城市景观河道的生态混凝土与硬质护坡对水质净化的对比研究
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Comparative Study of Water Purification by Ecological Concrete and Hard Revetment in Urban Landscape Rivers
  • 作者:薛黎铭
  • 英文作者:Xue Liming;
  • 关键词:景观河道 ; 生态护坡 ; 水质净化
  • 英文关键词:landscape river;;ecological revetment;;water quality purification
  • 中文刊名:城市道桥与防洪
  • 英文刊名:Urban Roads Bridges & Flood Control
  • 机构:上海市静安区河道水政管理所;
  • 出版日期:2019-09-15
  • 出版单位:城市道桥与防洪
  • 年:2019
  • 期:09
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:15+148-150
  • 页数:4
  • CN:31-1602/U
  • ISSN:1009-7716
  • 分类号:X52;TV861
摘要
以上海市静安区走马塘河道为研究对象,通过比较常规混凝土护坡与生态护坡对河水中COD、TN与TP的去除效率考察两种材料对水质的净化效果。研究表明:常规混凝土护坡与生态混凝土护坡的COD、TN与TP去除率分别为26.41%、46.42%、37.22%和64.26%、73.50%、48.99%;生态混凝土护坡较高的去除效率主要是通过空隙内微生物降解与材料吸附协同实现的。
        Taking Zhoumatang River in Jingan District of Shanghai as the study object, the removal efficiencies of COD, TN and TP in river water by the conventional concrete revetment and the ecological revetment are compared to inspect the purification effects of two materials on water quality. The results show that the removal rates of COD, TN and TP by the conventional concrete revetment and the ecological concrete revetment are 26.41%, 46.42%, 37.22%, and 64.26%, 73.50%, 48.99%, respectively. The higher removal efficiency of the ecologic concrete revetment is mainly achieved through the cooperation of micro-biological degradation and the material adsorption in the void.
引文
[1]张华.水利工程护坡生态化设计技术研究[J].珠江水运,2019(3):66-67.
    [2]陈晓宇.生态护坡在城市道路工程中的应用探讨[J].城市道桥与防洪,2019(1):185-187,22.
    [3]王浩,董盛文.水利工程中生态护坡措施功能及特点分析[J].中国水运(下半月),2019,19(1):167-168,175.
    [4]王远培,刘树生,刘庆玉.河道生态护坡方法创新[J].水资源开发与管理,2018(12):74-78.
    [5]杨非,王建清,张亚平,等.农田排水河道的生态修复工程设计与实际效果[J].中国给水排水,2018,34(18):95-99.
    [6]汪绿培,陈新新.基于模糊层次-主成分分析法的河道生态护坡综合评价[J].水利科技与经济,2018,24(8):38-42.