等离子体辅助选择性催化还原氮氧化物的试验研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
以氨气(NH3)为还原剂的选择性催化还原(SCR)技术因催化剂成熟且抗硫中毒性能强等优点成为颇受关注的柴油机NOx催化还原技术,是最有希望在规定时间内使柴油机NOx排放达到欧Ⅴ及以上排放标准的技术之一。但是,柴油车用SCR技术需要解决低温工况下NOx去除效率低下的问题。为此,国外采用在SCR反应器前增加预氧化装置(DOC)使NOx低温还原效率低的问题得到缓解。但是,DOC通常所用的贵金属催化剂容易硫中毒,因此,SCR技术的应用受到柴油含硫量的制约。
     本文针对SCR系统存在的技术问题提出新的解决方案,研究开发适用于高硫份柴油车尾气的新型柴油机SCR系统——等离子体辅助选择性催化还原氮氧化物。本文将进行模拟柴油机排气试验研究和柴油机台架试验研究,主要研究内容包括以下四个方面:
     (a)自行搭建模拟柴油机排气NH3-SCR试验台架,考察了混合气组分、反应温度以及空速等因素对SCR系统NOx去除效率的影响。研究发现,反应温度对NOx去除效率影响非常大。提高NO2的量对于低温工况下能大幅度提高SCR还原NOx效率,当[NO2]/[NO]=1时可以使SCR在各低温工况下去除效率最高。
     (b)采用介质阻挡放电(DBD)型式的等离子体发生器作为NO的预氧化反应器,研究了DBD过程中NO的预氧化,并考察了混合气组分、温度以及能量密度等因素对NO预氧化性能的影响。研究发现,在合适的O2体积分数下,通过放电产生的等离子体可以有效地将NO部分氧化为NO2。研究还发现,C3H6在等离子体预氧化过程中起了关键的作用。
     (c)进行了DBD反应器与SCR反应器耦合系统试验,考察了混合气组分、反应温度以及能量密度对NOx去除效率的影响,并比较了SCR系统与DBD-SCR耦合系统在去除NOx方面的性能差异。研究发现,C3H6的加入可以大幅度提高NOx去除效率,但过多的C3H6同时又会产生大量的CO。与直接加入NO2实现快速SCR相比,使用DBD辅助SCR有更高的NOx去除效率。
     (d)基于YC6G柴油机,搭建了带有DBD辅助SCR系统的试验台架。改变发动机工况,分别考察了SCR系统与DBD-SCR耦合系统去除NOx的性能。研究发现DBD-SCR耦合系统能显著提高发动机台架试验中低温工况下的NOx去除效率,但是输入DBD反应器的能量密度较大。
Due to the advantage of mature catalyst performance and strong resistance to sulfur poisoning, the selective catalytic reduction (SCR) with ammonia (NH3) as the reducing agent received much research interest, and is considered to be one of the most promising methods to meet the Euro V and above emission regulations within the specified time. However, the low NOx removal efficiency of SCR at low temperature condition is a big problem for diesel vehicle application. For this reason, partial pre-oxidation of NO into NO2 is needed to achieve the fast-SCR, which process is active at low temperature. Pre-oxidation of NO raise another challenge that the sulfur matters in the diesel exhaust easily devastate the precious metal catalysts usually used for NO oxidation.
     In order to solve the problems mentioned above, a new approach, plasma-enhanced selective catalytic reduction of NOx was proposed. In this paper, a novel SCR system combined with plasma reactor was established. Both simulated gas experiment and diesel engine bench test were investigated in this study which mainly consists of four sections as followed.
     (a) An experimental system of NH3-SCR for simulated gas was set up and on which, a series of experiments aiming to study the NOx removal efficiency of SCR system under different reaction conditions (component and concentration of gas mixture, reaction temperature and space velocity, etc.) were carried out. The results demonstrate that NOx removal efficiency was influenced by reaction temperature greatly. NOx removal efficiency increases with the increasing concentration of NO2 in the gas mixture, especially at low temperature. Peak NOx removal efficiency occurs when the ratio of [NO2]/[NO] reaches 1 at low temperature levels.
     (b) A dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) reactor was designed to partially oxidize NO to NO2. Several factors, including gas component, temperature and energy density were investigated on the NO pre-oxidation performance of DBD reactor with the presence of appropriate amount of O2. It was found that hydrocarbon species greatly affect NO pre-oxidation in plasma process by promoting NO coversion to NO2.
     (c) Removal of NOx in the system combing DBD reactor with SCR reactor was tested under different conditions (gas component, reaction temperature and energy density, etc.). The performance difference between SCR system and Plasma-SCR system was analyzed. The results reveal that with the addition of C3H6, the NOx removal efficiency can be improved significantly, but high C3H6 concentration leads to large amount of CO emission. The Plasma-SCR system has much higher NOx removal efficiency than that of fast-SCR process achieved by adding NO2 directly.
     (d) An engine test bench with Plasma-SCR system was setup based on YC6G diesel engine. NOx removal in both SCR system and Plasma-SCR system was tested under different conditions (engine speed, torque). At low temperature condition, NOx removal efficiency can be improved significantly by coupling SCR reactor with DBD reaction. However, the consumed energy in engine bench test is much higher than that of simulated gas experiment.
引文
[1]孙克勤、钟秦.火电厂烟气脱销技术及工程应用[M].北京:化学工业出版社, 2006.1-30.
    [2]洪兆鸣,殷旭东,吴敏华,陈宁.大气中NOx污染研究[J].环境污染与防治网络版论文摘要, 06(2009) 109-111.
    [3]汪卫东.现代柴油车排放及其控制技术综述[J].汽车研究与开发, 01(2005) 35-41.
    [4] Giuseppe Salvatore Madia. Measures to enhance the NOx conversion in urea-SCR systems for automotive applications [D]. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, 2002.
    [5] T. Cartus, G. Holy, et al. Integration of the NOx-adsorber technology in future gasoline and diesel engine concepts [C]. 19th International Vienna Motor Symposium, May 7-8, 1998, 343.
    [6] Selective Catalytic Reduction(Final Report)-the most promising technology to comply with the imminent EuroⅣand EuroⅤemission standards for HD vehicles [R]. ACEA, June, 2009.
    [7] Z. Chen, V. K.Mathur. Nonthermal plasma electrocatalytic reduction of nitrogen oxide [J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 42(2003) 6682-6687.
    [8] A Fritz, V Pitchon. The current state of research on automotive lean NOx catalysis [J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 13(1997) 1-25.
    [9] V.C. Belessi, C.N. Costa, et al. Selective catalytic reduction of NOx by propane on Co-loaded zeolites [J]. Catalysis Today, 59(2000) 347-363.
    [10] Held W, Konig A, Richter T, et al. Catalytic NOx reduction in net oxidizing exhaust gas [J]. SAE paper, 900496, 1990.
    [11]陈广新,余林,林永强等,La-Sr-Fe-Co系钙钛矿型汽车尾气净化催化剂的性能研究[J].分子催化, 19(2005) 260-265.
    [12] Juergen Steinwandel, et al. Catalytic diesel soot filter. U.S. Patent, No.4929581. 1990-05-29.
    [13]林克卫.柴油引擎氮氧化物防制技术SCR (urea)系统之介绍[J].车辆研测资讯, 9(2006) 2-8.
    [14] John Hoard. Plasma-catalysis for diesel exhaust treatment: current state of art [J]. SAE paper, 2001-01-0185.
    [15] H. Miessner, K-P. Francker, R.Rudolph, Th. Hammer. NOx removal in excess oxygen by plasma-enhanced selective catalytic reduction [J]. Catalysis Today, 75(2002) 325-330.
    [16] Christine Lambert,Robert Hammerle. Technical advantages of urea-SCR for light-duty and heavy-duty diesel vehicle applications [J]. SAE Paper, 2004-01-1292.
    [17] Kawanami M,Horiuchi M. Advanced catalyst studies of diesel NO reduction for on-highway trucks [J]. SAE Paper, 950154, 1995.
    [18] Gieshof J, Sindlinger A. Improved SCR systerns for heavy duty applications [J]. SAE Paper, 2000-01-0189.
    [19] Krijnsen H. C. Bench-scale demonstration of an integrated DeSoot-DeNO system [C]. SAE Paper, 2001-01-0515.
    [20]吴小春. Urea-SCR系统降低NOx的实验研究[J].航海工程, 06(2004) 28-30.
    [21] N.Y. Tops?e, H. Tops?e, J. A. Dumesic. Vanadia/titania catalysts for selective catalytic reduction (SCR) of nitric-oxide by ammonia: I. Combined temperature-programmed in-situ FTIR and on-line mass-spectroscopy studies [J]. Journal of Catalysis, 151(1995) 226-240.
    [22] N.Y. Tops?e, J. A. Dumesic, H. Tops?e. Vanadia/titania catalysts for selective catalytic reduction (SCR) of nitric-oxide by ammonia: II. Studies of active sites and formulation of catalytic cycles [J]. Journal of Catalysis, 151(1995) 241-252.
    [23] J. A. Dumesic, N.Y. Tops?e, H. Tops?e, et al. Kinetics of selective catalytic reduction of nitric oxide by ammonia over vanadia/titania [J]. Journal of Catalysis, 163(1996) 409-417.
    [24] Manfred Koebel, Giuseppe Madia, Martin Elsener. Selective catalytic reduction of NO and NO2 at low temperatures [J]. Catalysis Today, 73(2002) 239-247.
    [25] R. Q. Long, R. T. Yang. Temperature-programmed desorption/surface reaction (TPD/TPSR) study of Fe-exchanged ZSM-5 for selective catalytic reduction of nitric oxide by ammonia [J]. Journal of Catalysis, 198(2001) 20-28.
    [26] J. Koop, O. Deutschmann. Detailed surface reaction mechanism for Pt-catalyzed abatement of automotive exhaust gases [J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 91(2009) 47-58.
    [27] Guido Busca, Luca Lietti, et al. Chemical and mechanistic aspects of the selective catalytic reduction of NOx by ammonia over oxide catalysts: A review [J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 18(1998) 1-36.
    [28] Luca Lietti, Pio Forzatti, Fiorenzo Bregani. Steady-state and transient reactivity study of TiO2-supported V2O5-WO3 De-NOx catalysts: relevance of the vanadium-tungsten interaction on the catalytic activity [J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 35(1996) 3884-3892.
    [29] Carlo Orsenigo, Luca Lietti, et al. Dynamic investigation of the role of the surface sulfates in NOx reduction and SO2 oxidation over V2O5-WO3/TiO2 catalysts [J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 37(1998) 2350-2359.
    [30] B.M.Penetrante, R.M.Brusasco, B.T.Merritt, G.E.Vogtlin. Sulfur tolerance of selective partial oxidation of NO to NO2 in a plasma [J]. SAE paper, 1999-01-3687.
    [31] Lifeng Xu, Robert W. McCabe and Robert H. Hammerle. NOx self-inhibition in selectivecatalytic reduction with urea (ammonia) over a Cu-zeolite catalyst in diesel exhaust [J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 39(2002) 51-63.
    [32] M. Thornton, M. Tatur, D. Tomazic, P. Weber, C. Webb. Full useful life (120,000 miles) exhaust emission performance of a NOx adsorber and diesel particle filter equipped passenger car and medium-duty engine in conjunction with ultra low sulfur fuel [C]. The 2005 Diesel Engine Emissions Reduction (DEER) Conference, Chicago, Illinois, August, 2005, 21-25.
    [33] Cl Aardahl, CF Habeger, KG Rappe, et al. Plasma-enhanced SCR of NOx in simulated heavy-duty exhaust: sulfur, hydrocarbon, and temperature effects [R]. United States Department of Energy, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, 2001.
    [34] Marnix A. Tas, R. van Hardeveld, and E. M. van Veldhuizen. Reactions of NO in a positive streamer corona plasma [J]. Plasma Chemistry and Plasma Processing, 17(1997) 371-391.
    [35] Th. Hammer, Th. Kappes, M. Baldauf. Plasma catalytic processes for environmental problems [J]. Catalysis Today, 59 (2000) 411-416.
    [36] Nagatoshi Suzuki, Manabu Higashi, and Satoshi Uchida, Kan-ichi Fujii. Simultaneous removal of NOx, SOx, and soot in diesel engine exhaust by plasma/oil dynamics means [J]. SAE, 910562, 1991.
    [37]营井秀郎[日本],等离子体电子工程学[M].张海波,张丹[译],北京:科学出版社,2002,4-19.
    [38]徐学基,诸定昌.气体放电物理[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,1996, 50-80.
    [39]许根慧,姜恩永,盛京.等离子体技术与应用[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2006, 1-72.
    [40] Ren Z F, Huang Z P, Wang JH, et al. Synthesis of large arrays of well-aligned carbon nanotubes on glass [R]. Science, 282(1998) 1105-1107.
    [41] W. B. Choi, Y. M. Jin, H. Y. Kim, et al. Electrophoresis deposition of carbon nanotubes for triode-type field emission display [J]. Applied Physics Letters, 78 (2001) 1547-1549.
    [42] L.A. Rosenthal. Electrical characterization of a corona discharge for NOx aftertreatment [J]. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 338 (1973) 1-5.
    [43] C. L. Aardahl, C. F. Habeger, M. L. Balmer et al. Plasma-enhanced catalytic reduction of NOx in simulated lean exhaust [J]. SAE paper, 2000-01-2961.
    [44] M. Lou Balmer, Russ Tonkyn, Steven Yoon et al. NOx destruction behavior of select materials when combined with a non-thermal plasma [J]. SAE paper, 1999-01-3640.
    [45] P. X. Tran, F. P. White, M. P. Mathur, J. M. Ekmann. NOx emissions of a jet diffusion flame which is surrounded by a shroud of combustion air [R]. USDOE Pittsburgh Energy Technology Center, 1996.
    [46] John Hoard, M. Lou Balmer. Analysis of plasma-catalysis for diesel NOx remediation [J].SAE paper, 982429, 1998.
    [47] B. M. Penetrante, M. C. Hsiao, B. T. Merritt, G. E. Vogtlin. Multi-stage selective catalytic reduction of NOx in lean-burn engine exhaust [C]. Diesel Engine Emissions Reduction Workshop, San Diego, CA, 1997.
    [48] B. M. Penetrante, R. M.Brusasco, B. T. Merritt, W. J. Pitz, G. E. Vogtlin. Plasma-assisted catalytic reduction of NOx [J]. SAE paper, 982508, 1998.
    [49] A Khacef, J M Cormier, J M Pouvesle. NOx remediation in oxygen-rich exhaust gas using atmospheric pressure non-thermal plasma generated by a pulse nanosecond dielectric barrier discharge [J]. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 35(2002) 1491-1498.
    [50] Young Sun Mok, Yil Jeong Huh. Simultaneous removal of nitrogen oxides and particulate matters from diesel engine exhaust using dielectric barrier discharge and catalysis hybrid system [J]. Plasma Chemistry and Plasma Processing, 25(2005) 625-639.
    [51] Young Sun Mok, Dong Jun Koh, Kyong Tae Kim, and In-Sik Nam. Nonthermal plasma-enhanced catalytic of nitrogen oxides over V2O5/TiO2 and Cr2O3/TiO2 [J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 42(2003) 2960-2967.
    [52]陈伟路,曾念兰.氨选择性催化还原NOx的实验研究[J].湘潭大学自然科学学报, 15(1993) 108-112.
    [53] Phil Blakeman. SCR experience for first fit and retrofit [C].国际大城市机动车污染防治研讨会. International Metropolitan Vehicle Pollution Control Seminar, China, September, 2007.
    [54] Hisakazu Suzuki and Hajime Ishii. Emission characteristics of a urea SCR system under catalysts activated and de-activated conditions [J]. SAE paper, 2006-01-0639.
    [55] Rui Marques, Stephanie Da Costa, Patrick, Da Costa. Plasma-assisted catalytic oxidation of methane on the influence of plasma energy deposition and feed composition [J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 82(2008) 50-57.
    [56] B.S.Rajanikanth, Satyabrata Rout. Studies on nitric oxide removal in simulated gas compositions under plasma-dielectric/catalytic discharges [J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 74(2001) 177-195.
    [57] Lowke John J, Morrow Richard. Theoretical analysis of removal of oxides of sulphur and nitrogen in pulsed operation of electrostatic precipitators [J]. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, 23(1995) 661-671
    [58] Yong Nie. Jingyi Wang, Kan Zhong, Liming Wang, Zhicheng Guan. Synergy study for plasma-facilitated C2H4 selective catalytic reduction of NOx over Ag/γ-Al2O3 catalyst [J]. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, 35(2007) 669-676.
    [59] W. Tsang and J. T. Herron. Chemical kinetic data base for propellant combustion. I.Reactions involving NO, NO2, HNO, HNO2, HCN and N2O [J]. Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data, 20(1994) 609-663.
    [60] Y. Endo, S. Tsuchiya, C. Yamada, E. Hirota, and S. Koda. Microwave kinetic spectroscopy of reaction intermediates: O+ ethylene reaction at low pressure [J]. The Joural of Chemical Physics, 85(1986) 4446-4452.
    [61] K. Mahmud, P. Marshall, and A. Fontijn. A high-temperature photochemistry kinetics study of the reaction of O(3P) atoms with ethylene from 290 to 1510 K [J]. The Joural of Physical Chemistry, 91(1987) 1568-1573.
    [62] W. Tsang and R. F. Hampson. Chemical kinetic data base for combustion chemistry. Part I. Methane and related compounds [J]. Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data, 15(1986) 1087-1279.
    [63] R. Atkinson, D. L. Baulch, R. A. Cox, R. F. Hampson, J. A. Kerr, M. J. Rossi, and J. Troe. Evaluated kinetic, photochemical and heterogeneous data for atmospheric chemistry: Supplement V, IUPAC subcommittee on gas kinetic data evaluation for atmospheric chemistry [J]. Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data, 26(1997) 521-1011.
    [64] G. Lombardi. N, Blin-Simiand. F, Jorand. L, et al. Effect of propene, n-decane, and toluene plasma kinetics on NO conversion in homogeneous oxygen-rich dry mixtures at ambient temperature [J]. Plasma Chemistry and Plasma Processing, 27(2007) 414-445.
    [65] Ai-Min Zhu, Qi Sun, et al. Conversion of NO in NO/N2, NO/O2/N2, NO/C2H4/N2 and NO/C2H4/O2/N2 systems by dielectric barrier discharge plasmas [J]. Plasma Chemistry and Plasma Processing, 25(2005) 371-386.