文摘
To achieve food and environmental security, closing the gap between actual and attainable N-use efficiency should be as important as closing yield gaps. Using a meta-analysis of 205 published studies from 317 study sites, including 1332 observations from rice, wheat, and maize system in China, reactive N (Nr) losses, and total N2O emissions from N fertilization both increased exponentially with increasing N application rate. On the basis of the N loss response curves from the literature meta-analysis, the direct N2O emission, NH3 volatilization, N leaching, and N runoff, and total N2O emission (direct + indirect) were calculated using information from the survey of farmers. The PFP-N (kilogram of harvested product per kilogram of N applied (kg (kg of N)鈭?)) for 6259 farmers were relative low with only 37, 23, and 32 kg (kg of N)鈭? for rice, wheat, and maize systems, respectively. In comparison, the PFP-N for highest yield and PFP-N group (refers to fields where the PFP-N was within the 80鈥?00th percentile among those fields that achieved yields within the 80鈥?00th percentile) averaged 62, 42, and 53 kg (kg of N)鈭? for rice, wheat, and maize systems, respectively. The corresponding grain yield would increase by 1.6鈥?.3 Mg ha鈥?, while the N application rate would be reduced by 56鈥?00 kg of N ha鈥? from average farmer field to highest yield and PFP-N group. In return, the Nr loss intensity (4鈥?1 kg of N (Mg of grain)鈭?) and total N2O emission intensity (0.15鈥?.29 kg of N (Mg of grain)鈭?) would both be reduced significantly as compared to current agricultural practices. In many circumstances, closing the PFP-N gap in intensive cropping systems is compatible with increased crop productivity and reductions in both Nr losses and total N2O emissions.