Treatment of (silox)
3Ta (
1, silox =
tBu
3SiO) with BH
3·THF and BCl
2Ph afforded (silox)
3Ta(BH
3) (
2) and (silox)
3Ta(
2-B,Cl-BCl
2Ph) (
3), which are both remarkably stable Ta(III) compounds. NMe
3 and ethylene failed to removeBH
3 from
2, and no indication of BH
3 exchange with BH
3·THF-
d8 was noted via variable-temperature
1H NMRstudies. Addition of BH
3·THF to (silox)
3TaH
2 provided the borohydride-hydride (silox)
3HTa(
3-BH
4) (
5), and itsthermolysis released H
2 to generate
2. Exposure of
2 to D
2 enabled the preparation of isotopologues(silox)
3Ta(BH
3-nD
n) (
n = 0,
2; 1,
2-D; 2,
2-D
2; 3,
2-D
3) for isotopic perturbation of chemical shift studies, but thesefailed to distinguish between "inverse adduct" (i.e., (silox)
3Ta
BH
3) or (silox)
3Ta(
2-B,H-BH
3) forms of
2. Computationalmodels (RO)
3Ta(BH
3) (R = H,
2'; SiH
3,
2SiH SiMe
3,
2SiMe, and Si
tBu
3,
2SiBu) were investigated to assess the relativeimportance of steric and electronic effects on structure and bonding. With small R,
2-B,H structures were favored,but for
2SiMe and
2SiBu, the dative structure proved to be similar in energy. The electonic and vibrational featuresof both structure types were probed. The IR spectrum of
2 was best matched by the
2-B,H conformer of
2SiBu. Inrelated computations pertaining to
3, small R models favored the oxidative addition of a BCl bond, while with R =Si
tBu
3 (
3SiBu), an excellent match with its X-ray crystal structure revealed the critical steric influence of the siloxligands.