基于多源遥感数据的1000 kV山东环网特高压线路地质灾害风险评价
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:1000 kV Shandong ring network ultra-high voltage line based on multi-source remote sensing data Geological hazard assessment
  • 作者:肖峰 ; 吴昊亭 ; 徐国庆 ; 罗兆楠 ; 刘新 ; 贾宗凯
  • 英文作者:XIAO Feng;WANG Hao-ting;XU Guo-Qing;LUO Zhao-nan;LIU Xin;JIA Zong-kai;State Grid AC Construction Company;Unisplendour Software System Corporation Limited;
  • 关键词:山东环网 ; 滑坡地质灾害 ; 层次分析法 ; 遥感数据 ; 风险评价
  • 英文关键词:Shandong ring network;;geological hazards;;analytic hierarchy process;;remote sensing data;;risk assessmen
  • 中文刊名:矿产勘查
  • 英文刊名:Mineral Exploration
  • 机构:国家电网公司交流建设分公司;紫光软件系统有限公司;
  • 出版日期:2019-04-28
  • 出版单位:矿产勘查
  • 年:2019
  • 期:04
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:313-321
  • 页数:9
  • CN:11-5875/TD
  • ISSN:1674-7801
  • 分类号:P694;TM75
摘要
山东环网全称为潍坊—临沂—枣庄—菏泽—石家庄1000 kV特高压交流输电线路工程。以山东环网3标段沿线为研究区,收集和整理现有资料,选取坡度、坡高、坡向、坡形、距离水系距离等5个具有代表性的因素作为滑坡地质灾害的评价因子,通过层次分析法,对各个评价因子赋予权重。运用ArcGIS10的邻域分析、提取分析、表面分析、距离分析、重分类、加权叠加、重采样等工具,对各评价因子的多源遥感数据进行区域性分析,获得研究区的地质灾害风险评价图。对此区域进行地质灾害风险评价,将此区域内的地质灾害风险等级划分为:低风险、中等风险、高风险、极高风险4类。选取各类风险点与野外勘查结果进行对比,所得结果与野外调查结果基本一致。
        Shandong ring network is called Weifang-Linyi-Zaozhuang-Heze-Shijiazhuang 1000 kV ultra-high voltage alternating current transmission line project.Based on the research area along the standard section 3 of Shandong ring network,the existing data are collected and sorted out.Five representative factors such as slope,slope height,slope direction,slope shape and distance from water system are selected as evaluation factors of geological hazards,Each evaluation factor is weighted by analytic hierarchy process(AHP).The remote sensing data of each evaluation factor were analyzed by means of neighborhood analysis,extraction analysis,surface analysis,distance analysis,reclassification,weighted superposition,resample and other tools of ArcGIS10 to obtain the geological disaster risk assessment map of the study area.The risk level of geological disaster in this region is divided into four categories: low risk,medium risk,high risk and very high risk.All kinds of risk points were selected and compared with the results of field survey,and the results were basically consistent with the results of field survey.This paper introduces the combination of analytic hierarchy process(AHP) and multi-source remote sensing data to provide reference for analyzing and evaluating engineering geological hazard risk of ultra-high voltage alternating current transmission lines.
引文
陈奇,李智毅,石怀伦.2004.区域地质灾害危险性评价的思路与基本方法[J].地质力学学报,(1):71-80.
    褚洪斌,母海东,王金哲.2003.层次分析法在太行山区地质灾害危险性分区中的应用[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,(3):128-132.
    胡勇.2017.山区公路地质灾害危险性评价[D].西安:西安科技大学.
    李东升.2006.基于可靠度理论的边坡风险评价研究[D].重庆:重庆大学.
    凌炳,余敏.2015.滑坡灾害坡度坡向敏感性分析研究---以云南大关县为例[J].城市地质,10(3):66-68.
    卢全中,彭建兵,赵法锁.2003.地质灾害风险评估(价)研究综述[J].灾害学,18(4):59-63.
    彭令,徐素宁,彭军还.2016.多遥感数据支持下区域滑坡灾害风险评价[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),46(1):175-186.
    王其磊.2012.长输管道地质灾害定量风险评价技术研究[D].北京:中国地质大学(北京).
    向喜琼,黄润秋.2000.地质灾害风险评价与风险管理[J].地质灾害与环境保护,11(1):38-41.
    于博文,田淑芳,罗昌繁,饶凌志,杨竹.2017.基于高分一号卫星的江西樟树市地质灾害评价[J].测绘科学技术学报,34(5):514-518+524.
    赵立冬,傅荣华,张博.2007.天山公路沿线地质灾害危险性模糊综合评判---以K576+800~K690+000段为例[J].防灾减灾工程学报,(1):96-100.
    郑著彬,任静丽.2010.DEM地形分析在山区地质灾害研究中的应用---以云南省漾濞县为例[J].云南地理环境研究,22(2):19-22.