Water Management2002,54:107-122.
    J.J.Alarcon, R.Domingo,S.R.Green etc. Sap flow as indicator of transpiration and the waterstatus of young apricot trees[J].Plant and Soil,2000,227:77-85.
    J.M.Abrisqueta, A.Ruiz, J.A.Franco. Water balance of apricot trees(Prunes armeniaca L.cv.Bulida) under drip irrigation[J].Agricultural Water Management2001,50:211-227.
    Jones H G. Stomatal control of Photosynthesis and transpiration [J].Journal of ExperimentalBotany.1998,49(Special Issue):387-398.
    Jarvis P G,Menaughton K G. Stornatal control of transpiration: Scaling up from leaf to region[J].Ady.Eeol.Res.1986,15: l-49.
    Kramer P J. Water relations of plants [M].New York: Academic Press,1983.
    Lambers H, Chapin F S, Pons T L. Plant physiological ecology. Anded.[M]. SpringerVerlag,2008:610p.
    Lagergrenf, Lindrotha.Transpiration response to soilmoisture in pine and spruce trees inSweden [J]. Agricultural&Forest Meteorology,2002,112(2):67-85.
    Lal R. Long-term tillage and maize monoculture effect s on a tropical alfisol in westernnigeria. I. Crop yield and soil physical properties [J]. Soil and t illage research,1997,42(3):145-160.
    Lal R. Beyond copenhagen: Mitigating climate change and achieving food security throughsoil carbon sequestrat ion [J]. Food Security,2010,2(2):169-177.
    Lar R.Tillage and mulching effects on maize yield for seventeen conservation seasons on atropical alfisol [J]. Sustainable Agriculture,1995,5:79-93.
    Meinzer F C,Goldstein G,Jaekson P,et al. Environmental and Physiological regulation oftranspiration in tropical forest gap species: the influence of boundary layer and hydraulicProperties[J].Oeeologia.1995,101(4):514-522.
    Martin T A, Brown K J,Cermak J,etal. Crown conductance and tree and stand transpirationin a second-growth Abies amabilis forest[J].Canadian Journal of Forest Researeh.1997,27(6):797-808.
    Michelakis,N., Vouyoukalou, E.and Clapaki,G. Water use and soil moisture depletion by olivetrees under different irrigation conditions[J]. Agr. Water Man.,1996,29:315-325.
    M.G.Oconnell and I.Goodwin. Pear water relations under partial root zone drying [J]. ActaHort.2004,vol.664,453.
    M.H. Behboudian and Zora singh. Water relations and irrigation scheduling in grapevine[J].Horticultural Reviews,2001,Vol.27,189-225
    Martin, Thalheimer. Irrigation management [J].The compact Fruit Tree,2004, Vol.37(3):86-90
    M. Cohen, D.A.Goldhamer, E. Fereres etc. Assessment of peach tree responses to irrigationwater deficits by continuous monitoring of trunk diameter changes [J].Journal ofHorticultural Science&Biotechnology.2001,76(1):55-60.
    M.F.Ortuno, J.J.Alarcon,E.Nicolas etc. Sap flow and trunk diameter fluctuations of younglemon trees under water stress and rewatering [J]. Environmental and ExperimentalBotany.2005,54:155~162
    Meinzer F C,Grantz D A. Coordination of stomatal,hydraulic,and canopy boundary layerproperties:Do stomata balance conductances by measuring transpiration[J].PhysiologiaPlantarum.1991,83(2):324一329.
    Monteith J L,Unsworth M H. Principles of environmental Physics. Edward Arnold [J].NewYork1990.
    Morikawa Y,Hattori S,Kiyono Y. Transpiration of a31-year-old ChamaecyParis obtusa Endl.Stand before and after thinning [J].Treephysiology.1986,2(l-2-3):105-114.
    Mohapatra B K, Lenka D. Effect of plastic mulching on yield and water use efficiency inmaize[J]. Annals of Agricultural Research,1998,19:210-211.
    Monteith, J.L. Evaporation and environment. Symposium of the Society for experimentalBiology,The State and Movement of Water in Living Organisms, Academic Press,Inc.,NY.,1965,19:205-234.
    Mills, T. M., M.H. Behboudian, P.Y. Tan and B.E. Clothier. Plant water status and fruit qualityin Braeburn apples[J].Hortscience,2004,29(11):1274-1278.
    Naor, A.,Klein, I. and Doron,I. Stem water potential and applesize[J].J.Amer.Soc.Hort.Sci.1995,120:577-582.
    Nicolas E, Torrecillas A, Ortuno etc. Evaluation of transpiration in adult apricot trees from sapflow measurements[J].Agricultural Water Management2005,72(2):131-145.
    O.M.Garnt, M. Stoll and H.G. Jones. Partial root zone drying does not affect fruit yield ofraspberries[J].Journal of Horticultural Science&Biotechnology.2004,79(1):125-130.
    P.A. Nortes, A. Perez-Pastor, G.Egea etc. Comparison of change in stem diameter and waterpotential values for detecting water stress in young almond trees[J].Agricultural WaterManagement2005,77:296-307.
    Penman,H.L.,and I.F.Long.. Weather in Wheat. Quarterly J. Roy. Meteorol,Soc,1960,86:16-50.
    Rosanne Chabot, Sami Bouarfa, Daniel Zimmer etc. Evolution of the sap flow determinedwith a heat balance method to measure the transpiration of a sugarcanecanopy[J].Agricultural Water Management2005,75:10-24
    Philip, J.R. Plant water relations:some Physical aspects. Ann.Rev. PlantPhysical,1966,(17):245-268.
    Pereira A R,Green S,Nova N A V. Penman-Monteith reference evapotranspiration adapted toestimate irrigated tree transpiration [J]. Agricultural Water Management,2006,83:153-161.
    S. Anconelli and P. Mannini. Effects of regulated deficit irrigation on performance of pear inan Italian sub-humid area[J].Acta.Hort.2002,596:687-689
    S. Poni, F. Bernizzoni and M. Reinotti. Whole-canopy and single-leaf gas-exchange responsesto partial root zone drying in potted “Cabernet Sauvignon” grapevines[J].ActaHort.2005,689:277-307
    Sanliang Gu, Guoqiang Du, David Zoldoske etc. Effects of irrigation amount on waterrelations, vegetative growth, yield and fruit composition of Sauvignon blanc grapevinesunder partial rootzone drying and conventional irrigation in the San Joaqu in Valley ofCalifornia, USA[J].Journal of Horticultural Science&Biotechnology.2004,79(1):26~33
    Steve Green.Measurement of sap flow by the heat-pulse method.An instruction manual for theHPV system[J]. HortResearch Internal Report No.IR98/22
    Sperry J S,Alder N N,Eastlack S E.The effect of reduced hydraulic conductance on stomatalconductance and xylem cavitation[J].Journal of Experimental Botany.1993,44(6):1075.
    S.R.Green, K.G. McNaughton.Modelling effective stomatal resistance for calculatingtranspiration from an apple tree[J].Agricultural and Forest MeteorologyMeteorology,1997(83):1-26
    S.R.Green, Keith McNaughton, J.N.Wunsche etc.Modeling light interception andtranspiration of apple tree canopies[J].American Society ofAgronomy,2003(95):1380-1387
    Shuttle worth,W.J.,Wallace,J.S. Evaporation from sparse crops-an energy combinationtheory. Quarterly J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc,1985,111:839-855.
    subsurface drip irrigation conditions on vegetative development and yield of mature almondtrees[J].Plant and Soil,2004,260:169~183
    R. A. Ball, D. M. Oosterhuis.Measurement of root and leaf osmotic potential using thevapor-pressure osmometer. Environmental and Experimental Botany[J],2005,53:77-84
    S. Fuentes, J.P. Conroy and G. Kelley etc. Use of infrared thermography to assess spatial andtemporal variability of stomatal conductance of grapevines under partial root zone drying:An irrigation scheduling application[J]. Acta Hort.2005,689:309-316.
    Steve Green and B.E. Clothier. The root zone dynamics of water uptake by a mature appletree[J].Plant and Soil,1999(206):61-77.
    S.R. Green, I. Vogeler, B.E. Clothier etc. Modeling water uptake by a mature appletree[J].Australian Journal of Soil Research,2003,41,365-380.
    T.Einhorn and H.W. Caspari.Partial rootzone drying and deficit irrigation of “Gala” apples ina semi-arid climate[J].Acta Hort.2004,vol.664,197-204.
    Thorburn P J,Hatton T J,Walker G R.Combining measurements of transpiration and stableisotopes of water to determine groundwater discharge from forests[J].Journal ofHydrology.1993,150(2-4):563-587.
    Takanori Yamamoto, Kenichi Miyamoto, Yoshikazu Satoh. Rapid and simultaneousapproximation of photosynthetic photon flux density and net photosynthetic rate in acherry tree canopy by thermal imaging[J].J.Japan.Soc.Hort.Sci.,2005,74(2):101-108
    Tebrugge F, During R A. Reducing tillage intensity-a review of results from a long-termstudy in Germany [J]. Soil&Tillage Research,1999,53(1):15-28.
    T. Kaukoranta, J. Murto, J. Takala etc. Detection of water deficit in greenhouse cucumber byinfrared thermography and reference surfaces[J]. ScientiaHorticulturae,2005,106:447-463.
    Unger P. Straw mulch effect s on soil temperatures and sorghum germination and growth[J].gronomy Journal,1978,70(5):858.
    Unger P W. Wheat residue management effects on soil water storage and corn production[J].Soil Science Society of American Journal,1986,50:764-770.
    Wicks G A, Crutchfield D A, Burnside O C. Influence of wheat(Triticum aestium)strawmulch and metolachlor on corn(Zea mays)growth and yield [J].Weed science,1994,42:141-147.
    Wullschleger S D,Hanson P J,Tschaplinski T J. Whole-plant water flux in understory redmaple exposed to altered Precipitation regimes[J].Tree Physiology.1998,18(2):71-79.
    Waring R H,Whitehead D,Jarvis P G. The contribution of stored Water to transpiration inScots Pine[J].Plant,Cell and Environment.1979,2(4):309-317.
    Zweifel R,Steppe K,Sterck F J.Stornatal regulation by microelimate and tree water relations:interpreting ecophysiological field data with a hydraulic plant model[J]. JournalofExperimental Botany.2007,58(8):2113-2131.