Mechanistic Insight in the Function of Phosphite Additives for Protection of LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2 Cathode in High Voltage Li-Ion Cells

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Meinan He ; Chi-Cheung Su ; Cameron Peebles ; Zhenxing Feng ; Justin G. Connell ; Chen Liao ; Yan Wang ; Ilya A. Shkrob ; Zhengcheng Zhang
• 刊名：ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
• 出版年：2016
• 出版时间：May 11, 2016
• 年：2016
• 卷：8
• 期：18
• 页码：11450-11458
• 全文大小：550K
• 年卷期：0
• ISSN：1944-8252

文摘

Triethlylphosphite (TEP) and tris(2,2,2-trifluoroethyl) phosphite (TTFP) have been evaluated as electrolyte additives for high-voltage Li-ion battery cells using a Ni-rich layered cathode material LiNi_0.5Co_0.2Mn_0.3O₂ (NCM523) and the conventional carbonate electrolyte. The repeated charge/discharge cycling for cells containing 1 wt % of these additives was performed using an NCM523/graphite full cell operated at the voltage window from 3.0–4.6 V. During the initial charge process, these additives decompose on the cathode surface at a lower oxidation potential than the baseline electrolyte. Impedance spectroscopy and post-test analyses indicate the formation of protective coatings by both additives on the cathode surface that prevent oxidative breakdown of the electrolyte. However, only TTFP containing cells demonstrate the improved capacity retention and Coulombic efficiency. For TEP, the protective coating is also formed, but low Li⁺ ion mobility through the interphase layer results in inferior performance. These observations are rationalized through the inhibition of electrocatalytic centers present on the cathode surface and the formation of organophosphate deposits isolating the cathode surface from the electrolyte. The difference between the two phosphites clearly originates in the different properties of the resulting phosphate coatings, which may be in Li⁺ ion conductivity through such materials.