猪链球菌2型保护性抗原的筛选研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
猪链球菌2型(Streptococcus suis serotype 2; SS2)感染已经成为一种严重的人畜共患病,不仅造成大量猪死亡,更严重威胁着人类健康。我国于1998年和2005年两次在江苏和四川暴发人感染猪链球菌2型疫情,分别造成14人和39人死亡。不同于国外人感染病例以脑膜炎为主的特点,我国死亡病例多为休克型,病例起病急,病情重,病程短,死亡率高。
     目前对我国SS2的致病机制知之甚少,目前已知的毒力因子还不能全面解释毒素休克综合征(TSS)的发生,而对致病机制的缺乏了解又阻碍了SS2疫苗的研究。已知的毒力因子和保护性抗原包括荚膜多糖(CPS)、溶菌酶释放蛋白(MRP)、胞外因子(EF)、溶血素(SLY)、烯醇酶、6-磷酸葡萄糖酸脱氢酶(6PGD)、Sao等。在此基础上发现更多、更有效的保护性抗原成为SS2疫苗研究工作的当务之急。
     本研究通过免疫蛋白质组学识别出SS2菌株98012细胞壁和上清蛋白中的32种免疫原性蛋白,其中8种为细胞壁蛋白、5种为非细胞质蛋白(Non-Cytoplasm Protein)、其它为胞质蛋白。使用比较蛋白质组学方法识别出我国高致病株与普通致病株差异表达蛋白,并进行后续验证。选择其中的10种蛋白以pET-32a(+)为载体重组表达,表达已知保护性抗原MRP为后续研究阳性对照。免疫大鼠获得抗血清,Western Blot验证10种蛋白在16种不同SS2菌株中的存在状况,发现SSU98_0171、SSU98_1094、SSU98_1549、SSU98_1819、SSU1664五种抗原在不同菌株间高度保守,SSU98_0156、SSU98_0197、SSU98_0201、SSU98_0267、SSU98_1675在不同菌株之间表达有差异。分析比较蛋白质组学结果以及后面的验证结果,并与不同菌株的致病力相结合,笔者将SSU98_0156、SSU98_0197、SSU98_0267、SSU98_1675这4种蛋白定义为不同致病力菌株之间的差异表达蛋白,其中SSU98_1675为国内高致病株与国外致病株之间的差异蛋白,SSU98_0197、SSU98_0267在不同菌株间存在多态性。
     随后对除SSU98_0156之外的其它10种重组抗原进行评价。比较6名病人和5名健康人血清中针对10种重组抗原的抗体差异,结果显示SSU98_0197、SSU98_1094、SSU98_1549、SSU1664、MRP的抗体水平在病人比健康人显著性升高。比较针对10种重组抗原的抗体在人工感染小型猪前后血清中的变化情况,结果显示SSU98_0197、SSU98_1094、SSU98_1549、SSU98_1675、SSU1664的抗体在感染后比感染前显著性升高。比较针对10种重组抗原的抗体在灭活全菌免疫小型猪前后的变化情况,结果显示SSU98_0197、SSU98_0267、SSU98_1094、SSU98_1549、SSU1664、MRP的抗体在免疫后比免疫前显著性升高。体外大鼠抗血清调理吞噬试验显示有6种蛋白的抗血清调理杀菌率在50%以上,分别是SSU98_0171、SSU98_0197、SSU98_0267、SSU98_1094、SSU98_1819、SSU1664。
     根据前期试验结果,选择7种抗原以pET-28a(+)为载体重新表达,以去除TRX(硫氧还蛋白)对动物试验的影响,成功表达出5种抗原。使用QS-21(皂角甙的精细提取物)为佐剂,在CD-1小鼠模型上验证5种抗原的保护效果。首先对5种抗原单独免疫保护效果进行评价,使用1.5×LD50的98012菌液攻毒, SSU98_0197、SSU98_1094、SSU98_1675、MRP免疫组有较高存活率,分别为70%、67%、60%、70%,与单纯QS-21免疫组比较,经Wilcoxon检验分析,均有显著性差异,而SSU1664免疫组没有保护性。增加攻毒量后SSU98_0197、SSU98_1094、SSU98_1675、MRP免疫组存活率均下降,分别为20%、20%、50%、20%。与单纯QS-21免疫组比较,均有显著性差异,而SSU1664免疫组仍然没有保护效果。
     对保护效果好的SSU98_0197、SSU98_1094、SSU98_1675尝试使用组合抗原免疫小鼠。使用6.6×LD50的98012菌液攻毒,分组为SSU98_0197、SSU98_1094、SSU98_1675、SSU98_0197与SSU98_1675组合、SSU98_1094与SSU98_1675组合、SSU98_0197与SSU98_1094组合、三种蛋白组合免疫,7个试验组,存活率分别是30%、30%、30%、50%、40%、30%、60%,与单纯QS-21免疫组比较,经Wilcoxon检验分析,均有显著性差异。7个免疫组之间比较,仅三种蛋白组合免疫组与SSU98_0197单独免疫组有显著性差异。进一步比较SSU98_0197、SSU98_1094和SSU98_1675三种蛋白组合免疫组以及SSU98_0197和SSU98_1675两种蛋白组合免疫组的保护效果。4.8×LD50的98012菌液攻毒时,三种蛋白组合免疫组,SSU98_0197与SSU98_1675组合免疫组的存活率分别是60%和40%,两组间无显著性差异。使用7×LD50的98012菌液攻毒,三种蛋白组合免疫组和SSU98_0197+SSU98_1675组合免疫组的存活率分别是50%和20%,经Wilcoxon检验分析,两组间有显著性差异,提示三种蛋白组合免疫组对高剂量菌液的攻毒仍然有保护效果。
     将筛选出的3种保护性抗原SSU98_0197、SSU98_1094、SSU98_1675命名为SIP1、Lpp36、SIP2。构建基因缺失突变株05ZYΔLpp36和05ZYΔSIP2。为后续的功能研究奠定基础。
Streptococcus suis serotype 2 (SS2) infection has become a public health concern due to its zoonotic capability to cause severe infections in slaughterhouse workers and those who handle infected pork. Two outbreaks have occurred in humans in China with high mortality (19%-56%). One that happended in 1998 invovled 14 humans who died out of 25 infected cases. Another one that happended in 2005 included 215 reported cases and 39 deaths. In these outbreaks, toxic shock syndrome (TSS) was a major etiological and mortality factor.
     The mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis and virulence of S. suis are not completely understood, and attempts to control the infection are hampered by the lack of an effective vaccine. The known virulence factors and protective antigens of S. suis includes CPS, muramidase-released protein (MRP), extracellular factor (EF), suilysin (SLY),Enolase, 6-phosphogluconate-dehydrogenase (6PGD), Sao, etc. Some of these proteins had been proved to be able to provide certain degree of protection against the challenge of S. suis but not good enough yet.
     In this study, using an immunoproteomic approach, we identified 32 cell wall proteins (CWPs) and extracellular proteins (ECPs) with high immunogenicity in SS2. Among these proteins, eight known cell wall attached proteins, including 6 proteins containing the LPXTG motif, were identified in this work. The other proteins includes 5 non-cytoplasm proteins, and 19 cytoplasm proteins. Some differentially expressed proteins were identified by comparative proteomic analysis between the highly pathogenic SS2 and the moderately pathogenic SS2, and the differences were confirmed in the following study.
     Ten selected proteins were expressed in E. coli, and the amplified gene sequences were inserted into pET-32a(+) and transformed into E. coli strain BL21 (DE3). At the same the time, MRP was expressed as the positive control for further study. The polyclonal antisera against each recombinant protein were obtained from Wistar rats, and the immunized rats were bled 7 days after the final immunization. To determine the prevalence of those selected proteins in different SS2 strains, CWPs of 16 different SS2 strains were analyzed by Western blot with specific antiserum against each of the 10 recombinant proteins. Five proteins (SSU98_0171, SSU98_1094, SSU98_1549, SSU98_1819 and SSU1664) were detected in all 16 strains tested. SSU98_0201 were not detected in S. suis 1330. SSU98_0156, SSU98_0197, SSU98_0267, SSU98_1675 were defined as differentially expressed proteins between differently pathogenic SS2. SSU98_1675 could be used to distinguish the domestic highly pathogenic SS2 and foreign pathogenic SS2, while SSU98_0197 and SSU98_0267 size variants were expressed in differently pathogenic SS2.
     The recombinant antigens except SSU98_0156 were further evaluated. We tested the reactivity of 6 patient sera as well as 5 healthy individuals to the recombinant antigens. Besides MRP, patients showed significantly higher antibody levels against 4 antigens (SSU98_0197, SSU98_1094, SSU98_1549 and SSU1664). Furthermore, we assessed the specific antibody responses to the recombinant proteins by using sera isolated from both infected piglet and piglets immunized with formaldehyde-killed bacteria. After experimental infections, protein SSU98_0197, SSU98_1094, SSU98_1549, SSU98_1675 and SSU1664 induced significant antibody responses. In comparison to the sera before immunization, specific antibodies against protein SSU98_0197, SSU98_0267, SSU98_1094, SSU98_1549 and SSU1664 were significantly increased in the immunized piglets. Opsonophagocytic killing abilities of specific antibodies against the recombinant antigens were evaluated by the standard bactericidal assay. Antisera against 6 proteins (SSU98_0171, SSU98_0197, SSU98_0267, SSU98_1094, SSU98_1819 and SSU1664) enhanced the inhibition of S. suis growth in human blood.
     Taken together, 7 antigens were selected for futher screening protective antigens. Addtionally, to avoid the interference of TRX in the protective capacity assay, we expressed 7 antigens using pET-28a(+) expression vector, and 5 antigens were expressed and purified successfully. CD-1 mice were immunized with recombinant antigens mixed with QS-21. The mice were challenged with 1.5×LD50, respectively, the survival rates of groups immunized with SSU98_0197, SSU98_1094, SSU98_1675, MRP were 70%, 67%, 60%, 70%. When the mice were challenged with higher dose, the survival rates decreased to 20%, 20%, 50%, 20%. In both protection experiments, the statistical differences between recombinant antigens vaccinated groups and QS-21 vaccinated group were significant, while SSU1664 had no protective capacity.
     Then SSU98_0197, SSU98_1094, SSU98_1675 were assembled to achieve better protective effects. The mice were challenged with 6.6×LD50, and the survival rates of groups immunized with SSU98_0197, SSU98_1094, SSU98_1675, SSU98_0197 plus SSU98_1675, SSU98_1094 plus SSU98_1675, SSU98_0197 plus SSU98_1094, 3 proteins combined vaccine were 30%、30%、30%、50%、40%、30%、60%, respectively. And the statistical difference between 3 proteins combined vaccinated group and SSU98_0197 vaccinated group was significant.
     Furthermore, the protective capacity of 3 proteins combined vaccine and SSU98_0197 plus SSU98_1675 combined vaccine was evaluated. When the mice were challenged with 4.8×LD50, respectively, the survival rates of groups immunized with 3 proteins combined vaccine, SSU98_0197 plus SSU98_1675 combined vaccine were 60% and 40%, respectively. The statistical difference was not significant. When the mice were challenged with 7×LD50, respectively, the survival rates decreased to 50% and 20%, and the statistical difference was significant. This indicated that the 3 proteins combined vaccine had the better protective capacity against high dose challenge.
     The protective antigens SSU98_0197, SSU98_1094, SSU98_1675 were named SIP1, Lpp36, SIP2. Two deletion mutants 05ZYΔLpp36 and 05ZYΔSIP2 were constructed successfully.
引文
[1] Yu H, Jing H, Chen Z, et al. Human Streptococcus suis outbreak, Sichuan, China. Emerg Infect Dis 2006; 12(6): 914-20
    [2] Sriskandan S, Slater JD. Invasive disease and toxic shock due to zoonotic Streptococcus suis: an emerging infection in the East? PLoS Med 2006; 3(5): e187
    [3] Chen Z, Peng B, Wang S, et al. Rapid screening of highly efficient vaccine candidates by immunoproteomics. Proteomics 2004; 4(10): 3203-13
    [4] Kelly DF, Rappuoli R. Reverse vaccinology and vaccines for serogroup B Neisseria meningitidis. Adv Exp Med Biol 2005; 568: 217-23
    [5] Ying T, Wang H, Li M, et al. Immunoproteomics of outer membrane proteins and extracellular proteins of Shigella flexneri 2a 2457T. Proteomics 2005; 5(18): 4777-93
    [6] Chitlaru T, Gat O, Grosfeld H, et al. Identification of in vivo-expressed immunogenic proteins by serological proteome analysis of the Bacillus anthracis secretome. Infect Immun 2007; 75(6): 2841-52
    [7] Vytvytska O, Nagy E, Bluggel M, et al. Identification of vaccine candidate antigens of Staphylococcus aureus by serological proteome analysis. Proteomics 2002; 2(5): 580-90
    [8] Navarre WW, Schneewind O. Surface proteins of gram-positive bacteria andmechanisms of their targeting to the cell wall envelope. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 1999; 63(1): 174-229
    [9] Robertson ID, Blackmore DK. Occupational exposure to Streptococcus suis type 2. Epidemiol Infect 1989; 103(1): 157-64
    [10] Winterhoff N, Goethe R, Gruening P, et al. Identification and characterization of two temperature-induced surface-associated proteins of Streptococcus suis with high homologies to members of the Arginine Deiminase system of Streptococcus pyogenes. J Bacteriol 2002; 184(24): 6768-76
    [11] Vecht U, Arends JP, van der Molen EJ, et al. Differences in virulence between two strains of Streptococcus suis type II after experimentally induced infection of newborn germ-free pigs. Am J Vet Res 1989; 50(7): 1037-43
    [12] Vecht U, Wisselink HJ, Jellema ML, et al. Identification of two proteins associated with virulence of Streptococcus suis type 2. Infect Immun 1991; 59(9): 3156-62
    [13] Holt ME, Enright MR, Alexander TJ. Immunisation of pigs with killed cultures of Streptococcus suis type 2. Res Vet Sci 1990; 48(1): 23-7
    [14] Foster N, Staats JJ, Chengappa MM. Isolation, characterization and protection studies in mice of a streptomycin-dependent mutant of Streptococcus suis type 1/2. Vet Res Commun 1994; 18(3): 155-63
    [15] Kebede M, Chengappa MM, Stuart JG. Isolation and characterization of temperature-sensitive mutants of Streptococcus suis: efficacy trial of the mutant vaccine in mice. Vet Microbiol 1990; 22(2-3): 249-57
    [16] Pallares FJ, Schmitt CS, Roth JA, et al. Evaluation of a ceftiofur-washed whole cell Streptococcus suis bacterin in pigs. Can J Vet Res 2004; 68(3): 236-40
    [17] Fittipaldi N, Harel J, D'Amours B, et al. Potential use of an unencapsulated and aromatic amino acid-auxotrophic Streptococcus suis mutant as a live attenuated vaccine in swine. Vaccine 2007; 25(18): 3524-35
    [18] Elliott SD, Clifton-Hadley F, Tai J. Streptococcal infection in young pigs. V. An immunogenic polysaccharide from Streptococcus suis type 2 with particular reference to vaccination against streptococcal meningitis in pigs. J Hyg (Lond) 1980; 85(2): 275-85
    [19] Baums CG, Kock C, Beineke A, et al. Streptococcus suis bacterin and subunit vaccine immunogenicities and protective efficacies against serotypes 2 and 9. Clin Vaccine Immunol 2009; 16(2): 200-8
    [20] Wisselink HJ, Vecht U, Stockhofe-Zurwieden N, et al. Protection of pigs against challenge with virulent Streptococcus suis serotype 2 strains by a muramidase-released protein and extracellular factor vaccine. Vet Rec 2001; 148(15): 473-7
    [21] Jacobs AA, Loeffen PL, van den Berg AJ, et al. Identification, purification, and characterization of a thiol-activated hemolysin (suilysin) of Streptococcus suis. Infect Immun 1994; 62(5): 1742-8
    [22] Jacobs AA, van den Berg AJ, Loeffen PL. Protection of experimentally infected pigs by suilysin, the thiol-activated haemolysin of Streptococcus suis. Vet Rec 1996; 139(10): 225-8
    [23] Okwumabua O, Chinnapapakkagari S. Identification of the gene encoding a 38-kilodalton immunogenic and protective antigen of Streptococcus suis. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 2005; 12(4): 484-90
    [24] Tan C, Fu S, Liu M, et al. Cloning, expression and characterization of a cell wall surface protein, 6-phosphogluconate-dehydrogenase, of Streptococcus suis serotype 2. Vet Microbiol 2008; 130(3-4): 363-70
    [25] Li Y, Martinez G, Gottschalk M, et al. Identification of a surface protein of Streptococcus suis and evaluation of its immunogenic and protective capacity in pigs. Infect Immun 2006; 74(1): 305-12
    [26] Li Y, Gottschalk M, Esgleas M, et al. Immunization with recombinant Sao protein confers protection against Streptococcus suis infection. Clin Vaccine Immunol 2007; 14(8): 937-43
    [27] Esgleas M, Li Y, Hancock MA, et al. Isolation and characterization of alpha-enolase, a novel fibronectin-binding protein from Streptococcus suis. Microbiology 2008; 154(Pt 9): 2668-79
    [28] Zhang A, Chen B, Mu X, et al. Identification and characterization of a novel protective antigen, Enolase of Streptococcus suis serotype 2. Vaccine 2009; 27(9): 1348-53
    [29] Aranda J, Garrido ME, Cortes P, et al. Analysis of the protective capacity of three Streptococcus suis proteins induced under divalent-cation-limited conditions. Infect Immun 2008; 76(4): 1590-8
    [30] Miller JD, Neely MN. Large-scale screen highlights the importance of capsule for virulence in the zoonotic pathogen Streptococcus iniae. Infect Immun 2005; 73(2): 921-34
    [31] Hu MC, Walls MA, Stroop SD, et al. Immunogenicity of a 26-valent group A streptococcal vaccine. Infect Immun 2002; 70(4): 2171-7
    [33] Quessy S, Dubreuil JD, Caya M, et al. Comparison of pig, rabbit and mouse IgG response to Streptococcus suis serotype 2 proteins and active immunization of mice against the infection. Can J Vet Res 1994; 58(3): 220-3
    [33] Vecht U, Wisselink HJ, Stockhofe-Zurwieden N, et al. Characterization of virulence of the Streptococcus suis serotype 2 reference strain Henrichsen S 735 in newborn gnotobiotic pigs. Vet Microbiol 1996; 51(1-2): 125-36
    [34] Dominguez-Punaro MC, Segura M, Plante MM, et al. Streptococcus suis serotype 2, an important swine and human pathogen, induces strong systemic and cerebral inflammatory responses in a mouse model of infection. J Immunol 2007; 179(3): 1842-54
    [35]王继春,何孔旺,何家惠等.猪链球菌2型动物致病性试验研究中国兽医科技2001, 31 (8): 27-9.
    [36]吴全忠,田云,陆承平.猪链球菌2型引致脑炎及败血症的豚鼠模型中国兽医学报22 (3); 228-30.
    [37]曹兴建,曹照明,陈相等.猪链球菌2型等细菌不同感染途径研究中国比较医学杂志2007, 17 (5): 275-7.
    [38] Hughes MJ, Moore JC, Lane JD, et al. Identification of major outer surface proteins of Streptococcus agalactiae. Infect Immun 2002; 70(3): 1254-9
    [39] Mujahid S, Pechan T, Wang C. Improved solubilization of surface proteins from Listeria monocytogenes for 2-DE. Electrophoresis 2007; 28(21): 3998-4007
    [40] Jing HB, Yuan J, Wang J, et al. Proteome analysis of Streptococcus suis serotype 2. Proteomics 2007;
    [41] Chen C, Tang J, Dong W, et al. A glimpse of streptococcal toxic shock syndrome from comparative genomics of S. suis 2 Chinese isolates. PLoS ONE 2007; 2(3): e315
    [42] Zhang W, Lu CP. Immunoproteomic assay of membrane-associated proteins of Streptococcus suis type 2 China vaccine strain HA9801. Zoonoses Public Health 2007; 54(6-7): 253-9
    [43] Brassard J, Gottschalk M, Quessy S. Cloning and purification of the Streptococcus suis serotype 2 glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase and its involvement as an adhesin. Vet Microbiol 2004; 102(1-2): 87-94
    [44] Antikainen J, Kuparinen V, Lahteenmaki K, et al. Enolases fromGram-positive bacterial pathogens and commensal lactobacilli share functional similarity in virulence-associated traits. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 2007; 51(3): 526-34
    [45] Granato D, Bergonzelli GE, Pridmore RD, et al. Cell surface-associated elongation factor Tu mediates the attachment of Lactobacillus johnsonii NCC533 (La1) to human intestinal cells and mucins. Infect Immun 2004; 72(4): 2160-9
    [46] Navarrete CT, Devia C, Lessa AC, et al. The role of endothelin converting enzyme inhibition during group B streptococcus-induced pulmonary hypertension in newborn piglets. Pediatr Res 2003; 54(3): 387-92
    [47] Fenno JC, Tamura M, Hannam PM, et al. Identification of a Treponema denticola OppA homologue that binds host proteins present in the subgingival environment. Infect Immun 2000; 68(4): 1884-92
    [48] Henrich B, Hopfe M, Kitzerow A, et al. The adherence-associated lipoprotein P100, encoded by an opp operon structure, functions as the oligopeptide-binding domain OppA of a putative oligopeptide transport system in Mycoplasma hominis. J Bacteriol 1999; 181(16): 4873-8
    [49] Dale JB, Penfound T, Chiang EY, et al. Multivalent group A streptococcal vaccine elicits bactericidal antibodies against variant M subtypes. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 2005; 12(7): 833-6
    [50] Kensil CR, Kammer R. QS-21: a water-soluble triterpene glycoside adjuvant. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 1998; 7(9): 1475-82
    [51] Liu G, Anderson C, Scaltreto H, et al. QS-21 structure/function studies: effect of acylation on adjuvant activity. Vaccine 2002; 20(21-22): 2808-15
    [52] Kensil CR, Wu JY, Anderson CA, et al. QS-21 and QS-7: purified saponin adjuvants. Dev Biol Stand 1998; 92: 41-7
    [53] Soltysik S, Bedore DA, Kensil CR. Adjuvant activity of QS-21 isomers. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1993; 690: 392-5
    [54] Smith HE, Vecht U, Wisselink HJ, et al. Mutants of Streptococcus suis types 1 and 2 impaired in expression of muramidase-released protein and extracellular protein induce disease in newborn germfree pigs. Infect Immun 1996; 64(10): 4409-12
    [55] Lun S, Perez-Casal J, Connor W, et al. Role of suilysin in pathogenesis of Streptococcus suis capsular serotype 2. Microb Pathog 2003; 34(1): 27-37
    [56] Segura M, Gottschalk M, Olivier M. Encapsulated Streptococcus suisinhibits activation of signaling pathways involved in phagocytosis. Infect Immun 2004; 72(9): 5322-30
    [57] Takamatsu D, Osaki M, Sekizaki T. Thermosensitive suicide vectors for gene replacement in Streptococcus suis. Plasmid 2001; 46(2): 140-8
    [58] Takamatsu D, Osaki M, Sekizaki T. Construction and characterization of Streptococcus suis-Escherichia coli shuttle cloning vectors. Plasmid 2001; 45(2): 101-13
    [59] Wisselink HJ, Smith HE, Stockhofe-Zurwieden N, et al. Distribution of capsular types and production of muramidase-released protein (MRP) and extracellular factor (EF) of Streptococcus suis strains isolated from diseased pigs in seven European countries. Vet Microbiol 2000; 74(3): 237-48
    [60] Wei Z, Li R, Zhang A, et al. Characterization of Streptococcus suis isolates from the diseased pigs in China between 2003 and 2007. Vet Microbiol 2008;
    [61] Gottschalk M, Lebrun A, Wisselink H, et al. Production of virulence-related proteins by Canadian strains of Streptococcus suis capsular type 2. Can J Vet Res 1998; 62(1): 75-9
    [62] Pizza M, Scarlato V, Masignani V, et al. Identification of vaccine candidates against serogroup B meningococcus by whole-genome sequencing. Science 2000; 287(5459): 1816-20
    [63] Maione D, Margarit I, Rinaudo CD, et al. Identification of a universal Group B streptococcus vaccine by multiple genome screen. Science 2005; 309(5731): 148-50
    [64] Rodriguez-Ortega MJ, Norais N, Bensi G, et al. Characterization and identification of vaccine candidate proteins through analysis of the group A Streptococcus surface proteome. Nat Biotechnol 2006; 24(2): 191-7
    [65] Liu L, Cheng G, Wang C, et al. Identification and experimental verification of protective antigens against Streptococcus suis serotype 2 based on genome sequence analysis. Curr Microbiol 2009; 58(1): 11-7
    [66] Zhang W, Lu CP. Immunoproteomics of extracellular proteins of Chinese virulent strains of Streptococcus suis type 2. Proteomics 2007; 7(24): 4468-76
    [67] Zhang A, Xie C, Chen H, et al. Identification of immunogenic cell wall-associated proteins of Streptococcus suis serotype 2. Proteomics 2008; 8(17): 3506-15
    [68] Blum H, Rollinghoff M, Gessner A. Expression and co-cytokine function of murine thioredoxin/adult T cell leukaemia-derived factor (ADF). Cytokine 1996; 8(1):6-13
    [69] Jespersgaard C, Hajishengallis G, Huang Y, et al. Protective immunity against Streptococcus mutans infection in mice after intranasal immunization with the glucan-binding region of S. mutans glucosyltransferase. Infect Immun 1999; 67(12): 6543-9
    [70] Ogunniyi AD, LeMessurier KS, Graham RM, et al. Contributions of pneumolysin, pneumococcal surface protein A (PspA), and PspC to pathogenicity of Streptococcus pneumoniae D39 in a mouse model. Infect Immun 2007; 75(4): 1843-51
    [71] Iannelli F, Chiavolini D, Ricci S, et al. Pneumococcal surface protein C contributes to sepsis caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae in mice. Infect Immun 2004; 72(5): 3077-80
    [72] Rose L, Shivshankar P, Hinojosa E, et al. Antibodies against PsrP, a novel Streptococcus pneumoniae adhesin, block adhesion and protect mice against pneumococcal challenge. J Infect Dis 2008; 198(3): 375-83
    [1] Yu H, Jing H, Chen Z et al. Human Streptococcus suis outbreak, Sichuan, China[J]. Emerg Infect Dis, 2006, 12(6):914-20
    [2] Sriskandan S, Slater JD. Invasive disease and toxic shock due to zoonotic Streptococcus suis: an emerging infection in the East[J]? PLoS Med, 2006, 3(5):e187
    [3] Holt ME, Enright MR, Alexander TJ. Immunisation of pigs with killed cultures of Streptococcus suis type 2[J]. Res Vet Sci, 1990, 48(1):23-7
    [4] Foster N, Staats JJ, Chengappa MM. Isolation, characterization and protection studies in mice of a streptomycin-dependent mutant of Streptococcus suis type 1/2[J]. Vet Res Commun, 1994, 18(3):155-63
    [5] Kebede M, Chengappa MM, Stuart JG. Isolation and characterization of temperature-sensitive mutants of Streptococcus suis: efficacy trial of the mutant vaccine in mice[J]. Vet Microbiol, 1990, 22(2-3):249-57
    [6] Pallares FJ, Schmitt CS, Roth JA et al. Evaluation of a ceftiofur-washed whole cell Streptococcus suis bacterin in pigs[J]. Can J Vet Res, 2004, 68(3):236-40
    [7] Fittipaldi N, Harel J, D'Amours B et al. Potential use of an unencapsulated and aromatic amino acid-auxotrophic Streptococcus suis mutant as a live attenuated vaccine in swine[J]. Vaccine, 2007, 25(18):3524-35
    [8] Elliott SD, Clifton-Hadley F, Tai J. Streptococcal infection in young pigs. V. An immunogenic polysaccharide from Streptococcus suis type 2 with particular reference to vaccination against streptococcal meningitis in pigs[J]. J Hyg (Lond), 1980, 85(2):275-85
    [9] Baums CG, Kock C, Beineke A et al. Streptococcus suis bacterin and subunit vaccine immunogenicities and protective efficacies against serotypes 2 and 9[J]. Clin Vaccine Immunol, 2009, 16(2):200-8
    [10] Vecht U, Wisselink HJ, Jellema ML, Smith HE. Identification of two proteins associated withvirulence of Streptococcus suis type 2. Infect Immun, 1991, 59(9):3156-62
    [11] Wisselink HJ, Vecht U, Stockhofe-Zurwieden N, Smith HE. Protection of pigs against challenge with virulent Streptococcus suis serotype 2 strains by a muramidase-released protein and extracellular factor vaccine[J]. Vet Rec, 2001, 148(15):473-7
    [12] Jacobs AA, Loeffen PL, van den Berg AJ, Storm PK. Identification, purification, and characterization of a thiol-activated hemolysin (suilysin) of Streptococcus suis[J]. Infect Immun, 1994, 62(5):1742-8
    [13] Jacobs AA, van den Berg AJ, Loeffen PL. Protection of experimentally infected pigs by suilysin, the thiol-activated haemolysin of Streptococcus suis[J]. Vet Rec, 1996, 139(10):225-8
    [14] Okwumabua O, Chinnapapakkagari S. Identification of the gene encoding a 38-kilodalton immunogenic and protective antigen of Streptococcus suis[J]. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol, 2005, 12(4):484-90
    [15] Li Y, Martinez G, Gottschalk M et al. Identification of a surface protein of Streptococcus suis and evaluation of its immunogenic and protective capacity in pigs[J]. Infect Immun, 2006, 74(1):305-12
    [16] Li Y, Gottschalk M, Esgleas M et al. Immunization with recombinant Sao protein confers protection against Streptococcus suis infection[J]. Clin Vaccine Immunol, 2007, 14(8):937-43
    [17] Esgleas M, Li Y, Hancock MA et al. Isolation and characterization of alpha-enolase, a novel fibronectin-binding protein from Streptococcus suis[J]. Microbiology, 2008, 154(Pt 9):2668-79
    [18] Zhang A, Chen B, Mu X et al. Identification and characterization of a novel protective antigen, Enolase of Streptococcus suis serotype 2[J]. Vaccine, 2009, 27(9):1348-53
    [19] Geng H, Zhu L, Yuan Y et al. Identification and characterization of novel immunogenic proteins of Streptococcus suis serotype 2[J]. J Proteome Res, 2008, 7(9):4132-42
    [20] Zhang A, Xie C, Chen H, Jin M. Identification of immunogenic cell wall-associated proteins of Streptococcus suis serotype 2[J]. Proteomics, 2008, 8(17):3506-15
    [21] Zhang W, Lu CP. Immunoproteomic assay of membrane-associated proteins of Streptococcus suis type 2 China vaccine strain HA9801[J]. Zoonoses Public Health, 2007, 54(6-7):253-9
    [22] Zhang W, Lu CP. Immunoproteomics of extracellular proteins of Chinese virulent strains of Streptococcus suis type 2[J]. Proteomics, 2007, 7(24):4468-76
    [23] Liu L, Cheng G, Wang C et al. Identification and experimental verification of protective antigens against Streptococcus suis serotype 2 based on genome sequence analysis[J]. Curr Microbiol, 2009, 58(1):11-7
    [24] Wisselink HJ, Smith HE, Stockhofe-Zurwieden N et al. Distribution of capsular types and production of muramidase-released protein (MRP) and extracellular factor (EF) of Streptococcus suis strains isolated from diseased pigs in seven European countries[J]. Vet Microbiol, 2000, 74(3):237-48
    [25] Gottschalk M, Lebrun A, Wisselink H et al. Production of virulence-related proteins by Canadian strains of Streptococcus suis capsular type 2[J]. Can J Vet Res, 1998, 62(1):75-9
    [26] Aranda J, Garrido ME, Cortes P et al. Analysis of the protective capacity of three Streptococcus suis proteins induced under divalent-cation-limited conditions[J]. Infect Immun, 2008, 76(4):1590-8
    [27] Tan C, Fu S, Liu M et al. Cloning, expression and characterization of a cell wall surface protein, 6-phosphogluconate-dehydrogenase, of Streptococcus suis serotype 2[J]. Vet Microbiol, 2008, 130(3-4):363-70