分流制系统雨水管网混接旱天排放污染特征研究
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:A study on characteristics of dry-weather discharge pollution from separate storm drains with inappropriate flow entries
  • 作者:尹海龙 ; 王月 ; 赵刚
  • 英文作者:YIN Hailong;WANG Yue;ZHAO Gang;College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University;Key Laboratory of Yangtze River Water Environment, Ministry of Education, Tongji University;
  • 关键词:分流制系统 ; 雨污混接 ; 质量平衡 ; 管道沉积物 ; 河水倒灌
  • 英文关键词:stormwater drainage system;;illicit discharge;;mass balance;;in-pipe sediments;;river water intrusion
  • 中文刊名:环境科学学报
  • 英文刊名:Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae
  • 机构:同济大学环境科学与工程学院;同济大学长江水环境教育部重点实验室;
  • 出版日期:2019-10-26
  • 出版单位:环境科学学报
  • 年:2019
  • 期:10
  • 基金:国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项(No.2017ZX07603-003)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:361-368
  • 页数:8
  • CN:11-1843/X
  • ISSN:0253-2468
  • 分类号:TU992;X52
摘要
分流制排水系统中,雨水管网混接污水在旱天直排河道,造成河道水质恶化.本文以上海市某混接分流制排水系统(3.74 km~2)为研究对象,通过开展雨水管网旱天排放水质监测(SS、COD、BOD_5、NH_3-N、TN等),以及雨水管网旱天污染输移质量平衡分析,研究了混接雨水管网旱天排放污染特征.结果表明:①雨水管网旱天排放分为重力流排放和雨水泵开启排放两种情况,重力流排放水质与混接水量水质和河水倒灌相关,雨水泵开启排放水质与混接水量水质、管道淤泥冲刷和河水倒灌相关.②当旱天前期雨水泵不开泵时间小于2 d时,河水倒灌会对重力流排放和雨水泵站排放水质造成明显影响.③随着前期不开泵时间增加,管道淤积程度越发严重;雨水泵排放COD、BOD_5、SS浓度与前期不开泵时间满足指数关系.④旱天重力流排放期间的管道底泥淤积量大于泵站排放期间的淤泥冲刷量,年度尺度上57%的淤积底泥通过旱天雨水泵开启排出,其余43%的淤积底泥在雨天随雨水泵排出,从而进一步加重了河道雨天污染.
        Dry-weather discharge from the separate storm drains due to illicit sewage or other sources entries resulted in the water quality deterioration of receiving waters. In this study, a separate storm drains with inappropriate sewage entries(3.74 km~2) in Shanghai was investigated to determine the characteristics of dry-weather days discharge by performing water quality monitoring(SS, COD, BOD_5, NH_3-N, TN) and quantifying the mass balance of illicit discharge transport during dry-weather days. Our findings were listed as follows: ①For the separate storm drains, dry-weather discharge arose from two scenarios, that is, gravity flow discharge and pumping discharge as a result of storm pumps operation. Water quality of gravity flow was affected by flow discharges and water quality of illicit discharge types as well as river water intrusion. Water quality of pumping flow was determined by flow discharges and water quality of illicit discharge types, in-pipe sediments erosion and river water intrusion. ②When the antecedent non-pumping period was less than 2 d of dry-weather days, water quality of both gravity flow and pumping flow would be significantly affected by river intrusion; ③The longer the antecedent non-pumping days, the more serious the sediments deposition would be. An exponential function was found between antecedent non-pumping days and pumping discharge concentration of SS, COD and BOD_5. ④Over annual scale, the amount of deposited sediments under gravity flow was greater than that of scoured sediments under pumping discharge. It was estimated that throughout one year, 57% of the deposited sediments was flushed into the river due to storm pumps operation on dry-weather days, and the remaining 43% was flushed into the river on wet-weather days, further aggravating river pollution during rainfall.
引文
Barco J,Papiri S,Stenstrom M K.2008.First flush in a combined sewer system[J].Chemosphere,71(5):827-833
    Brombach H,Weiss G,Fuchs S.2005.A new database on urban runoff pollution:comparison of separate and combined sewer systems[J].Water Science & Technology,51(2):119-128
    Chebbo G.2001.Production and transport of urban wet weather pollution in combined sewer systems:the "Marais" experimental urban catchment in Paris[J].Urban Water,3(1/2):3-15
    丁庆玲,王倩,张琼华,等.2017.太湖上游城市宜兴城区主干道路径流污染特征解析[J].环境科学学报,37(9):3456-3463
    Gasperi J.2006.Spatial variability of the characteristics and the origins of hydrocarbons pollution forwarding in Parisian combined sewer[D].Paris:Ecole Nationale des Ponts et Chaussees
    Gromaire-Mertz M C,Garnaud S,Gonzalez A,et al.1999.Characterisation of urban runoff pollution in Paris[J].Water Science and Technology,39(2):1-8
    Gupta K,Saul A J.1996.Specific relationships for the first flush load in combined sewer flows[J].Water Research,30(5):1244-1252
    韩芸,彭党聪,许玮,等.2007.合流制管道溢流水质分析及特性研究[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版),39(6):834-838
    何庆慈,李立青,孔玲莉,等.2005.武汉市汉阳区的暴雨径流污染特征[J].中国给水排水,21(2):101-103
    Kim L H,Kayhanian M,Stenstrom M K.2004.Event mean concentration and loading of litter from highways during storms[J].Science of the Total Environment,330(1/3):101-113
    华明,徐祖信.2004.苏州河沿岸市政泵站放江特征分析[J].给水排水,30(11):33-36
    李贺,李田.2006.上海高密度居民区合流制系统雨天溢流水质研究[J].环境科学,27(8):1565-1569
    鹿海峰,华蕾,王浩正,等.2012.城市合流制管网降雨径流污染特征分析[J].中国环境监测,28(6):94-99
    Kafi M,Gasperi J,Moilleron R,et al.2008.Spatial variability of the characteristics of combined wet weather pollutant loads in Paris[J].Water Research,42(3):539-549
    牛司平,王璇,Kim Y C,等.2019.高速公路路面雨水径流下渗系统性能研究[J].环境科学学报,39(3):762-767
    Rule K L,Comber S D W,Ross D,et al.2006.Sources of priority substances entering an urban wastewater catchment:trace organic chemicals[J].Chemosphere,63(4):581-591
    Saul A J,Skipworth P J,Tait S J,et al.2003.Movement of total suspended solids in combined sewers[J].Journal of Hydraulic Engineering,129(4):298-307
    谭琼,李田,高秋霞.2005.上海市排水系统雨天出流的初期效应分析[J].中国给水排水,21(11):26-30
    王海邻,曹雪莹,任玉芬,等.2019.北京城市主干道降雨径流污染负荷分析[J].环境科学学报,39(6):1860-1867
    Xu Z,Yin H,Li H.2014.Quantification of non-stormwater flow entries into storm drains using a water balance approach[J].Science of The Total Environment,487:381-388
    徐祖信,屈计宁,罗海林.2003.上海市合流制管道雨污混合水和典型生活污水水质调查与分析[J].上海环境科学,(z1):102-105