农村土地整治与美丽乡村建设的耦合关系——以南京市11个项目区为例
|
摘要
[目的]探索农村土地整治项目与美丽乡村建设之间的耦合关系和耦合联动内容,为优化面向美丽乡村建设的土地综合整治模式提供理论参考。[方法]以南京市11个项目区为例,首先建立起土地整治项目评价和美丽乡村建设评价体系,运用熵权法确定指标权重,用相对系数评价法对基础数据计算出各自分值,然后引入SPSS软件中的11种曲线估计回归模型,探究土地整治项目与美丽乡村建设的耦合关系,最后通过相关系数R~2和耦合曲线走势分析土地整治项目与美丽乡村建设之间的相互关系。[结果]南京市土地整治各项目与与美丽乡村建设中村社环境的耦合关系相对不明显,与管理民主的耦合度有待提高。[结论]在今后的土地整治工作中要更加重视保护环境,提高项目的民众参与度,进而提高两者之间的耦合关系,最终实现两系统之间的互利共赢。
[Objective] To provide a theoretical reference for optimizing the comprehensive land consolidation model for the construction of beautiful countryside, the coupling relationship between the rural land consolidation project and the construction of beautiful countryside was studied. [Methods] Eleven project areas in Nanjing City were taken as an example to firstly establish the evaluation index system of land consolidation and the construction of beautiful countryside. Secondly, the entropy weight method was used to determine the weight of index, and the relative coefficient evaluation method was used to calculate the respective scores of the basic data. Then the 11 kinds of curves in SPSS were used to estimate the regression model so as to explore the coupling relationship between land consolidation project and the construction of beautiful countryside. Finally, the relationship between land consolidation project and construction of beautiful countryside was analyzed by referring to the correlation coefficient R~2 and the trend of the correlation curve. [Results] The relationship between the land consolidation project and the environment of countryside in Nanjing City is relatively insignificant and the correlation degree of democratic management needs to be improved. [Conclusion] For the rural land consolidation work in the future, the protection of environment should be valued, and the public participation in the project should be improved to get a better coupling relationship between land consolidation project and the construction of beautiful countryside, achieving a mutual benefit between two systems.
[Objective] To provide a theoretical reference for optimizing the comprehensive land consolidation model for the construction of beautiful countryside, the coupling relationship between the rural land consolidation project and the construction of beautiful countryside was studied. [Methods] Eleven project areas in Nanjing City were taken as an example to firstly establish the evaluation index system of land consolidation and the construction of beautiful countryside. Secondly, the entropy weight method was used to determine the weight of index, and the relative coefficient evaluation method was used to calculate the respective scores of the basic data. Then the 11 kinds of curves in SPSS were used to estimate the regression model so as to explore the coupling relationship between land consolidation project and the construction of beautiful countryside. Finally, the relationship between land consolidation project and construction of beautiful countryside was analyzed by referring to the correlation coefficient R~2 and the trend of the correlation curve. [Results] The relationship between the land consolidation project and the environment of countryside in Nanjing City is relatively insignificant and the correlation degree of democratic management needs to be improved. [Conclusion] For the rural land consolidation work in the future, the protection of environment should be valued, and the public participation in the project should be improved to get a better coupling relationship between land consolidation project and the construction of beautiful countryside, achieving a mutual benefit between two systems.
引文
[1] 陈润羊.美丽乡村建设研究文献综述[J].云南农业大学学报:社会科学,2018,12(2):8-14.
[2] 谷树忠,胡咏君,周洪.生态文明建设的科学内涵与基本路径[J].资源科学,2013,35(1):2-13.
[3] 杨雪松.农村土地综合整治绩效评价体系研究[D].南京农业大学,2015.
[4] 张忆,司静波.黑龙江省农村土地整治示范项目绩效评价[J].江苏农业科学,2017,45(3):270-275.
[5] Korthals Altes W K,Bong I S.Promoting Rural Development through the Use of Land Consolidation:The Case of Korea[J].International Planning Studies,2011,16(2):151-167.
[6] 黄曦红.湘乡市“美丽乡村”建设模式及效益评价[D].湖南师范大学,2016.
[7] 王惠林,洪明.政府治理与村民自治的互动机制、理论解释及政策启示:基于“美丽乡村建设”的案例分析[J].学习与实践,2018(3):105-112.
[8] 胡小风,陈雨生,胡涛,等.德清美丽乡村示范村建设[J].山东林业科技,2018,48(1):71-74+77.
[9] 王锐,陈光银.基于层次分析—模糊综合评价法的贫困村土地整治项目扶贫成效评价:以石柱县万朝镇万乐村土地整治项目为例[J].农村经济与科技,2018,29(3):15-19.
[10] Tang Xiumei,Chen Baiming,Zhang Leina,et al.Analysis of cultivated land consolidation potential in China[J].Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2012,28(1):219-224.
[11] 程文仕,黄鑫,刘洋,等.基于土地整治绩效空间差异和潜力分级的投入优先序研究[J].水土保持通报,2018,38(1):192-197.
[12] 罗黎婷.基于耕地功能分化的“两块田”农地整治模式研究[D].江西南昌:东华理工大学,2017.
[13] 刘鹏.基于“三生”协调的农地整治效应评价[D].重庆:西南大学,2017.
[14] 张勇.农村土地整治的PPP模式研究[D].北京:中国地质大学(北京),2017.
[15] 王文玲.新型城镇化背景下美丽乡村建设问题研究[D].安徽芜湖:安徽工程大学,2017.
[16] 蔡湘佐.乐清市美丽乡村建设问题研究[D].吉林长春:吉林大学,2017.
[17] 张文.城乡统筹背景下的滕州市美丽乡村建设模式研究[D].重庆:重庆师范大学,2017.
[18] 王园园.荆州市美丽乡村建设评价体系的构建及运用[D].湖北荆州:长江大学,2017.
[19] 彭枫,丁玉娟.贵州土地整治与美丽乡村建设的关系探讨[J].现代农业科技,2017(17):293-295.
[20] 郭飞,吴浩.面向美丽乡村建设的农村土地综合整治模式创新:阜阳市美丽乡村节地工程的定位与实践[J].农村经济与科技,2016,27(11):23-26.
[21] 信桂新,杨朝现,魏朝富,等.人地协调的土地整治模式与实践[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(19):262-275.
[22] 冯应斌,杨庆媛.转型期中国农村土地综合整治重点领域与基本方向[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(1):175-182.
[23] 丁灿,周琳琳.农村土地整治环境效益综合评价:以商丘市为例[J].安徽农业科学,2018,46(24):182-187.
[24] 李帅,魏虹,倪细炉,等.基于层次分析法和熵权法的宁夏城市人居环境质量评价[J].应用生态学报,2014,25(9):2700-2708.
[25] 信桂新,杨朝现,杨庆媛,等.用熵权法和改进TOPSIS模型评价高标准基本农田建设后效应[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(1):238-249.
[26] 郧宛琪,朱道林,汤怀志.中国土地整治战略重塑与创新[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(4):1-8.
[27] 孙心如,周学武,王占岐.农村土地整治与生态文明建设耦合关系研究[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(2):267-271.
[28] 贾进章,周西华,刘剑.风机特性曲线数据拟合最佳次数的确定[J].辽宁工程技术大学学报:自然科学版,2000(5):478-480.
[29] List J A,Gallet C A.The environmental Kuznets curve:does one size fit all?[J].Natural Field Experiments,1999,31(3):409-423.
[2] 谷树忠,胡咏君,周洪.生态文明建设的科学内涵与基本路径[J].资源科学,2013,35(1):2-13.
[3] 杨雪松.农村土地综合整治绩效评价体系研究[D].南京农业大学,2015.
[4] 张忆,司静波.黑龙江省农村土地整治示范项目绩效评价[J].江苏农业科学,2017,45(3):270-275.
[5] Korthals Altes W K,Bong I S.Promoting Rural Development through the Use of Land Consolidation:The Case of Korea[J].International Planning Studies,2011,16(2):151-167.
[6] 黄曦红.湘乡市“美丽乡村”建设模式及效益评价[D].湖南师范大学,2016.
[7] 王惠林,洪明.政府治理与村民自治的互动机制、理论解释及政策启示:基于“美丽乡村建设”的案例分析[J].学习与实践,2018(3):105-112.
[8] 胡小风,陈雨生,胡涛,等.德清美丽乡村示范村建设[J].山东林业科技,2018,48(1):71-74+77.
[9] 王锐,陈光银.基于层次分析—模糊综合评价法的贫困村土地整治项目扶贫成效评价:以石柱县万朝镇万乐村土地整治项目为例[J].农村经济与科技,2018,29(3):15-19.
[10] Tang Xiumei,Chen Baiming,Zhang Leina,et al.Analysis of cultivated land consolidation potential in China[J].Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2012,28(1):219-224.
[11] 程文仕,黄鑫,刘洋,等.基于土地整治绩效空间差异和潜力分级的投入优先序研究[J].水土保持通报,2018,38(1):192-197.
[12] 罗黎婷.基于耕地功能分化的“两块田”农地整治模式研究[D].江西南昌:东华理工大学,2017.
[13] 刘鹏.基于“三生”协调的农地整治效应评价[D].重庆:西南大学,2017.
[14] 张勇.农村土地整治的PPP模式研究[D].北京:中国地质大学(北京),2017.
[15] 王文玲.新型城镇化背景下美丽乡村建设问题研究[D].安徽芜湖:安徽工程大学,2017.
[16] 蔡湘佐.乐清市美丽乡村建设问题研究[D].吉林长春:吉林大学,2017.
[17] 张文.城乡统筹背景下的滕州市美丽乡村建设模式研究[D].重庆:重庆师范大学,2017.
[18] 王园园.荆州市美丽乡村建设评价体系的构建及运用[D].湖北荆州:长江大学,2017.
[19] 彭枫,丁玉娟.贵州土地整治与美丽乡村建设的关系探讨[J].现代农业科技,2017(17):293-295.
[20] 郭飞,吴浩.面向美丽乡村建设的农村土地综合整治模式创新:阜阳市美丽乡村节地工程的定位与实践[J].农村经济与科技,2016,27(11):23-26.
[21] 信桂新,杨朝现,魏朝富,等.人地协调的土地整治模式与实践[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(19):262-275.
[22] 冯应斌,杨庆媛.转型期中国农村土地综合整治重点领域与基本方向[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(1):175-182.
[23] 丁灿,周琳琳.农村土地整治环境效益综合评价:以商丘市为例[J].安徽农业科学,2018,46(24):182-187.
[24] 李帅,魏虹,倪细炉,等.基于层次分析法和熵权法的宁夏城市人居环境质量评价[J].应用生态学报,2014,25(9):2700-2708.
[25] 信桂新,杨朝现,杨庆媛,等.用熵权法和改进TOPSIS模型评价高标准基本农田建设后效应[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(1):238-249.
[26] 郧宛琪,朱道林,汤怀志.中国土地整治战略重塑与创新[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(4):1-8.
[27] 孙心如,周学武,王占岐.农村土地整治与生态文明建设耦合关系研究[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(2):267-271.
[28] 贾进章,周西华,刘剑.风机特性曲线数据拟合最佳次数的确定[J].辽宁工程技术大学学报:自然科学版,2000(5):478-480.
[29] List J A,Gallet C A.The environmental Kuznets curve:does one size fit all?[J].Natural Field Experiments,1999,31(3):409-423.