企业衍生效应对创新网络演化的作用机理研究——以高技术产业集群为例
|
摘要
由创新网络和企业衍生概念入手,将衍生效应分解为知识溢出、集群创新文化和竞争关系3个维度,将集群创新网络分解为"质"、"量"两个维度,以北京、大连、济南、天津高技术产业集群的衍生企业为对象,实证研究企业衍生效应对集群创新网络的影响。结果显示,企业衍生效应对集群创新网络演化存在正向促进作用。其中,知识溢出、集群创新文化与创新网络的"质"维度存在显著正相关关系,知识溢出、集群创新文化和适度竞争关系与创新网络的"量"维度存在显著正相关关系。
Starting with the concepts of innovation networks and spin-off,the derivative effect could be decomposed into three dimensions:knowledge spillover,cluster innovation culture and competitive relationship.The cluster innovation networks could be decomposed into two dimensions:"quality"and"quantity",with empirical research on high-tech industrial cluster in Beijing,Dalian,Jinan,and Tianjin,we examined the influence of derivative effect on innovation networks.The empirical results show that spin-off have a positive effect on the evolution of cluster innovation networks.Moreover,there are significant positive correlations between knowledge spillover,cluster innovation culture and innovation network quality dimensions,and significant positive correlation between knowledge spillovers,cluster innovation culture,moderate competition and innovation networks.
Starting with the concepts of innovation networks and spin-off,the derivative effect could be decomposed into three dimensions:knowledge spillover,cluster innovation culture and competitive relationship.The cluster innovation networks could be decomposed into two dimensions:"quality"and"quantity",with empirical research on high-tech industrial cluster in Beijing,Dalian,Jinan,and Tianjin,we examined the influence of derivative effect on innovation networks.The empirical results show that spin-off have a positive effect on the evolution of cluster innovation networks.Moreover,there are significant positive correlations between knowledge spillover,cluster innovation culture and innovation network quality dimensions,and significant positive correlation between knowledge spillovers,cluster innovation culture,moderate competition and innovation networks.
引文
[1]FREEMAN C.Networks of innovators:a synthesis of research issues[J].Research Policy,1991,20(5):499-514.
[2]马力,臧旭恒.企业衍生:高技术产业集群成长的动力[J].现代经济探讨,2012(4):37-40.
[3]魏江,郑小勇.文化嵌入与集群企业创新网络演化的关联机制[J].科研管理,2012,33(12):10-22.
[4]邬爱其.企业创新网络构建与演进的影响因素实证分析[J].科学学研究,2006,24(1):141-149.
[5]COPPER A C.Spin-offs and technical entrepreneurship[J].IEEE Transactions on Engineering and Management,1971,18(1):2-6.
[6]COPPER A C.Technical entrepreneurship:what do we know[J].R&D Management,1973,3(2):59-64.
[7]马力,臧旭恒.企业衍生研究述评[J].管理学报,2012,9(12):1869-1874.
[8]GARVIN D A.Spin-offs and the new firm formation process[J].California Management Review,1983,25(2):3-20.
[9]萨克森宁.地区优势:硅谷和128号公路地区的文化与竞争[M].上海:上海远东出版社,1999.
[10]ANDREA F,THOMAS R.High-tech clusters,technology spillovers,and trade secret laws[J].International Journal of Industrial Organization,2004,22(1):45-65.
[11]GARNSEY E,HEFFERNAN P.High-technology clustering through spin-out and attraction:the cambridge case[J].Regional Studies,2005,39(8):1127-1144.
[12]王缉慈.创新的空间[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2001.
[13]FRYGES H,WRIGHT M.The origin of spin-offs:a typology of corporate and academic spin-offs[J].Small Business Economics,2014,43(2):245-259.
[14]吴结兵,蔡宁.产业集群理论述评---从三个角度看集群理论的融合与发展[J].重庆大学学报:社会科学版,2007,13(6):16-21.
[15]唐晓华,苏梅梅.产业过度竞争测度基准及聚类分析[J].中国工业经济,2003(6):29-35.
[16]BURT R S.Toward a structural theory of action:network models of social structure,perception,and action[M].New York:Academic Press,1982.
[17]MARK G.Economic action and social structure:the problem of embeddedness[J].American Journal of Sociology,1985,91(3):481-510.
[18]邬爱其.集群企业网络化成长机制研究---对浙江三个产业集群的实证研究[D].杭州:浙江大学,2004.
[19]马力,臧旭恒.企业衍生效应对高技术产业集群发展的影响与对策研究[J].云南财经大学学报,2012(4):80-86.
[20]杜跃平,王开盛.创新文化与技术创新[J].中国软科学,2007(2):150-153.
[21]杨隽萍.科技型大学衍生公司价值形成机理[M].上海:上海交通大学出版社,2010:77.
[22]陈佳莹,林少疆.企业创新网络关系特征对技术创新绩效的影响路径[J].统计与决策,2014(2):186-188.
[23]张志文.区域创新文化促进高技术产业集群发展机理研究[J].科技进步与对策,2009,26(7):23-26.
[24]陈依元.创新文化:自主创新的文化驱动力[J].中国发明与专利,2009(5):25-28.
[25]王国红.知识溢出与产业集群中的企业学习研究[M].北京:科学出版社,2010.
[26]武志伟,陈莹.企业间关系质量的测度与绩效分析---基于近关系理论的研究[J].预测,2007,26(2):8-13.
[27]张旭锐,张颖颖,李勃.网络异质性、外部知识整合与探索式创新绩效---基于陕西省孵化企业的实证分析[J].科学决策,2015(11):51-65.
[2]马力,臧旭恒.企业衍生:高技术产业集群成长的动力[J].现代经济探讨,2012(4):37-40.
[3]魏江,郑小勇.文化嵌入与集群企业创新网络演化的关联机制[J].科研管理,2012,33(12):10-22.
[4]邬爱其.企业创新网络构建与演进的影响因素实证分析[J].科学学研究,2006,24(1):141-149.
[5]COPPER A C.Spin-offs and technical entrepreneurship[J].IEEE Transactions on Engineering and Management,1971,18(1):2-6.
[6]COPPER A C.Technical entrepreneurship:what do we know[J].R&D Management,1973,3(2):59-64.
[7]马力,臧旭恒.企业衍生研究述评[J].管理学报,2012,9(12):1869-1874.
[8]GARVIN D A.Spin-offs and the new firm formation process[J].California Management Review,1983,25(2):3-20.
[9]萨克森宁.地区优势:硅谷和128号公路地区的文化与竞争[M].上海:上海远东出版社,1999.
[10]ANDREA F,THOMAS R.High-tech clusters,technology spillovers,and trade secret laws[J].International Journal of Industrial Organization,2004,22(1):45-65.
[11]GARNSEY E,HEFFERNAN P.High-technology clustering through spin-out and attraction:the cambridge case[J].Regional Studies,2005,39(8):1127-1144.
[12]王缉慈.创新的空间[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2001.
[13]FRYGES H,WRIGHT M.The origin of spin-offs:a typology of corporate and academic spin-offs[J].Small Business Economics,2014,43(2):245-259.
[14]吴结兵,蔡宁.产业集群理论述评---从三个角度看集群理论的融合与发展[J].重庆大学学报:社会科学版,2007,13(6):16-21.
[15]唐晓华,苏梅梅.产业过度竞争测度基准及聚类分析[J].中国工业经济,2003(6):29-35.
[16]BURT R S.Toward a structural theory of action:network models of social structure,perception,and action[M].New York:Academic Press,1982.
[17]MARK G.Economic action and social structure:the problem of embeddedness[J].American Journal of Sociology,1985,91(3):481-510.
[18]邬爱其.集群企业网络化成长机制研究---对浙江三个产业集群的实证研究[D].杭州:浙江大学,2004.
[19]马力,臧旭恒.企业衍生效应对高技术产业集群发展的影响与对策研究[J].云南财经大学学报,2012(4):80-86.
[20]杜跃平,王开盛.创新文化与技术创新[J].中国软科学,2007(2):150-153.
[21]杨隽萍.科技型大学衍生公司价值形成机理[M].上海:上海交通大学出版社,2010:77.
[22]陈佳莹,林少疆.企业创新网络关系特征对技术创新绩效的影响路径[J].统计与决策,2014(2):186-188.
[23]张志文.区域创新文化促进高技术产业集群发展机理研究[J].科技进步与对策,2009,26(7):23-26.
[24]陈依元.创新文化:自主创新的文化驱动力[J].中国发明与专利,2009(5):25-28.
[25]王国红.知识溢出与产业集群中的企业学习研究[M].北京:科学出版社,2010.
[26]武志伟,陈莹.企业间关系质量的测度与绩效分析---基于近关系理论的研究[J].预测,2007,26(2):8-13.
[27]张旭锐,张颖颖,李勃.网络异质性、外部知识整合与探索式创新绩效---基于陕西省孵化企业的实证分析[J].科学决策,2015(11):51-65.