American Brachytherapy Society Task Group Report: Combination of brachytherapy and external beam radiation for high-risk prostate cancer

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Daniel E. Spratt¹ ; Payal D. Soni¹ ; Patrick W. McLaughlin¹ ; ^{mclaughb@med.umich.edu} ; Gregory S. Merrick² ; ³ ; Richard G. Stock⁴ ; John C. Blasko⁵ ; Michael J. Zelefsky⁶
• 关键词：Prostate cancer therapy ; Combination brachytherapy and external beam radiation ; High-risk prostate cancer
• 刊名：Brachytherapy
• 出版年：2017
• 出版时间：January-February 2017
• 年：2017
• 卷：16
• 期：1
• 页码：1-12
• 全文大小：842 K
• 卷排序：16

文摘

To review outcomes for high-risk prostate cancer treated with combined modality radiation therapy (CMRT) utilizing external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) with a brachytherapy boost.Methods and MaterialsThe available literature for high-risk prostate cancer treated with combined modality radiation therapy was reviewed and summarized.ResultsAt this time, the literature suggests that the majority of high-risk cancers are curable with multimodal treatment. Several large retrospective studies and three prospective randomized trials comparing CMRT to dose-escalated EBRT have demonstrated superior biochemical control with CMRT. Longer followup of the randomized trials will be required to determine if this will translate to a benefit in metastasis-free survival, disease-specific survival, and overall survival. Although greater toxicity has been associated with CMRT compared to EBRT, recent studies suggest that technological advances that allow better definition and sparing of critical adjacent structures as well as increasing experience with brachytherapy have improved implant quality and the toxicity profile of brachytherapy. The role of androgen deprivation therapy is well established in the external beam literature for high-risk disease, but there is controversy regarding the applicability of these data in the setting of dose escalation. At this time, there is not sufficient evidence for the omission of androgen deprivation therapy with dose escalation in this population. Comparisons with surgery remain limited by differences in patient selection, but the evidence would suggest better disease control with CMRT compared to surgery alone.ConclusionsDue to a series of technological advances, modern combination series have demonstrated unparalleled rates of disease control in the high-risk population. Given the evidence from recent randomized trials, combination therapy may become the standard of care for high-risk cancers.