中国对外贸易摩擦与应对策略研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
20世纪90年代以来中国的经济发展取得了举世瞩目的成就。随着中国经济的繁荣发展,经济全球化进一步加深,我国面临的贸易摩擦也逐渐增加,如何在国际化背景下研究对外贸易摩擦,以及找到相应的解决途径,无疑具有非常重要的现实意义。本文致力于研究我国对外贸易摩擦及应对策略,深入地分析贸易摩擦产生根源及效应,其最终目的在于找到减少我国对外贸易摩擦的有效途径。
     本文首先对贸易摩擦进行了界定,对其表现形式进行深入细致的分析,在详细阐述入世前后中外贸易摩擦演变状况的基础上,全面剖析中国与主要发达国家,发展中国家的贸易摩擦现状;其次,文章结合案例,从国外、国内两方面深入探讨中外贸易摩擦的成因,并从积极和消极两个角度分析贸易摩擦对中国经济和外贸发展的影响;在如何解决贸易摩擦问题的过程中,重点介绍WTO争端解决机制的作用;最后,从政府和企业的角度出发,对如何调整对外经贸发展战略以减少贸易摩擦进行比较深入的探讨。本文在写作过程中利用大量最新的案例与数据资料,运用以定性与定量相结合的研究方法来进行分析完成,对中国对外贸易摩擦进行了细致的分析,创造性提出从根本上解决贸易摩擦的具体策略。
     总之,解决贸易摩擦并非一朝一夕的事,政府、企业必须携手应对,不断完善贸易制度和产业政策,提高我国企业的国际竞争力,进一步与国际社会接轨,只有这样才能够有效地减少我国对外贸易摩擦,最大化地降低我国在贸易摩擦中的经济损失。
Since 1990’s, China’s economy has gained great achievements. With the prosperity and development of China’s economic, China’s trade frictions are gradually increasing. It’s no doubt that how to study trade frictions in the context of international economic and find the appropriate avenue for settlement is very practical important. This article dedicates to the research of China's foreign trade friction, coping strategies and in-depth analysis of the causes and effects of trade friction. The ultimate aim is to find effective means to reduce China's foreign trade frictions.
     Firstly, this thesis defines trade frictions, and analyses its representation, development conditions and the difference between China and the main developed countries. Secondly, this thesis discusses the cause of those frictions from external and internal environment, and analyses the influence on the development of China’economy and foreign trade from positive and negative sides. On the way how to resolve trade frictions, the most important introduction is the role of WTO dispute settlement mechanism. Finally, on the side of government and enterprise, this thesis discusses the adjustment of foreign trade strategy in order to reduce the occurrences of trade frictions. In the writing process of this paper, a great number of cases and the latest data have been used. Combined qualitative and quantitative research analysis methods have been used too. The paper carries out a detailed analysis of the trade friction and creatively proposes specific strategies to resolve trade frictions.
     Overall government and enterprise must work together to deal with trade frictions which can’t be resolved in a short time. The industry and trade policies must be constantly improved. The international competitiveness of industry and enterprise must be enhanced. Only in this way can we maximize avoid international trade frictions or reduce losses in the international trade frictions.
引文
[1]包小忠.中国对外贸易摩擦前瞻.华南师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2006(1).
    [2]蔡珍贵. WTO时代的国际贸易新壁垒研究.中国市场出版社, 2007.
    [3]陈立鹏.应对贸易摩擦演义之第三回:贸易摩擦武器探秘.大经贸, 2006(3).
    [4]丁黎.从贸易角度探讨中国的贸易摩擦与对策.国际贸易问题, 2005(11).
    [5]付娟.贸易摩擦日益频繁的原因及对策分析.东北财经大学学报, 2003(7).
    [6]贾海基,李春顶.中国对外贸易摩擦频繁爆发之合理性研究及对策.国际贸易问题, 2006(7).
    [7]于铁流,李秉祥.中美贸易摩擦的原因及其解决对策.管理世界,2004(9).
    [8]赵瑾.日美贸易摩擦的历史演变及其在经济全球化下的特点.世界经济,2002(2).
    [9]张金.如何应对新时期贸易摩擦——关于美泰公司召回我国玩具事件的深度分析.经贸广场,2008(6).
    [10]高树超.WTO争端解决机制漫谈之四.时代经贸,2004(9).
    [11]李小年.WTO法律规则与争端解决机制.上海财经大学出版社,2000.
    [12]余敏友.WTO争端解决机制概论.上海人民出版社,2001.
    [13]李洪雷,赵岩.中国应对WTO争端解决机制策略研究.商业经济,2005(4).
    [14] Bagwell Kyle and Stagier, Robert. Strategic Trade, Competitive Industries and Agricultural Trade Disputes. Economics and Politics, 2001(13 ): 113~128.
    [15] Baron David P. Integrated Strategy and International Trade Dispute: The Kodak-Fuji film Case. Journal of Economics Management Strategy, 1997(6): 291~346.
    [16] Bernstein Jason and Skull, David. Calculating Trade Damages in the Context of the World Trade Organization’s Dispute Settlement Process. Review of Agricultural Economics, 2003(25):385~398.
    [17]鞠真.入世以来的贸易摩擦:现状、原因与对策.市场周刊—管理探索, 2005(6).
    [18]雷达,于春海.内外均衡、结构调整和贸易摩擦.世界经济与政治, 2004(8).
    [19]李丽.中美贸易摩擦的政治经济分析.世界经济研究, 2005(1).
    [20]梁军.中美贸易摩擦的经济学困惑及其政治经济学解释.国际观察, 2005(4).
    [21]聂文慧.应对贸易摩擦、改善贸易环境.中国经贸, 2006(4).
    [22] Brown, Chad P. Trade Dispute and the Implementation of Protection Under the GATT: An Empirical Assessment. Journal of International Economics, 2004(62):263~294.
    [23] Brander, J. A and Spencer, B. J. Export Subsidies and International Market Share Rivalry. Journal of international Economics, 1985(18): 83~100.
    [24] Darren, Allan. Self-Fulfilling Optimism in a Trade-Friction Model of the Business Cycle.AEAPapers and Proceedings, 1988(4):369~372.
    [25] Eaton, Jonathan and Grossman, Genome. Optimal Trade and Industrial Policy under Oligopoly. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1986(10):383~406.
    [26] Ederington, Josh and McClain, Phillip. Discriminatory Tariffs and International Negotiations.Journal of International Economics, 2003,(61): 397~424.
    [27] Elms, Deborah Kay. Large Cost, Small Benefits: Explaining Trade Dispute Outcomes. Political Psychology, 2004(25) : 241~270.
    [28] Granolas, Earl L and Petrel Roberto. Politics, the WTO and Trade Disputes: Evidence from US Cases. Pacific Economics Review, 2002(7) : 335~357.
    [29] Grossman, Gene M and Help man, Elhanan. Protection for Sale. The American Economic Review, 1994,(84 ):833~850.
    [30]路红艳,王保伦.基于市场开放和贸易摩擦的产业安全形势分析及对策研究.北京工商大学学报(社会科学版), 2006(1).
    [31]马常娥.论中国应对贸易摩擦的策略与技巧.财贸经济, 2005(10).
    [32]苗迎春.中美贸易摩擦及其影响.当代亚太, 2004(3).
    [33]裴长洪.我们应该如何看待和应对贸易摩擦.学习与实践, 2005(8).
    [34]钱学锋.经济全球化下中国的贸易摩擦问题及其解决机制.亚太经济, 2004(6).
    [35] Kastler, Justin and Powell Douglas. The SPS Agreement: Addressing Historical Factors in Trade Dispute Resolution. Agriculture and Human Values, 2002(19): 283~292.
    [36] Kerugma Paul R .Strategic Trade Policy and the New International Economics. International Organization, 1990(4): 107~135.
    [37] Lee, Kyung-Ho and Mach, Jai S. Institutional Changes and Anti-dumping Decisions in the United States. Journal of Policy Modeling, 2003(25): 555~565.
    [38]王厚双.公关在日本处理日美贸易摩擦中的作用.国际贸易问题, 2003(1).
    [39]王雪峰,王平利.反倾销:当代显性贸易摩擦主要表现形式的原因分析.财贸经济,2005(8).
    [40] Huff, David L and Jenks, George F. A Graphic Interpretation of the Friction of Distance in Gravity Models. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 1968,(58): 814~824.
    [41] Irwin, Douglas A and Pavcnik, Nina. Airbus versus Boeing Revisited: International Competition in the Aircraft Market. Journal of International Economics, 2004(64): 223~245.
    [40] Johnson, Harry G. Optimum Welfare and Maximum Revenue Tariffs. The Review of Economic Studies, 1954(19 ): 28~35.
    [43] Reynolds, Kara M. Subsidizing Rent-seeking: Anti-dumping Protection and the Byrd Amendment. Journal of International Economics, 2006(70):490~502.
    [44] Sherman Richard and Ellison Johan. Trade Disputes and Non-state Actors: New Institutional Arrangements and the Privatization of Commercial Diplomacy. Blackwell Journal Compilation, 2006(10):473~489.
    [45] Stern Robert M. Tariffs and Other Measures of Trade Control: A Survey of Recent Developments. Journal of Economic Literature, 1973(11) : 857~888.
    [46]魏国学,熊启泉.美中贸易摩擦不断的原因.世界经济研究,2006(3).
    [47]尹翔硕.中美贸易摩擦的影响及我们的政策重点.世界经济研究,2006(8).
    [48] Sturm Daniel M. Product Standards, Trade Disputes, and Protection. Canadian Economics Association, 2006(39): 564~581.
    [49] Yoshimatsu Hidetaka. Social Demand, State Capability and Globalization: Japan-China Trade Friction Over Safe-guards. The Pacific Review, 2002(15) : 381~408.
    [50]薛敬孝.WTO框架下中国经济发展研究.清华大学出版社,2007(1).